X6M track tested - 0 to 60 in 4.3s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2009, 01:49 PM
  #1  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Cool X6M track tested - 0 to 60 in 4.3s

X6M track tested - 0 to 60 in 4.3s <hr style="color: rgb(244, 244, 244); background-color: rgb(244, 244, 244);" size="1"> <!-- / icon and title --> <!-- message -->
IL Track Tested: 2010 BMW X6 M



When BMW introduced the idea of the SAV (Sport Activity Vehicle) with the original X5, we scoffed appropriately. Then we drove it and were shocked that the ungainly beast was not ungainly at all. Then BMW took it a bit further and rolled out the X6. It appeared even more useless, yet it, too, was a surprisingly entertaining drive.

BMW didn't stop there, of course, as it rolled out Motorsport versions of both the X5 and the X6 earlier this year. There was no good reason for them to exist, but BMW went ahead and built them anyway. After testing the X6 M, we're glad BMW took the time.

You see, this X6 is so fast that its odd looks, big sticker and pointless existence don't really matter. You simply have to respect it for what it can do. And we're not just talking about going fast in a straight line. It stops and turns amazingly well, too. It's a triumph of engineering over design and marketing. Just take a look at the numbers if you don't believe us.

Vehicle: 2010 BMW X6 M
Odometer: 357
Date: 9/30/2009
Driver: Josh Jacquot
Price: $95,025

Specifications:
Drive Type: All-wheel drive
Transmission Type: Six-speed manual
Engine Type: Twin-turbo V8
Displacement (cc/cu-in): 4,395cc (268cu-in)
Redline (rpm): 7,000
Horsepower (hp @ rpm): 555 @ 6,000
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm): 501 @ 1,500
Brake Type (front): 15.6-inch ventilated cast-iron disc with two-piece rotors and 4-piston fixed calipers
Brake Type (rear): 15.2-inch ventilated cast-iron disc with two-piece rotors, and 2-piston sliding calipers
Steering System: Speed-proportional, driver-selectable hydraulic-assist rack-and-pinion power steering
Suspension Type (front): Independent, double wishbone, coil spring, driver-adjustable variable dampers, self-adjusting active antiroll bar
Suspension Type (rear): Independent, multilink, self-leveling air springs, driver-adjustable variable dampers, self-adjusting active antiroll bar
Tire Size (front): 275/40R20 106W
Tire Size (rear): 315/35R20 110W
Tire Brand: Bridgestone
Tire Model: Dueller H/P Sport
Tire Type: Summer Performance
Wheel Size: 20-by-10 inches front -- 20-by-11 inches rear
Wheel Material (front/rear): Aluminum
As tested Curb Weight (lb): 5,256

Test Results:
0 - 30 (sec): 1.7
0 - 45 (sec): 2.9
0 - 60 (sec): 4.3
0 - 75 (sec): 6.4
1/4 Mile (sec @ mph): 12.6
0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec): 4.1
30 - 0 (ft): 28
60 - 0 (ft): 107
Braking Rating: Excellent
Slalom (mph): 68.6
Skid Pad Lateral acceleration (g): 0.91
Handling Rating: Very Good
Db @ Idle: 43.3
Db @ Full Throttle: 70.4
Db @ 70 mph Cruise: 66.0


Acceleration Comments: Very quick in default mode. Few will ever need to use "M" mode. Still, this thing absolutely honks with all the limiters turned off. Best run with minimal brake torque -- all while ignoring launch control "flag" indicator.

Braking Comments: First run was the shortest (107 feet!). Consistent pedal, but distances got longer with every stop (up to 112 feet).

Handling Comments: Skid pad: Truly an impressive-handling SUV. Corners dead flat, offers incredible feedback and has enough power to influence chassis. But why can't I disable stability control? Slalom: Stability control never is truly off, which is why "on" number is faster than "off" number -- get aggressive with it off and it will punish you.
Old 10-10-2009, 01:58 PM
  #2  
mmmmmm....
 
S14 n Tsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 20,524
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts
that's freaking fast!
Old 10-10-2009, 01:59 PM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Torque (lb-ft @ rpm): 501 @ 1,500

If this engine ends up in the next M5... then.. eep.

Just be sad to lose the high revving engines. But those times might have been lost..
Old 10-10-2009, 02:05 PM
  #4  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
myron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 8,205
Received 269 Likes on 229 Posts
I like the x6 and the x6M is just plain crazy. Those are some insane numbers
Old 10-10-2009, 02:08 PM
  #5  
Three Wheelin'
 
(Cj)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Somewhere out there
Age: 46
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:wow:

I'd buy an M5 with this engine in a heartbeat
Old 10-10-2009, 02:10 PM
  #6  
Three Wheelin'
 
achenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Orleans LA area
Age: 51
Posts: 1,935
Received 198 Likes on 68 Posts
can't wait until the tuners get ahold of those
Old 10-10-2009, 02:25 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Saintor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: MTL, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 2,905
Received 124 Likes on 104 Posts
From Edmunds about the X5 M with the same engine.

