Best AWD system overall?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 08:25 PM
  #1  
paliknight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
Likes: 5
From: NJ, USA
Best AWD system overall?

sorry if this is a repost, but ive always wondered which car company had the best AWD system in the market?

top 3?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #2  
NSXNEXT's Avatar
Senior Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 27,921
Likes: 1,080
From: where the weather suits my clothes
http://forums.motortrend.com/70/6251...tem/index.html
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2009 | 10:28 PM
  #3  
paliknight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
Likes: 5
From: NJ, USA
^^^interesting. they never seemed to settle on one though. thanks for the link.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 02:25 AM
  #4  
CL6's Avatar
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 1
From: Republik of Kalifornia
For what... off roading... snow... handling..?

Originally Posted by paliknight
sorry if this is a repost, but ive always wondered which car company had the best AWD system in the market?

top 3?
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 02:57 AM
  #5  
Edr0e's Avatar
...
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Ca
This is an easy one

of course mitsubishi's AWD system!!! It features an Active Center Differential and Active Yaw Control.

Active Center Differential is an electronically controlled hydraulic multi-plate clutch which distributes torque between the front and rear to improve traction under acceleration out of a corner. It works in conjunction with Active Yaw Control which enhances grip and steering response whilst driving through the bend itself. Using sensors, ACD regulates slippage in the 50:50 torque-split diff from free to lock-up according to speed and load. So under hard acceleration the ACD moves towards lock-up to put more torque down on the road for stronger traction, but with rapid steering inputs it operates virtually like an open differential to improve steering feel and response.

A choice of three setting - tarmac, gravel and snow - operated manually, gradually lock up the Active Centre Differential depending on road conditions.

Active Yaw Control was developed by Mitsubishi to improve a vehicle's cornering and acceleration performance, and consequently its safety, under a wide range of operating conditions. This is achieved by utilizing a torque transfer differential which is controlled by various sensors and an electronic control unit (ECU) to enable a difference in torque to go to each of the rear wheels. by increasing the level of torque to the left rear wheel and reducing the torque level to the right wheel, it is possible to change the yaw movement of the vehicle. This in turn will cause the vehicle to steer inwards and reduce the amount of slip on the front tyres, thus resulting in reduced under-steer. It also works if over-steer occurs.by reducing the torque level to the left hand rear wheel and increasing the torque level to the right hand wheel, again changing the yaw movement to reduce over-steer.

By controlling the amount of torque transmitted to the rear wheels when there is less traction, or a difference in grip on the road surface, AYC also works to improve acceleration and stability on slippery roads.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 03:33 AM
  #6  
mrmako's Avatar
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,804
Likes: 1,291
From: Japan
Talking Right from Subaru

Subaru employs Symmetrical All Wheel Drive. This system has the following features:

Vehicle Dynamics Control (VDC) With Traction Control System (TCS)
Vehicle Dynamics Control is a stability system that keeps the vehicle on its intended path. VDC measures a number of variables such as steering input, braking, and the angle of the vehicle. The system applies individual brakes and/or reduces engine power to help maintain vehicle control.
TCS is designed to prevent wheel spin and to aid with friction. This electronic system detects loss of traction and targets the distressed wheels. Brake-force is applied and engine power is redirected to functioning drive wheels.

How VDC with TCS Works

How VDC with TCS Senses and Controls
An added feature to the full-time security of Symmetrical All-Wheel Drive, VDC with TCS engages when needed. A control module analyzes the current driving situation by monitoring vehicle speed, throttle opening, gear position, lateral G force, yaw rate, brake pedal pressure, and steering wheel angle. Based on the data from these sources, a computer coordinates control of torque distribution, engine output, and the Antilock Brake System to help maintain vehicle stability.

So is Mitsubishi a better system? It's a matter of fine technical detail. I say drive both and be the judge.

