Best AWD system overall?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2009, 08:25 PM
  #1  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
paliknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 975
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Best AWD system overall?

sorry if this is a repost, but ive always wondered which car company had the best AWD system in the market?

top 3?
Old 03-26-2009, 08:40 PM
  #2  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
NSXNEXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: where the weather suits my clothes
Age: 55
Posts: 27,921
Received 1,080 Likes on 661 Posts
http://forums.motortrend.com/70/6251...tem/index.html
Old 03-26-2009, 10:28 PM
  #3  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
paliknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 975
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
^^^interesting. they never seemed to settle on one though. thanks for the link.
Old 03-27-2009, 02:25 AM
  #4  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For what... off roading... snow... handling..?

Originally Posted by paliknight
sorry if this is a repost, but ive always wondered which car company had the best AWD system in the market?

top 3?
Old 03-27-2009, 02:57 AM
  #5  
...
 
Edr0e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is an easy one

of course mitsubishi's AWD system!!! It features an Active Center Differential and Active Yaw Control.

Active Center Differential is an electronically controlled hydraulic multi-plate clutch which distributes torque between the front and rear to improve traction under acceleration out of a corner. It works in conjunction with Active Yaw Control which enhances grip and steering response whilst driving through the bend itself. Using sensors, ACD regulates slippage in the 50:50 torque-split diff from free to lock-up according to speed and load. So under hard acceleration the ACD moves towards lock-up to put more torque down on the road for stronger traction, but with rapid steering inputs it operates virtually like an open differential to improve steering feel and response.

A choice of three setting - tarmac, gravel and snow - operated manually, gradually lock up the Active Centre Differential depending on road conditions.

Active Yaw Control was developed by Mitsubishi to improve a vehicle's cornering and acceleration performance, and consequently its safety, under a wide range of operating conditions. This is achieved by utilizing a torque transfer differential which is controlled by various sensors and an electronic control unit (ECU) to enable a difference in torque to go to each of the rear wheels. by increasing the level of torque to the left rear wheel and reducing the torque level to the right wheel, it is possible to change the yaw movement of the vehicle. This in turn will cause the vehicle to steer inwards and reduce the amount of slip on the front tyres, thus resulting in reduced under-steer. It also works if over-steer occurs.by reducing the torque level to the left hand rear wheel and increasing the torque level to the right hand wheel, again changing the yaw movement to reduce over-steer.

By controlling the amount of torque transmitted to the rear wheels when there is less traction, or a difference in grip on the road surface, AYC also works to improve acceleration and stability on slippery roads.
Old 03-27-2009, 03:33 AM
  #6  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,481
Received 990 Likes on 532 Posts
Talking Right from Subaru

Subaru employs Symmetrical All Wheel Drive. This system has the following features:

Vehicle Dynamics Control (VDC) With Traction Control System (TCS)
Vehicle Dynamics Control is a stability system that keeps the vehicle on its intended path. VDC measures a number of variables such as steering input, braking, and the angle of the vehicle. The system applies individual brakes and/or reduces engine power to help maintain vehicle control.
TCS is designed to prevent wheel spin and to aid with friction. This electronic system detects loss of traction and targets the distressed wheels. Brake-force is applied and engine power is redirected to functioning drive wheels.

How VDC with TCS Works

How VDC with TCS Senses and Controls
An added feature to the full-time security of Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, VDC with TCS engages when needed. A control module analyzes the current driving situation by monitoring vehicle speed, throttle opening, gear position, lateral G force, yaw rate, brake pedal pressure, and steering wheel angle. Based on the data from these sources, a computer coordinates control of torque distribution, engine output, and the Antilock Brake System to help maintain vehicle stability.

So is Mitsubishi a better system? It's a matter of fine technical detail. I say drive both and be the judge.

(My money is on Subaru, as the only thing they make is AWD. They don't do a FWD or RWD car. Because of this, they know how to do it right. )

Old 03-27-2009, 07:21 AM
  #7  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
:ibhondash-awdproponentscheckin:
Old 03-27-2009, 08:38 AM
  #8  
Not Registered
 
Bdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 5,829
Received 87 Likes on 49 Posts
Hummer H1
Land Rover
Subaru
Old 03-27-2009, 08:49 AM
  #9  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Sh-awd
Old 03-27-2009, 10:05 AM
  #10  
I shoot people
 
is300eater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 22,400
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,431 Posts
I'm going to go with Audi (because they've been doing that Quattro thing for decades) and Subaru (because AWD is ALL they do)
Old 03-27-2009, 10:07 AM
  #11  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by paliknight
sorry if this is a repost, but ive always wondered which car company had the best AWD system in the market?

