Top 5 sleeper cars

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2013, 07:51 AM
  #1  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Top 5 sleeper cars

http://autos.yahoo.com/blogs/open-ro...2307.html?vp=1

<<<

I know I know it's all subjective.
The following users liked this post:
Crazy Bimmer (08-23-2013)
Old 08-22-2013, 08:45 AM
  #2  
'08 MX5 GT 6spd.
 
MarbleGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Lone Star State
Posts: 6,234
Received 1,192 Likes on 485 Posts
The Gene sedan is the definition of a sleeper. Unless you're up on your imports, you have no idea what lurks inside.

It reminds me of the first time I saw a 2001ish GS400 with exhaust on it. The sound and look don't match, but damn was it bad ass.
Old 08-22-2013, 09:15 AM
  #3  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Nice.

I think i would replace the Taurus with the Flex in that list. Its every bit as fast and is a larger sleeper (not to mention a filter, exhaust and 400 buck tune and your running high 12s)
Old 08-22-2013, 09:38 AM
  #4  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
S-class, 7 series, 550i Gran Turismo? Any higher end luxury car with a big engine and conservative looks?
Old 08-22-2013, 10:35 AM
  #5  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by FastAcura
S-class, 7 series, 550i Gran Turismo? Any higher end luxury car with a big engine and conservative looks?
Nah anyone that sees the badge will automatically assume it's a performance car.
Old 08-22-2013, 11:31 AM
  #6  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 41
Posts: 15,510
Received 1,090 Likes on 767 Posts
Neil wins...
Old 08-22-2013, 12:32 PM
  #7  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
Nah anyone that sees the badge will automatically assume it's a performance car.
Luxury cars are usually known for luxurious features and not performance. Of course car guys know that luxury automakers have cars that produce a lot of horsepower. But if you're a car guy then you can't really consider the cars in that article sleepers since we all know they are quick.

Let's take my coworkers for example, they think Benzes, BMWs, Lexuses, etc are slow and only offer a soft ride and I wouldn't be surprised if 99% of the population thinks the same. They think unless it LOOKS fast, it's not fast.

Line up an S65 AMG or S8 next to a Corvette or Mustang and ask a random person which one they would think is faster.
Old 08-22-2013, 01:33 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,613 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Hell yeah CTS-V wagon! I can't count how many people I've startled on the freeway by downshifting from 6th to 4th and taking off like a bat out of hell. Heehee!

The Genesis R-Spec definitely belongs on that list. I looked at that before I bought the V wagon. I could definitely live with an R-Spec.....and its better gas mileage compare to the CTS-V.
Old 08-22-2013, 01:36 PM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by FastAcura
Luxury cars are usually known for luxurious features and not performance. Of course car guys know that luxury automakers have cars that produce a lot of horsepower. But if you're a car guy then you can't really consider the cars in that article sleepers since we all know they are quick.

Let's take my coworkers for example, they think Benzes, BMWs, Lexuses, etc are slow and only offer a soft ride and I wouldn't be surprised if 99% of the population thinks the same. They think unless it LOOKS fast, it's not fast.

Line up an S65 AMG or S8 next to a Corvette or Mustang and ask a random person which one they would think is faster.
But none of them look like Sleepers.
Old 08-22-2013, 01:50 PM
  #10  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 41
Posts: 15,510
Received 1,090 Likes on 767 Posts
i reckon the new Chevy SS could be a contender too...
Old 08-22-2013, 01:50 PM
  #11  
Engineer
 
savage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Boston
Age: 41
Posts: 4,525
Received 76 Likes on 53 Posts
Nothing like a great sleeper.


To the average person mine just looks like another 3-series with some rims, especially with the darker color. To any car aficionado, it's a different story.
Old 08-22-2013, 02:03 PM
  #12  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (10)
 
aznboi2424's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Age: 35
Posts: 6,287
Received 208 Likes on 187 Posts
LS460 is pretty sleepy too...
Old 08-22-2013, 02:28 PM
  #13  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 47
Posts: 10,799
Received 2,151 Likes on 1,097 Posts
No 300C SRT8? It's a completely subjective list. I agree that they all are sleepers, besides the CTS-V. Anyone that doesn't know about the Vagon lives under a rock.
Old 08-22-2013, 03:10 PM
  #14  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
But none of them look like Sleepers.
They look and sound more sleeperish than a CTS-V which was in this article...
Old 08-22-2013, 06:48 PM
  #15  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,248
Received 1,223 Likes on 698 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
But none of them look like Sleepers.
I could understand the AMG due to the aggressive wheels it sports, but how is the S8 not a sleeper? This thing looks every bit as boring & slow compared to a Mustang at first glance.
Old 08-22-2013, 07:49 PM
  #16  
One on the right for me
 