(My money is on Subaru, as the only thing they make is AWD. They don't do a FWD or RWD car. Because of this, they know how to do it right. )

Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 07:21 AM
  #7  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,017
Likes: 1,737
:ibhondash-awdproponentscheckin:
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 08:38 AM
  #8  
Bdog's Avatar
Not Registered
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 87
From: Virginia
Hummer H1
Land Rover
Subaru
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #9  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,385
Likes: 3,068
From: Appleton WI
Sh-awd
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 10:05 AM
  #10  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,080
Likes: 3,676
From: Vancouver BC
I'm going to go with Audi (because they've been doing that Quattro thing for decades) and Subaru (because AWD is ALL they do)
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #11  
TzarChasm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,732
Likes: 233
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by paliknight
sorry if this is a repost, but ive always wondered which car company had the best AWD system in the market?

top 3?
You really need to tell us what "best" means. If you want an off road vehicle, you simply can't beat a hummer. Except maybe with a Duce and a half, which is all wheel drive, on all 10 wheels.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #12  
Dicorp's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Subaru.
Quattro.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:29 PM
  #13  
TommySalami's Avatar
E92
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,039
Likes: 93
From: socal
Originally Posted by is300eater
I'm going to go with Audi (because they've been doing that Quattro thing for decades) and Subaru (because AWD is ALL they do)
Audi AWD has a front-wheel bias, which = lame

Subaru's seems good, especially with the STi which lets you change the F/R torque distribution

And Nissan's ATTESA-ETS system that is in the Skyline GT-Rs
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #14  
CL6's Avatar
CL6
My only car is a Bus
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 1
From: Republik of Kalifornia
Well one word for off roading: Pinzgauer


Originally Posted by TzarChasm
You really need to tell us what "best" means. If you want an off road vehicle, you simply can't beat a hummer. Except maybe with a Duce and a half, which is all wheel drive, on all 10 wheels.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #15  
taitando's Avatar
Moto Enthusiast
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by TommySalami
Audi AWD has a front-wheel bias, which = lame

Subaru's seems good, especially with the STi which lets you change the F/R torque distribution

And Nissan's ATTESA-ETS system that is in the Skyline GT-Rs
Um...No. Where'd you hear that? Yes, Audi has FWD cars, but their Quattro cars were always 50:50 Front/Rear split. Since the B7 RS4, they've now gone more with a 40:60 split.

Maybe you're mixing it up with Acura's SH-AWD, which is more FWD based.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 01:48 PM
  #16  
TommySalami's Avatar
E92
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 8,039
Likes: 93
From: socal
Originally Posted by taitando
Um...No. Where'd you hear that? Yes, Audi has FWD cars, but their Quattro cars were always 50:50 Front/Rear split. Since the B7 RS4, they've now gone more with a 40:60 split.
Rearry? I thought I heard it on here that they had a fwd bias. Oh well
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 03:58 PM
  #17  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
You need to give some sort of criteria..

Mitsubishi and Subaru make excellent AWD setups for snow/gravel handling with some performance thrown in.

Acura of course has SH-AWD which has its merits for snow and performance.

If you're talking about off-roading are you wanting AWD or a true 4WD with locking differentials?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 02:15 AM
  #18  
Eoanou's Avatar
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 7
From: CT
And no one mentions Lambo?

EVO IX MR had the best AWD system clearly head and shoulders above anything else for the price.

Subaru is pretty good as well.

Audi is good to.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 11:46 AM
  #19  
Brandon24pdx's Avatar
Por Favor?
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 10
Nissan ATTESSA-ETS (sp?) is the probably one of the best AWD systems for on-road performance. Like someone mentioned, the same basic system that saw duty in the R32+ GT-R. Under normal driving situations all torque goes to the back wheels (actually it's something like a 2/98 split), but can go all the way to a 50/50 lock under slip conditions.

For off-road or inclement conditions, I've always heard the Mitsubishi EVO's AWD system is one of the most advanced.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 01:17 PM
  #20  
1killercls's Avatar
GEEZER
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 44,444
Likes: 2,227
From: Dunedin, Fla.
Mine works well for me in my mazdaspeed 6. Thats about all I know about it.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 03:38 AM
  #21  
paliknight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
Likes: 5
From: NJ, USA
sorry for not clarifying, i meant for pure performance. say you were going to race the car at a track.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 03:40 AM
  #22  
Blazing GT's Avatar
.... .... .... ... ....
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,547
Likes: 16
From: N Y C
Sh-awd
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #23  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,385
Likes: 3,068
From: Appleton WI
Originally Posted by paliknight
sorry for not clarifying, i meant for pure performance. Say you were going to race the car at a track.
sh-awd
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 02:40 PM
  #24  
Mokos23's Avatar
Race Director
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
what about mercedes 4matic or bmw's awd systems?

does vw's 4motion basically use the same system as audi's quattro since audi is part of vw?
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #25  
tegkid's Avatar
spaz
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 1
From: seattle
the g37's system is pretty cool since you can adjust how much power you want going to the front.
Reply
Old Mar 29, 2009 | 09:38 PM
  #26  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 21,406
Likes: 2,185
From: Space Coast, FL
x drive, it distributes torque like SH-AWD (which overdrives outside wheel as well) to each wheel independently while braking too! which SH-AWD doesn't do...
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 12:02 AM
  #27  
sharp218's Avatar
Your garage
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 409
Likes: 3
Quattro
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 12:44 AM
  #28  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by Mokos23
what about mercedes 4matic or bmw's awd systems?

does vw's 4motion basically use the same system as audi's quattro since audi is part of vw?
VW"s 4 motion system is not the same as traditional Audi's Quattro system. I say "traditional" because nowadays both 4motion and Quattro are just marketing names.