We thought Porsche had written the final word on high-performance sport-utility vehicles. We were so wrong.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=158706



I can' t stand the X6...
Old 10-10-2009, 02:34 PM
  #8  
Three Wheelin'
 
(Cj)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Somewhere out there
Age: 46
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd prefer a super sedan to both "super crossovers" (<-- "super crossover" doesn't even sound right. sounds like a transformer or something lol)
Old 10-10-2009, 03:09 PM
  #9  
Runs on Dunkin
 
1slo23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: College Station
Age: 36
Posts: 1,810
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
holy crap thats fast
Old 10-10-2009, 03:22 PM
  #10  
Registered but harmless
 
Will Y.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 59
Posts: 14,841
Received 1,102 Likes on 763 Posts
:shakehead Waste of a nice engine in an overweight, pointless and ugly vehicle.

Last edited by Will Y.; 10-10-2009 at 03:24 PM.
Old 10-10-2009, 03:51 PM
  #11  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 35,924
Received 8,136 Likes on 4,805 Posts
Id much rather have an X5M if I had to get a truck, but that engine in an M5 would be bonkers.
Old 10-10-2009, 03:54 PM
  #12  
The Third Ball
 
Sarlacc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,124
Received 4,824 Likes on 2,571 Posts
X6 M is HOT
Old 10-10-2009, 03:57 PM
  #13  
Three Wheelin'
 
achenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Orleans LA area
Age: 51
Posts: 1,935
Received 198 Likes on 68 Posts
i like them both but the wheels are FAIL! They could have done so much better for almost $100k.
Old 10-10-2009, 04:25 PM
  #14  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,612 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Gawdang that is fast.

The stopping distance from 60' is only four feet longer than my CTS-V (103 feet). That is INCREDIBLE for a 5200 pound truck.
Old 10-10-2009, 05:04 PM
  #15  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Sure wish it could outrun the ugly!
Old 10-10-2009, 05:14 PM
  #16  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,451
Received 946 Likes on 515 Posts
Talking For who?

Originally Posted by Will Y.
:shakehead Waste of a nice engine in an overweight, pointless and ugly vehicle.


I just don't get why anyone would you own that vehicle? Does it really serve some type of utility? Or is it the "I can afford anything crowd"? It is very fast, but

I see more point in a Trailblazer SS than I do this.
Old 10-10-2009, 05:20 PM
  #17  
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WI
Age: 46
Posts: 14,035
Received 27 Likes on 20 Posts
@ the performance numbers

@ the price
Old 10-10-2009, 05:24 PM
  #18  
Registered Member
 
SouthernBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suburb of Manassas, VA
Posts: 8,342
Received 162 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Gawdang that is fast.

The stopping distance from 60' is only four feet longer than my CTS-V (103 feet). That is INCREDIBLE for a 5200 pound truck.
I'd rather have a CTS-V or a Z06. Both would hand the Bimmer his lunch.
Old 10-10-2009, 05:28 PM
  #19  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 35,924
Received 8,136 Likes on 4,805 Posts
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
I'd rather have a CTS-V or a Z06. Both would hand the Bimmer his lunch.
So can a Koenigsegg, but it is impressive none-the-less that a two and a half ton TRUCK can produce these results.
Old 10-10-2009, 06:11 PM
  #20  
Registered Member
 
SouthernBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suburb of Manassas, VA
Posts: 8,342
Received 162 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
So can a Koenigsegg, but it is impressive none-the-less that a two and a half ton TRUCK can produce these results.
Oh yes, you're certainly right about that. It is indeed, quite impressive.
Old 10-10-2009, 06:24 PM
  #21  
Suzuka Master
 
mcflyguy24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oreland, Pa
Age: 41
Posts: 5,846
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Seriously .91g's skidpad in 5000+lb SUV?? That's insane. Enough power and anything will go fast in a straight line. Still would rather take the X5M over this ugly whatever you want to call it.
Old 10-10-2009, 09:37 PM
  #22  
Suzuka Master
 
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Shit...that is fuckin' fast. It still looks like a giant turd though, except now it has a $95k price-tag. I'll take the X5M, which REALLY looks bad ass!
Old 10-10-2009, 09:48 PM
  #23  
Three Wheelin'
 
achenator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Orleans LA area
Age: 51
Posts: 1,935
Received 198 Likes on 68 Posts
Maybe I'll buy my wife an X5M in a year or so when I can pick one up for $60k.
Old 10-11-2009, 09:28 AM
  #24  
Suzuka Master
 
nokiaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,271
Received 236 Likes on 97 Posts
The magic of german engineering.

