Is Infiniti > Acura?
#1
Race Director
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is Infiniti > Acura?
This person on the vtec forum put this thread title on there "Infiniti: Everything you want Acura to be".
I saw this thread title there and I kept thinking this guy does have some valid points, but others are nonsense. Does Nissan really have a better racing history than Honda? I don't think so.
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...item_id=671370
Scratch that,
Nissan: Everything you want Honda to be
1) Torque
2) High Revving V6 (VQ35HR)
3) V8s
4) ATTESA-ETS
5) Turbos
6) Low Displacement High Output 4 cyl (although it was years ago, still proves they have the know-how) SR16VE N1
7) RWD platforms
8) (Infiniti) Can actually be compared to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus and be taken seriously
9) Good styling (subjective)
10) CVT and now Hybrid (with the help of Toyota)
11) Racing Heritage
So many things right... makes you wonder about Honda
I saw this thread title there and I kept thinking this guy does have some valid points, but others are nonsense. Does Nissan really have a better racing history than Honda? I don't think so.
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...item_id=671370
Scratch that,
Nissan: Everything you want Honda to be
1) Torque
2) High Revving V6 (VQ35HR)
3) V8s
4) ATTESA-ETS
5) Turbos
6) Low Displacement High Output 4 cyl (although it was years ago, still proves they have the know-how) SR16VE N1
7) RWD platforms
8) (Infiniti) Can actually be compared to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus and be taken seriously
9) Good styling (subjective)
10) CVT and now Hybrid (with the help of Toyota)
11) Racing Heritage
So many things right... makes you wonder about Honda
#3
Senior Moderator
Depends who you ask. Not everyone wants those things that are listed.
I know my dad wont buy Infiniti because he thinks Acura's interiors are far better. I would tend to think thats how most consumers are.
They care about price and looks... but then again BMW doesnt have the greatest interiors.
I know my dad wont buy Infiniti because he thinks Acura's interiors are far better. I would tend to think thats how most consumers are.
They care about price and looks... but then again BMW doesnt have the greatest interiors.
#4
mmmmmm....
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Depends who you ask. Not everyone wants those things that are listed.
I know my dad wont buy Infiniti because he thinks Acura's interiors are far better. I would tend to think thats how most consumers are.
They care about price and looks...
I know my dad wont buy Infiniti because he thinks Acura's interiors are far better. I would tend to think thats how most consumers are.
They care about price and looks...
#5
The only racing heritage I give a rats ass about is F1. Although Honda has NEVER been able to build a decent chassis (in their first foray into chassis building they built a car that their lead driver said was undrivable and would not race it, their second driver drove it...and died) they have shown they can build some world beating engines. Only two manufacturers have a better engine building resume' in F1: Ford (Cosworth) and Ferrari.
Acura is the value leader in almost lux and almost sport with a strong dash of driver interactive tech, great reliability and excellent fuel efficiency, but comes in last in the upline import full line builder cache fight. IMHO it is a company that couldn't sell a single car based on heart, it sells everyone based on the head. Thats not a bad thing unless you want to conquer the world as an auto maker. Further, anyone who bought a Acura can rest assured they probably bought the car in the niche which made the most fiscal sense but just not the type of choice that fuels the heart fires of the average enthusiast.
Acura is the value leader in almost lux and almost sport with a strong dash of driver interactive tech, great reliability and excellent fuel efficiency, but comes in last in the upline import full line builder cache fight. IMHO it is a company that couldn't sell a single car based on heart, it sells everyone based on the head. Thats not a bad thing unless you want to conquer the world as an auto maker. Further, anyone who bought a Acura can rest assured they probably bought the car in the niche which made the most fiscal sense but just not the type of choice that fuels the heart fires of the average enthusiast.
#6
Originally Posted by Crazy Sellout
Depends who you ask. Not everyone wants those things that are listed.
I know my dad wont buy Infiniti because he thinks Acura's interiors are far better. I would tend to think thats how most consumers are.