top 3?
You really need to tell us what "best" means. If you want an off road vehicle, you simply can't beat a hummer. Except maybe with a Duce and a half, which is all wheel drive, on all 10 wheels.
Old 03-27-2009, 01:07 PM
  #12  
Drifting
 
Dicorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Age: 40
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Subaru.
Quattro.
Old 03-27-2009, 01:29 PM
  #13  
E92
 
TommySalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: socal
Age: 36
Posts: 8,039
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by is300eater
I'm going to go with Audi (because they've been doing that Quattro thing for decades) and Subaru (because AWD is ALL they do)
Audi AWD has a front-wheel bias, which = lame

Subaru's seems good, especially with the STi which lets you change the F/R torque distribution

And Nissan's ATTESA-ETS system that is in the Skyline GT-Rs
Old 03-27-2009, 01:34 PM
  #14  
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
CL6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well one word for off roading: Pinzgauer


Originally Posted by TzarChasm
You really need to tell us what "best" means. If you want an off road vehicle, you simply can't beat a hummer. Except maybe with a Duce and a half, which is all wheel drive, on all 10 wheels.
Old 03-27-2009, 01:46 PM
  #15  
Moto Enthusiast
 
taitando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Age: 46
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TommySalami
Audi AWD has a front-wheel bias, which = lame

Subaru's seems good, especially with the STi which lets you change the F/R torque distribution

And Nissan's ATTESA-ETS system that is in the Skyline GT-Rs
Um...No. Where'd you hear that? Yes, Audi has FWD cars, but their Quattro cars were always 50:50 Front/Rear split. Since the B7 RS4, they've now gone more with a 40:60 split.

Maybe you're mixing it up with Acura's SH-AWD, which is more FWD based.
Old 03-27-2009, 01:48 PM
  #16  
E92
 
TommySalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: socal
Age: 36
Posts: 8,039
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
Originally Posted by taitando
Um...No. Where'd you hear that? Yes, Audi has FWD cars, but their Quattro cars were always 50:50 Front/Rear split. Since the B7 RS4, they've now gone more with a 40:60 split.
Rearry? I thought I heard it on here that they had a fwd bias. Oh well
Old 03-27-2009, 03:58 PM
  #17  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
You need to give some sort of criteria..

Mitsubishi and Subaru make excellent AWD setups for snow/gravel handling with some performance thrown in.

Acura of course has SH-AWD which has its merits for snow and performance.

If you're talking about off-roading are you wanting AWD or a true 4WD with locking differentials?
Old 03-28-2009, 02:15 AM
  #18  
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Eoanou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: CT
Age: 38
Posts: 4,779
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
And no one mentions Lambo?

EVO IX MR had the best AWD system clearly head and shoulders above anything else for the price.

Subaru is pretty good as well.

Audi is good to.
Old 03-28-2009, 11:46 AM
  #19  
Por Favor?
 
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 43
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
Nissan ATTESSA-ETS (sp?) is the probably one of the best AWD systems for on-road performance. Like someone mentioned, the same basic system that saw duty in the R32+ GT-R. Under normal driving situations all torque goes to the back wheels (actually it's something like a 2/98 split), but can go all the way to a 50/50 lock under slip conditions.

For off-road or inclement conditions, I've always heard the Mitsubishi EVO's AWD system is one of the most advanced.
Old 03-28-2009, 01:17 PM
  #20  
GEEZER
 
1killercls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Dunedin, Fla.
Posts: 44,441
Received 2,214 Likes on 1,418 Posts
Mine works well for me in my mazdaspeed 6. Thats about all I know about it.
Old 03-29-2009, 03:38 AM
  #21  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
paliknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 975
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
sorry for not clarifying, i meant for pure performance. say you were going to race the car at a track.
Old 03-29-2009, 03:40 AM
  #22  
.... .... .... ... ....
 
Blazing GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: N Y C
Age: 35
Posts: 7,547
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
Sh-awd
Old 03-29-2009, 10:57 AM
  #23  
Senior Moderator
 
fsttyms1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Appleton WI
Age: 49
Posts: 81,383
Received 3,063 Likes on 2,119 Posts
Originally Posted by paliknight
sorry for not clarifying, i meant for pure performance. Say you were going to race the car at a track.
sh-awd
Old 03-29-2009, 02:40 PM
  #24  
Race Director
 
Mokos23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about mercedes 4matic or bmw's awd systems?

