MPG on hybrid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 06:29 AM
  #1  
SantaBarbaran's Avatar
Thread Starter
1st Gear
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
MPG on hybrid

Have been driving my Hybrid w/ tech Package or a few weeks. First week, I was averaging 38 MPG, now I am consistently doing 43. I do mostly HW driving, and try to watch how I drive. But I do downshift to accelerate and also do AC.

Anyone else with hybrid want to share what they are seeing?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 07:05 AM
  #2  
neuronbob's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 20,067
Likes: 4,698
From: Cleveland area, OH
Inhabitat got 44 mpg in the hybrid ILX WITHOUT using the Econ button, and driving similarly to you.

Reference HERE

So it appears that Acura could be underestimating the mileage? If so, this would be a PR boon for Acura.

BTW, WELCOME to Acurazine, SantaBarbaran. It appears you are ILX owner #3 on the site and the first hybrid owner. Please post your purchase details in the ILX owner sign-in thread-HERE.

Could you share your other driving impressions of the ILX, interior, etc., as well?
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 04:56 PM
  #3  
Rocket_man's Avatar
Summer is Coming
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 647
From: Houston
Originally Posted by SantaBarbaran
Have been driving my Hybrid w/ tech Package or a few weeks. First week, I was averaging 38 MPG, now I am consistently doing 43. I do mostly HW driving, and try to watch how I drive. But I do downshift to accelerate and also do AC.

Anyone else with hybrid want to share what they are seeing?
Welcome to Acurazine and congrats on your new car. That is pretty nice mileage for a hybrid that doesn't look like a hybrid (thank God!). I'm sure people would like to know about the drivability of the car. How does it accelerate to get on the highway? Passing? Do you drive with Econ mode on or off? How is space in the trunk? I assume the rear seat does not go down.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2012 | 07:19 PM
  #4  
BDoggPrelude's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,437
Likes: 591
From: Colorado
They probably underrated the MPG's after the amount of crap Honda has been going through with the Civic Hybrid debacle.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2012 | 01:41 PM
  #5  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Typical Honda way of doing things...
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2012 | 02:07 PM
  #6  
4cruizn's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 807
Likes: 412
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by neuronbob
BTW, WELCOME to Acurazine, SantaBarbaran. It appears you are ILX owner #3 on the site and the first hybrid owner.

Yes, welcome! And look forward to hearing about your other impressions about the car (and some pictures!). Congratulations on the MPG success.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #7  
smarty666's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 5
From: NJ
For the love of God, please tell me why Premium gasoline is recommended in the ILX? Isn't the hybrid the same thing as the one in the civic? Has anyone tried putting regular in the hybrid and 2.0L engine? Notice any changes in mpg?

It would seem, especially when Lexus and Buick have moved to regular in their lower models, that Acura should be doing the same to stay competitive. Regular should be what is required in a vehicle like the ILX.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2012 | 12:20 PM
  #8  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
To suit the "premium" image of Acura lol.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 10:01 AM
  #9  
anton1974's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 22
Likes: 1
I'm curious to know if the original poster is going by the mid estimate on the cars dash, or going by miles traveled/gallons.

On my TSX, the mid says 1.5 mpg better than it comes out to in real life.

