Dating & Relationships Love sucks. Now you can cry about it…

Engagement/Marriage

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-20-2008, 11:59 AM
  #81  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Street Spirit
You keep posting studies and statistics. The thing is, relationships (whether it be romantic or just friendships) are not based only on logic or studies....they involve people who have EMOTIONS. It makes a world of difference when you stop looking at numbers and think of it in terms of living beings.
You can love someone but still make smart, educated, and logical decisions.

Emotions aren't an excuse to ignore reality.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:03 PM
  #82  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Street Spirit
I don't think anyone is suggesting you marry a girl from your one-night stand because she's cute and 29, the age she thinks she should get married.
Then you agree that I should be doing what I'm doing.

OMG!!! A relationship...err..I mean, marriage involves work??? Sh*t.
It shouldn't involve work. There's an inverse relationship between a happy relationship and how much work it takes to keep it together.

Every relationship of any kind (family, friendship, relationship) evolves and goes through ups and downs. Do you really think that's a shocking statement? Maybe you just run when that time comes, so you think that news should surprise us.
I don't believe that's a shocking statement but I don't believe it's always noble to keep something alive when there really are greener pastures. I don't have a problem severing ties. I can make new ones very quickly. I have more faith in myself than I do in others to do the right thing for me.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:08 PM
  #83  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
Certainly I don't disagree. They CAN be, but putting out the assumption that all of us ARE is taking things a bit far. Do you disagree?
I never once said "all" - I don't need "all" to make a decision about something. Enough women CAN be, given the right circumstances (like divorce) to turn me off to marriage in the first place.

Take a nap.
Come with

I didn't have a divorce attorney. I didn't want his things. (And yes, he had plenty to take.) See, the thing is, I married someone I not only loved, but liked and respected. That didn't change when we decided not to continue living our lives together. And because he also married someone he respected and trusted, he didn't get screwed over. No prenup, no attorneys, no battles. He kept his, I kept mine, the things we acquired together over the years were divided equitably with NO arguing, because we were both fair-minded in our approach.
That's great that that worked for you but you could have had more. Like I said it's your right and just because you didn't exercise it does not mean that the courts would not have favored your requests more than his. It's just a fact.

Why is it so hard for women to accept the fact that they are looked at more favorably in court?
Old 08-20-2008, 12:11 PM
  #84  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Hilarious.

I have been told I am dumb, dense, and a little man in this thread by a 25 year old SINGLE relationship genius.

Like I said, just because you suck at relationships, does not mean we all do.

My proof is almost 12 years of HAPPY marriage. What is yours? Statistics...yea that will keep ya warm and loved on a winters night.

Now, go ahead and call me some more names so you can feel better about yourself.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:11 PM
  #85  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
A relationship shouldn't involve work? Ahhh...so every thing of every day should be picture perfect, revolve around only you and what is happening only in this second. THAT sounds more like the Disney crap you were talking about before. Do you not call your friends to go out? Do you make compromises on where you go to eat sometimes, or do you just drop them when it's not all about you? Relationships involve two people, there's bound to be some work involved in keeping BOTH people happy (compromise, communication, attention, etc)....work.

Truth is, bumps in the road don't end relationships on their own. If two people want to make it through a low-point in life, whether it be illness, a difference of opinion, lack of comprise, job stress, financial issues, children, poor communication, family -- it can be done if they WANT it to. If a resolution can't be reach or if they just aren't willing to give it a go, then I agree, there's no point in staying in a life that you are unhappy with! Why waste your time on any relationship you're not interested in. But I'd bet you that a lot of marriages end only because it is a faster, easier, more convenient way to just not bother putting effort into who and what is important to you, not because of ONLY the issues themselves.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:16 PM
  #86  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Amis-

Really, I shouldn't even bother arguing with you about your jaded viewpoints. So approximately 50% fail? That means 50% succeed. Is the glass half empty or half full? It's a matter of perspective. Truthfully, the only person your cynicism affects is you when it helps you to keep people at arm's length. That is, of course, your prerogative.

The thing that's chapping me a bit is something that also doesn't actually affect me. (So really it shouldn't chap, but I own that I'm an empathetic person, and a woman, so there it is.) The point. This guy came in here looking for advice on WHEN to get married, not WHETHER. You're in here spewing distaste for the institution. We get it. You'll never ever ever ever marry. From the things you've posted in the past, I 100% agree with you - don't ever get married. It's clearly not a good choice for you.

