Threesome
#1
Threesome
Hey i have a chance to have a threesome this weekend. One girl is really hot, the other, average. But still two want to have sex with me. Only problem is that my friend is trying to get in on this, thus taking away my chance for a threesome. I mean he's my boy and all but still. My Choices: fuck one girl, and have him fuck the other, or fuck both girls at the same time and let him go find his own. What should I do?
#7
Originally Posted by DRM600
make a threesome.
although, it could be fun to do a dp on a girl.
although, it could be fun to do a dp on a girl.
that's just too close for comfort
Trending Topics
#10
Originally Posted by atsxdude
Hey i have a chance to have a threesome this weekend. One girl is really hot, the other, average. But still two want to have sex with me. Only problem is that my friend is trying to get in on this, thus taking away my chance for a threesome. I mean he's my boy and all but still. My Choices: fuck one girl, and have him fuck the other, or fuck both girls at the same time and let him go find his own. What should I do?
#12
You have to tell him flat out to stop being a cockblock, trust me it works every time if you just flat out say to your buddy "hey your being a fucking cockblock". If you hang out with those chicks tonight make sure he is NOT with you, dont answer his calls today
#13
Originally Posted by is300eater
I'd say tell your buddy to be a good friend and just let you do the 3some, cause he has a higher chance of gettin' laid than your chance of getting another 3some... besides, he would've had the "average" one anyway, right? It's not like he's missing out on bangin' some hot chick...
#14
Originally Posted by atsxdude
yeah. Left out a small part: He does not get lucky often. Like once a year often. i almost feel guilty. Almost.
Last edited by is300eater; 10-14-2006 at 02:59 PM.
#15
Originally Posted by Sdog2012
You have to tell him flat out to stop being a cockblock, trust me it works every time if you just flat out say to your buddy "hey your being a fucking cockblock". If you hang out with those chicks tonight make sure he is NOT with you, dont answer his calls today
#20
Originally Posted by atsxdude
Well i kinda told him i would hook him up with this chick (average girl) but she saw his pic and was like fuck no. Her friend (hot chick) told me she would be down for whatever. she said she would be down for a threesome but not my friend. thats why i feel guilty.almost. Both these girls are slutty as shit.
Do the threesome.
#21
A good friend wouldn't put you in a position to choose.
As a guideline ... bros before hos. But when the term "menage a trois" enters the equation, the rule is modified to "bro in the closet with video camera recording said bro and hos."
As a guideline ... bros before hos. But when the term "menage a trois" enters the equation, the rule is modified to "bro in the closet with video camera recording said bro and hos."
#34
Originally Posted by iamhomin
When the hot chick's naked next to the average chick, do you really want to pay attention to the avg one? Give the avg to your friend, he's a poor bastard anyway
#35
A three way with two women and one man poses some strategic problems, including jealousy for the woman who is not, at the moment, recieving attention. If you're gonna do it, you gotta be aware that you have to be meticulous. It also helps if the two women in question get into a certain amount of bi action, so that you're not entirely responsibile for all of the action. With that, then YOU need to not be jealous when the two women get it on, and shut you out of the action.
Two guys and two girls is more of a challenge, because it is no longer a threeway, and is too small for a proper orgy. The intimacy of four people means, inevitably, that you are going to have phsyical contact, whether intentional or inadvertant, with another naked male. If that either doesn't bother you or turns you on, then go for it, but be aware that in a four-way, the intimacy of the situation means you actually know who/what your are touching and vice-versa. And, with that few a number, touch will occur.
There can be real excitement in two men with one woman (she gets a tremendous kick out of it, but the rules that I noted in paragraph one apply. And, inevitably, someone gets sloppy seconds.
If you're going to consdier a four-way, might consider opening it up to two or three more couples, and stage a decent orgy, during which the darkness of night provides sufficient anonymity that the nature of the action remains purely carnal, and the focus on whose body parts are whose or what gets fully lost in the shuffle.
Two guys and two girls is more of a challenge, because it is no longer a threeway, and is too small for a proper orgy. The intimacy of four people means, inevitably, that you are going to have phsyical contact, whether intentional or inadvertant, with another naked male. If that either doesn't bother you or turns you on, then go for it, but be aware that in a four-way, the intimacy of the situation means you actually know who/what your are touching and vice-versa. And, with that few a number, touch will occur.
There can be real excitement in two men with one woman (she gets a tremendous kick out of it, but the rules that I noted in paragraph one apply. And, inevitably, someone gets sloppy seconds.