Quattro used to represent torsen-LSD design. It has quick response, permanent AWD, but it's also pricey and torque split is not variable. 4motion on the other hand is basically a cheaper/simpler version of the famous Porsche 959's PSK system. It uses a multi-plate clutch center differential developed by Haldex.

Most Audi's still use the Torsen-LSD system, but I think the Golf-based cars, like the S3 and TT use the Haldex system. The Passat on the other hand uses the Torsen-LSD system, even though it's called 4motion.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 12:46 AM
  #29  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by csmeance
x drive, it distributes torque like SH-AWD (which overdrives outside wheel as well) to each wheel independently while braking too! which SH-AWD doesn't do...
I think only the X6 has that torque vectoring capability. I'm not sure whether all x-drive vehicles have that feature.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 05:23 AM
  #30  
mrmako's Avatar
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,804
Likes: 1,291
From: Japan
A Subaru Legacy Spec B has the Torsen LSD. It's part of the option package (along with better suspension and some cosmetics).

IMO, I think a system that has variable yaw control, and the ability to distribute torque where and when needed is the best system. And it looks like the Mitsubishi, Subaru, and VW systems do it well.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #31  
TzarChasm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,732
Likes: 233
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by CL6
Well one word for off roading: Pinzgauer
87HP air cooled engine?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 12:33 PM
  #32  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 18,017
Likes: 1,737
Everyone knows there are control and capability benefits of all-wheel drive when you’re dealing with the elements—come sand or high water. Dropping an engine’s torque down to the ground with four tire patches instead of two would give any vehicle more traction. But headed to market in more and more performance cars are new systems that can seamlessly and instantaneously distribute torque to any single wheel at a time. Welcome to torque vectoring all-wheel drive.

Most modern all-wheel-drive cars and SUVs already offer some type of computer-controlled, part-time engagement to save fuel. When the computer detects that one or more wheels is rotating faster than the vehicle’s speed or that the vehicle is yawing off its intended path of travel, the system steps in. First, it engages the other drive axle and applies a proportion of the vehicle’s torque to it. If the wheels continue to spin, the computer reduces engine torque or even brakes one of the wheels, if necessary.

In recent times, these systems have taken a fairly radical step forward. Automakers have reinvented front and rear differentials to the point where an engine’s torque can be passed around—or vectored—to each corner of the car. In other words, your torque can go from front to back like a traditional all-wheel-drive setup <i>and</i> distribute from left to right on a given axle—all very, very quickly. It’s like having a computer-controlled, super-speed limited slip differential in each axle. This means not only great foul-weather traction but also eerily competent handling performance on dry roads.

Acura, for instance, has offered its Super Handling All-Wheel-Drive (SH-AWD) system for several years. It monitors vehicle speed, wheel speed, gear position, steering angle, yaw rate, lateral G forces and other inputs, while automatically adding torque to the outside rear wheel in corners to make the car turn quicker. A set of electromagnetic clutches in the rear differential passes the torque from side to side. The system, which normally distributes torque 90 percent up front and 10 percent in the rear, quickly changes to a 50/50 split during acceleration or hard cornering. The system can then send some or all of that 50 percent going to the rear axle directly to the outside tire to make the vehicle bend into a corner more sharply. Mitsubishi, a torque vectoring pioneer, has used a similar system called Active Yaw Control in the rear axle of its high-performance Evolution sport sedan since the late ’90s.

Audi, BMW and others are taking it a step further: While SH-AWD only works on the rear axle of a normally front-drive vehicle, new systems from automotive suppliers Ricardo in Britain and ZF in Germany can vector torque to all four tires simultaneously.

