And BTW, use this:

 

Bleh.. I'm off to more interesting threads...

 

someone ban this idiot i dont want him on the board so get rid of him now!!!! some stupid kid talking crap as always so ban him and be done with him

 

I don't think he should be banned but i'd love for him to sum up his point into one paragraph. Cuz up to now I have no clue what it is.

 

n00b owned by teh intercooler god

 

all i gotta say is whoever wanna race my GIRLS S4 vs there charged cl-s bring it on...i've raced her (but i don't have a charger..) and lost like crazy! her car is FAST..a good race would be her S4 vs my 300zxTT...thats yet to happen though

 

he would destroy an e36 m3

 

:noob:

 

damnit you beat me to it :P

 

i'll race her.

 

 

Don't pop the hood till after the race. That is, if she can catch up.

 

lol well maybe she doesn't just have a s4..maybe it's a RS4, and i forgot to mention it ?

 

Edit:


That'd be a real good race, you should put a grand on your girls car.

 

damn blmjmx got like 4 cars eh u baller?

 

who's kit she running?

 

nah i was just messing..she doesn't have a rs4..one of my friends is building a rs8 i guess. 4.2 v8 TT, though..should be done within the year..

 

if she had a rs4, i'd steal her car and give her mine lol

 

________________________________

he should be banned just because he does not agree wtith you?

 

no i just think that rippin on scalbert is unacceptable.these noobs need to learn who knows what about cars

 

:noob:


Post pics of your car and your girl akuracls...

 

 

Saw a RS6 and S4 ran in Irwindale 1/8 track 2 nights ago. 6spdmanual and I was not impress with both their time. RS6 8.85@83.2 and S4 8.97@79.7mph. I thought that RS6 should be doing high 7's and high 80's mph.

 

you could always just log out, leave and never come back.

 

Car-Stats.com Report for 2003 BMW M3
Obtained from C&D May, 2003
0-60: 4.8 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 13.6
1/4 Speed: 105

Car-Stats.com Report for 2002 BMW M3
Obtained from MT January, 2002
0-60: 4.7 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 13.2
1/4 Speed: 107

Car-Stats.com Report for 2003 Audi S4 Quattro
Obtained from C&D May, 2003
0-60: 5 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 13.6
1/4 Speed: 103

Car-Stats.com Report for 2001 Audi S4 Quattro
Obtained from C&D October, 2001
0-60: 5.5 Transmission: Manual
1/4 Mile: 14.2
1/4 Speed: 97

According to these stats, a blown CL-S should be able to at least hang with the older model S4 (stock, of course). This is all in a straight line though.

I wonder why there is such a difference between MT and C&D stats?

 

suck a dick hobo^^

 

im not a noob btw

 

Because C&D can't drive for shit...

 

my 330i 'll kick yo ass

 

Not a chance in hell. Get yourself a RWD car if you want all that power. Trust me, I learned my lesson in a FWD 2K3 Maxima.

 

:noob:

Just because a car is FWD doesn't mean it can't make power. It will be harder to launch, but from a roll he will do well against the Audi. Might even surprise the M3. allmotor_2000 beat a M3 vert and he wasn't running his turbo set up. Just Intake/Headers and some custom port and polish work.

 

again, its your dads. Stop being a poser

 

:nutkick:

 

I will, I will. I just want this car to last me another 2 years or so. My wife is overdue for a new car so I can't change quite yet. I might as well have fun with the CL until I move on to a RWD/AWD monster. Besides, I think it is important to "baby-step" your way into more powerful cars. Mistakes in a powerful machine become very dangerous and expensive.

 

I never said a FWD car can't make a lot power. They can and will. My point is if you want to safely and effieciently drive a car with all that torque and HP a RWD is the obvious route. Wheel hop sux and going through a turn with that much power has trouble all over it. I am all for getting as much power as you can out of your car (I have a SCd S2K), but if you really want to do it the right way then RWD is a must. The G35 6-speed is a perfect substitue to the CL, or the sedan 6-speed in place of the TL.

Don't get me wrong, I still love the CL/TL. Just not for adding serious amounts of HP.

 

Well said. But if you're going to baby step into something more serious, I'd stick with exhaust/headers/intake. Skip the SC and wait for the real monster down the road. My buddy had a TL-S with headers/intake/exhaust and man did that baby fly! Makes his 04 TL seem slow!

 

I agree with the truth and concept to this statement. However, real application is another thing.

Without a doubt, RWD is a better platform to begin with when the plans are to produce significant power. But if the desire is there, it may not be practical to trade vehicles and then begin modifying. Also, there may be qualities to the current vehicle which may not be found or liked on the alternatives (cough, interior design on the mentioned alternative to the CL).

I hear this argument often and it is a valid one. But only when really applied. If someone drives the vehicle under 7/10 of its ability the benefits of RWD is not fully realized. When properly set up you can get pretty good capability from FWD. However, there is a still a margin which cannot be made up for but if not utilized by the RWD vehicle it is irrelevant.

 

I already have those mods + pulleys. The SC adds more power, but it isn't going to make it into an undrivable car like some of you are implying. I'm talking about adding 40-50 WHP, not a hundred or more.

 

Man they put on weight. My old e36 4 dr M wighes 3145 dry.

 

Its too late for me. The look on peoples faces as they see an over weight front wheel drive 4 door semi/luxery vehicle pass them as they are in modded GTs, WRXs, SRT-4s, corvettes, etc... is priceless.