does vw's 4motion basically use the same system as audi's quattro since audi is part of vw?
Old 03-29-2009, 03:16 PM
  #25  
spaz
iTrader: (7)
 
tegkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the g37's system is pretty cool since you can adjust how much power you want going to the front.
Old 03-29-2009, 09:38 PM
  #26  
Senior Moderator
 
csmeance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Space Coast, FL
Posts: 20,881
Received 2,004 Likes on 1,424 Posts
x drive, it distributes torque like SH-AWD (which overdrives outside wheel as well) to each wheel independently while braking too! which SH-AWD doesn't do...
Old 03-30-2009, 12:02 AM
  #27  
Your garage
 
sharp218's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 409
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Quattro
Old 03-30-2009, 12:44 AM
  #28  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by Mokos23
what about mercedes 4matic or bmw's awd systems?

does vw's 4motion basically use the same system as audi's quattro since audi is part of vw?
VW"s 4 motion system is not the same as traditional Audi's Quattro system. I say "traditional" because nowadays both 4motion and Quattro are just marketing names.

Quattro used to represent torsen-LSD design. It has quick response, permanent AWD, but it's also pricey and torque split is not variable. 4motion on the other hand is basically a cheaper/simpler version of the famous Porsche 959's PSK system. It uses a multi-plate clutch center differential developed by Haldex.

Most Audi's still use the Torsen-LSD system, but I think the Golf-based cars, like the S3 and TT use the Haldex system. The Passat on the other hand uses the Torsen-LSD system, even though it's called 4motion.
Old 03-30-2009, 12:46 AM
  #29  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
Originally Posted by csmeance
x drive, it distributes torque like SH-AWD (which overdrives outside wheel as well) to each wheel independently while braking too! which SH-AWD doesn't do...
I think only the X6 has that torque vectoring capability. I'm not sure whether all x-drive vehicles have that feature.
Old 03-30-2009, 05:23 AM
  #30  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,481
Received 990 Likes on 532 Posts
A Subaru Legacy Spec B has the Torsen LSD. It's part of the option package (along with better suspension and some cosmetics).

IMO, I think a system that has variable yaw control, and the ability to distribute torque where and when needed is the best system. And it looks like the Mitsubishi, Subaru, and VW systems do it well.
Old 03-30-2009, 11:56 AM
  #31  
Suzuka Master
 
TzarChasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 52
Posts: 6,732
Received 233 Likes on 166 Posts
Originally Posted by CL6
Well one word for off roading: Pinzgauer
87HP air cooled engine?
Old 03-30-2009, 12:33 PM
  #32  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,896
Received 1,666 Likes on 930 Posts
Everyone knows there are control and capability benefits of all-wheel drive when you’re dealing with the elements—come sand or high water. Dropping an engine’s torque down to the ground with four tire patches instead of two would give any vehicle more traction. But headed to market in more and more performance cars are new systems that can seamlessly and instantaneously distribute torque to any single wheel at a time. Welcome to torque vectoring all-wheel drive.

Most modern all-wheel-drive cars and SUVs already offer some type of computer-controlled, part-time engagement to save fuel. When the computer detects that one or more wheels is rotating faster than the vehicle’s speed or that the vehicle is yawing off its intended path of travel, the system steps in. First, it engages the other drive axle and applies a proportion of the vehicle’s torque to it. If the wheels continue to spin, the computer reduces engine torque or even brakes one of the wheels, if necessary.

In recent times, these systems have taken a fairly radical step forward. Automakers have reinvented front and rear differentials to the point where an engine’s torque can be passed around—or vectored—to each corner of the car. In other words, your torque can go from front to back like a traditional all-wheel-drive setup <i>and</i> distribute from left to right on a given axle—all very, very quickly. It’s like having a computer-controlled, super-speed limited slip differential in each axle. This means not only great foul-weather traction but also eerily competent handling performance on dry roads.

Acura, for instance, has offered its Super Handling All-Wheel-Drive (SH-AWD) system for several years. It monitors vehicle speed, wheel speed, gear position, steering angle, yaw rate, lateral G forces and other inputs, while automatically adding torque to the outside rear wheel in corners to make the car turn quicker. A set of electromagnetic clutches in the rear differential passes the torque from side to side. The system, which normally distributes torque 90 percent up front and 10 percent in the rear, quickly changes to a 50/50 split during acceleration or hard cornering. The system can then send some or all of that 50 percent going to the rear axle directly to the outside tire to make the vehicle bend into a corner more sharply. Mitsubishi, a torque vectoring pioneer, has used a similar system called Active Yaw Control in the rear axle of its high-performance Evolution sport sedan since the late ’90s.

Audi, BMW and others are taking it a step further: While SH-AWD only works on the rear axle of a normally front-drive vehicle, new systems from automotive suppliers Ricardo in Britain and ZF in Germany can vector torque to all four tires simultaneously.

