Formula One: 2021 Season News and Discussion Thread
#1041
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
The way I understand it, it looks like Hamilton will start pole for Saturday's sprint race, but then the ICE penalty will drop him 5 places for the start of the race on Sunday. So if he finishes 2nd in the sprint race, he should start 7th on Sunday.
However, if this technical infringement with the wing is confirmed, he may be excluded from the qualifying results, which I suspect means that he had no qualifying time, meaning he will start last on Saturday. And after that, he probably will get ANOTHER 5 grid penalty for Sunday.
I haven't read anything that states this, but this is what I think is happening based on snippets of different stories.
However, if this technical infringement with the wing is confirmed, he may be excluded from the qualifying results, which I suspect means that he had no qualifying time, meaning he will start last on Saturday. And after that, he probably will get ANOTHER 5 grid penalty for Sunday.
I haven't read anything that states this, but this is what I think is happening based on snippets of different stories.
#1042
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
Just found this and you're correct F-C on the start position any any additional penalties to LH
"Lewis Hamilton took P1 in Brazil qualifying, but he appeared to think his grid penalty will be applied in Saturday’s sprint, rather than Sunday’s grand prix.
A quirk of a sprint qualifying weekend means that any pre-existing grid penalties are applied after the sprint and before the grand prix, as the sprint does not technically qualify as a ‘race’ due to it setting the provisional grid for Sunday.
Hamilton will take a five-place drop after Mercedes he changed his Internal Combustion Engine at Interlagos, but this will happen on Sunday after the grid is fully set after sprint qualifying, meaning he will start the race no higher than sixth. He could yet even drop out of the qualifying standings altogether with the FIA investigating a possible DRS infringement on the rear wing of Hamilton’s W12.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/lewis-...lty-confusion/
"Lewis Hamilton took P1 in Brazil qualifying, but he appeared to think his grid penalty will be applied in Saturday’s sprint, rather than Sunday’s grand prix.
A quirk of a sprint qualifying weekend means that any pre-existing grid penalties are applied after the sprint and before the grand prix, as the sprint does not technically qualify as a ‘race’ due to it setting the provisional grid for Sunday.
Hamilton will take a five-place drop after Mercedes he changed his Internal Combustion Engine at Interlagos, but this will happen on Sunday after the grid is fully set after sprint qualifying, meaning he will start the race no higher than sixth. He could yet even drop out of the qualifying standings altogether with the FIA investigating a possible DRS infringement on the rear wing of Hamilton’s W12.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/lewis-...lty-confusion/
Last edited by Chief F1 Fan; 11-13-2021 at 06:53 AM.
#1043
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Alfa dealership in Shanghai already advertising that Zhou will be in AR F1 next year.
#1044
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
https://racer.com/2021/11/12/verstap...in-parc-ferme/
This is BOGUS! Is this F1's way to manufacture the championship so to give RB a penalty to match Mercedes penalty?
If they give Max a penalty for this "infraction" it will go down as one of the most blatant biases since Schumacher's penalty for passing Hill on the formation lap at Silverstone.
Drivers have always looked at other cars in parc ferme. It's not like they are taking a ruler to measure any dimensions.
This is BOGUS! Is this F1's way to manufacture the championship so to give RB a penalty to match Mercedes penalty?
If they give Max a penalty for this "infraction" it will go down as one of the most blatant biases since Schumacher's penalty for passing Hill on the formation lap at Silverstone.
Drivers have always looked at other cars in parc ferme. It's not like they are taking a ruler to measure any dimensions.
#1045
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
Touching versus merely looking which is strictly verboten.
#1046
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
and is it me or anyone else think this: FP2 seems a waste of time now.
#1047
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
#1048
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
Hamilton starting from the back of the pack for the Sprint race. Verstappen got a Ł50k penalty for the parc ferme incident.
I think both penalties are justified.
I think both penalties are justified.
#1049
Community Architect
robb m.
robb m.
wow, thank goodness it's just a cash fine for Max.
#1050
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
This was actually what I predicted a few hours ago, except I was expecting a $5000 fine for Verstappen.
#1051
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
Great sprint race!! Wowza
#1052
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
If today was a preview, Hamilton will be on the top step. That dive on Norris into turn 1 was fantastic.