BUT. Maybe it is for this guy. Maybe he loves his girl enough to take that chance and to experience the pitfalls and the beauty. Why do you try so hard to talk him out of it? Do you really think he'll be a happier man if he goes to his girl and says "sorry babe, but this guy on the net convinced me that marriage is a load of bs, so no deal?" Then she dumps him and he's without the girl who he has said completes him. I don't see the benefit of trying to convince him he's making a mistake, that's all.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:21 PM
  #87  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
I never once said "all" - I don't need "all" to make a decision about something. Enough women CAN be, given the right circumstances (like divorce) to turn me off to marriage in the first place.



Come with



That's great that that worked for you but you could have had more. Like I said it's your right and just because you didn't exercise it does not mean that the courts would not have favored your requests more than his. It's just a fact.

Why is it so hard for women to accept the fact that they are looked at more favorably in court?
Oh, I know I could have, and I accept the fact that decisions are made in women's favor. You're absolutely right, and that's just one of many broken aspects of our judicial system.

Consider it a pointed effort not to be part of the problem. I don't consider it my right to take his money or belongings. We were partners for 13 years, now we're not. That's it.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:21 PM
  #88  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
Do you really think he'll be a happier man if he goes to his girl and says "sorry babe, but this guy on the net convinced me that marriage is a load of bs, so no deal?" Then she dumps him and he's without the girl who he has said completes him.
I definitely think he'll be happier. He just hasn't read those statistics yet.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:27 PM
  #89  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Originally Posted by Street Spirit
I definitely think he'll be happier. He just hasn't read those statistics yet.
Oh shit...
Old 08-20-2008, 12:29 PM
  #90  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by 1killercls
Hilarious.

I have been told I am dumb, dense, and a little man in this thread by a 25 year old SINGLE relationship genius.

Like I said, just because you suck at relationships, does not mean we all do.

My proof is almost 12 years of HAPPY marriage. What is yours? Statistics...yea that will keep ya warm and loved on a winters night.

Now, go ahead and call me some more names so you can feel better about yourself.
Killer, I don't need a woman in my bed to be happy.

Believe it or not I'm actually in a loving relationship now. Am I looking to get married? Nope! I'm actually very good in relationships (assuming a girl can keep me interested long enough for me to consider monogamy).

Just because I haven't signed a marriage certificate doesn't make you any better than me.

Your "proof" that one individual can be happy in a marriage does not a trend make. Just like one man falling from a 16-story building does not mean it's a good idea for all of us to consider taking that leap.

And for the record, you started with the name calling. I know you lost some brain cells in the 80s and it's difficult for you to think very clearly these days. But at least try.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:30 PM
  #91  
Registered but harmless
 
Will Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 14,845
Received 1,106 Likes on 764 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
Men receive no concrete or legal benefits from marriage. ZERO.

Until you can show me a specific legal benefit to marriage FOR A MAN, my opinion stands.
Joint tax returns = lower taxes.

Community property laws also benefit kept men like Whiskers and Kevin Federline.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:31 PM
  #92  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Oh..and for the OP. If you love the woman...and she loves you...get married if ya want to. marriage rocks with the right person, I was lucky and found the right person. There are no guarantee's in life, that is what makes it worth living. Marriage does take work, compromise and understanding...but the result of it is HAPPINESS!
Old 08-20-2008, 12:32 PM
  #93  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,912
Received 1,234 Likes on 823 Posts
Originally Posted by Will Y.
Joint tax returns = lower taxes.

Community property laws also benefit kept men like Whiskers and Kevin Federline.
Well, Im glad I can be in such good company as Kevin Federline....

And yes, I am all for marriage......
Old 08-20-2008, 12:33 PM
  #94  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
No offense, but you're an idiot and like a typical moron you're not rebutting a single argument I made.


Actually you were the first with the name calling here.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:33 PM
  #95  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Street Spirit
A relationship shouldn't involve work? Ahhh...so every thing of every day should be picture perfect, revolve around only you and what is happening only in this second. THAT sounds more like the Disney crap you were talking about before. Do you not call your friends to go out? Do you make compromises on where you go to eat sometimes, or do you just drop them when it's not all about you? Relationships involve two people, there's bound to be some work involved in keeping BOTH people happy (compromise, communication, attention, etc)....work.


I was making a general point that is true. The harder you have to work to keep a relationship alive the less likely it is to exist. Period. You don't have to jump into hyperbole to denounce that. It's a fact of human nature.