The Ricardo Cross-Axle Torque-Vectoring system uses wet clutches and planetary gearsets, in both the front and rear differentials, that are controlled by electrical, electromechanical or electrohydraulic control systems. Ricardo says the system’s response time, from the push of the accelerator to the delivery of up to 90 percent of available torque, is only about 0.1 seconds. If Ricardo’s vectoring is used only in an all-wheel-drive vehicle’s center differential, the engine torque effectively gets passed around front-to-rear and side-to-side—with split-second accuracy—for every driving condition. Look for it in the new Audi A4 and A5.

German transmission and driveline company ZF has also developed a torque-vectoring system, called Vector Drive—and it’s ready for volume production in all-wheel and rear-wheel drive vehicles. The system distributes drive torque individually to each of the rear wheels, generating a yaw movement around the vertical axis. This improves both cornering performance and vehicle stability in less-than-ideal road conditions. When driving straight, the torque vectoring rear axle behaves like an ordinary open differential. Drive torque is distributed equally to the wheels. Torque is only distributed individually along both halfshafts on an axle during cornering, controlled by an electromechanically actuated multi-disk brake. The ZF system also generates wheel differential torque independently of the drive torque. When cornering through a downhill section off the throttle, the outer wheel receives more drive torque than the inner wheel, allowing crisper turn-in. The gears of the planetary gearset don’t turn when driving straight, so the system saves fuel too. The torque-vectoring drive also acts like a positive-traction or locking differential on dry or uneven traction startups, with torque going to the wheel with higher friction potential.

These new torque vectoring systems will undoubtedly join forces with the pre-existing ABS brakes, traction control, stability control, steering and rollover mitigation systems. The result will be smarter, safer and quicker vehicles, whether it’s on a rain-soaked freeway, a snowy driveway or a racetrack. —Jim McCraw
Popular Mechanics
Old 03-30-2009, 01:37 PM
  #33  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
Originally Posted by TommySalami
Audi AWD has a front-wheel bias, which = lame
Audi changed their FWD bias a few years ago.
Old 03-30-2009, 02:59 PM
  #34  
Not Registered
 
Bdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 5,829
Received 87 Likes on 49 Posts
I know it's not all the cool cars we're talking about, but a neat vid... that's been posted before! I'd like to see BMW and Audi AWD tests.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Old 03-30-2009, 04:16 PM
  #35  
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
 
mrmako's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,481
Received 990 Likes on 532 Posts
Nice. I'd like to see the Mitsubishi on there, as well as a Merc and BMW. I think Audi would be similar to the VW.
Old 03-30-2009, 04:38 PM
  #36  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,493
Received 835 Likes on 519 Posts
Lol, they wouldn't include Mitsubishi there because most likely it will pass the test. I would like to see how sh-awd would do.

So Audi and BMW are basically buying designs from Ricardo and/or ZF. What about Honda? Where did they get their design from?
Old 03-30-2009, 05:44 PM
  #37  
Oliver!!!
 
litesout's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 46
Posts: 3,962
Received 38 Likes on 30 Posts
The only one I've had any direct experience with is the Audi Haldex system from the TT Quatro Turbo. With the 6MT and the VSC turned off I could smoke all four tires. But with the system turned on I could put the passenger in my lap on a right hand turn. It was unbelievable, until it came time to do a fluid change. That Haldex system requires fluid changes every 15k miles, and it ain't cheap.
Old 03-30-2009, 05:47 PM
  #38  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
Lol, they wouldn't include Mitsubishi there because most likely it will pass the test. I would like to see how sh-awd would do.

So Audi and BMW are basically buying designs from Ricardo and/or ZF. What about Honda? Where did they get their design from?
Honda designed it themselves, just like their transmissions.. its all done in house. No need to pay other companies for use of technology.
Old 03-30-2009, 07:58 PM
  #39  
is out, so the
 
Allen-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 756
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm a big fan of SH-AWD. I don't think the true potential of it has been released. I'd like to see it with 20:80 F/R in a small RWD car like the S2000.

But, this fight will go on and on for forever. But who has the lightest AWD system? I know all that extra equipment adds weight, so who has reduced the weight, while still gaining performance?
Old 03-31-2009, 04:20 PM
  #40  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
paliknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NJ, USA
Age: 35
Posts: 975
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Bdog
I know it's not all the cool cars we're talking about, but a neat vid... that's been posted before! I'd like to see BMW and Audi AWD tests.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
thats an interesting video, but it is obviously biased.

i would like to see those tests done from a 3rd unbiased party with all the most famous AWD systems out. (honda, mitsubishi, BMW, mercedes, audi/volkswagen, nissan, subaru, and even the american AWD systems)


Quick Reply: Best AWD system overall?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.