It's just not a good month for Accords...
Good thing you guys are okay, and be wary of aches/pains that arise a while after the fact.
A manual transmission car brings more joy than an the same, comparably priced automatic car will.... keep that in mind.
A manual transmission car brings more joy than an the same, comparably priced automatic car will.... keep that in mind.
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
I would take a manual transmission car in a heartbeat, but I think it might be a little selfish on my part. My mom drives the car as well, and my brother just got his permit. I could convince them to learn, but I feel it'd just be an inconvenience for them. We'll see.
2004 TSX, 138,000 kilometres, $7,000.
http://wwwa.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TS...o/19_5414179_/
2004 TSX, 138,000 kilometres, $7,000.
http://wwwa.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TS...o/19_5414179_/
I would take a manual transmission car in a heartbeat, but I think it might be a little selfish on my part. My mom drives the car as well, and my brother just got his permit. I could convince them to learn, but I feel it'd just be an inconvenience for them. We'll see.
2004 TSX, 138,000 kilometres, $7,000.
http://wwwa.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TS...o/19_5414179_/
2004 TSX, 138,000 kilometres, $7,000.
http://wwwa.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TS...o/19_5414179_/
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Hmm, I think you're right. I read somewhere that the bulk of them with A/C problems were in Canada, too. I don't use A/C much, but it's nice to have when there.
I'm shying away from TLs, mainly because I don't want to have to deal with rattles and dash cracks. The Accord surprisingly didn't have any rattles until about a week before the accident, and it was infuriating.
I found an 05 Mazda6 wagon for less than $7k, V6, MT.
Interior doesn't seem as nice as the Accord however.
Still waiting to hear back from the other guy's insurance, he should have called back by now.
I'm shying away from TLs, mainly because I don't want to have to deal with rattles and dash cracks. The Accord surprisingly didn't have any rattles until about a week before the accident, and it was infuriating.
I found an 05 Mazda6 wagon for less than $7k, V6, MT.
Interior doesn't seem as nice as the Accord however.Still waiting to hear back from the other guy's insurance, he should have called back by now.
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Good news (ish)
Just got off the phone with State Farm and a Honda bodyshop downtown. Both guys were extremely helpful.
The shop that the car is at now belongs to the tow company who was first on scene on Monday. They haven't touched the car besides moving it to the back lot. They're not on State Farm's list of bodyshops, so we decided it to move it to a shop that is. State Farm's shops guarantee the work done, basically if I'm not satisfied they'll go back and do it as many times as need be until it's perfect with no hassle.
I've dealt with the shop before when the car was sideswiped a few years ago. Great paintwork, iffy bodywork. Not bad, but not perfect. Decided it was worth avoiding the hassle. Besides, it'll likely be totaled anyways.
Car will be getting towed down tomorrow, and hopefully the teardown and inspection will start. I'll be swapping rental cars for something bigger to move stuff back to Windsor. Right now we have a Corolla with manual windows.
Glad things are moving rather quickly. Everyone has been very helpful. Guy who hit me was nice, tow drivers were nice, body shop was nice, insurance was nice, new bodyshop was nice.
In an industry with such a bad rap, it's nice to see people who just want to help.
Just got off the phone with State Farm and a Honda bodyshop downtown. Both guys were extremely helpful.
The shop that the car is at now belongs to the tow company who was first on scene on Monday. They haven't touched the car besides moving it to the back lot. They're not on State Farm's list of bodyshops, so we decided it to move it to a shop that is. State Farm's shops guarantee the work done, basically if I'm not satisfied they'll go back and do it as many times as need be until it's perfect with no hassle.
I've dealt with the shop before when the car was sideswiped a few years ago. Great paintwork, iffy bodywork. Not bad, but not perfect. Decided it was worth avoiding the hassle. Besides, it'll likely be totaled anyways.
Car will be getting towed down tomorrow, and hopefully the teardown and inspection will start. I'll be swapping rental cars for something bigger to move stuff back to Windsor. Right now we have a Corolla with manual windows.