The following 3 users liked this post by civicdrivr:
#1053
Senior Moderator
Exciting race today! Looking forward to tomorrow
#1054
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Seems like a game of inches between Red Bull and Mercedes right now. So looking at the weather, it will not rain on Sunday, but it will be 10 degrees warmer on Sunday than Saturday. It was mentioned this weekend that the Red Bull tire performance is better when it is warmer, so it'd be interesting to see if that pans out during the warmer race day.
The following users liked this post:
Chief F1 Fan (11-14-2021)
#1055
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
To my eye, that move from Max should've resulted in a penalty.
#1056
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
Best F1 race I’ve seen in at least 20 years.
The following users liked this post:
astro (11-15-2021)
#1057
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
The following users liked this post:
astro (11-15-2021)
#1058
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
True, but imo that move was egregious and deserving of a time penalty. It wouldn't matter in the grand scheme of things but it doesn't look good when he gets away with a move like that. He opened up the wheel and drove off track, pushing Hamilton very wide.
#1059
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes
on
4,341 Posts
I agree with you.
At least Lew gave Max a shortly after.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (11-14-2021)
#1060
Community Architect
robb m.
robb m.
i don't think it deserved a penalty at all. that's hard racing, no contact, no foul.
#1061
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
It is "too early" to consider protesting against Mercedes, despite the reigning champions emerging suddenly with "incredible" straightline speed in Brazil.
"We need to look at where that speed comes from," said Red Bull boss Christian Horner.
"It's not normal and we need to look at it, but it's too early to protest."
Lewis Hamilton, who closed his points deficit to Max Verstappen to 14 points with his win on Sunday, had his Friday pole position taken away for a breach of the DRS rules.
But Red Bull also suspects that the rear wing overly flexes.
"That would be our very last resort," said Dr Helmut Marko when asked if a protest is now on the cards.
"First we would try to have the parts that we believe are not compliant changed. But we do not yet have enough facts to be able to proceed," he added.
Marko said Mercedes has pulled off producing a "rocket" of a new engine for Hamilton to tackle the final races - a feat has says is a "mystery to us".
"With us, a new engine brings three to five kilowatts. Hamilton's new engine brings a good 15.
"Mercedes says they have an insane amount of engine wear, but that won't help us because then the championship will be over.
"Now we are trying to understand how everything works."
Marko said his preference would be a new technical directive relating to rear wing flexibility, while Mercedes team boss Toto Wolff said the FIA could disassemble the wing into "a hundred parts" and still find nothing illegal.
"One directive appeared after Mercedes' request at the start of the season," Marko said, "so we can influence the emergence of a new one."
For his part, Mercedes' Hamilton was also slapped with a fine for undoing his seatbelts on the post-chequer lap at Interlagos - but insisted he remains steadfast for the final trio of races.
"I wouldn't say it's revenge - that's not my style," the seven time world champion said after winning on Sunday.
"But there did seem to be many forces that were against us this weekend and we just fought on as a team," he told the Spanish broadcaster DAZN.
"This is what a world championship battle should look like."
"We need to look at where that speed comes from," said Red Bull boss Christian Horner.
"It's not normal and we need to look at it, but it's too early to protest."
Lewis Hamilton, who closed his points deficit to Max Verstappen to 14 points with his win on Sunday, had his Friday pole position taken away for a breach of the DRS rules.
But Red Bull also suspects that the rear wing overly flexes.
"That would be our very last resort," said Dr Helmut Marko when asked if a protest is now on the cards.
"First we would try to have the parts that we believe are not compliant changed. But we do not yet have enough facts to be able to proceed," he added.
Marko said Mercedes has pulled off producing a "rocket" of a new engine for Hamilton to tackle the final races - a feat has says is a "mystery to us".
"With us, a new engine brings three to five kilowatts. Hamilton's new engine brings a good 15.
"Mercedes says they have an insane amount of engine wear, but that won't help us because then the championship will be over.
"Now we are trying to understand how everything works."
Marko said his preference would be a new technical directive relating to rear wing flexibility, while Mercedes team boss Toto Wolff said the FIA could disassemble the wing into "a hundred parts" and still find nothing illegal.
"One directive appeared after Mercedes' request at the start of the season," Marko said, "so we can influence the emergence of a new one."
For his part, Mercedes' Hamilton was also slapped with a fine for undoing his seatbelts on the post-chequer lap at Interlagos - but insisted he remains steadfast for the final trio of races.
"I wouldn't say it's revenge - that's not my style," the seven time world champion said after winning on Sunday.
"But there did seem to be many forces that were against us this weekend and we just fought on as a team," he told the Spanish broadcaster DAZN.
