Weekend car thats under $35k?
#42
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
I dont make threads like this when i do. I normally just go out and get it without asking for advice.
I just enjoy daydreaming
![Blush](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/blush.gif)
https://acurazine.com/forums/member-cars-sale-49/fs-2007-335i-coupe-6-speed-location-chicago-burb%2A%2Asold%2A%2A-394281/
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I guess you're liking the 3 more than you thought you would?
#43
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Greenie, I seen a bunch of 993 (non-turbo) in that range. Would still pick that over a NSX?
![Loco](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/loco.gif)
If I was serious about buying either, I would probably have to drive both...
#44
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
I just enjoy daydreaming ![Blush](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/blush.gif)
![Blush](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/blush.gif)
![Stupid](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/imwithstupid.gif)
I'm too cheap to actually pull the trigger on anything, but I do like to daydream too...
I like living vicariously thru a lot of the guys here that seem to have gone thru a bunch of cars since I joined AZ...
#45
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Street Spirit
Mmm-hmm.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=394281
I guess you're liking the 3 more than you thought you would?
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=394281
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I guess you're liking the 3 more than you thought you would?
Im still not buying anything to replace the 335i anytime soon. I dont have the time to enjoy a 2nd car lately.
Yes, the Mazda3 has impressed me quite a bit. For the money its really hard to beat.
#47
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,640
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
S2000 for sure
MAYBE a BMW 128
MAYBE a BMW 128
#49
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Late C5 ZO6 Corvette, well within the $35k ceiling. Forgot about that one. I almost bought an early-model C5 before deciding on the S2000.
Back to the OP's question, I think it really depends what you want from a car, if you don't want something to work on and just want to enjoy it the Japanese cars are the clear choice. Or if you want more of a show car, old school american muscle, or something that sounds bad ass and is lightning quick in a straight line, modern muscle cars or do you want something esoteric and eccentric, old euro cars. Or a better yet a real cool project, build a monster Miata, with an aluminum blocked 5.0, it will be way under budget, will easily have 350hp in a light package that would be a blast to drive, japanese chassis, american muscle and super rare. There are tons of choices, but I would lean towards something light for a weekend car. There is a 05 elise in autoweek, with 5k miles for $33k, also looks like a good deal.
As much as I love P-cars, they get real expensive, real quick to keep in pristine order, and high priced maintenance is not something I ever want to deal with. I have a friend with a 86 911 turbo, it has 18k original miles on it, and while it is a beautiful car to look at it, it is not so great to drive by modern standards and god for bid you did start driving it would probably need tons of oil leaks fixed due to its age and lack of driving.
#50
08+ C6s have triple cone synchros compared to double cones in older models.... with that said my list would pretty much have a C6 (I don't really like the hardtop look of the C5 Z06), NSX, S2000, Miata of any gen, Elise, or anything that can go topless, comes in manual, is RWD and preferably has only 2 seats and/or is trackable. Maybe even an Integra Type-R since during the week it'll sit in the garage for fear of thieves.
I actually like the C5 hatchback bodystyle a little more, just a shame they couldn't make it a hatchback like the regular C5. The profile of the the C6 isn't very flattering at the rear
For some strange reason I just have an urge to put an LSx + 6-speed from Tremec in an older muscle car.... maybe like a junker V6 model so no one will miss it or scream blasphemy. I really like 69 Mustangs, split bumper 70-73 Camaros, Firebird Formulas of the same years, along with the 442s and Buick GS's. Or a coke bottle Stingray with t-tops.
I actually like the C5 hatchback bodystyle a little more, just a shame they couldn't make it a hatchback like the regular C5. The profile of the the C6 isn't very flattering at the rear
For some strange reason I just have an urge to put an LSx + 6-speed from Tremec in an older muscle car.... maybe like a junker V6 model so no one will miss it or scream blasphemy. I really like 69 Mustangs, split bumper 70-73 Camaros, Firebird Formulas of the same years, along with the 442s and Buick GS's. Or a coke bottle Stingray with t-tops.
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
#51
Originally Posted by wackura
Which is an all around better car; the NSX or the s2000?
Basically the NSX was 3X the price of an S2000 when purchased new, so it is a more powerful and more complex vehicle. If you've driven NSX's before you know that they are excellent cars. But they were on the market for 15 years so there was a lot of variation from the 1990 to 2005 models. Picking up an early model with a lot of miles could cost you a lot in maintenance and upgrades.