Truth is, bumps in the road don't end relationships on their own. If two people want to make it through a low-point in life, whether it be illness, a difference of opinion, lack of comprise, job stress, financial issues, children, poor communication, family -- it can be done if they WANT it to. If a resolution can't be reach or if they just aren't willing to give it a go, then I agree, there's no point in staying in a life that you are unhappy with! Why waste your time on any relationship you're not interested in. But I'd bet you that a lot of marriages end only because it is a faster, easier, more convenient way to just not bother putting effort into who and what is important to you, not because of ONLY the issues themselves.
You're making my point for me.

Work and happiness are inversely related. The more work, the harder a relationship is and vice versa.

Are you just arguing with me to argue or what?
Old 08-20-2008, 12:36 PM
  #96  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Will Y.
Joint tax returns = lower taxes.
Not on balance.

That benefit is quickly nullified once you add kids and lifestyle subsidies.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:36 PM
  #97  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
Killer, I don't need a woman in my bed to be happy.


Awesome....Says the guy who has talked about nothing in previous threads but needing a woman as interested in sex 5 times a day (and who better be the best at it), or he's on the prowl for someone else.

Originally Posted by amisconception
Believe it or not I'm actually in a loving relationship now. Am I looking to get married? Nope! I'm actually very good in relationships (assuming a girl can keep me interested long enough for me to consider monogamy).
This is what I don't understand about your mentality. Why is a relationship all about what one person needs to do in order to keep the other happy? It's a partnership, along with just being able to be happy as an individual, as well as a couple. Why should one person have to keep things interesting for only you. Where do you come in?
Old 08-20-2008, 12:37 PM
  #98  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by 1killercls
Actually you were the first with the name calling here.
Originally Posted by 1killercls
Happily married for 11 years here...and I can tell ya one thing. Amisconception's post is pure Horse Shit.

No offense Amis, but it sure sounds like some bitch screwed you over bad.
That was your first post.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:37 PM
  #99  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts

PSSSTT!!!! Hey Amis!!! WILL YOU MARRY ME??




Old 08-20-2008, 12:40 PM
  #100  
Go Giants
 
Whiskers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: PA
Age: 53
Posts: 69,912
Received 1,234 Likes on 823 Posts
Wow, Amis, you are getting a lashing....I say all power to you my friend...
Old 08-20-2008, 12:42 PM
  #101  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Street Spirit


Awesome....Says the guy who has talked about nothing in previous threads but needing a woman as interested in sex 5 times a day (and who better be the best at it), or he's on the prowl for someone else.
I mean from the perspective of a "loving and happy" relationship.

Sex isn't difficult to get. And she doesn't have to spend the night, either.

This is what I don't understand about your mentality. Why is a relationship all about what one person needs to do in order to keep the other happy? It's a partnership, along with just being able to be happy as an individual, as well as a couple. Why should one person have to keep things interesting for only you. Where do you come in?
I offer a good time and good sex. I keep myself up and I'm socially appealing to women. For the type of women that I like, that's all they need. I'm not interested in a woman that wants to lock me down ASAP and have 2.5 kids and a Chrysler Pacifica.

I don't need a woman to advance my career. Or workout for me. Or eat better for me. Or do my laundry, or iron my shirts, or wipe my ass.

I've said it plenty of times and I'll say it again: If a girl doesn't like me she can go home

That doesn't mean I'm not friendly (at least, if she deserves it) or I don't make time for her. I just don't expect nor want a mommy.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:44 PM
  #102  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst

PSSSTT!!!! Hey Amis!!! WILL YOU MARRY ME??





The funny part is that I don't communicate any of this to women I'm interested in.

Because they wouldn't date me if I did. Which is interesting because it reveals an interesting dynamic.

You guys are all privvy to stuff girls I actually date don't get to hear.
Old 08-20-2008, 12:45 PM
  #103  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Whiskers
Wow, Amis, you are getting a lashing....I say all power to you my friend...
haha, it's not the first time

Thanks!
Old 08-20-2008, 12:47 PM
  #104  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception

The more work, the harder a relationship is and vice versa.
I agree.

As I said, of course there comes a point when there's no point in staying in a relationship that neither person gets enjoyment out of. My point was that you seem to think we're all naive in thinking relationships are all about happiness 100% of the time, and that we'll somehow be amazed to hear that some marriages have issues.