They care about price and looks... but then again BMW doesnt have the greatest interiors.
I know my dad wont buy Infiniti because he thinks Acura's interiors are far better. I would tend to think thats how most consumers are.
They care about price and looks... but then again BMW doesnt have the greatest interiors.
I'm pretty sure interiors are one of the last things on people's minds when shopping for a car.
It's just that Internet car forums has turned everyone into dash strokers recently.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
Correct me if im wrong but in 2006 year didnt acura sell 80,000 more cars then infiniti?
Because X sells more cars then Y, therefore X is better?
I guess GM makes the best cars in the world then.
#9
mmmmmm....
Originally Posted by psteng19
What's your point?
Because X sells more cars then Y, therefore X is better?
I guess GM makes the best cars in the world then.
Because X sells more cars then Y, therefore X is better?
I guess GM makes the best cars in the world then.
#10
One on the right for me
I'm still partial to the interior of the early 90's Q45, except I'd like cupholders.
I'm mixed on whether infiniti is better than Acura, I like some things Infiniti offers and others that Acura offers
I'm mixed on whether infiniti is better than Acura, I like some things Infiniti offers and others that Acura offers
#11
Originally Posted by ilitig8
Only two manufacturers have a better engine building resume' in F1: Ford (Cosworth) and Ferrari.
The "DF" series of Cosworths was one of the greatest engines ever built but Ford just put their name on it and really didn't do much as far as the actual design and building.
#12
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by ilitig8
Acura is the value leader in almost lux and almost sport with a strong dash of driver interactive tech, great reliability and excellent fuel efficiency, but comes in last in the upline import full line builder cache fight. IMHO it is a company that couldn't sell a single car based on heart, it sells everyone based on the head. Thats not a bad thing unless you want to conquer the world as an auto maker. Further, anyone who bought a Acura can rest assured they probably bought the car in the niche which made the most fiscal sense but just not the type of choice that fuels the heart fires of the average enthusiast.
IMO one or the other is not "better" just "different."
#13
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Is Infinit > Honda? Meh. Really depends on what your looking for in a car IMHO.
#15
Originally Posted by synth19
Give me an Acura interior any day over an infiniti. imho.
Although I think Acura is still a few steps ahead with the avant-garde designs. The RL with that huge ass boomerang of wood on the dashboard was a surprise. And the new MDX's interior is quite nice. I can't wait to see it in person at the auto show!
#16
Senior Moderator
Infiniti = better marketed than Acura right now without a doubt.
Acura = Honda = conservative. Infiniti = taking a chance ... winning a lot of editors (and consumer's) hearts.
They need to shake things up -- just like when Acura started (ie Legend, Integra, NSX) ... those captured the hearts of drivers. Look at it now? Acura doesn't even have a coupe ... 4 door, very conservative looking cars (I can say that since I own a 2002 TLS + 2007 TSX) with a hint of sport and a few 'techie' SUVs. I'm sure the founder of Honda is shaking his head right now (up in the sky) ...
I'm sure things are profitable but cars are not always practical solutions. There has to be an element of desire / passion to it. I think Acura needs to think outside the box, just as it did back in the late 80s / early 90s to bring its grassroots followers back into the fold. Because right now ... I'm looking elsewhere for the next new car ...
Acura = Honda = conservative. Infiniti = taking a chance ... winning a lot of editors (and consumer's) hearts.
They need to shake things up -- just like when Acura started (ie Legend, Integra, NSX) ... those captured the hearts of drivers. Look at it now? Acura doesn't even have a coupe ... 4 door, very conservative looking cars (I can say that since I own a 2002 TLS + 2007 TSX) with a hint of sport and a few 'techie' SUVs. I'm sure the founder of Honda is shaking his head right now (up in the sky) ...
I'm sure things are profitable but cars are not always practical solutions. There has to be an element of desire / passion to it. I think Acura needs to think outside the box, just as it did back in the late 80s / early 90s to bring its grassroots followers back into the fold. Because right now ... I'm looking elsewhere for the next new car ...