If you're going to consdier a four-way, might consider opening it up to two or three more couples, and stage a decent orgy, during which the darkness of night provides sufficient anonymity that the nature of the action remains purely carnal, and the focus on whose body parts are whose or what gets fully lost in the shuffle.
#36
Originally Posted by ric
A three way with two women and one man poses some strategic problems, including jealousy for the woman who is not, at the moment, recieving attention. If you're gonna do it, you gotta be aware that you have to be meticulous. It also helps if the two women in question get into a certain amount of bi action, so that you're not entirely responsibile for all of the action. With that, then YOU need to not be jealous when the two women get it on, and shut you out of the action.
Two guys and two girls is more of a challenge, because it is no longer a threeway, and is too small for a proper orgy. The intimacy of four people means, inevitably, that you are going to have phsyical contact, whether intentional or inadvertant, with another naked male. If that either doesn't bother you or turns you on, then go for it, but be aware that in a four-way, the intimacy of the situation means you actually know who/what your are touching and vice-versa. And, with that few a number, touch will occur.
There can be real excitement in two men with one woman (she gets a tremendous kick out of it, but the rules that I noted in paragraph one apply. And, inevitably, someone gets sloppy seconds.
If you're going to consdier a four-way, might consider opening it up to two or three more couples, and stage a decent orgy, during which the darkness of night provides sufficient anonymity that the nature of the action remains purely carnal, and the focus on whose body parts are whose or what gets fully lost in the shuffle.
Two guys and two girls is more of a challenge, because it is no longer a threeway, and is too small for a proper orgy. The intimacy of four people means, inevitably, that you are going to have phsyical contact, whether intentional or inadvertant, with another naked male. If that either doesn't bother you or turns you on, then go for it, but be aware that in a four-way, the intimacy of the situation means you actually know who/what your are touching and vice-versa. And, with that few a number, touch will occur.
There can be real excitement in two men with one woman (she gets a tremendous kick out of it, but the rules that I noted in paragraph one apply. And, inevitably, someone gets sloppy seconds.
If you're going to consdier a four-way, might consider opening it up to two or three more couples, and stage a decent orgy, during which the darkness of night provides sufficient anonymity that the nature of the action remains purely carnal, and the focus on whose body parts are whose or what gets fully lost in the shuffle.
#37
Originally Posted by BstonBruin
experience?
#38
Originally Posted by ric
only when on drugs......does tend to blur the memories, but the protocols remain the same. I was young once... and the '60's and '70's were quite - libertine -
#40
Originally Posted by ric
A three way with two women and one man poses some strategic problems, including jealousy for the woman who is not, at the moment, recieving attention. If you're gonna do it, you gotta be aware that you have to be meticulous. It also helps if the two women in question get into a certain amount of bi action, so that you're not entirely responsibile for all of the action. With that, then YOU need to not be jealous when the two women get it on, and shut you out of the action.
Two guys and two girls is more of a challenge, because it is no longer a threeway, and is too small for a proper orgy. The intimacy of four people means, inevitably, that you are going to have phsyical contact, whether intentional or inadvertant, with another naked male. If that either doesn't bother you or turns you on, then go for it, but be aware that in a four-way, the intimacy of the situation means you actually know who/what your are touching and vice-versa. And, with that few a number, touch will occur.
There can be real excitement in two men with one woman (she gets a tremendous kick out of it, but the rules that I noted in paragraph one apply. And, inevitably, someone gets sloppy seconds.
If you're going to consdier a four-way, might consider opening it up to two or three more couples, and stage a decent orgy, during which the darkness of night provides sufficient anonymity that the nature of the action remains purely carnal, and the focus on whose body parts are whose or what gets fully lost in the shuffle.
Two guys and two girls is more of a challenge, because it is no longer a threeway, and is too small for a proper orgy. The intimacy of four people means, inevitably, that you are going to have phsyical contact, whether intentional or inadvertant, with another naked male. If that either doesn't bother you or turns you on, then go for it, but be aware that in a four-way, the intimacy of the situation means you actually know who/what your are touching and vice-versa. And, with that few a number, touch will occur.
There can be real excitement in two men with one woman (she gets a tremendous kick out of it, but the rules that I noted in paragraph one apply. And, inevitably, someone gets sloppy seconds.
If you're going to consdier a four-way, might consider opening it up to two or three more couples, and stage a decent orgy, during which the darkness of night provides sufficient anonymity that the nature of the action remains purely carnal, and the focus on whose body parts are whose or what gets fully lost in the shuffle.
Ric for president....