View Poll Results: Which one would you buy?
2009 SRT8 6speed
23.91%
2010 2SS Camaro 6 speed
23.91%
2011 Mustang GT vert 6 speed
52.17%
Voters: 92. You may not vote on this poll

Camaro SS, Challenger SRT8 or Mustang GT Vert

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:36 AM
  #41  
TylerT's Avatar
Turd Polisher
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,809
Likes: 3,039
From: San Diego
+1 on used Corvette
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:40 AM
  #42  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
Originally Posted by NJ SHAWD
Thanks for the feedback on the tranny.
After some due dilegence, the 0-60 times came back like this
Mustang 4.6 seconds
Camaro 5.0 seconds
Challenger 5.3 seconds
Certainly not as fast as the two others but I wouldn't call it a pig

While the interior is somewhat bland, I think the Challenger is the best looking one hands down. Is has a look of bad A$$ to me.
I mentioned my dad having a '10 Challenger SRT.
I've had a months worth of seat time.
about 1500 miles.
the seat bolsters are awesome and very comfy. I'm a small guy but they hugged me well. I had a 6foot tall 400lb guy sit in the passenger seat. all he could say was "OMG this is soo comfortable"

At first I thought the skip shift feature was a bad tranny issue.
then, started researching and found that it is a feature.
if you're going less than a set MPH it wont allow you to shift into 3rd.
it only allows you to go from 2 to 4.
most people disable this feature, through a tune or a shift skip block plate.

the torque is what sold me on the car.
by 2.5k RPM every one that was at the light with you, are now WAAAAAY behind you.

but compared to the other pony cars, this one is slow.

sure the interior, particularly the dash area is bland...but you're not buying the car for its interior.
the exterior and driving experience make up for it.

the onboard computer with the 0-60, g-forces, and other performance testing features is fun!
here is my thread:
https://acurazine.com/forums/car-talk-5/2010-dodge-challenger-srt8-786393/


I took off the gay fake carbon fiber vinyl.

Last edited by justnspace; 08-31-2011 at 08:45 AM.
The following users liked this post:
NJ SHAWD (08-31-2011)
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:49 AM
  #43  
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Back From The dead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 49
From: NJ
Ok, I didn't see any red in your previous post...now it makes sense.
Thanks!
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:50 AM
  #44  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,469
Likes: 5,132
From: Los Angeles, Ca
The other two are faster on paper.

People who know how to drive them on the other hand tell a different story. The playing field is actually fairly level.

A tune and some bolt ons...whole different beast.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (08-31-2011)
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:55 AM
  #45  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Sarlacc
The other two are faster on paper.
There isn't much to separate the 3 performance wise, and even if there is, does a few tenths either way really matter besides bragging rights? Each will be damn fun and damn fast.

You have to go with what you like best/feel most comfortable in. Throw acceleration times and MPG out the window.
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:56 AM
  #46  
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Back From The dead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 49
From: NJ
argh...I have to go test drive this beast this morning (challenger) but will stop at the ford dealer as well. Film at 11
Old 08-31-2011 | 08:58 AM
  #47  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
unfortunately, I couldnt persuade my dad to modify it!
I wanted to tune it soo bad
Old 08-31-2011 | 09:23 AM
  #48  
pttl's Avatar
My first Avatar....
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,445
Likes: 7,087
From: NJ
Since you've eliminated the Mustang....the Challenger is probably the best drivers car....Bigger...comfy...but probably thirstier than the SS.

The SS is a bit claustrophobic. Line of sight out is very limited.

From what I understand, the '11 Challenger has a reworked the suspension, making the car handle far better and feel smaller.
Old 08-31-2011 | 09:29 AM
  #49  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
^plus a bigger engine!
MOAR FUN!!!!!!!
Old 08-31-2011 | 09:36 AM
  #50  
CCColtsicehockey's Avatar
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,664
Likes: 3,906
From: Mooresville, NC
So this will be the daily driver??? What does that make the Kia and the TL then?
Old 08-31-2011 | 09:38 AM
  #51  
pttl's Avatar
My first Avatar....
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,445
Likes: 7,087
From: NJ
Originally Posted by justnspace
^plus a bigger engine!
MOAR FUN!!!!!!!
Not of the chassis can't handle it.
Old 08-31-2011 | 09:41 AM
  #52  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
^are there reports of this?

6.4L and re-worked suspension = WIN
Old 08-31-2011 | 09:48 AM
  #53  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
If it's a weekend/pleasure car I'd go with the Mustang vert. If it's serving other duties, I'd likely go SRT8. Don't get me wrong, I love the Camaro, but I just see so many of them that the SRT8 stands out a bit to me.

Otherwise, go vert. It's always more fun with the top down. Don't believe me? Bang your girl with her shirt on, then go topless... which is more fun? For pleasure, Topless > *
The following users liked this post:
oo7spy (08-31-2011)
Old 08-31-2011 | 10:06 AM
  #54  
pttl's Avatar
My first Avatar....
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,445
Likes: 7,087
From: NJ
Originally Posted by justnspace
^are there reports of this?