"This is what a world championship battle should look like."
The following users liked this post:
NBP04TL4ME (11-15-2021)
#1062
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,964
Received 1,237 Likes
on
1,024 Posts
Agreed - something was definitely up or changed significantly with Hamilton's car in yesterday's race.
#1063
Moderator
Great race(s). Was up til after 11 last night catching up.
Not sure if it was all down to the new ICE for LH, but he was absolutely flying. Good to see some team encouragement for VB, he was reeling MV in at the end, just not quite quick enough.
Not sure if it was all down to the new ICE for LH, but he was absolutely flying. Good to see some team encouragement for VB, he was reeling MV in at the end, just not quite quick enough.
#1064
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
I don't think it was completely MBZ's unexplained gains in fact I think it can be explained that the front end of the RBR was burning up tires quicker than MBZ was, ditto the rears. MBZ did a lot of work in Brackley between Mexico and Brazil to understand where they made a mistake in set up in 2019 where RBR was markedly quicker and won against them. MBZ got their set up dead on and won, the key being traction out of Turns 4 & 12 where when RBR's rears were giving up the fight quicker against MBZ's, the latter was able to capitalize.
#1065
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,964
Received 1,237 Likes
on
1,024 Posts
Agreed and I'm sure that is part of it. MV was able to put or at least keep distance between he and LH in most of the curves but LW absolutely had more speed in the straightaways. And not to mention once LH was ahead of MV he simply pulled away. Didn't see what the final difference between #1 and #2 was but at one point I thought I saw it at 7+ seconds. Now its RBR's turn to figure out how to make up the difference/answer the change.
#1066
Moderator
Lewis finished 10.5s ahead of Max
Valtteri was about 3s behind Max. He was around 9 seconds behind Max when Lewis made the pass & took 6 seconds out of the gap over about 10 laps.
Valtteri was about 3s behind Max. He was around 9 seconds behind Max when Lewis made the pass & took 6 seconds out of the gap over about 10 laps.
#1067
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
Qatar and Abu Dhabi are not going to be kind to RBR either
#1068
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
The following users liked this post:
CCColtsicehockey (11-16-2021)
#1069
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
F1's second Worst-kept secret confirmed regarding driver changes
Gio out,, Zhou in.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/antoni...ve-alfa-romeo/
and off to Formula E ya go:https://www.essentiallysports.com/f1...XcK_egDWPHt8y8
Gio out,, Zhou in.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/antoni...ve-alfa-romeo/
and off to Formula E ya go:https://www.essentiallysports.com/f1...XcK_egDWPHt8y8
Last edited by Chief F1 Fan; 11-16-2021 at 05:00 AM.
#1070
Moderator
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/c...ement/6784353/
Ricciardo was battling for the points at Interlagos on Sunday when he suffered a sudden loss of power and had to drop out of the race.
Following an initial investigation at the track, McLaren discovered a problem with components relating to its power unit installation.
McLaren team principal Andreas Seidl said: "We had a power loss on track. In the initial investigation we found a technical issue, a crack on the chassis side of the power unit installation, which we need to now investigate. I can give you a better update next week in Qatar."
Ricciardo reckoned that if he had not hit trouble then there was a chance that he could have pulled off a one-stop strategy to beat Ferrari duo Carlos Sainz and Charles Leclerc.
"We knew they had to two-stop," said the Australian. "I think they had a bit more pace but maybe through strategy we could've disrupted them.
"But then we had a loss of power and had to retire the car. Definitely a shame, but it was a much more promising day than [Saturday]. We'll take the positives from that, and we've got another chance next week."
Ricciardo's failure added to a troubled afternoon for McLaren, with Lando Norris having had his hopes of a strong finish dashed by a puncture caused in a clash with Sainz off the line.
Although McLaren is locked in a fight with Ferrari for third place in the constructors' championship, Seidl felt there was no malice in the incident.
Speaking about the Norris puncture, Seidl said: "He had a great launch. And I think Carlos had quite a bad start.
"Lando had to go somewhere and on the outside it's very tight out there. I think he simply ran out of space and unfortunately touched the front wing of Carlos, causing the puncture. It was an unlucky racing incident.
"In terms of the recovery drive, the car was damaged. He lost quite a bit of downforce on the rear axle, some damage from the puncture I think. Then he did a great recovery drive."
