G35 Coupe Vs Acura CL-S (Video)
#122
I've stayed out of this conversation until now since it's about the 1000th time the CL has been compared to the G35c/Z, and it gets us nowhere. All are nice cars. End of story.
But I do have to comment on Torque's comment. Oh wow.. 14.7 personal best!! I'm quaking in my boots. Your car is an Accord. It's not CL/G35/Z. I drive an 03 Accord sedan as my city car and winter car. It's well made and comfortable, but it's no looker. Stop trying to butt in? All those pictures and it still looks like ass IMO
But I do have to comment on Torque's comment. Oh wow.. 14.7 personal best!! I'm quaking in my boots. Your car is an Accord. It's not CL/G35/Z. I drive an 03 Accord sedan as my city car and winter car. It's well made and comfortable, but it's no looker. Stop trying to butt in? All those pictures and it still looks like ass IMO
#124
Man, we need some help over here. My friend has an auto V6 2003 Cord and an injen intake...
we are desperately trying to get into the 14s...his times are consistently 15.1 with the occasional 15.2 and 15.0
He will put in the high octane gas...etc to try and help and now we are going to try some free mods before we put stock intake on(which we hear is not giving gains like it should)
that color of G35 with the shiny brembs behind the wheels makes me wet...every time
we are desperately trying to get into the 14s...his times are consistently 15.1 with the occasional 15.2 and 15.0
He will put in the high octane gas...etc to try and help and now we are going to try some free mods before we put stock intake on(which we hear is not giving gains like it should)
that color of G35 with the shiny brembs behind the wheels makes me wet...every time
#126
Originally posted by zeroday
why do your wheels look so tiny. looks like itty bitty toy wheels heheh
why do your wheels look so tiny. looks like itty bitty toy wheels heheh
.........oh and as for the "toy" comment, well it looks like nissan's the one running away with that department. "Hotwheels" clearly made the engine, for it to be running 14's, and don't get me started on the number "fisher price" did on your interior!
#127
Originally posted by cusdaddy
I've stayed out of this conversation until now since it's about the 1000th time the CL has been compared to the G35c/Z, and it gets us nowhere. All are nice cars. End of story.
But I do have to comment on Torque's comment. Oh wow.. 14.7 personal best!! I'm quaking in my boots. Your car is an Accord. It's not CL/G35/Z. I drive an 03 Accord sedan as my city car and winter car. It's well made and comfortable, but it's no looker. Stop trying to butt in? All those pictures and it still looks like ass IMO
I've stayed out of this conversation until now since it's about the 1000th time the CL has been compared to the G35c/Z, and it gets us nowhere. All are nice cars. End of story.
But I do have to comment on Torque's comment. Oh wow.. 14.7 personal best!! I'm quaking in my boots. Your car is an Accord. It's not CL/G35/Z. I drive an 03 Accord sedan as my city car and winter car. It's well made and comfortable, but it's no looker. Stop trying to butt in? All those pictures and it still looks like ass IMO
dude everyone agrees that the Z is a collosal disappointment in the acceleration department! They should be slapped for going with a N/A V6 IMHO!
#130
Originally posted by zeroday
my z would rip your ugly azz bitch car POS a new one. don't even get me started. you drive a damn accord wtf r u thinking???
my z would rip your ugly azz bitch car POS a new one. don't even get me started. you drive a damn accord wtf r u thinking???
car and driver: 14.5 @99mph
motortrend: 14.5 @99mph
99mph?........hmm........... isn't that what your Z traps at? looks like chicks will be keeping up with your "sports car" on the way to go get tampons at dominiks.
#131
dude, the Z in my humble opinon still looks like hammered shit! don't let me get into how your almost 40K sports car, still runs 14's, just like me! dude please! your surpposed to be measuring cock with stangs, ls1's and supras, all costing thousands less while delivering at least 13's!
dude everyone agrees that the Z is a collosal disappointment in the acceleration department! They should be slapped for going with a N/A V6 IMHO!
dude everyone agrees that the Z is a collosal disappointment in the acceleration department! They should be slapped for going with a N/A V6 IMHO!
Give me a freaking break. The Z looks 1000x better than your Accord. Ask anyone on the street which looks better. BTW, my Z was $28,700 not $40k.
And there are a number of bone stock Z's are running 13.8-14.0. It's FAR faster than your best of 14.7 or usual low 15's.
Last time. You drive a freaking Accord. I drive an Accord. I know what it is and what it's now. One day you may realize your place in the food chain
#133
Originally posted by zeroday
many many NA z's are in the 13's you moron.
many many NA z's are in the 13's you moron.