6.4L and re-worked suspension = WIN
No...the 2011 Challenger by all accounts is much improved...still not on the Stang's level of handling/performance...but way better than the 09/10 Challengers.

I don't think the OP wants to go with an 11 Chally. If he wanted an '11 Challenger...the RT would be the best way to go...get the reworked chassis and still have a 370 HP V8...and keep costs somewhat under control.

The '11 SRT's are BIG bucks...for less money than that, he could get a Boss 302, which would destroy anything in the class, as far as performance goes....but still he'd have to beware of the 6MT.
Old 08-31-2011 | 10:14 AM
  #55  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
^sure, I know he isnt springing for an '11.
but you brought up the re-worked suspension, etc.

for the cars that he has shown us, I'd still take the SRT.
Old 08-31-2011 | 10:14 AM
  #56  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Originally Posted by juniorbean
It's always more fun with the top down. Don't believe me? Bang your girl with her shirt on, then go topless... which is more fun? For pleasure, Topless > *
Old 08-31-2011 | 10:41 AM
  #57  
CCColtsicehockey's Avatar
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,664
Likes: 3,906
From: Mooresville, NC
Originally Posted by juniorbean
Otherwise, go vert. It's always more fun with the top down. Don't believe me? Bang your girl with her shirt on, then go topless... which is more fun? For pleasure, Topless > *
This is signature worthy
Old 08-31-2011 | 11:58 AM
  #58  
oo7spy's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 31,897
Likes: 7,249
From: Austin, TX
Old 08-31-2011 | 12:04 PM
  #59  
CocheseUGA's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 18,761
Likes: 960
From: Kennesaw, GA
Originally Posted by juniorbean
If it's a weekend/pleasure car I'd go with the Mustang vert. If it's serving other duties, I'd likely go SRT8. Don't get me wrong, I love the Camaro, but I just see so many of them that the SRT8 stands out a bit to me.

Otherwise, go vert. It's always more fun with the top down. Don't believe me? Bang your girl with her shirt on, then go topless... which is more fun? For pleasure, Topless > *


Convertibles, in general, suck.
Old 08-31-2011 | 12:24 PM
  #60  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Drive a similarly-equipped 2011+ Mustang GT before or after you drive that convertible. I guarantee you that you'll notice a difference... whether it's tolerable or not is up to you.

I'm sure the 2011+ convertible isn't like a Fox Body of old. In general even new convertibles tend to be more sluggish - in straight lines or otherwise - and less confidence inspiring than their hardtop counterparts.
Old 08-31-2011 | 12:26 PM
  #61  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
^weight comes into play.
Old 08-31-2011 | 12:30 PM
  #62  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,469
Likes: 5,132
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by pttl
Not of the chassis can't handle it.
Originally Posted by pttl
No...the 2011 Challenger by all accounts is much improved...still not on the Stang's level of handling/performance...but way better than the 09/10 Challengers.

I don't think the OP wants to go with an 11 Chally. If he wanted an '11 Challenger...the RT would be the best way to go...get the reworked chassis and still have a 370 HP V8...and keep costs somewhat under control.

The '11 SRT's are BIG bucks...for less money than that, he could get a Boss 302, which would destroy anything in the class, as far as performance goes....but still he'd have to beware of the 6MT.
The chassis can more than handle it.

The 08-10 SRT suspension is by no means garbage, its quite capable. and upgrading the suspension is easy and relatively inexpensive.

Yes, the 11 SRT is MUCH improved..and now the 12 SRT has a dual mode suspension. But not so much that I would totally discount the 08-10, especially based on the price you can acquire them at now.

If we were really talking about a 10 RT vs a 11 RT...yeah, HUGE difference stock for stock.

The new SRTs aren't really big bucks, especially when you tack on the deals people have been making on them.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (08-31-2011)
Old 08-31-2011 | 12:32 PM
  #63  
Sarlacc's Avatar
The Third Ball
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 49,469
Likes: 5,132
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Originally Posted by Costco
Drive a similarly-equipped 2011+ Mustang GT before or after you drive that convertible. I guarantee you that you'll notice a difference... whether it's tolerable or not is up to you.

I'm sure the 2011+ convertible isn't like a Fox Body of old. In general even new convertibles tend to be more sluggish - in straight lines or otherwise - and less confidence inspiring than their hardtop counterparts.
Because of safety requirements, etc convertibles add weight and reduce strucural rigidity, so verts tend to have more body roll and slop along with being heavier.
Old 08-31-2011 | 12:33 PM
  #64  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
^I loved the SRT more than the TL through twist and turns, albeit one is RWD.
Old 08-31-2011 | 01:01 PM
  #65  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Please just throw out all the magazine crap and go test drive all three first.

And 0-60 doesn't mean much dude... just drive all three, get the one that you like the most.
Old 08-31-2011 | 01:17 PM
  #66  
juniorbean's Avatar
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 28,461
Likes: 1,760
From: The QC
Originally Posted by CocheseUGA


Convertibles, in general, suck.
Nice blanket statement. How do you figure? Especially for a pleasure vehicle? Likely will never see the track, likely will never be driven too hard, likely will just be used for cruising, meets and get-togethers.

