View Poll Results: Which one would you buy?
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll
Camaro SS, Challenger SRT8 or Mustang GT Vert
#1
Camaro SS, Challenger SRT8 or Mustang GT Vert
So if you had your choice...
SRT8 is an 09 with 3000 miles. Black on black 6 speed all options including Nav
Camaro 2SS is a 2010 with 1600 miles. Victory red with tan interior...all options but no nav
2011 Mustang GT convertible with 3100 miles Triple black with appearance package nav and all goodies inside
All about the same money
What's your pick...looking hard tomorrow
SRT8 is an 09 with 3000 miles. Black on black 6 speed all options including Nav
Camaro 2SS is a 2010 with 1600 miles. Victory red with tan interior...all options but no nav
2011 Mustang GT convertible with 3100 miles Triple black with appearance package nav and all goodies inside
All about the same money
What's your pick...looking hard tomorrow
#7
If only the Mustang wasn't a convertible.... not a huge fan how convertibles drive in general. Now, cars that were designed from the outset to be convertibles/roadsters, e.g. MX-5, S2000, Z4M.... they're good in my book.
SRT8
SRT8
The following 2 users liked this post by Costco:
Bearcat94 (09-04-2011),
is300eater (09-03-2011)
Trending Topics
#11
You know what I voted for.
But seriously the Mustang is probably the biggest bang for the buck. When I see the Camaro, all I think of is Transfomers. The SRT8 looks so overweight. And Mopars just have too many electrical gremlins.
But seriously the Mustang is probably the biggest bang for the buck. When I see the Camaro, all I think of is Transfomers. The SRT8 looks so overweight. And Mopars just have too many electrical gremlins.
#14
#17
#26
Of course I put in my Mustang vote but my vote shouldn't matter...Go out and drive them and find the one that suits you best.
Can you live with the Challengers size? (Definitely bigger than the others)
Can you live with the Camaros rediculous trunk opening and sub par interior?
Can you live with the awesomeness that is the 2011 Mustang 5.0?
Seriously though, drive them all, for at least 30 minutes each. In traffic and on the highway and decide which one suits your style best.
Can you live with the Challengers size? (Definitely bigger than the others)
Can you live with the Camaros rediculous trunk opening and sub par interior?
Can you live with the awesomeness that is the 2011 Mustang 5.0?
Seriously though, drive them all, for at least 30 minutes each. In traffic and on the highway and decide which one suits your style best.
Last edited by S A CHO; 08-30-2011 at 09:36 PM.
#28
#34
Do the mustangs have a history of bad 6 speeds?
Of course I put in my Mustang vote but my vote shouldn't matter...Go out and drive them and find the one that suits you best.
Can you live with the Challengers size? (Definitely bigger than the others)
Can you live with the Camaros rediculous trunk opening and sub par interior?
Can you live with the awesomeness that is the 2011 Mustang 5.0?
Seriously though, drive them all, for at least 30 minutes each. In traffic and on the highway and decide which one suits your style best.
Can you live with the Challengers size? (Definitely bigger than the others)
Can you live with the Camaros rediculous trunk opening and sub par interior?
Can you live with the awesomeness that is the 2011 Mustang 5.0?
Seriously though, drive them all, for at least 30 minutes each. In traffic and on the highway and decide which one suits your style best.
While i would love one, this will be a daily driver and I just haven't looked at the Vette that way.
#36
you mean, you dont know that the challenger is a pig?
the challenger is slow.
lighten it a bit, and it might be able to hang with the other two cars....well, considering you're thinking about the vert....
that one might be heavy as well.
and yes. the Mustang's tranny was built in china.
Some are holding up and some are having trouble.
research this.
there is a lot of talk about these chinese made trannies.
#39
I think I have to eliminate the Mustang for several reasons...that leaves me with the Challenger and the Camaro.
Just typing out loud here...
Cons -
Challenger
1. Steering wheel design (looks typically Dodge)
2. Fuel economy - a bit less than the camaro (but not a deal breaker)
3. Performance - listed 0-60 at 5.3 seconds vs camaro at 5.0
4. Black - looks bad@$$, but hard to keep clean
Camaro
1. No navigation - this may be a deal breaker
2. Tiny trunk - probably more like trunk opening
3. 6.2l aluminum block has had issues and I owned one in the past.
Just typing out loud here...
Cons -
Challenger
1. Steering wheel design (looks typically Dodge)
2. Fuel economy - a bit less than the camaro (but not a deal breaker)
3. Performance - listed 0-60 at 5.3 seconds vs camaro at 5.0
4. Black - looks bad@$$, but hard to keep clean
Camaro
1. No navigation - this may be a deal breaker
2. Tiny trunk - probably more like trunk opening
3. 6.2l aluminum block has had issues and I owned one in the past.
#40
you mean, you dont know that the challenger is a pig?
the challenger is slow.
lighten it a bit, and it might be able to hang with the other two cars....well, considering you're thinking about the vert....
that one might be heavy as well.
and yes. the Mustang's tranny was built in china.
Some are holding up and some are having trouble.
research this.
there is a lot of talk about these chinese made trannies.
the challenger is slow.
lighten it a bit, and it might be able to hang with the other two cars....well, considering you're thinking about the vert....
that one might be heavy as well.
and yes. the Mustang's tranny was built in china.
Some are holding up and some are having trouble.
research this.
there is a lot of talk about these chinese made trannies.
After some due dilegence, the 0-60 times came back like this
Mustang 4.6 seconds
Camaro 5.0 seconds
Challenger 5.3 seconds
Certainly not as fast as the two others but I wouldn't call it a pig
I haven't found anything with low enough miles, but I may look at the new hard top now.