subinf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 41
Posts: 27,913
Received 271 Likes on 173 Posts
^ - I agree. S6/S8 from Audi looks pretty low key.
Old 08-22-2013, 09:05 PM
  #17  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by FastAcura
They look and sound more sleeperish than a CTS-V which was in this article...
But the V in the article was a wagon. Very few ever give a wagon a 2nd look.
Old 08-22-2013, 09:10 PM
  #18  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
I could understand the AMG due to the aggressive wheels it sports, but how is the S8 not a sleeper? This thing looks every bit as boring & slow compared to a Mustang at first glance.
At $100,000+ it's no sleeper.
I like that they finally included cars that are in reach by the average person.
Old 08-22-2013, 09:11 PM
  #19  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
I could understand the AMG due to the aggressive wheels it sports, but how is the S8 not a sleeper? This thing looks every bit as boring & slow compared to a Mustang at first glance.
Like said above, the list is very subjective, and it depends on whos looking at it. First thing i look at is the wheels/tires. They are usually the big give away to what it is. You can spot a V6 stang a mile away (which isnt a sleeper) And compared to the A8, the S8 isnt anywhere boring looking.


Last edited by fsttyms1; 08-22-2013 at 09:14 PM.
Old 08-22-2013, 09:15 PM
  #20  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
At $100,000+ it's no sleeper.
I like that they finally included cars that are in reach by the average person.
Old 08-22-2013, 09:18 PM
  #21  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
1. sleeper
Often reffering to what appears to be an ordinary looking stock commuter car that is anything but stock under the hood. Pretty much the exact opposite of your every day riced up civic.

I would include the Pontiac G8 GT in this list too
Neon SRT-4 too

Technically a sleeper is one where you take a stock car that is and stuff a big block V8 or FI high hp motor in it.

Like the modded Dodge Caravan that we've all seen vids of at the drag strip.

Last edited by NSXNEXT; 08-22-2013 at 09:22 PM.
Old 08-22-2013, 10:35 PM
  #22  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,248
Received 1,223 Likes on 698 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
At $100,000+ it's no sleeper.
I like that they finally included cars that are in reach by the average person.
The price of the car has zero bearing on the term sleeper.
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
Like said above, the list is very subjective, and it depends on whos looking at it. First thing i look at is the wheels/tires. They are usually the big give away to what it is. You can spot a V6 stang a mile away (which isnt a sleeper) And compared to the A8, the S8 isnt anywhere boring looking.
But, that doesn't always ring true. I can order a V6 Mustang straight from Ford with the Performance package, 19" machine-polished wheels, exterior accessories, & all of the sudden, it looks a lot like a 5.0 from a distance, esp. when you can configure a 5.0 in a pretty similar outfit.

Last edited by Rick_TL-S; 08-22-2013 at 10:47 PM.
Old 08-22-2013, 10:52 PM
  #23  
Evil Mazda Driver
 
PortlandRL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 37
Posts: 11,212
Received 174 Likes on 89 Posts
It's not fast by today's supercar standards but my 2010 Santa Fe could really hustle with that 3.5 liter V6 although putting 276 horsepower through the front wheels lead to some fairly catastrophic torque steer. It would really shock people who would try to cut around me in the ending lane and all I would have to do is breathe on the accelerator and I'd gain 25-30 MPH in no time at all. I think the 0-60 time was right about 7 seconds which isn't bad for a 2-ton SUV with the aerodynamics of a masonry brick.

The rest of the car was a pile of shit but damn do I still miss how powerful that thing was. The Elantra is not fast....not by anybody's standards.
Old 08-23-2013, 01:48 PM
  #24  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
The price of the car has zero bearing on the term sleeper.

But, that doesn't always ring true. I can order a V6 Mustang straight from Ford with the Performance package, 19" machine-polished wheels, exterior accessories, & all of the sudden, it looks a lot like a 5.0 from a distance, esp. when you can configure a 5.0 in a pretty similar outfit.
I didnt say it was the tell all. Its just where i usually start. Exhaust is another. Certain models have exhaust in different locations as opposed to their hotter versions. Either way the S8 to me isnt a sleeper. It stands out amongst the A8 too much.
Old 08-23-2013, 02:05 PM
  #25  
Senior Moderator
 
oo7spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 31,897
Received 7,247 Likes on 4,858 Posts
Originally Posted by PortlandRL
It's not fast by today's supercar standards but my 2010 Santa Fe could really hustle with that 3.5 liter V6 although putting 276 horsepower through the front wheels lead to some fairly catastrophic torque steer. It would really shock people who would try to cut around me in the ending lane and all I would have to do is breathe on the accelerator and I'd gain 25-30 MPH in no time at all. I think the 0-60 time was right about 7 seconds which isn't bad for a 2-ton SUV with the aerodynamics of a masonry brick.