Glad things are moving rather quickly. Everyone has been very helpful. Guy who hit me was nice, tow drivers were nice, body shop was nice, insurance was nice, new bodyshop was nice.
In an industry with such a bad rap, it's nice to see people who just want to help.
It's acceptable because with the traffic is so bad that at 4am when you can actually go that fast the cops just feel bad for you.
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
Had the car towed to the new shop today. Guys let me drive it from the back lot out front to the waiting tow truck. It still drove perfect (aside from being a total). Likely the last time I'll ever drive it. 
Wasn't even set down on the ground at the new shop before the SA came out and said it was totaled. They're still going to do a teardown to make it official, but there's no hope. Oh well. It was a fantastic car, and we were lucky enough to get one from the original owner with all dealer records.
Now comes the interesting part: Looking for cars. Not really looking to spend much, if anything more than what we're given for the car. On the list:
Accord
TSX
TL
Accord
Mazda 6
Altima
Accord
Legacy
Jetta
Passat
Accord
S40
Yeah.

Wasn't even set down on the ground at the new shop before the SA came out and said it was totaled. They're still going to do a teardown to make it official, but there's no hope. Oh well. It was a fantastic car, and we were lucky enough to get one from the original owner with all dealer records.
Now comes the interesting part: Looking for cars. Not really looking to spend much, if anything more than what we're given for the car. On the list:
Accord
TSX
TL
Accord
Mazda 6
Altima
Accord
Legacy
Jetta
Passat
Accord
S40
Yeah.
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
$7,200.
It's a fair amount considering the mileage (135k), but I'd much, much rather just have the damn car back. Not getting a cent for the 3-month old starter either.
Whatever. Drove a 2005 Mazda6 V6 today, and was fairly impressed. I like the way it looks, and drives for the most part. Torque
I don't know what the horsepower/torque figures are for that car, but it's a ****load more than my widdle old 2.4. Definetely interested in a V6 this time around.
It was missing some little things. Mirrors didn't fold, nor were they heated. The audio display was very small and pixelated. I didn't like how everything in the IP and dash display illuminated red. The turning circle was surprisingly big and the transmission had some slip-ups. The hood seemed significantly longer than it did on the Accord's, but was just as hard to see.
It's a surprisingly low car. Getting out, my foot slammed on the ground. I like the fact that it's low, but my mom is worried about parking it, and she doesn't want to deal with dipping down that low when getting in and climbing out. The brakes weren't that confident, hard stops required more pressure than I would like. The car is a little bit smaller, but not enough to make it a deciding factor.
It did have some little things that the Accord didn't have. The steering wheel was satisfactorily thick, the leather felt great, and I appreciated the Bose audio. The IP had a display that showed what gear you're in, and the tach and speedo were the same size. The rear spoiler was a great help in knowing where your rear bumper was, something I've always had a problem with in the Accord. Split-folding rear seats are great, too.
As I've already said, I like the way it looks. Don't normally give it a second look in traffic, but looking at one in person is much better. It's much more powerful than the Accord, too. No WOT runs, but a stab on the throttle just brings the car forward, and enough throttle brings a downshift that feels as if you're jumping onto a moving bus. Very intoxicating. My car would downshift and rev easily, but the acceleration that accompanied it was akin to sitting on a couch bring pushed by a 10-year-old. Sounded great, though.
Side note: Does anyone know of any car in this range that has rev-matching downshifts? Every AT with manumatic function that I've driven doesn't, and it makes for uncomfortable low-speed downshifts when not on the throttle.
Also looking at small SUVs. Maybe RAV4s, Tucsons.
It's a fair amount considering the mileage (135k), but I'd much, much rather just have the damn car back. Not getting a cent for the 3-month old starter either.Whatever. Drove a 2005 Mazda6 V6 today, and was fairly impressed. I like the way it looks, and drives for the most part. Torque
I don't know what the horsepower/torque figures are for that car, but it's a ****load more than my widdle old 2.4. Definetely interested in a V6 this time around. It was missing some little things. Mirrors didn't fold, nor were they heated. The audio display was very small and pixelated. I didn't like how everything in the IP and dash display illuminated red. The turning circle was surprisingly big and the transmission had some slip-ups. The hood seemed significantly longer than it did on the Accord's, but was just as hard to see.