#17
Have you guys ever shifted a manual G35, its not a well designed shifter. You can feel the vibes on your foot and hand. Recently Car and Driver blasted the drivetrain in a comparision with the 328i.
There is no way I would ever buy a Nissan/Infiniti manual car.
There is no way I would ever buy a Nissan/Infiniti manual car.
#18
The shifter vibration thing is only in VQ cars; the problem is Nissan/Infiniti use the VQ in, well, everything. Apparently they fixed the problem in the new G37. It's been in every manual VQ car I've driven though, so I am not holding my breath.
#19
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes
on
1,309 Posts
I have some good feelings about Acura's future in general and the next TSX and TL in particular.
#21
B A N N E D
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Montgomery County, Maryland
Age: 36
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i still prefer Acura Over Anything honestly....
its the love of the company.. been around honda.acura my whole life.. its like the guys with ford or chevy.... thre probably is better stuff out there,, but nothing really can take over the nice 3rd gear jerk of vtech....
its the love of the company.. been around honda.acura my whole life.. its like the guys with ford or chevy.... thre probably is better stuff out there,, but nothing really can take over the nice 3rd gear jerk of vtech....
#23
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by derrick
I'm sure things are profitable but cars are not always practical solutions. There has to be an element of desire / passion to it. :
Honda = mass market, sensible, fuel efficient, family oriented, safe
Acura = should be the passionate, bolder, little compromise, performace, more-than-you-need-and-wililng-to-pay-for-it luxury brand.
Instead, they just turned Acura into an extension of the Honda lineup, and with too much overlap with Honda's upper-end models also. If you look at each infiniti's model DNA and each Acura model's DNA, it's pretty obvious...most infinitis are built on the same platform as a RWD sports car, while most Acuras are built on the same platform as a FWD family sedan.
#24
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
I have some good feelings about Acura's future in general and the next TSX and TL in particular.
#25
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by picus
The shifter vibration thing is only in VQ cars; the problem is Nissan/Infiniti use the VQ in, well, everything. Apparently they fixed the problem in the new G37. It's been in every manual VQ car I've driven though, so I am not holding my breath.
Its not the motor itself, because the auto is smooth as butter near redline.
#26
CL-Pride
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Gabriel (LA), CA & La Jolla, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO, i think Acura's interior is best I seen. Sport + Luxury + Futuristic. I seen my friend's G35, the interior layout is too complicated and old fashion. When I first saw the 3rd Gen TL's interior, I was very impress.
However performance wise, I think Infiniti > Acura, unless Honda starts using FR and break the FF curse. (excluding S2k and NSX)
However performance wise, I think Infiniti > Acura, unless Honda starts using FR and break the FF curse. (excluding S2k and NSX)
#27
I need 2 more gears
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Springvale, Maine
Age: 45
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Originally Posted by S14 n Tsx
you stole my words..
You mean Toyota must make the best cars in the world then as they overtook GM in overall sales last year. In this case I would have to agree as Toyota does make the most reliable cars in the world, 2nd would be Honda IMO.
#29
Moderator Alumnus
Originally Posted by 04EuroAccordTsx
Does Nissan really have a better racing history than Honda?
As you said the guy is mostly right...
Now he is ONLY focusing on performance... which is probably what is important to him.
Honda doesn't sell anything that resembles a race car or stellar performance. The RL is the highest output engine they sell and it's pretty pathetic at that. The S2000 is the best performing car Honda sells now and it's a 4 banger Nissan has the new Skyline GTR they are releasing soon and the 350z.
Honda is at the bottom of the barrel for performance. Once they ditch FWD they might have a chance. Assuming they wake up and make more powerful engines to go with.
Hyundai is even catching up to Honda...
Honda is a conservative manufacturer with performance NOT in mind. I don't know why people think they are some huge powerhouse for performance. It's just not the case they are TOO conservative. That's their entire business model.