Norris was able to recover to finish in 10th place but, on a day when Ferrari took fifth and sixth, the Woking-based team's hopes of ending the season third in the standings are fading.
McLaren is now 31.5 points behind Ferrari, with three races remaining.
Following an initial investigation at the track, McLaren discovered a problem with components relating to its power unit installation.
McLaren team principal Andreas Seidl said: "We had a power loss on track. In the initial investigation we found a technical issue, a crack on the chassis side of the power unit installation, which we need to now investigate. I can give you a better update next week in Qatar."
Ricciardo reckoned that if he had not hit trouble then there was a chance that he could have pulled off a one-stop strategy to beat Ferrari duo Carlos Sainz and Charles Leclerc.
"We knew they had to two-stop," said the Australian. "I think they had a bit more pace but maybe through strategy we could've disrupted them.
"But then we had a loss of power and had to retire the car. Definitely a shame, but it was a much more promising day than [Saturday]. We'll take the positives from that, and we've got another chance next week."
Ricciardo's failure added to a troubled afternoon for McLaren, with Lando Norris having had his hopes of a strong finish dashed by a puncture caused in a clash with Sainz off the line.
Although McLaren is locked in a fight with Ferrari for third place in the constructors' championship, Seidl felt there was no malice in the incident.
Speaking about the Norris puncture, Seidl said: "He had a great launch. And I think Carlos had quite a bad start.
"Lando had to go somewhere and on the outside it's very tight out there. I think he simply ran out of space and unfortunately touched the front wing of Carlos, causing the puncture. It was an unlucky racing incident.
"In terms of the recovery drive, the car was damaged. He lost quite a bit of downforce on the rear axle, some damage from the puncture I think. Then he did a great recovery drive."
Norris was able to recover to finish in 10th place but, on a day when Ferrari took fifth and sixth, the Woking-based team's hopes of ending the season third in the standings are fading.
McLaren is now 31.5 points behind Ferrari, with three races remaining.
#1071
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Sad to see Giovinazzi go, but exciting to see Zhou come to F1. Same old story with F1, not enough cars.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (11-16-2021)
#1072
Senior Moderator
F1's second Worst-kept secret confirmed regarding driver changes
Gio out,, Zhou in.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/antoni...ve-alfa-romeo/
and off to Formula E ya go:https://www.essentiallysports.com/f1...XcK_egDWPHt8y8
Gio out,, Zhou in.
https://www.planetf1.com/news/antoni...ve-alfa-romeo/
and off to Formula E ya go:https://www.essentiallysports.com/f1...XcK_egDWPHt8y8
Figured it was just classic China spilling the beans early we've seen the iPhone /Foxconn leaks, should be used to it
The following users liked this post:
CCColtsicehockey (11-16-2021)
#1073
Moderator
Not overly surprised....
https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/3...ady-dec-5-race
https://www.espn.com/f1/story/_/id/3...ady-dec-5-race
The Saudi Arabian Grand Prix is "up against it" to complete the Jeddah facility set to host the country's first Formula One race on Dec. 5.
Photos have emerged in the past week showing the facility far from completed in terms of both the circuit and the paddock and pit complex, raising concerns the venue will not be ready in time.
FIA race director Michael Masi is visiting the circuit on Tuesday to inspect and give the track formal sign off to host the race.
F1 is sticking to the line that the race will be ready to host the penultimate round of the championship, although sporting director Steve Nielsen, one of the key figures in bringing new facilities to the calendar, has said there's still a lot that needs doing.
"It's an ambitious project, it will be a great facility," Nielsen told Autosport.
"They're up against it, they are. But they're literally working 24/7 as they have been for quite a long time now. I saw some more photos this morning, and they've made huge progress. But still a lot to do.
"So it really is going to be down to the wire. But they'll get it done. Everything we need to put the race on safely we'll have, I'm confident of that."
After Sunday's Brazilian Grand Prix, Masi said: "I'm confident that it will be ready.
"It was always going to be very close. There's no doubt about that.
"Everything that I've seen, the progress day-on-day and week-on-week has been amazing since I was there last. Looking forward to having a look Tuesday."
Photos have emerged in the past week showing the facility far from completed in terms of both the circuit and the paddock and pit complex, raising concerns the venue will not be ready in time.
FIA race director Michael Masi is visiting the circuit on Tuesday to inspect and give the track formal sign off to host the race.
F1 is sticking to the line that the race will be ready to host the penultimate round of the championship, although sporting director Steve Nielsen, one of the key figures in bringing new facilities to the calendar, has said there's still a lot that needs doing.