It's a surprisingly low car. Getting out, my foot slammed on the ground. I like the fact that it's low, but my mom is worried about parking it, and she doesn't want to deal with dipping down that low when getting in and climbing out. The brakes weren't that confident, hard stops required more pressure than I would like. The car is a little bit smaller, but not enough to make it a deciding factor.
It did have some little things that the Accord didn't have. The steering wheel was satisfactorily thick, the leather felt great, and I appreciated the Bose audio. The IP had a display that showed what gear you're in, and the tach and speedo were the same size. The rear spoiler was a great help in knowing where your rear bumper was, something I've always had a problem with in the Accord. Split-folding rear seats are great, too.
As I've already said, I like the way it looks. Don't normally give it a second look in traffic, but looking at one in person is much better. It's much more powerful than the Accord, too. No WOT runs, but a stab on the throttle just brings the car forward, and enough throttle brings a downshift that feels as if you're jumping onto a moving bus. Very intoxicating. My car would downshift and rev easily, but the acceleration that accompanied it was akin to sitting on a couch bring pushed by a 10-year-old. Sounded great, though.
Side note: Does anyone know of any car in this range that has rev-matching downshifts? Every AT with manumatic function that I've driven doesn't, and it makes for uncomfortable low-speed downshifts when not on the throttle.
Also looking at small SUVs. Maybe RAV4s, Tucsons.
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5517949_/
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5518100_/
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5528665_/
Too good to be true? I won't be able to take a look at them until next weekend, hopefully they're not sold by then. But at those prices...
Also looking at some old RLs. What do you guys think of those?
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5518100_/
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5528665_/
Too good to be true? I won't be able to take a look at them until next weekend, hopefully they're not sold by then. But at those prices...
Also looking at some old RLs. What do you guys think of those?
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5517949_/
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5518100_/
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5528665_/
Too good to be true? I won't be able to take a look at them until next weekend, hopefully they're not sold by then. But at those prices...
Also looking at some old RLs. What do you guys think of those?
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5518100_/
http://www.autotrader.ca/a/Acura/TL/...o/19_5528665_/
Too good to be true? I won't be able to take a look at them until next weekend, hopefully they're not sold by then. But at those prices...
Also looking at some old RLs. What do you guys think of those?
$7,200.
It's a fair amount considering the mileage (135k), but I'd much, much rather just have the damn car back. Not getting a cent for the 3-month old starter either.
Whatever. Drove a 2005 Mazda6 V6 today, and was fairly impressed. I like the way it looks, and drives for the most part. Torque
I don't know what the horsepower/torque figures are for that car, but it's a ****load more than my widdle old 2.4. Definetely interested in a V6 this time around.
It was missing some little things. Mirrors didn't fold, nor were they heated. The audio display was very small and pixelated. I didn't like how everything in the IP and dash display illuminated red. The turning circle was surprisingly big and the transmission had some slip-ups. The hood seemed significantly longer than it did on the Accord's, but was just as hard to see.
It's a surprisingly low car. Getting out, my foot slammed on the ground. I like the fact that it's low, but my mom is worried about parking it, and she doesn't want to deal with dipping down that low when getting in and climbing out. The brakes weren't that confident, hard stops required more pressure than I would like. The car is a little bit smaller, but not enough to make it a deciding factor.
It did have some little things that the Accord didn't have. The steering wheel was satisfactorily thick, the leather felt great, and I appreciated the Bose audio. The IP had a display that showed what gear you're in, and the tach and speedo were the same size. The rear spoiler was a great help in knowing where your rear bumper was, something I've always had a problem with in the Accord. Split-folding rear seats are great, too.