And Acura has been ran into the ground by bad marketing and poor technology choices. Acura needs to be revamped with a new lineup and new drivetrain options. And maybe in a 5 years people will take them seriously...
This is the same info I've repeated for years...
I love my TL, and wouldn't trade it up for anything. But I also got a good deal on it
So performance wise Honda is a joke.
But if your looking for a conservative nice car with good performance they can't be beat, I was, and that's why I bought one....
#30
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by 04EuroAccordTsx
This person on the vtec forum put this thread title on there "Infiniti: Everything you want Acura to be".
I saw this thread title there and I kept thinking this guy does have some valid points, but others are nonsense. Does Nissan really have a better racing history than Honda? I don't think so.
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...item_id=671370
Scratch that,
Nissan: Everything you want Honda to be
1) Torque
2) High Revving V6 (VQ35HR)
3) V8s
4) ATTESA-ETS
5) Turbos
6) Low Displacement High Output 4 cyl (although it was years ago, still proves they have the know-how) SR16VE N1
7) RWD platforms
8) (Infiniti) Can actually be compared to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus and be taken seriously
9) Good styling (subjective)
10) CVT and now Hybrid (with the help of Toyota)
11) Racing Heritage
So many things right... makes you wonder about Honda
I saw this thread title there and I kept thinking this guy does have some valid points, but others are nonsense. Does Nissan really have a better racing history than Honda? I don't think so.
http://www.vtec.net/forums/one-messa...item_id=671370
Scratch that,
Nissan: Everything you want Honda to be
1) Torque
2) High Revving V6 (VQ35HR)
3) V8s
4) ATTESA-ETS
5) Turbos
6) Low Displacement High Output 4 cyl (although it was years ago, still proves they have the know-how) SR16VE N1
7) RWD platforms
8) (Infiniti) Can actually be compared to BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus and be taken seriously
9) Good styling (subjective)
10) CVT and now Hybrid (with the help of Toyota)
11) Racing Heritage
So many things right... makes you wonder about Honda
IMO, Infiniti is not necessarily better than Acura (although arguably more popular). Rather, Acura seems to have chosen to go on a road less traveled than its Infiniti counterpart.
Acura just needs a few "tweaks" to their lineup to make their products more attractive (i.e.: SH-AWD avail on all models, K23A in the TSX, a V8 option for the RL and maybe a couple of coupes based on both the RL and TL each)
But, I do commend Infiniti for taking it to BMW and having put them on notice. However, this is just not Acura's mission at the moment.
#31
Originally Posted by vishnus11
starting to think it was just me after having driven 2 manual G35 coupes (one brand new) that had the same damn problem - a level of harshness and vibration near redline that is downright UNACCEPTABLE in a luxury car. THen I saw that G35 review in car and driver, and they blasted it for the same thing.
Its not the motor itself, because the auto is smooth as butter near redline.
Its not the motor itself, because the auto is smooth as butter near redline.
As for the shifter; yes... in my coupe over 4000rpm it was almost unbearable. Part of the reason my sedan was an auto. I thought for sure it'd be fixed on the new '07's but if anything it is worse.
#32
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by calgary2800
Have you guys ever shifted a manual G35, its not a well designed shifter. You can feel the vibes on your foot and hand. Recently Car and Driver blasted the drivetrain in a comparision with the 328i.
There is no way I would ever buy a Nissan/Infiniti manual car.
There is no way I would ever buy a Nissan/Infiniti manual car.
#33
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by SiGGy
I don't know why people think they are some huge powerhouse for performance. It's just not the case they are TOO conservative.
Or maybe because they constantly compare themselves to sportier alternatives and try to find "work-arounds" to their FWD platform limitations such as better suspensions and SH-AWD in order to make them more "performance" oriented. Acura portrays itself as performance oriented, but sends conflicting signals in its products such as lack of V8 or especially RWD and coupes. Sure, their models are relatively decent performers, but if they want to BE what they portray themselves as, then they should EMBRACE performance without compromises rather than finding "workarounds" for inherently less performance capable platforms (FWD).
