Another TSX Test Drive Review
#1
It's Always Shabbat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another TSX Test Drive Review
Well, I took my ride to the dealer to get an oil change and for a transmission check because I'm paranoid after hearing all the stories here (all is well with my 01-s 42k btw).. So I decided to check out the TSX and what do you know, a salesman actually came up to me and offered to let me take it out.. That's (literally) never happened to me (22 yrs old)..
Long story short.. The car is much too quiet for me.. I like the young cool guy feeling of driving the CL.. somewhat sporty, somewhat luxury.. but the TSX is all quiet and boring and accordish.. it's slow.. i floored it and never flung back in my seat or felt balance swing a little as my CL does.. no pep.. if i had to squeeze through two cars or get over quickly i dont feel like i could.. not nearly like i can in my CL..
maybe im just spoiled by my car.. but the TSX leaves a lot to be desired in terms of speed.. it handled no differently than my car either.. what i did notice was how incredibly quiet the cabin is.. and i really like the look of the dash and the look from behind the car.. very sexy...
radio stinks.. blue on greyish color needs work.. dual climate was nice but the position of all the buttons is still not there.. i like how the CL heated seats buttons are tucked in a little.. on the TSX they're in the open.. not clean enough for me..
but a nice car for a 40 year old i guess who doesnt care much for speed, but does require a smooth quiet comfortable ride..
is the stereo bose? Salesmen kept telling me it is but I saw no mention of bose anywhere and it sure didnt sound that great..
Long story short.. The car is much too quiet for me.. I like the young cool guy feeling of driving the CL.. somewhat sporty, somewhat luxury.. but the TSX is all quiet and boring and accordish.. it's slow.. i floored it and never flung back in my seat or felt balance swing a little as my CL does.. no pep.. if i had to squeeze through two cars or get over quickly i dont feel like i could.. not nearly like i can in my CL..
maybe im just spoiled by my car.. but the TSX leaves a lot to be desired in terms of speed.. it handled no differently than my car either.. what i did notice was how incredibly quiet the cabin is.. and i really like the look of the dash and the look from behind the car.. very sexy...
radio stinks.. blue on greyish color needs work.. dual climate was nice but the position of all the buttons is still not there.. i like how the CL heated seats buttons are tucked in a little.. on the TSX they're in the open.. not clean enough for me..
but a nice car for a 40 year old i guess who doesnt care much for speed, but does require a smooth quiet comfortable ride..
is the stereo bose? Salesmen kept telling me it is but I saw no mention of bose anywhere and it sure didnt sound that great..
#2
Cajun Gumbo Man
If it doesn't say "BOSE" it ain't Bose.........Why wouldn't they put Bose ??????????????????????
I'm 43 and DON'T LIKE A GRANNY QUITE CABIN and Slow at that ! I'm not impressed with it.....
I'm 43 and DON'T LIKE A GRANNY QUITE CABIN and Slow at that ! I'm not impressed with it.....
#4
Cajun Gumbo Man
The looks of the car is NOT appealing, therefore not interested in Driving a MT or slush box TSX.
Thanks !
Thanks !
#5
Suzuka Master
Re: Another TSX Test Drive Review
Originally posted by elliot
... So I decided to check out the TSX and what do you know, a salesman actually came up to me and offered to let me take it out.. That's (literally) never happened to me (22 yrs old)..
... So I decided to check out the TSX and what do you know, a salesman actually came up to me and offered to let me take it out.. That's (literally) never happened to me (22 yrs old)..
#6
I've driven our TSX Auto demo a couple times now and I usually come back with a smile on my face. The engine is powerful enough to move the car well and the sportshift's letting you drop down to first and not auto-shifting you into 2nd is a nice change from the CLS.
The CLS is such an old person's design compared to the TSX. The TSX is marketed primarily to mid 20s to mid 30s and it really fits that age group to a T. Sexy interior, lotsa features, enough performance to pass and get out of its own way even with 4 passengers, and 4 doors.
I think the exterior could be shaped a little better but it's still a sweet car. Perfect competition for the A4, IS300, and S40, just as it's supposed to be.