By work, I mean things like open and honest communication, compromise, etc. Some people don't need to work at it at all, as they've found someone truly compatible, with personalities, desires, goals, styles, and interests that mesh....Other people need to work at it.


Originally Posted by amisconception
Are you just arguing with me to argue or what?
Mostly, yeah. AZ is all about entertainment to me, and I enjoy reading your statistics (better find myself that attorney real soon).
Old 08-20-2008, 12:48 PM
  #105  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
The funny part is that I don't communicate any of this to women I'm interested in.

Because they wouldn't date me if I did. Which is interesting because it reveals an interesting dynamic.

You guys are all privvy to stuff girls I actually date don't get to hear.
Wait, was that a yes or a no?


Old 08-20-2008, 12:50 PM
  #106  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by Street Spirit




Mostly, yeah. AZ is all about entertainment to me, and I enjoy reading your statistics (better find myself that attorney real soon).
I'll be keeping a close eye on the "post your photo equipment" thread! Poor Dan...
Old 08-20-2008, 12:52 PM
  #107  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
The funny part is that I don't communicate any of this to women I'm interested in.

Because they wouldn't date me if I did. Which is interesting because it reveals an interesting dynamic.

You guys are all privvy to stuff girls I actually date don't get to hear.
Why waste their time...err.....I mean, your time too?

Why not just live the life of a one-night stand kinda guy until your old age? Because, IMO, if you don't want to live together, get married, or have children, you'll come to an age where the women you date might be. Why not be upfront from the get-go and let her find the right person for her, while you continue dating the right kind of people for you?
Old 08-20-2008, 12:54 PM
  #108  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
Wait, was that a yes or a no?


Statistics for second marriages are even worse
Old 08-20-2008, 12:55 PM
  #109  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
Statistics for second marriages are even worse









What about 4th? My mom's on her 4th. Of course the first guy was gay, so that wasn't her fault. She married the second one twice, so you can't say she didn't try!
Old 08-20-2008, 01:05 PM
  #110  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
That was your first post.
That is not name calling. I said your POST was pure HS.

Regardless... if I hurt your feelings.
Old 08-20-2008, 01:06 PM
  #111  
I'm Down Right Fierce!
Thread Starter
 
BraveDemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,953
Received 40 Likes on 31 Posts
^ Well Amis, I actually took the time to read all of your posts and while I do think its neat that you took the time to post actual statistics I don't think "women" and "feminsim" are the necessarily the primary factors in the high divorce rates.

If anything I think its a combination of: 1. changing morality, 2. economics, 3. social views of relationships.

We're essentially encouraging a generation of promiscuity and encouraging non commital relationships, so what can we expect?

What people fail to understand is that MARRIAGE IS HARD. Life doesn't get easier when you get married; rather I personally believe it gets harder. You no longer have independence; you now have another person that you need to care/worry for, and who will care for and worry about you. Add children to that formula and it gets harder I imagine.

The questions people need to face is whether in spite of the hardships of marriage, does your love for your SO outweighs those hardships? Does your love outweigh those hardships so much that you'd be willing to work through anything that comes your way?

For me personally, I know being married to my GF will be hard - we'll both be working 10-12 hour days as starting attorneys, whatever time we spend together after that work day will be our "left overs" since we'll be tired, and she and I both have character flaws (we all do, we just need to admit it).

But for me personally, and for Ravi and others on here, we can say that despite the hardships of marriage that we would not give up being with the SO that we love more than ourselves. Sure there will be bad days I'm sure; but I can rest assured knowing that for the most part we will work through those problems to the best of our abilities. I can honestly say that I am happiest when I'm with my GF; even if we're doing some stupid mundane thing like watching TV together, the comfort and peace I feel by just having her next to me is worth more to me than any excitement I'd get from banging some random hot chick I meet at a bar/club.

I don't think your viewpoints are necessarily wrong - I'm sure there are gold digging women out there using marriage as a method to become financially secure. But I'm certain that there are just as many men who prey on rich cougars with the same intent.

High divorce rates: Its not just because of women, its not just because men, its because of people. Times have changed, morality has changed, people have changed.

Marriage isn't for everyone and I'm not going to convince you that its for you. In fact from what I understand from your posts, I believe that marriage isn't for you and I respect that. And to be honest, theres absolutely nothing wrong with that; you do what makes you happy. I'm not even going to say "try it" because we don't have to try things in order to know that we won't like it - my GF asks me to try going to watch a ballet with her and her friends to which I always give an emphatic "hell no." I don't have to watch a ballet in person to know that I'll hate it.