Of course a hard-top is more rigid and handles better (typically weighs less too), but if none of those features are being utilized, there's no need to go hard-top...
Old 08-31-2011 | 01:36 PM
  #67  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
How the hell is a Challenger a drivers car? Shitty center of gravity and weighs a billion pounds.
Old 08-31-2011 | 02:30 PM
  #68  
03tLsNBP's Avatar
MechEng
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 5,910
Likes: 486
From: Long Island, NY
^ have you driven one?

i drove my friends 11' V6 Challenger and it was very nice to drive. better than the V6 camaro i thought. i havent driven the mustang yet.
Old 08-31-2011 | 02:31 PM
  #69  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
^should have kept that info to yourself.

i dont think the six cylinder does the challenger any justice.
while the SRT8 might not be a drivers car, it is fun.

traction control off = sideways heaven.
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:08 PM
  #70  
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Back From The dead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 49
From: NJ
So I just got back from the test drive in the Challenger and I was surprised. The suspension is great. It rides smoother than the TL in a different kind of way. The seats are really comfortable. The sound is just wow.

Overall rating:
Acceleration - 8.5 and you can feel that it is suffocating.
Handling - 8
Ride - 8.5
Looks - 9 (especially with the metallic black...it hides dust)
Interior - 7.5
Shifting - 9.5
Room - 7.5 but kills the other two in truck and rear seat.

Overall 8.5. I think it's a winner.


As this will be my daily driver (the wife fell in love with the Optima) I need a bit of room and a comfortable ride. I still find it hard to believe how well it handles jarring bumps and still has very little body roll.
We have the right price on the car, but they're low balling me on the trade. I'll wait it out a bit risking losing it.

Last edited by NJ SHAWD; 08-31-2011 at 03:19 PM.
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:11 PM
  #71  
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Back From The dead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 49
From: NJ
I went this morning and took out the Camaro. I had driven the 6 cyl base models as rentals 2 or 3 times and was ok with them. The 2SS just rips in performance, but I was not impressed with the ride or the interior. Plus the lack of room will turn out to be a big issue for me in time. The dealer was a Hyundai dealer too. I took out the 2012 Genesis sedan while I was here. They have come so far with it over the 2009. The suspension is almost perfect now.

Last edited by NJ SHAWD; 08-31-2011 at 03:18 PM.
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:14 PM
  #72  
JS + XES's Avatar
I drive a Subata.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 20,301
Likes: 2,603
From: Socal
Good to hear that you drove them.

So, you like the SRT8 the most, yeah?
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:14 PM
  #73  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Since you like the Challenger and the dealer is giving you a hard time on the trade, why not start exploring a newer (still pre-owned) RT? maybe even save a few bucks. There should be plenty of cars available outside of these 3 no?

LOL at JB.
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:21 PM
  #74  
CCColtsicehockey's Avatar
Moderator
Regional Coordinator (Southeast)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 43,664
Likes: 3,906
From: Mooresville, NC
So you will be trading in the TL for this then???
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:27 PM
  #75  
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Back From The dead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 49
From: NJ
Originally Posted by JS + MS3
Good to hear that you drove them.

So, you like the SRT8 the most, yeah?
Yes, out of the three for sure. I haven't touched a Dodge since 99 and hope the quality lasts. I was impressed with how they put it together.

Originally Posted by dom
Since you like the Challenger and the dealer is giving you a hard time on the trade, why not start exploring a newer (still pre-owned) RT? maybe even save a few bucks. There should be plenty of cars available outside of these 3 no?

LOL at JB.
That will be the next step. A newer SRT would be preferable though over the RT. Even the 09 SRT has 50bhp over the newer RT. If I can pick up this 09 it would end up about $4k less than a similarly equipped RT.
The following users liked this post:
justnspace (08-31-2011)
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:28 PM
  #76  
NJ SHAWD's Avatar
Thread Starter
Back From The dead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 49
From: NJ
Originally Posted by CCColtsicehockey
So you will be trading in the TL for this then???
Yes if I can get the right amount on trade. They're offering $27k on my 09 SHAWD with Tech and 23,500 miles. I was hoping for more
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:29 PM
  #77  
justnspace's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Likes: 16,269
You dont want the RT.
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:31 PM
  #78  
Crazy Bimmer's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 34,937
Likes: 638
From: Chicago Burbs
Challenger is a pig. Get the Mustang.

HI Sarlacc
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:34 PM
  #79  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by justnspace
You dont want the RT.
Its just that an SRT8 seems like overkill for a daily driver. Isn't the RT more than enough?
Old 08-31-2011 | 03:36 PM
  #80  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Crazy Acura
Challenger is a pig. Get the Mustang.

HI Sarlacc


Quick Reply: Camaro SS, Challenger SRT8 or Mustang GT Vert



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:54 PM.