#134
99mph?........hmm........... isn't that what your Z traps at? looks like chicks will be keeping up with your "sports car" on the way to go get tampons at dominiks.
Once more.. It's an Accord. Nice car to commute to work in. Not a sports car
#135
Originally posted by 03TL_PlaTinUM
2003 accord v6 6spd
car and driver: 14.5 @99mph
motortrend: 14.5 @99mph
99mph?........hmm........... isn't that what your Z traps at? looks like chicks will be keeping up with your "sports car" on the way to go get tampons at dominiks.
2003 accord v6 6spd
car and driver: 14.5 @99mph
motortrend: 14.5 @99mph
99mph?........hmm........... isn't that what your Z traps at? looks like chicks will be keeping up with your "sports car" on the way to go get tampons at dominiks.
#139
drag radials? put slicks on a stock '04 SRT4(250whp/280wtq), and you'll run a 12.9!
#140
Originally posted by 03TL_PlaTinUM
drag radials? put slicks on a stock '04 SRT4(250whp/280wtq), and you'll run a 12.9!
drag radials? put slicks on a stock '04 SRT4(250whp/280wtq), and you'll run a 12.9!
#142
Originally posted by cusdaddy
. Ask anyone on the street which looks better. BTW, my Z was $28,700 not $40k.
. Ask anyone on the street which looks better. BTW, my Z was $28,700 not $40k.
#144
Originally posted by cusdaddy
First of all, there is no way in hell a BONE STOCK SRT-4 is running a 12.9. Secondly, it does not put out 250whp stock
First of all, there is no way in hell a BONE STOCK SRT-4 is running a 12.9. Secondly, it does not put out 250whp stock
stock '04 str4 dyno
#145
You are a fckn retard. I could have easily bought a G35, but I LOVE the Z's styling compared to the G. WHo are "some of the Z guys" and who the fck are "all the popular magazines" you are fckn gay.
#146
oh, and is your Z a 2003? how did you escape the markups? many went for 40K+
#150
Originally posted by Maximized
Arent you the guy that was up at Byron in April. Black Accord V6 right? Man I wouldn't be talking smack to anyone....You ran like a 14.8 or something like that right? Thats .1 faster than my brother's auto 4th gen at the same track/same conditions.
Arent you the guy that was up at Byron in April. Black Accord V6 right? Man I wouldn't be talking smack to anyone....You ran like a 14.8 or something like that right? Thats .1 faster than my brother's auto 4th gen at the same track/same conditions.
#151
I cant believe this has become a Z vs SRT4 vs Accord thread. The SRT4 and Accord are both FWD cars, WHICH SUCK FOR PERFORMANCE, plain and simple. The Z might not be the quickest car, but it's a nicely rounded package. I would take good handling anyday over straightline speed. If you want a fast straight line car, buy a 5.0
#153
btw, I drive a Z...and... who the fck says "takes one to know one" welcome me back to 1988.
Originally posted by 03TL_PlaTinUM
takes one to know one my friend. and btw....... your GAYDAR is way off!
takes one to know one my friend. and btw....... your GAYDAR is way off!
#154
Originally posted by Maximized
I cant believe this has become a Z vs SRT4 vs Accord thread. The SRT4 and Accord are both FWD cars, WHICH SUCK FOR PERFORMANCE, plain and simple. The Z might not be the quickest car, but it's a nicely rounded package. I would take good handling anyday over straightline speed. If you want a fast straight line car, buy a 5.0
I cant believe this has become a Z vs SRT4 vs Accord thread. The SRT4 and Accord are both FWD cars, WHICH SUCK FOR PERFORMANCE, plain and simple. The Z might not be the quickest car, but it's a nicely rounded package. I would take good handling anyday over straightline speed. If you want a fast straight line car, buy a 5.0
#155
well didn't he used to drive a cls? which is basically a hopped up acc.......d?
#156
I agree. But I never thought my "hopped up acc" was godsend. You really crack me up dude. I'm done with this thread
Originally posted by 03TL_PlaTinUM
well didn't he used to drive a cls? which is basically a hopped up acc.......d?
well didn't he used to drive a cls? which is basically a hopped up acc.......d?
#157
Originally posted by cusdaddy
He used to... What does that have to do with now? It's also not an Accord. It's a CL. Yes, it shares many parts, but it's still not an Accord
He used to... What does that have to do with now? It's also not an Accord. It's a CL. Yes, it shares many parts, but it's still not an Accord
#159
dude 250whp for an econobox starting at 19k! nissan, where's the power?
#160
Originally posted by 03TL_PlaTinUM
dude 250whp for an econobox starting at 19k! nissan, where's the power?
dude 250whp for an econobox starting at 19k! nissan, where's the power?