Virginia... Radar Detectors... Almost, almost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 07:03 PM
  #41  
subinf's Avatar
One on the right for me
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,914
Likes: 272
From: Bay Area, CA
They aren't human yet. Just a clump of cells.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 07:12 PM
  #42  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 29
From: WI
You missed the point......
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 07:17 PM
  #43  
subinf's Avatar
One on the right for me
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,914
Likes: 272
From: Bay Area, CA
You didn't answer the question
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 07:40 PM
  #44  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 29
From: WI
To me, hurting != injury

You can hurt somebody without actually injuring them. Stealing their car/money, arson, certain sex crimes, are few that come to mind.

So, no...I don't take the same approach to all laws.

If I am speeding, I am neither hurting nor injuring somebody.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 08:27 PM
  #45  
TS_eXpeed's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 23,451
Likes: 54
Originally Posted by sho_nuff1997
To me, hurting != injury

You can hurt somebody without actually injuring them. Stealing their car/money, arson, certain sex crimes, are few that come to mind.

So, no...I don't take the same approach to all laws.

If I am speeding, I am neither hurting nor injuring somebody.
You are putting a high risk to it though.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:04 PM
  #46  
BaByBlAcKtYpE-s's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 2
I tend to speed alot on the highways/freeways but in school zone or residential area i keep it to the speed limit maybe 5 over in more open resident street but never school zones. Kids are known to jump out whenever they feel like it and a car going 20 will stop in half the distance of a car going 30-35.

I rather be late then to run some over.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:13 PM
  #47  
majin ssj eric's Avatar
Punk Rocker
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 79
From: St Simons Island, GA
Originally Posted by CocheseUGA
You really missed the point of this one.



I love the law. The fines go to running the state's trauma centers. If you want to put yourself at risk of needing the meat wagon, you're going to help pay for it.

Because 84 is so slow.

Furthermore, you don't even have the facts of the fine correct. It's $200 + speeding fine either instance.

http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2...B_160_AP_7.htm
You're right, I don't know where I got the numbers from but it is $200 for both infractions.

Still, this idea that speeding is the cause of trauma accidents is just flat wrong. I work in a Trauma center myself and the vast majority of accidents we see roll through are relatively low-speed collisions. I live right on I95 and we usually get a serious accident from there maybe once every 3-4 months.

The injuries you will sustain from getting in a wreck at 90mph are not significantly greater than that of 70mph and just because you are going 90mph does not mean you are automatically going to end up in a fiery crash.

If you truly want to curb the number of deaths on our highways the only way is NOT draconian speed enforcement, but a much more stringent and expensive licensing process. Enforcement of other traffic laws besides speeding (such as left lane pass-only) would also help....
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:22 PM
  #48  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 29
From: WI
Originally Posted by TS_eXpeed
You are putting a high risk to it though.

Ya....to myself. As I said earlier, speeding laws only protect me from myself. I can do that on my own. Thanks.

And, to add to majin's idea...

In Germany, speeding in non-residential areas is on the driver. If you get into an accident going over 130kph, insurance will not cover you. This allows people to police themselves.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:33 PM
  #49  
BaByBlAcKtYpE-s's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 2
You put everyone around you at risk because say your speeding then someone walks across the street and you can't stop in time and hit them. If you had gone slower you would have been able to stop.

I think those who speed in highly populated areas especially when there are kids around are quite childish.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:38 PM
  #50  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 29
From: WI
And if you are not speeding and can't stop in time? Maybe we should just not drive all together.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:42 PM
  #51  
BaByBlAcKtYpE-s's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 2
But you have a higher chance of stopping in time. I rather increase my chances then to decrease it because I feel like speeding in a school zone or residential area. Like I said i rather be late then to risk the lives of others around me.

If i want to go 70-80 i have the freeways and highways when there isn't traffic. If i want to see how fast my car can go then I go to the tracks. I have my fun while keeping myself and others safe.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:55 PM
  #52  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 29
From: WI
I disagree with speed limits in general, but I never said anything about going 70-80 in residential area. I don't need a sign telling me to slow down around children and in populated areas.

I was mostly talking about highways.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:06 PM
  #53  
BaByBlAcKtYpE-s's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 2
Still there isn't a need to do triple digits or close to that on highways. Speed on highways seem to be a bit slow especially for today standard for cars and hp. Even family four door sedans are breaking 300hp. They don't need more then half of that to go 70-80.

So I somewhat agree that the current speed limit on some highways are a bit slow, but i still don't think that there shouldn't be a speed limit at all.

To stay on topic radar detectors shouldn't be ban that I think is just stupid especially if you are the ONLY state that bans it.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:44 PM
  #54  
phee's Avatar
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,203
Likes: 231
55 on a highway is too low
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 10:57 PM
  #55  
BaByBlAcKtYpE-s's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 2
it is very slow I say it be more 65-70, but i think that the speeders would only speed even more then because with everyone going at that speed it will pretty much feel the same i think.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 07:15 AM
  #56  
CocheseUGA's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,761
Likes: 960
From: Kennesaw, GA
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
You're right, I don't know where I got the numbers from but it is $200 for both infractions.

Still, this idea that speeding is the cause of trauma accidents is just flat wrong. I work in a Trauma center myself and the vast majority of accidents we see roll through are relatively low-speed collisions. I live right on I95 and we usually get a serious accident from there maybe once every 3-4 months.

The injuries you will sustain from getting in a wreck at 90mph are not significantly greater than that of 70mph and just because you are going 90mph does not mean you are automatically going to end up in a fiery crash.

If you truly want to curb the number of deaths on our highways the only way is NOT draconian speed enforcement, but a much more stringent and expensive licensing process. Enforcement of other traffic laws besides speeding (such as left lane pass-only) would also help....
The fines are really to help support the Level 1 trauma centers. Without turning this into a R&P thread, we can blame the degenerates who decide that they can waste Peach State Medicare on getting free rides downtown. You can't charge gunshot victims extra, so speeders get the punishment.

Which, like I said, I don't have a problem with. If someone feels the need to go that much faster than the posted limits (that's 30mph in Atlanta), then they can help fund the trauma centers. It's a conscious choice.

Originally Posted by phee
55 on a highway is too low
I agree. Especially on the Atlanta Autobahn. I go between 75-80 on 285 just to not get run over. 100 seemed to be the goal this morning.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Yumcha
Automotive News
70
Dec 7, 2020 05:39 PM
chrisr
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
4
Dec 4, 2015 02:17 AM
ITSJESTER
4G TL Photograph Gallery
7
Oct 13, 2015 12:53 PM
sockr1
Car Parts for Sale
22
Oct 1, 2015 01:31 AM
deyainrdy4ds
2G TL (1999-2003)
5
Sep 22, 2015 10:15 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.