In terms of "fun factor" the S2000 is right there with the NSX, and you can get a brand new one with full warranty for the price of a beat-up NSX. There are few vehicles more fun than an S2000 with with a few strategic mods... exhaust for a great sound, coilovers to adjust ride height/damping, and shorter rear end gears for extra punch. Drop the top, find a twisty road, enjoy the best 6 speed tranny on the planet and rev out the award-winning engine.
A lot of the NSX owners also own S2000's because they are such fun cars. Both are a bit tame in completely stock form, but come to life quickly with a few tweeks.
#52
Originally Posted by s2ka
A lot of the NSX owners also own S2000's because they are such fun cars. Both are a bit tame in completely stock form, but come to life quickly with a few tweeks.
#55
Senior Moderator
IMHO, the NSX has everything you can ask for:
1. Reliability
2. Exotic looks
3. mod friendly
4. cool community
5. rare and exclusive
6. performance
7. "fun factor"
Only a couple of major service things such as a water pump, timing belt, and clutch.... other then that.... car is pretty much a DD with normal maintenance. There are plenty of NSX's out there with 100-150k miles! Try doing all of the above with a P-car.
1. Reliability
2. Exotic looks
3. mod friendly
4. cool community
5. rare and exclusive
6. performance
7. "fun factor"
Only a couple of major service things such as a water pump, timing belt, and clutch.... other then that.... car is pretty much a DD with normal maintenance. There are plenty of NSX's out there with 100-150k miles! Try doing all of the above with a P-car.
#57
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
Originally Posted by synth19
IMHO, the NSX has everything you can ask for:
1. Reliability
2. Exotic looks
3. mod friendly
4. cool community
5. rare and exclusive
6. performance
7. "fun factor"
Only a couple of major service things such as a water pump, timing belt, and clutch.... other then that.... car is pretty much a DD with normal maintenance. There are plenty of NSX's out there with 100-150k miles! Try doing all of the above with a P-car.
1. Reliability
2. Exotic looks
3. mod friendly
4. cool community
5. rare and exclusive
6. performance
7. "fun factor"
Only a couple of major service things such as a water pump, timing belt, and clutch.... other then that.... car is pretty much a DD with normal maintenance. There are plenty of NSX's out there with 100-150k miles! Try doing all of the above with a P-car.
#59
Senior Moderator
I respectfully disagree. You can find a low mileage 91-93 for around 30-35k. And this is with up-to-date maintenance.
Originally Posted by iTimmy
Not for $35k, you are going to be stuck with a car that has high miles, was abused or neglected and is in need of some of those expensive repairs, otherwise I more or less agree.
#60
Senior Moderator
Not really, for the NSX, my insurance only went up around $300/ 6 months when I added her.
Originally Posted by Mokos23
i guess the only downsize is expensive insurance?
#61
Trolling Canuckistan
Originally Posted by teranfon
A car I've looked at for years, lost interest, looked at again, moved onto something else, and then come back to has been a Porsche 928. I've always been fascinated by these big Porsches that purists claim to have the engine in the wrong end, but I would eventually like to try one. The depreciation is huge, making them relatively inexpensive, but maintenance on them is horrendously expensive.
Terry
Terry
#64
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
Originally Posted by synth19
I respectfully disagree. You can find a low mileage 91-93 for around 30-35k. And this is with up-to-date maintenance.
Your insurance went up $300, bi-annually when you got the NSX, that is a noticeable increase, probably not a deal breaker through. When I went from a 07 G35 to a 08 S2000 my insurance went up $60 annually. Your annual increase is nearly 50% of my total annual premium. If someone is trying to do something with a budget, an exotic, even a reliable one, is not the answer.
Don't get me wrong, I like the NSX, just not at $35k, at $45-50k I think it becomes more appealing because the cars are newer, in better condition, etc...
#66
Senior Moderator
here is just ONE example of a '93, asking only 34.5k:
http://nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=107079
Just one example, there are several on prime that fit my criteria. The above car has low miles, appears to be in great condition, and maintenance is up-to-date. For cars this old, I would consider something in the 60-70k mileage range. That is "low" for me.
http://nsxprime.com/forums/showthread.php?t=107079
Just one example, there are several on prime that fit my criteria. The above car has low miles, appears to be in great condition, and maintenance is up-to-date. For cars this old, I would consider something in the 60-70k mileage range. That is "low" for me.
#67
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by synth19
Not really, for the NSX, my insurance only went up around $300/ 6 months when I added her.
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
#68
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by black label
Rnengade Hybrids LS1 V8 swap takes care of many of your reliability issues.