Like i said before, most Acuras are built on the same platform as a FWD family sedan, while most Infinitis are built on the same platform as a RWD sports car.
to me, Acura's is like the homosexual that is still unsure which way it should swing (come out of the closet? he doesn't even know if he is in the closet!). no one would knock it one way or the other as long as it came out and showed what it wants to be...but people knock it because it sends conflicting signals between the marketing and the products.
#34
Race Director
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SiGGy
Dude, does it matter who has a better history?
As you said the guy is mostly right...
Now he is ONLY focusing on performance... which is probably what is important to him.
Honda doesn't sell anything that resembles a race car or stellar performance. The RL is the highest output engine they sell and it's pretty pathetic at that. The S2000 is the best performing car Honda sells now and it's a 4 banger Nissan has the new Skyline GTR they are releasing soon and the 350z.
Honda is at the bottom of the barrel for performance. Once they ditch FWD they might have a chance. Assuming they wake up and make more powerful engines to go with.
Hyundai is even catching up to Honda...
Honda is a conservative manufacturer with performance NOT in mind. I don't know why people think they are some huge powerhouse for performance. It's just not the case they are TOO conservative. That's their entire business model.
And Acura has been ran into the ground by bad marketing and poor technology choices. Acura needs to be revamped with a new lineup and new drivetrain options. And maybe in a 5 years people will take them seriously...
This is the same info I've repeated for years...
I love my TL, and wouldn't trade it up for anything. But I also got a good deal on it
So performance wise Honda is a joke.
But if your looking for a conservative nice car with good performance they can't be beat, I was, and that's why I bought one....
As you said the guy is mostly right...
Now he is ONLY focusing on performance... which is probably what is important to him.
Honda doesn't sell anything that resembles a race car or stellar performance. The RL is the highest output engine they sell and it's pretty pathetic at that. The S2000 is the best performing car Honda sells now and it's a 4 banger Nissan has the new Skyline GTR they are releasing soon and the 350z.
Honda is at the bottom of the barrel for performance. Once they ditch FWD they might have a chance. Assuming they wake up and make more powerful engines to go with.
Hyundai is even catching up to Honda...
Honda is a conservative manufacturer with performance NOT in mind. I don't know why people think they are some huge powerhouse for performance. It's just not the case they are TOO conservative. That's their entire business model.
And Acura has been ran into the ground by bad marketing and poor technology choices. Acura needs to be revamped with a new lineup and new drivetrain options. And maybe in a 5 years people will take them seriously...
This is the same info I've repeated for years...
I love my TL, and wouldn't trade it up for anything. But I also got a good deal on it
So performance wise Honda is a joke.
But if your looking for a conservative nice car with good performance they can't be beat, I was, and that's why I bought one....
I don't know why Honda wants to be conservative or don't want to take risks. Maybe because they don't want to mess up the formula which is make quality balanced cars and sell them at a descent price. Actually Honda should keep doing that, but Acura shouldn't.
#36
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by tsx19's
Man I Think That Honda Has A Better History....
Nissan Are Good But Cant Beat The Honda Power!!
Nissan Are Good But Cant Beat The Honda Power!!
not speaking of racing heritage, but of production heritage...when people think of Honda heritage, they think of Civics and Accords and motorcycles.
When people think of Nissan heritage, they don't think of Sentra or Altima, they think of the Datsun Z.
#37
Race Director
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mrdeeno
not speaking of racing heritage, but of production heritage...when people think of Honda heritage, they think of Civics and Accords and motorcycles.
When people think of Nissan heritage, they don't think of Sentra or Altima, they think of the Datsun Z.
#38
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 36
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 04EuroAccordTsx
When I think of Nissan heritage I think of the Datsun/Nissan Maxima too
gota love those twin snails
and this guy
I dont know why