"It's an ambitious project, it will be a great facility," Nielsen told Autosport.
"They're up against it, they are. But they're literally working 24/7 as they have been for quite a long time now. I saw some more photos this morning, and they've made huge progress. But still a lot to do.
"So it really is going to be down to the wire. But they'll get it done. Everything we need to put the race on safely we'll have, I'm confident of that."
After Sunday's Brazilian Grand Prix, Masi said: "I'm confident that it will be ready.
"It was always going to be very close. There's no doubt about that.
"Everything that I've seen, the progress day-on-day and week-on-week has been amazing since I was there last. Looking forward to having a look Tuesday."
#1074
Senior Moderator
https://streamable.com/tp7dub
onboard from Max’s car. Initially, i was under the impression that Max pushed Lewis wide as well but onboard may have redeemed him for me
onboard from Max’s car. Initially, i was under the impression that Max pushed Lewis wide as well but onboard may have redeemed him for me
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (11-16-2021)
#1075
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Will this be as bad or even worse than Korea 2010?
https://www.motor1.com/news/25209/jo...f1-race-prize/
#1076
Moderator
https://streamable.com/tp7dub
onboard from Max’s car. Initially, i was under the impression that Max pushed Lewis wide as well but onboard may have redeemed him for me
onboard from Max’s car. Initially, i was under the impression that Max pushed Lewis wide as well but onboard may have redeemed him for me
Now, whether he turned in late, to close LH off
He missed the apex by about 1/3 car-width, but wasn't as far to the right as you'd normally be to hit the prime line, with Lewis steaming up the outside.
Racing incident / hard racing, IMO.
The following users liked this post:
civicdrivr (11-16-2021)
#1077
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Western New York
Age: 64
Posts: 25,181
Received 7,143 Likes
on
3,631 Posts
my comments at post 987: https://rennlist.com/forums/off-topi...2021-a-66.html, if Max had understeer at :13, the wheel would've been turned much sharper to the left and he would've been sliding in to Hamilton.
What I should've done:
Onboard with Max L48, Turn 4 Sa Paolo. Watch the video, when LH is next to him and slightly ahead Max's hands at :13 in and position of the vehicle looks as though they are going to hit the apex. At :14 after he's driven LH off the track, completely missed the apex and his wheel position shows much more steering input.
At :13
At :14
Last edited by Chief F1 Fan; Today at 09:39 AM.
What I should've done:
Onboard with Max L48, Turn 4 Sa Paolo. Watch the video, when LH is next to him and slightly ahead Max's hands at :13 in and position of the vehicle looks as though they are going to hit the apex. At :14 after he's driven LH off the track, completely missed the apex and his wheel position shows much more steering input.
At :13
At :14
Last edited by Chief F1 Fan; Today at 09:39 AM.
Last edited by Chief F1 Fan; 11-16-2021 at 05:23 PM.
#1078
Moderator
^ Have to log in to view
But, to your comments, that makes sense, he probably could've turned in more, might've run/held it wide purposely to hold LH off.
But, to your comments, that makes sense, he probably could've turned in more, might've run/held it wide purposely to hold LH off.
#1079
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
https://streamable.com/tp7dub
onboard from Max’s car. Initially, i was under the impression that Max pushed Lewis wide as well but onboard may have redeemed him for me
onboard from Max’s car. Initially, i was under the impression that Max pushed Lewis wide as well but onboard may have redeemed him for me
At nearly 16 seconds (can't see the exact time stamp), Max reaches the largest steering angle through this turn. You can just see the inside curbing on the left. Note where the nose and wheels are pointing:
At this point he had already pushed Lewis off the racing line.
At 16 seconds, he's opened the wheel and the car is at the curbing. Look where his wheels are pointing.
He continues with that steering angle until the yellow Pirelli banner in the runoff area where he has a slight snap of oversteer (emphasis on slight, the car didn't appear to be sliding but there could have been wheelspin). At that time Lewis was behind and pushed way wide.
I want Max to win this year. I wasn't happy with the outcome of Silverstone, as I thought Lewis put his car where it shouldn't have been. I defended Max's move at Monza because - to my eye - Max had the racing line. But this one is hard for me to defend. Maybe it's because Masi and the stewards are wildly inconsistent.
#1080
Moderator
^ Looking at it as above, it definitely looks intentional, from 2 still shots.