Whatever BS artist it was who said his acura CL-s smoked an audi a6 2.7t is LYING. No way any stock cl-s will beat a 2.7t, off the line, inthe long run, on mars, on the moon , not anywhere...If he did beat one, there was something wrong with it , or the driver didnt punch it all the way. I took the governer off my 2.7t, and got it up to about 165, no stock cl-s will do that...It also goes 0-6o in 6 flat, and its an auto(when its in auto stick mode)

 

You racing an automatic? :gheylaugh:

Go you, now get off this forum before you make us Audi owners look bad.

 

funny... i have a Tip 2.7T A6 as well and im also on a acura site...



i ran a 5.0 mustang / CL-s in my A6 on the 3-4th day i got it a little power brake launch in tip mode and neither of them beat me.

im bone stock...afraid to mod cause im still on warranty

 

I had a 2.7t A6 has a loaner and its plenty quick stock. Even with automatic.

I just dont like trolls who signed up just to make threads like this. Lame.

 

i agree.. fairly lame

 

isnt there some way the admins can check the ip adress to see if its somebody already on this site or something.

 

 

what would that matter most DSL ISP's have a static IP aress system. rest your modem and BAM your a different IP

 

 

^







Wouldn't a 6 speed CL-S give the 2.7T a good run?

 

Ahahaha

 

the one i ran was probably automatic but it was a type S it has exhaust sounded like an intake and tinted windows

but it really didnt seem to matter i could hear him hold the rev and launch broke tires screeching and i just shot ahead and kept pulling and at around 75 ish he just let off and he was WAYYYYY back there

 

Stock for stock a CL-S should beat it. But if the 2.7t even has a ECU/CHIP then no, it will smoke the CL-S. The A6 2.7t is extremly heavy.

 

Exactly but once modded the CL/TL has no chance. I tried to get one to play with me this morning, but he declined I wanted an A6 but was worried about electrical gremlins so I just got the TL with its glass tranny instead.

 

I know he didnt just register here to post that stupid shit.

 

3745 lb's versus the type s's 3525 roughly 200 pounds

 

Back in the day, I had an automatic 2001 CL-S and my good friend had a 2001 2.7T automatic.

We raced quite often and it essentially was a wash. I was a bit faster from a stop (the weight and slight turbo lag hampered his launch) and he was a bit faster from a roll.

I then got headers and an CAI for my CL and I was definitely faster than the 2.7T. But he could have chipped his car as well, so it really doesn't matter.

Either way, as I said, it doesn't matter at all. Neither car is a drag racer and I have no idea why you posted here.

 

3510~ for the CL-S

3924lb for the A6 2.7t

Almost 400lb difference.

www.edmunds.com

 

lame ass thread.

 

 

a stock 2001 cl-s runs the 1/4 mile in 15.60 and a 2001 A6 2.7T runs it in 15.10.

case closed.

 

A stock 2001 CL-S runs the 1/4 in 14.8

I ran it in 14.2 with headers and an intake only at Englishtown.

Again, neither car is really fast in a straight line stock, so I don't even know why people are debating this.

 

This would be a case of magazineraceomia...

And not even a magazine would have those numbers. A stock 6 speed CL-S has hit low 14s. An auto is not 1.5 seconds slower.

 

Mine ran 15.1 bone stock with bad conditions. I then ran a 14.2 at 99.8 mph with just OBX headers on my CL-S. It was also a Auto. Case Closed back at ya.

 

Hmm the CL-S is much faster than the 2.7t stock for stock.

Audi A6 2.7 T S line quattro (sedan) 4wd - V6 2.7L twin turbo (265 hp) 5A + ABS
0-60 7.30
1/4 15.62
mph
92.50
Braking
118

Audi A6 sedan quattro - V6 3.0L (220 hp) 6M + ABS
0-60
8.37
1/4
16.17
mph
91.60
braking
128

 

HA! I had almost the exact same time with my OBX headers and AEM CAI. It was 14.2 at 99.7 I believe.

 

no clue where you got those stats, but im pretty sure those are wrong especially for the 2.7t. No way it does 0-60 slower than a civic si

 

Nice!!!

 

It's a heavy car! 265hp and 4000lb and AWD does not equal to fast!

They were done found with a simple internet search and found on a car forum actually for Audis.

 

I want to make a correction to a item i said. It actually has 250 hp. And the manual gearbox 6mt was able to pull this info:

Once you look under the hood things get more interesting. The 2.7T A6 shares the same 2.7 liter 250 hp bi-turbo V6 that is found in the Audi S4. The 6-speed transmission and brake system are also the same and the exhaust system is similar as well. Official performance numbers are 0-60 in 6.0 seconds and 14.7 seconds for the quarter mile - only slightly slower than the S4.

 

oooaaaahhhh!! you guyz totallyz pwned me!

anyways, i just got those stats online from MSN autos, so that's my proof. drag slips for proof, anyone?

i actually dont care either way, i dont really care for either car.

 

i know theres some 3rd gens in the bay area...type s's

any stock one wanna meet up and try this for fun?

 

Seems like such a silly thread.

The A6 is much heavier and slower than a CLS. But i still would rock an A6 over a CLS any day.

 

Cuz its a pimp car

 

I've been watching technojunky1 ever since he posted this thread but I couldn't find any proof he's a spammer, but now I got my proof so I am going to ban him. I'll leave the thread open and let the Car Talk mods handle it.

Proof:
IP address does not exist
email address appears to also not exist
Registered, posted thread, hasn't been seen since

If technojunky1 reads this and wants to contest the ban, he can click on the Contact Us box at the bottom of the page and tell the admins his story.

 

Kids dont have life