All I will say, is that I was in the same boat as you Amis - if you had spoken to me 4 years ago, I would've told you I'm never getting married and that there was no point to it. But all that changed after I met my current GF; now I can truly say that nothing in my life compares to being with her.
Old 08-20-2008, 01:11 PM
  #112  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
Nicely put BD.
Old 08-20-2008, 01:19 PM
  #113  
Registered but harmless
 
Will Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 14,845
Received 1,106 Likes on 764 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
Not on balance.

That benefit is quickly nullified once you add kids and lifestyle subsidies.
You are now evading what you call a "specific legal benefit" with assumptions about facts (that married couples are not DINKs, but will have X kids, etc.) which are not in law.

Oh, and my wife ordered me to tell you that marriage is good.
Old 08-20-2008, 01:54 PM
  #114  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Will Y.
You are now evading what you call a "specific legal benefit" with assumptions about facts (that married couples are not DINKs, but will have X kids, etc.) which are not in law.

Oh, and my wife ordered me to tell you that marriage is good.
But you do realize that that specific benefit does not outweigh the fact that men (in general) have less discretionary income once they are married, right? So while they receive a tax benefit, what good is it if they have less money to spend on balance anyway?
Old 08-20-2008, 02:11 PM
  #115  
werd
 
amisconception's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 15,078
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by BraveDemon
^ Well Amis, I actually took the time to read all of your posts and while I do think its neat that you took the time to post actual statistics I don't think "women" and "feminsim" are the necessarily the primary factors in the high divorce rates.

If anything I think its a combination of: 1. changing morality, 2. economics, 3. social views of relationships.
All of those, to one degree or another, are a function of liberal or "progressive" movements that were altered as a consequence of feminism and the breakdown of "patriarchal dominance" - so no, I don't believe it's a coincidence that all of these factors grew out of the latter half of the 20th century.

What people fail to understand is that MARRIAGE IS HARD. Life doesn't get easier when you get married; rather I personally believe it gets harder. You no longer have independence; you now have another person that you need to care/worry for, and who will care for and worry about you. Add children to that formula and it gets harder I imagine.
I don't see why marriage creates additional problems that a person who values a woman in a long-term relationship wouldn't have. I fail to see how signing a marriage certificate makes those items that much more difficult. Specifcally what exactly makes marriage harder than if you truly loved and cared about a woman prior to marriage in a LTR?

The questions people need to face is whether in spite of the hardships of marriage, does your love for your SO outweighs those hardships? Does your love outweigh those hardships so much that you'd be willing to work through anything that comes your way?
Again, why do you need marriage to overcome hardships? Why would marriage increase or decrease commitment? Why can't love exist without a legally binding contract?

For me personally, I know being married to my GF will be hard - we'll both be working 10-12 hour days as starting attorneys, whatever time we spend together after that work day will be our "left overs" since we'll be tired, and she and I both have character flaws (we all do, we just need to admit it).
Then why rush into marriage if your career is barely starting?

But for me personally, and for Ravi and others on here, we can say that despite the hardships of marriage that we would not give up being with the SO that we love more than ourselves.
So in essence, because you fear losing her, you'll bite bullet and get married... To keep her around. In fear she'll jump ship or branch swing maybe? Kind of like an ultimatum?

Sure there will be bad days I'm sure; but I can rest assured knowing that for the most part we will work through those problems to the best of our abilities. I can honestly say that I am happiest when I'm with my GF; even if we're doing some stupid mundane thing like watching TV together, the comfort and peace I feel by just having her next to me is worth more to me than any excitement I'd get from banging some random hot chick I meet at a bar/club.
That's great. Really, I'm happy for you. So why do you want to screw it up with marriage? Why can't you just exist in the state which you are in now? Why complicate it?

I don't think your viewpoints are necessarily wrong - I'm sure there are gold digging women out there using marriage as a method to become financially secure. But I'm certain that there are just as many men who prey on rich cougars with the same intent.
Well, here you are definitely wrong. There are not as many men preying on rich older women as there are young women preying on rich older men. First of all, the amount of rich men is exponentially higher than there are rich women. Secondly, men aren't attracted to $$$$$$$$ and security as a vehicle for intimacy. We like nice asses and blowjobs.

High divorce rates: Its not just because of women, its not just because men, its because of people. Times have changed, morality has changed, people have changed.
Already addressed.