Seriously though, that is outright impressive.
Old 10-11-2009, 12:47 PM
  #25  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,344
Received 2,779 Likes on 1,407 Posts
love the X6... always have... and I love how there are haters... makes it even better.
Old 10-11-2009, 12:52 PM
  #26  
Off roading in his
iTrader: (6)
 
ZhenyaF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 38
Posts: 940
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
I for one LOVE the X6. The interior, not so much.

Its a polarizing car, most either love it or hate it. On that note, I love the ZDX too, and it has an awesome interior.
Old 10-11-2009, 03:58 PM
  #27  
Suzuka Master
 
mcflyguy24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oreland, Pa
Age: 41
Posts: 5,846
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by ZhenyaF
I for one LOVE the X6. The interior, not so much.

Its a polarizing car, most either love it or hate it. On that note, I love the ZDX too, and it has an awesome interior.
Yep I can honestly say I hate both of those "crossovers" do to their weird looks IMO. I do agree on the ZDX having a nice looking interior though.
Old 10-11-2009, 04:26 PM
  #28  
Three Wheelin'
 
(Cj)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Somewhere out there
Age: 46
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I like the look of the X6 and the ZDX, but I don't like the reduced utility for their sizes and the poor gas mileage. I'd rather have a sedan or 4 door coupe than one of these coupe crossover monsters.
Old 10-11-2009, 05:25 PM
  #29  
Mazda3 and Honda Civic in
 
gdubb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston
Age: 47
Posts: 5,635
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sick!!! The numbers are awesome out the this car/suv or whatever the hell it is
Old 10-11-2009, 10:18 PM
  #30  
Chapter Leader
(Northeast Florida)
iTrader: (1)
 
gatrhumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 44
Posts: 35,532
Received 1,651 Likes on 1,116 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Sure wish it could outrun the ugly!
You'd need Learjet-type numbers for that!
Old 10-11-2009, 10:48 PM
  #31  
Disinformation Terminator
 
TheMirror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NorCal
Age: 54
Posts: 1,930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't care how fast it is, I wouldn't be caught dead in that thing.
Old 10-11-2009, 11:00 PM
  #32  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's hot. Plus I just saw one the other day on my street, in red too. Gahhdammmn I want it!
Old 10-11-2009, 11:07 PM
  #33  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Originally Posted by Dem1K
I think it's hot. Plus I just saw one the other day on my street, in red too. Gahhdammmn I want it!
You just need your G35 back!
Old 10-11-2009, 11:08 PM
  #34  
My Garage not
iTrader: (2)
 
wasupdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Westsiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
who's going to buy this thing besides some dudes in dubai? i've seen about two x6's on the streets of la where literally every model bmw is driving around. i've seen way more dinan and alpina package 7-series than x6's around.

Last edited by wasupdog; 10-11-2009 at 11:10 PM.
Old 10-11-2009, 11:10 PM
  #35  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,344
Received 2,779 Likes on 1,407 Posts
I've seen more X6's than that... and Yes, I'm in Southern Cali too. They didn't make as many of these than the 7 series... nor do they expect to sell as many. Last I checked... they're selling quite well
Old 10-12-2009, 12:04 AM
  #36  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
teh CL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Kelowna
Age: 36
Posts: 14,217
Received 999 Likes on 650 Posts
those numbers are unreal
Old 10-12-2009, 12:31 AM
  #37  
Got a Job!
iTrader: (1)
 
Dem1K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC (NoLita)
Age: 38
Posts: 4,343
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
You just need your G35 back!
Old 10-12-2009, 02:00 PM
  #38  
J35A8
 
korrupted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,313
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I don't see the point of having such great power in a crossover. Why not just buy a M5
Old 10-12-2009, 02:28 PM
  #39  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,344
Received 2,779 Likes on 1,407 Posts
to each his own...

if there's a market for it... they'll make it (and that goes for EVERYTHING in life).
Old 10-12-2009, 02:32 PM
  #40  
A clean ride is in
 
treyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ft Worth, Texas
Age: 57
Posts: 3,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't see why people hate this car, I saw one on the road last week and I was smitten!! This crossover is PIMP!!


Quick Reply: X6M track tested - 0 to 60 in 4.3s



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 PM.