DirecTV Preps for Ultra HDTV Signals

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 05:37 PM
  #1  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
DirecTV Preps for Ultra HDTV Signals

DirecTV has begun the groundwork for a rollout of ultra HDTV (UHDTV), according to a report.

AdvancedTelevision.com said that Philip Goswitz, senior vice president of space and communications and technology development for DirecTV, is preparing for 4,000- and 8,000-line services, although Goswitz did not say when.

Reports have indicated, however, that the format could be ready by as early as 2016, with 2018 to 2020 seen as a more likely timeframe. In any event, DirecTV is looking toward the future.

"4,000- and 8,000-line services are great for the satellite industry, and will ensure that satellite broadcasting continues to distinguish itself for image quality of service," Goswitz reportedly said, according to AdvancedTelevision.com "We see this as a key strategic advantage for us."
DirecTV representatives could not be reached Friday for comment.

Current 1080p signals use 1080 horizontal lines of resolution. The so-called "4K" format is used by the digital cinema industry, but those refer to horizontal lines of resolution. Digital cinema resolution, for example, is commonly 4096-by-1714 pixels.

It's possible that Goswitz referred to so-called QFHD, which basically doubles the 1080p HDTV standard in the vertical and horizontal dimensions: 3,840-by-2,160. But those still don't come close to 4,000 lines of vertical resolution.

True ultra HD or UHDTV, however, has been proposed by NHK, also known as Super Hi-Vision. At 7,680-by-4,320, or 4320p HDTV, the resolution far exceeds conventional HDTVs and digital cinema. Uncompressed, the video would require massive bandwidth and storage space; in 2006, however, NHK demonstrated a compressed version, using an NHK codec that compressed the video signal from approximately 24 Gbits/s down to 180-600 Mbits/s and the audio from 28 Mbit/s to 7-28 Mbits/s. Prototype TVs from LG (pictured) have also been shown.

To enable the transition, DirecTV sees itself migrating from Ku-band to Ka-band satellites. Ka-band satellites offer higher bandwidth than Ku-band satellites, but reportedly are more susceptible to so-called "rain fade," or a degradation of performance during rainy conditions.

"At DirecTV we see a couple of things happening," Goswitz said. "First, our subscribers are migrating away from Ku-band, and upgrading themselves to Ka-band and its HDTV services. In four or five years, our Ku-band [transmissions] could end. We are also developing the so-called Reverse Band for DBS services, and these are on our Road Map for future international services. 4000-line is exciting to us because of its image quality, and the potential for glasses-free 3D."
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2401711,00.asp
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 05:50 PM
  #2  
doopstr's Avatar
Team Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 25,967
Likes: 2,685
From: Jersey
How about they figure out PPV?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 05:56 PM
  #3  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
^^ People still use PPV?!?!?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 07:54 PM
  #4  
F-C's Avatar
F-C
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 18,097
Likes: 1,440
From: NYC
I think they should focus more on improving their current service.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2012 | 08:58 PM
  #5  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Originally Posted by F-C
I think they should focus more on improving their current service.
Yes, adding channels and not be dickheads to their current customers.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 05:59 AM
  #6  
gatrhumpy's Avatar
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,532
Likes: 1,654
Will anyone be able to tell the difference on TVs anyways?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 03:00 PM
  #7  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
^^ If you have a very large screen,
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2012 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
EL19's Avatar
Suzuka Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,340
Likes: 194
From: DC
I have a 105" screen but since the projector is 1080p would I see any benefit? Would it look like bluray as opposed to what my current cable looks like? Bluray looks CRAZY good that large.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 09:21 AM
  #9  
gatrhumpy's Avatar
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,532
Likes: 1,654
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
^^ If you have a very large screen,
Most people don't have very large screens, so the increase in 'clarity' would be worthless.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2012 | 06:25 PM
  #10  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by gatrhumpy
Most people don't have very large screens, so the increase in 'clarity' would be worthless.
SHARP demonstrated a version of UHDTV back in 2011 on a 85" LCD.


Nothing short of AMAZING clarity.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #11  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Its getting ridiculous.

4k and even 8k are great when watching movies at a theaters on a VERY large screen. The idea of bringing into homes is really kind of silly. 1080p is fantastic for 98% of home viewing needs.

Unless I'm watching Baraka...the kinda of detail that will be seen is really just overload...You'll go back to all your old movies and start seeing all the make up lines and wig nets, etc etc etc....it will actually degrade from what you are trying to watch.

That said Japan has been touting ultra HD for a few year now.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2012 | 05:08 PM
  #12  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
^^ People used to say that about HD too.

The people demand more clarity!!! :wink:
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2012 | 07:42 PM
  #13  
thunder04's Avatar
Sweet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 82
From: Northern VA
Moving all customers from Ku to Ka based equipment sounds like a bit of work (and expensive). I'm curious to see how this plays out. Maybe they'll simply hand out converter "dongles" that sit between the receiver and dish? Kind of like the B-Band Converter? Unless Ka requires a different LNB or dish...
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2012 | 11:54 AM
  #14  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
Thread Starter
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
^^ They did this when customers switched from SD to HD.

Nothing new here.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #15  
CLpower's Avatar
teh Senior Instigator
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 44,094
Likes: 980
From: Huntington Beach, CA -> Ashburn, VA -> Raleigh, NC -> Walnut Creek, CA
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Its getting ridiculous.

4k and even 8k are great when watching movies at a theaters on a VERY large screen. The idea of bringing into homes is really kind of silly. 1080p is fantastic for 98% of home viewing needs.

Unless I'm watching Baraka...the kinda of detail that will be seen is really just overload...You'll go back to all your old movies and start seeing all the make up lines and wig nets, etc etc etc....it will actually degrade from what you are trying to watch.

That said Japan has been touting ultra HD for a few year now.

720P is fantastic for 80% of home viewing needs
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 10:21 PM
  #16  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 50,498
Likes: 5,874
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
^^ People used to say that about HD too.

The people demand more clarity!!! :wink:

The people don't demand it...the companies want to force it...$$$
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2012 | 10:36 PM
  #17  
thunder04's Avatar
Sweet!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 82
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Moog-Type-S
^^ They did this when customers switched from SD to HD.

Nothing new here.
Ahh. Got it. I re-read the article and mis-read the bit about the Ku to Ka migration.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2012 | 06:47 AM
  #18  
gatrhumpy's Avatar
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 35,532
Likes: 1,654
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
Its getting ridiculous.

4k and even 8k are great when watching movies at a theaters on a VERY large screen. The idea of bringing into homes is really kind of silly. 1080p is fantastic for 98% of home viewing needs.

Unless I'm watching Baraka...the kinda of detail that will be seen is really just overload...You'll go back to all your old movies and start seeing all the make up lines and wig nets, etc etc etc....it will actually degrade from what you are trying to watch.

That said Japan has been touting ultra HD for a few year now.
My point exactly. It's worthless to most Americans.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
quanaman
4G TL (2009-2014)
7
Jan 9, 2023 07:33 PM
detailersdomain
Wash & Wax
3
Oct 9, 2015 10:13 PM
us285126
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
9
Oct 2, 2015 02:03 PM
rhdune16
Car Parts for Sale
0
Sep 28, 2015 11:31 AM
h22lude
3G TL (2004-2008)
7
Sep 27, 2015 06:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:07 PM.