#69
My brother's friend had a red 91 targa and now has a black 91 hardtop. Both were under 120k miles when he got em and he paid less than $30k for each one.
Both were in immaculate condition really, and not to mention he tracks/autoxes them once in a while.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
#70
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
My brother's friend had a red 91 targa and now has a black 91 hardtop. Both were under 120k miles when he got em and he paid less than $30k for each one.
Both were in immaculate condition really, and not to mention he tracks/autoxes them once in a while. ![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
#71
Originally Posted by iTimmy
I hardly think any car with over 100k miles is "low miles," but that's just me
IMO its subjective, or at least should be.... 100k miles on a chassis on a car from the 60's or 70's is pretty low. 100k miles on a 1999 is average to me, and 100k miles on a 2006 is really high.
The guy flogs the crap out of his NSXs... he said it himself, he redlines it at least once everytime he takes the car out, still runs like a champ.
The point was an good-condition NSX is easily attainable for less than $35k
#72
dɐɹɔ ǝɥʇ ʇɐɥʍ
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
mole hill -> mountain dude
IMO its subjective, or at least should be.... 100k miles on a chassis on a car from the 60's or 70's is pretty low. 100k miles on a 1999 is average to me, and 100k miles on a 2006 is really high.
The guy flogs the crap out of his NSXs... he said it himself, he redlines it at least once everytime he takes the car out, still runs like a champ.
The point was an good-condition NSX is easily attainable for less than $35k
IMO its subjective, or at least should be.... 100k miles on a chassis on a car from the 60's or 70's is pretty low. 100k miles on a 1999 is average to me, and 100k miles on a 2006 is really high.
The guy flogs the crap out of his NSXs... he said it himself, he redlines it at least once everytime he takes the car out, still runs like a champ.
The point was an good-condition NSX is easily attainable for less than $35k
We all are looking for something different in a car, who's right? Got me, but I have no plans on purchasing a car with even close to 100k miles on it ever, let alone any time soon. I spent too much time in the repair business and am probably jaded, but fixing a car is not something I like dealing with. But we are all different, some people like working on cars.
edit - not trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill, just having a discussion about weekend drivers and what I would want out of one. I think all of the regulars in car talk are more or less friends, or at the very least friendly and enjoy engaging in conversations discussing our opinions.
#73
Originally Posted by black label
Rnengade Hybrids LS1 V8 swap takes care of many of your reliability issues.
Terry
#74
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by iTimmy
the idea of buying a car with over a 100k miles for $30k just doesn't seem like a wise move to me. For a weekend fun car I want something that feels the part, not just looks it. All cars start requiring repairs over 100k miles, some just more then others, I hate dealing with that sort of stuff.
There seem to be a few high mileage (over 100K) AP1 s2k's out there forsale for around $12K or so... I wonder how the upkeep on those are...
#75
Suzuka Master
I've been wanting to get a small cheap weekend car to work on on my free time.
Lotus Elan S4
75' Alfa Romeo 2000 GT Veloce
'73 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7
On the more expensive side:
S2k
993
Lotus Elan S4
75' Alfa Romeo 2000 GT Veloce
'73 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7
On the more expensive side:
S2k
993
#76
Senior Moderator
Acura NSX. Hands-down.
And lemme guess, Jesal...you secretly want a new car again...bad.
And lemme guess, Jesal...you secretly want a new car again...bad.
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#77
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Age: 35
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
.....and so did my insurance once I bought my S2000. ![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
#78
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Street Spirit
Mmm-hmm.
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=394281
I guess you're liking the 3 more than you thought you would?
https://acurazine.com/forums/showthread.php?t=394281
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
I guess you're liking the 3 more than you thought you would?
![Big Grin](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#79
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by nokiaman
75' Alfa Romeo 2000 GT Veloce
'73 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7
On the more expensive side:
S2k
993
'73 Porsche 911 Carrera RS 2.7
On the more expensive side:
S2k
993
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
http://www.finecars.cc/en/detail/car...tml?no_cache=1
#80
Trolling Canuckistan
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
A 73 RS isn't on the expensive side ?? They only go about $175-250K in decent condition ![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
![rofl](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
Back to the 928 LS1 swap. To many it does kill the car, but to many it makes it better. It's just like the E type Jags out there with a Ford 351, it's no longer a classic, but it's closer to being a reliable daily driver.
Renegade Hybrids are doing a lot of interesting stuff to older Porsches. LS1's in 924,928,944, Subaru turbo 4's and ford 302's into 914's.