The rest of the car was a pile of shit but damn do I still miss how powerful that thing was. The Elantra is not fast....not by anybody's standards.
I was going to include Trooper's V6 Rav-4. 0-60 in 6.7? I would keep the SHO there considering a simple tune can pull out 445 HP and its still a V6. If the Flex can still keep up, then they both deserve to be on the list.
The following users liked this post:
SuperTrooper169 (08-23-2013)
Old 08-23-2013, 02:07 PM
  #26  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
The price of the car has zero bearing on the term sleeper.

But, that doesn't always ring true. I can order a V6 Mustang straight from Ford with the Performance package, 19" machine-polished wheels, exterior accessories, & all of the sudden, it looks a lot like a 5.0 from a distance, esp. when you can configure a 5.0 in a pretty similar outfit.
Exactly my point.

Big wheels does not mean fast car. If you don't know much about cars then you wouldn't think of an S class as a fast (quick) car, just a big luxury sedan.

If you do know a lot about cars, then there is no such thing as a sleeper. You know what the car is capable of.

IMO there is no such thing as a "sleeper" in stock form. A 11 civic with stock wheels is a sleeper.
Old 08-23-2013, 02:11 PM
  #27  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I didnt say it was the tell all. Its just where i usually start. Exhaust is another. Certain models have exhaust in different locations as opposed to their hotter versions. Either way the S8 to me isnt a sleeper. It stands out amongst the A8 too much.
That's because you already know a lot about cars. Unless it's a heavily modified car that looks stock, you should know what most cars are capable off. Genesis or CTS-V should not be considered "sleepers" if you don't consider an S8 a sleeper. You know what all those cars are capable of so the term "sleeper" doesn't apply here.
Old 08-23-2013, 02:30 PM
  #28  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 47
Posts: 10,799
Received 2,151 Likes on 1,097 Posts
Originally Posted by oo7spy
I was going to include Trooper's V6 Rav-4. 0-60 in 6.7? I would keep the SHO there considering a simple tune can pull out 445 HP and its still a V6. If the Flex can still keep up, then they both deserve to be on the list.
Funny I was just about to chime in with my wife's Rav4 since Portland mentioned his Santa Fe. I love that little Rav4. Every time I drive it I'm surprised about how hard it pulls.
Old 08-23-2013, 04:24 PM
  #29  
Suzuka Master
 
Rick_TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 7,248
Received 1,223 Likes on 698 Posts
Originally Posted by fsttyms1
I didnt say it was the tell all. Its just where i usually start. Exhaust is another. Certain models have exhaust in different locations as opposed to their hotter versions. Either way the S8 to me isnt a sleeper. It stands out amongst the A8 too much.
Once you start looking for details though, nothing is a sleeper because serious power requires some serious modifications viewable from outside.

There's a POS little Colt here in Dallas that at first glance looks like a red car with the paint peeling. But, someone like you could drive next to it for a mile, see big, thick drag-esque tires on the front, hear the exhaust, & eventually, hear the blow off valve of the turbo.

It's the first glance that helps a sleeper stay a sleeper & the Audi fits that bill until you purposely start looking for the bigger brakes & exhaust.
Old 08-23-2013, 05:42 PM
  #30  
In the Mid-South meow
iTrader: (2)
 
SuperTrooper169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Music City
Age: 47
Posts: 10,799
Received 2,151 Likes on 1,097 Posts
^ I personally expect all Audi sedans to be fast besides a base A4 1.8.
Old 08-23-2013, 05:43 PM
  #31  
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,076
Received 1,765 Likes on 804 Posts
1. Any car that is red and comes with an R badge is not a sleeper.
2. Anybody who know anything knows that SHO means, not a sleeper.
3. See #2, but replace SHO with SRT.
4. Really?! V. Sleeper?!
5. See #4 but replace V with R Spec.

This guy does not know what a sleeper is.
Old 08-23-2013, 06:56 PM
  #32  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by Rick_TL-S
Once you start looking for details though, nothing is a sleeper because serious power requires some serious modifications viewable from outside.