As I've already said, I like the way it looks. Don't normally give it a second look in traffic, but looking at one in person is much better. It's much more powerful than the Accord, too. No WOT runs, but a stab on the throttle just brings the car forward, and enough throttle brings a downshift that feels as if you're jumping onto a moving bus. Very intoxicating. My car would downshift and rev easily, but the acceleration that accompanied it was akin to sitting on a couch bring pushed by a 10-year-old. Sounded great, though.
Side note: Does anyone know of any car in this range that has rev-matching downshifts? Every AT with manumatic function that I've driven doesn't, and it makes for uncomfortable low-speed downshifts when not on the throttle.
Also looking at small SUVs. Maybe RAV4s, Tucsons.
It's a fair amount considering the mileage (135k), but I'd much, much rather just have the damn car back. Not getting a cent for the 3-month old starter either.Whatever. Drove a 2005 Mazda6 V6 today, and was fairly impressed. I like the way it looks, and drives for the most part. Torque
I don't know what the horsepower/torque figures are for that car, but it's a ****load more than my widdle old 2.4. Definetely interested in a V6 this time around. It was missing some little things. Mirrors didn't fold, nor were they heated. The audio display was very small and pixelated. I didn't like how everything in the IP and dash display illuminated red. The turning circle was surprisingly big and the transmission had some slip-ups. The hood seemed significantly longer than it did on the Accord's, but was just as hard to see.
It's a surprisingly low car. Getting out, my foot slammed on the ground. I like the fact that it's low, but my mom is worried about parking it, and she doesn't want to deal with dipping down that low when getting in and climbing out. The brakes weren't that confident, hard stops required more pressure than I would like. The car is a little bit smaller, but not enough to make it a deciding factor.
It did have some little things that the Accord didn't have. The steering wheel was satisfactorily thick, the leather felt great, and I appreciated the Bose audio. The IP had a display that showed what gear you're in, and the tach and speedo were the same size. The rear spoiler was a great help in knowing where your rear bumper was, something I've always had a problem with in the Accord. Split-folding rear seats are great, too.
As I've already said, I like the way it looks. Don't normally give it a second look in traffic, but looking at one in person is much better. It's much more powerful than the Accord, too. No WOT runs, but a stab on the throttle just brings the car forward, and enough throttle brings a downshift that feels as if you're jumping onto a moving bus. Very intoxicating. My car would downshift and rev easily, but the acceleration that accompanied it was akin to sitting on a couch bring pushed by a 10-year-old. Sounded great, though.
Side note: Does anyone know of any car in this range that has rev-matching downshifts? Every AT with manumatic function that I've driven doesn't, and it makes for uncomfortable low-speed downshifts when not on the throttle.
Also looking at small SUVs. Maybe RAV4s, Tucsons.
Thread Starter
Your Friendly Canadian




Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 17,447
Likes: 1,506
From: Toronto, Ontario
TLs were all scams. I got the exact e-mail and reply from two of those posted ads.
Oh well.
What does AZ think about the XC90? 2004, to be specific.
maybe... I can get one for pretty cheap, which might offset extra repairs. Any car we get would be run into the ground, though, so the less issues, the better, even if it's more $$$.
Thanks, I think?
No thanks. I don't want Bryan's ex-whore. 
What kind of issues are there with the 6?
And I think MT's pretty much off the table for now. Not fair to her if the bottom line is it's less convenient.
Oh well. What does AZ think about the XC90? 2004, to be specific.
maybe... I can get one for pretty cheap, which might offset extra repairs. Any car we get would be run into the ground, though, so the less issues, the better, even if it's more $$$.Thanks, I think?

No thanks. I don't want Bryan's ex-whore. 
What kind of issues are there with the 6?
And I think MT's pretty much off the table for now. Not fair to her if the bottom line is it's less convenient.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mada51589
3G TL Problems & Fixes
80
Jan 9, 2025 04:40 PM
CheeseyPoofs McNut
5G TLX (2015-2020)
33
Sep 7, 2015 12:02 PM