Oh, and congratz on the new car, I think they look real nice.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2012 | 09:29 PM
  #10  
smarty666's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 5
From: NJ
Originally Posted by iforyou
To suit the "premium" image of Acura lol.
LoL! I mean, the mpg that some reviewers and new owners are getting out of the hybrid are fantastic, but it is with premium gas. I'd be interested to see if that same mpg can be obtained with regular gas. If you could get the same mpg out of the hybrid and 2.0L I4 with regular gas then that would be pretty impressive and just add to even a greater bang for your buck value if you got the ILX, and you'd be in an Acura, which is a hell of a lot nicer than a Civic.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 12:36 AM
  #11  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Based on the compression ratio, I don't think there's a need to use premium fuel for the ILX hybrid. The compress ratio isn't that high that it would require higher octane.....But for a new ILX owner, they'd most likely want to stay safe and fill the car with premium fuel.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 04:47 AM
  #12  
Rocket_man's Avatar
Summer is Coming
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,857
Likes: 647
From: Houston
Originally Posted by iforyou
Based on the compression ratio, I don't think there's a need to use premium fuel for the ILX hybrid. The compress ratio isn't that high that it would require higher octane.....But for a new ILX owner, they'd most likely want to stay safe and fill the car with premium fuel.
This Hybrid drivetrain is the same as the Civic which doesn't need it. They may have specified 91 Octane because that is what they used to claim the expected mileage, but I don't think the engine needs it.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #13  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Yea, exactly my thoughts.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2012 | 10:49 PM
  #14  
rickpoole's Avatar
Cruisin'
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 23
Likes: 3
From: Dallas, TX
We test drove an ILX Hybrid today and after a 30 minute drive where we both drove fairly conservatively, but in traffic and in 95+ degree heat we only were showing 30 mpg on the MID (which would mean 28 in reality). It appeared the battery never achieved a full charge during this time so we're not sure what the car is capable of achieving. The dealer said the car was running on on premium and mileage would be slightly worse on regular. But, after returning to the dealership and asking whether premium was recommended or required to get the rated mileage there was a big debate and the sales guys didn't agree on the answer. We're planning to drive it again when the battery is fully charge to see how well it does in typical summer city driving.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:43 PM
  #15  
smarty666's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 5
From: NJ
Can anybody give any fuel economy numbers they are getting on the 2.0L I4 with the 5spd automatic transmission?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #16  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Sounds like the hybrid is underrated just like the CR-Z.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2012 | 09:50 PM
  #17  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by smarty666
Can anybody give any fuel economy numbers they are getting on the 2.0L I4 with the 5spd automatic transmission?
I've spoken to two ILX owners with that configuration, they got 37+ mpg on the highway. Long trips with mountain passes.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 06:01 AM
  #18  
Rickards's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 8
From: Montreal, QC
Originally Posted by smarty666
Can anybody give any fuel economy numbers they are getting on the 2.0L I4 with the 5spd automatic transmission?
2.0 I4 here. Car states I'm getting 9.8L/100 km, although I'm sure in reality it's around the 7L mark as the number was initially close to 11L because of my hot foot and it's been going down ever since. I'll reset that gauge and give you a real number after a couple days of driving.

I hover around 5L/100 km when I'm on the highway. The gas needle doesn't even budge.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #19  
dominik331's Avatar
Racer
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 433
Likes: 26
Originally Posted by Rickards
2.0 I4 here. Car states I'm getting 9.8L/100 km, although I'm sure in reality it's around the 7L mark as the number was initially close to 11L because of my hot foot and it's been going down ever since. I'll reset that gauge and give you a real number after a couple days of driving.

I hover around 5L/100 km when I'm on the highway. The gas needle doesn't even budge.
What's that in American?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 10:24 AM
  #20  
Rickards's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 8
From: Montreal, QC
Rephrased in MPG from this calculator: http://calculator-converter.com/l_10...per_100_km.php

2.0 I4 here. Car states I'm getting 24 MPG, although I'm sure in reality it's around the 34 MPG mark as the number was initially close to 11L because of my hot foot and it's been going down ever since. I'll reset that gauge and give you a real number after a couple days of driving.

I hover around 42-47 MPG when I'm on the highway. The gas needle doesn't even budge.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 10:27 AM
  #21  
Rickards's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 52
Likes: 8
From: Montreal, QC
Seeing that Acura.ca says I should be at 5.6L on the highway, 42 MPG would be more accurate for that last line than up to 47 MPG.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 11:00 AM
  #22  
spdandpwr's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 285
From: CT
thanks for converting it for us...wondering what ill average once/if i get the 6 manual...tyson, care to provide your thoughts on mileage
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 11:22 AM
  #23  
Spirited Driver's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 24
From: NJ
He said: "Getting 32+ MPG".
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 11:42 AM
  #24  
spdandpwr's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,939
Likes: 285
From: CT
^these mpg numbers seem to be under-rated across the board then, huh?
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2012 | 12:38 PM
  #25  
Spirited Driver's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 378
Likes: 24
From: NJ
Originally Posted by spdandpwr
^these mpg numbers seem to be under-rated across the board then, huh?
It appears Tyson has been doing most of his driving (6MT) on the highway therefore not so much but numbers may be very slightly better than advertised.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
neuronbob
3G RLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
23
Jul 16, 2019 10:48 AM
marinrain
ILX
5
Oct 6, 2015 12:36 AM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
Sep 27, 2015 06:16 PM
ceb
ILX
2
Sep 27, 2015 10:56 AM
TL14
5G TLX (2015-2020)
2
Sep 24, 2015 04:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.