Marriage isn't for everyone and I'm not going to convince you that its for you. In fact from what I understand from your posts, I believe that marriage isn't for you and I respect that. And to be honest, theres absolutely nothing wrong with that; you do what makes you happy. I'm not even going to say "try it" because we don't have to try things in order to know that we won't like it - my GF asks me to try going to watch a ballet with her and her friends to which I always give an emphatic "hell no." I don't have to watch a ballet in person to know that I'll hate it.
Actually, the consequences of being in a bad marriage are not just shared by me. These are broader problems within the actual institution of marriage. So, it's not just a personal decision as you'd like to describe it as. There are social consequences to the way marriage and its associated laws are structured.

All I will say, is that I was in the same boat as you Amis - if you had spoken to me 4 years ago, I would've told you I'm never getting married and that there was no point to it. But all that changed after I met my current GF; now I can truly say that nothing in my life compares to being with her.
That's very sweet and all but it doesn't change the fact that marraige has legal consequences. Not looking at those consequences and blindly jumping into marriage just leaves you more susceptible to the potential problems that can arise.

Look if you need to get married that badly, at least take the time to get educated about your options and what exactly may happen. You're going to be an attorney for Christ's sake! Get a prenup!
Old 08-20-2008, 02:23 PM
  #116  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
When my lawyer friend got married (traditional wedding), they both read the official, legal statements claiming no lawful reason why they should not be able to wed, blahblah, blah, blah, as their vows. Literally, they just read a legal declaration, claiming there was nothing binding that should prevent their marriage. It was a very touching ceremony.
Old 08-20-2008, 02:59 PM
  #117  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by amisconception
All of those, to one degree or another, are a function of liberal or "progressive" movements that were altered as a consequence of feminism and the breakdown of "patriarchal dominance" - so no, I don't believe it's a coincidence that all of these factors grew out of the latter half of the 20th century.
IMO, more stats and info showing a rise in divorce from xx decades ago does not necessarily mean the marriages from earlier years were happier or more successful than they are now, just that less couples officially, physically, legally parted ways. Based on the times, I bet there were just as many unhappy couples, who for a variety of reasons (cultural, religious, economical, practical, emotional, physical) could not part ways, even if their marriage really was over. But yes, society is different now, and people in general are much more independent from what was considered traditional, generations ago.

So to me, those stats are taken with a grain of salt. You can either base your life and your decisions on them, or take them in, know they are there, and move on with life with your own goals and meaning.

Lots of people stick around in unhappy situations, get married for the wrong reasons, certain cultures feel forced or pushed into marriage, and some barely know who they were dating and chose to get married without knowing enough about their spouse. That's not a sign of the times, that's always happened and always will, in spite of the marriages that do work.




Originally Posted by amisconception
I don't see why marriage creates additional problems that a person who values a woman in a long-term relationship wouldn't have.
Maybe that's because, as you replied to me earlier, some people in long-term relationships always use the LTR status as a way out; when problems get too tough, there's a lot less expectation and pressure to work it out. "If something isn't working, I can easily just walk away. We're not married." Truth is, you can walk away from a marriage too, but perhaps people who choose to get married vs. those who "just" want a long-term relationship, are the ones who are not afraid of commitment in its grandest sense (emotionally, physically, spiritually, financially...hell, even legally ). You said it yourself....marriages are harder to get out of. That probably also means it takes more commitment to be in one.
Old 08-20-2008, 03:06 PM
  #118  
Moderator Alumnus
 
teranfon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,547
Received 196 Likes on 99 Posts
This entire thread is scaring the hell out of me. Really.

Terry
Old 08-20-2008, 03:13 PM
  #119  
Earth-bound misfit
 
wndrlst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Age: 47
Posts: 31,704
Received 608 Likes on 312 Posts
It's making me want to call up my BF, tell him to stay in CO, and bury my head under my couch cushion for the foreseeable future. Or maybe I should just put it in my oven...





Love the new Av, pessimist-boy.
Old 08-20-2008, 03:17 PM
  #120  
Moderator
 
Street Spirit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,161
Likes: 0
Received 58 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by wndrlst
It's making me want to call up my BF, tell him to stay in CO, and bury my head under my couch cushion for the foreseeable future. Or maybe I should just put it in my oven...
Yeah.....yeah ---- tell him to stay in CO so I can search him out and steal all his money! I mean, if you're not going to do it, I will!

Oh, and I vote oven.....you should be in the kitchen, after all.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.