There's a POS little Colt here in Dallas that at first glance looks like a red car with the paint peeling. But, someone like you could drive next to it for a mile, see big, thick drag-esque tires on the front, hear the exhaust, & eventually, hear the blow off valve of the turbo.

It's the first glance that helps a sleeper stay a sleeper & the Audi fits that bill until you purposely start looking for the bigger brakes & exhaust.
Looking for details by no means takes it off the sleeper list. Some make their car look like the hot version, some dont. I know of many cars locally that you could stare at all the details you want until you are blue in the face and you would never know they would blow your doors off. Unsuspecting models that dont have all sorts of special bling are sleepers. The R-spec is one of them, especially if you take off the badge on the back. I wouldnt have to start looking or waste time looking for the details to see if the audi was a sleeper. It stands out at first glance. So no it doesnt fit the bill.
Old 08-23-2013, 07:49 PM
  #33  
Advanced
 
Johnsteph10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 92
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
In my experience, the CTS-V is the ultimate sleeper.

American Car? Check.
Cadillac? Check.
Pretty unassuming exterior in order of Wagon>Sedan>Coupe.

I can't tell you the number of time I have been asked why I bought a Caddie....then they learned about the V.
Old 08-23-2013, 08:10 PM
  #34  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by knight rider
1. Any car that is red and comes with an R badge is not a sleeper.
2. Anybody who know anything knows that SHO means, not a sleeper.
3. See #2, but replace SHO with SRT.
4. Really?! V. Sleeper?!
5. See #4 but replace V with R Spec.

This guy does not know what a sleeper is.
100% agreed. If you consider a V or Genesis R spec a sleeper, then you have to include all high powered luxury sedans.
Old 08-23-2013, 08:25 PM
  #35  
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,076
Received 1,765 Likes on 804 Posts
To follow up on my earlier post, here are three sleepers I can think of.

BMW 335 sedan
Very unassuming, especially the four door variant. It doesn't look fast. Hell, it doesn't even look like anything that would pack a twin turbo (or twin scroll single turbo, depending on the year). But, at a 1:1 HP to torque ratio @ 300 it can hang with the best of em'. It's quick.

Rolls Royce Ghost
Just because Mortimer is sitting in the back eating a gourmet sandwich with Grey Poupon doesn't mean that you should try this behemoth at the traffic light. With its 6.6L V12 it's supercar fast. Zero to 60 in 4.2 seconds. Sure, Mortimer will spill his Dom, but he'll be laughing and pointing when you finally arrive at the next traffic light.

Tesla Model S
Sure, it looks sporty enough to be fast, but you wouldn't think it is actually fast. It is. Taking 5.4 seconds 0 to 60, no engine noise, smoking the rear tires. That's respectably quick, especially considering the misconception about electric vehicles.
The following users liked this post:
00TL-P3.2 (08-26-2013)
Old 08-23-2013, 08:37 PM
  #36  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
ah, semantics.

Sleeper is a much more restricted term these days. Pretty much everyone that drives has the internet and thus knows more about which cars are fast and which ones aren't.

There'll always be enthusiasts that know better, but you must consider the average driver out there...

But the best kinds of sleepers are the shitty looking cars or something like a turbocharged minivan/SUV. I remember seeing youtube videos of '80s turbo Chrysler minivans which run 11s or 12s. That's a sleeper
Old 08-23-2013, 08:51 PM
  #37  
Rooting for Acura
iTrader: (1)
 
knight rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Austin Burbs
Posts: 8,076
Received 1,765 Likes on 804 Posts
^^ reminds me of this Top Gear segment


Last edited by knight rider; 08-23-2013 at 08:54 PM.
Old 08-23-2013, 09:01 PM
  #38  
Senior Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
Sorry just went for a nice long drive in my sleeper.
What you guys talking bout now?
Old 08-23-2013, 09:11 PM
  #39  
I
 
FastAcura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 40
Posts: 3,865
Received 58 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by knight rider
^^ reminds me of this Top Gear segment
PERFECT definition of a sleeper. Looks slow, you expect slow, you get fast.
Old 08-23-2013, 09:15 PM
  #40  
Senior Moderator
 
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chicago Burbs
Age: 43
Posts: 34,937
Received 638 Likes on 276 Posts
Originally Posted by NSXNEXT
Sorry just went for a nice long drive in my sleeper.
What you guys talking bout now?

Hopefully you woke up during the drive.


Quick Reply: Top 5 sleeper cars



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 AM.