The Ricardo Cross-Axle Torque-Vectoring system uses wet clutches and planetary gearsets, in both the front and rear differentials, that are controlled by electrical, electromechanical or electrohydraulic control systems. Ricardo says the system’s response time, from the push of the accelerator to the delivery of up to 90 percent of available torque, is only about 0.1 seconds. If Ricardo’s vectoring is used only in an all-wheel-drive vehicle’s center differential, the engine torque effectively gets passed around front-to-rear and side-to-side—with split-second accuracy—for every driving condition. Look for it in the new Audi A4 and A5.

German transmission and driveline company ZF has also developed a torque-vectoring system, called Vector Drive—and it’s ready for volume production in all-wheel and rear-wheel drive vehicles. The system distributes drive torque individually to each of the rear wheels, generating a yaw movement around the vertical axis. This improves both cornering performance and vehicle stability in less-than-ideal road conditions. When driving straight, the torque vectoring rear axle behaves like an ordinary open differential. Drive torque is distributed equally to the wheels. Torque is only distributed individually along both halfshafts on an axle during cornering, controlled by an electromechanically actuated multi-disk brake. The ZF system also generates wheel differential torque independently of the drive torque. When cornering through a downhill section off the throttle, the outer wheel receives more drive torque than the inner wheel, allowing crisper turn-in. The gears of the planetary gearset don’t turn when driving straight, so the system saves fuel too. The torque-vectoring drive also acts like a positive-traction or locking differential on dry or uneven traction startups, with torque going to the wheel with higher friction potential.

These new torque vectoring systems will undoubtedly join forces with the pre-existing ABS brakes, traction control, stability control, steering and rollover mitigation systems. The result will be smarter, safer and quicker vehicles, whether it’s on a rain-soaked freeway, a snowy driveway or a racetrack. —Jim McCraw
Popular Mechanics
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #33  
charliemike's Avatar
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,494
Likes: 1,569
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by TommySalami
Audi AWD has a front-wheel bias, which = lame
Audi changed their FWD bias a few years ago.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #34  
Bdog's Avatar
Not Registered
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,831
Likes: 87
From: Virginia
I know it's not all the cool cars we're talking about, but a neat vid... that's been posted before! I'd like to see BMW and Audi AWD tests.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #35  
mrmako's Avatar
Someday, an RS6 Avant+
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,804
Likes: 1,291
From: Japan
Nice. I'd like to see the Mitsubishi on there, as well as a Merc and BMW. I think Audi would be similar to the VW.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #36  
iforyou's Avatar
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,529
Likes: 852
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Lol, they wouldn't include Mitsubishi there because most likely it will pass the test. I would like to see how sh-awd would do.

So Audi and BMW are basically buying designs from Ricardo and/or ZF. What about Honda? Where did they get their design from?
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 05:44 PM
  #37  
litesout's Avatar
Oliver!!!
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 38
From: Orlando, FL
The only one I've had any direct experience with is the Audi Haldex system from the TT Quatro Turbo. With the 6MT and the VSC turned off I could smoke all four tires. But with the system turned on I could put the passenger in my lap on a right hand turn. It was unbelievable, until it came time to do a fluid change. That Haldex system requires fluid changes every 15k miles, and it ain't cheap.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #38  
Ken1997TL's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 45,641
Likes: 2,335
From: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Originally Posted by iforyou
Lol, they wouldn't include Mitsubishi there because most likely it will pass the test. I would like to see how sh-awd would do.

So Audi and BMW are basically buying designs from Ricardo and/or ZF. What about Honda? Where did they get their design from?
Honda designed it themselves, just like their transmissions.. its all done in house. No need to pay other companies for use of technology.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #39  
Allen-'s Avatar
is out, so the
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 756
Likes: 3
I'm a big fan of SH-AWD. I don't think the true potential of it has been released. I'd like to see it with 20:80 F/R in a small RWD car like the S2000.

But, this fight will go on and on for forever. But who has the lightest AWD system? I know all that extra equipment adds weight, so who has reduced the weight, while still gaining performance?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2009 | 04:20 PM
  #40  
paliknight's Avatar
Thread Starter
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 975
Likes: 5
From: NJ, USA
Originally Posted by Bdog
I know it's not all the cool cars we're talking about, but a neat vid... that's been posted before! I'd like to see BMW and Audi AWD tests.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ooQRxlChvMw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
thats an interesting video, but it is obviously biased.

i would like to see those tests done from a 3rd unbiased party with all the most famous AWD systems out. (honda, mitsubishi, BMW, mercedes, audi/volkswagen, nissan, subaru, and even the american AWD systems)
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:41 PM.