The CLS is such an old person's design compared to the TSX. The TSX is marketed primarily to mid 20s to mid 30s and it really fits that age group to a T. Sexy interior, lotsa features, enough performance to pass and get out of its own way even with 4 passengers, and 4 doors.
I think the exterior could be shaped a little better but it's still a sweet car. Perfect competition for the A4, IS300, and S40, just as it's supposed to be.
#7
Best D-Line in the NFL
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gainesville, Fl for college, Palm Beach Gardens, Fl at Home
Age: 38
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think interior is nice, engine sucks, id take Cl-S anyday. I hate all these bitches who complain about their Cl-S, our Acura's are damn nice.
Trending Topics
#8
....................
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: united states
Posts: 5,063
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I looked at one tonight at the dealership. This one had the gunmetal grey rims, silver interior accent trim package, fog lights, body molding kit, etc
Total came to like $29K!!!
For the $, I'd take a stick IS300 over it.
The rear does look great, I didn't know it was sooo tall in the back!
Also, I like the way the headlights look too, narrow.
The sides stick out. Seems like they would door ding easily.
Total came to like $29K!!!
For the $, I'd take a stick IS300 over it.
The rear does look great, I didn't know it was sooo tall in the back!
Also, I like the way the headlights look too, narrow.
The sides stick out. Seems like they would door ding easily.
#11
It's Always Shabbat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jrock, you and me must have looked at different cars.. yeah i drove the automatic, and the engine was slacking.. i floored it and had to wait a second for it to move.. and when it did, it wasn't too powerful ... this is competition for an a4, not a is300 or the others.. this is not nearly as nice as an a4, and the interior sucks compared to an a4, but it's a nicer exterior, imo.
nice interior in the tsx? you guyhs have different tastes than i do.. hate those oval shape with clicky buttons
nice interior in the tsx? you guyhs have different tastes than i do.. hate those oval shape with clicky buttons
#13
Originally posted by elliot
jrock, you and me must have looked at different cars.. yeah i drove the automatic, and the engine was slacking.. i floored it and had to wait a second for it to move.. and when it did, it wasn't too powerful ... this is competition for an a4, not a is300 or the others.. this is not nearly as nice as an a4, and the interior sucks compared to an a4, but it's a nicer exterior, imo.
nice interior in the tsx? you guyhs have different tastes than i do.. hate those oval shape with clicky buttons
jrock, you and me must have looked at different cars.. yeah i drove the automatic, and the engine was slacking.. i floored it and had to wait a second for it to move.. and when it did, it wasn't too powerful ... this is competition for an a4, not a is300 or the others.. this is not nearly as nice as an a4, and the interior sucks compared to an a4, but it's a nicer exterior, imo.
nice interior in the tsx? you guyhs have different tastes than i do.. hate those oval shape with clicky buttons
The only complaint I can find with the TSX, which is what I drove, is the lack of power passenger seat.
Also the exterior design is very nice up front but I find the rear quarters to be too big and square.
#14
I also test drove one yesterday. I was impressed with everything but the engine. Perhaps it is because it was an automatic (so i trying to convince myself), but i only get the feel of vtec when i put it in auto mode, when i go in sportshift mode, i couldn't get any vtec kicks. I was quite disappointed with the power, i rather have my 3.0 CL !
BUT i really love the interior and everything else !
BUT i really love the interior and everything else !
#15
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everyone who's complaining about the engine on the TSX are comparing it the CL's engine. Of course it won't feel as powerful! It's like an A6 2.7t owner complaining that the A4 1.8t is "nice but underpowered." If you're going to compare engines, compare it to engines in the same class (A4 1.8t, 325, etc) If you drove those cars, I don't think your comparison would be quite as lopsided.
#16
It's Always Shabbat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im sure that's true.. but i was strictly comparing it to the CL and therefore to waht i am used to and now (scarily) demand
#20
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by elliot
im sure that's true.. but i was strictly comparing it to the CL and therefore to waht i am used to and now (scarily) demand
im sure that's true.. but i was strictly comparing it to the CL and therefore to waht i am used to and now (scarily) demand
#21
Perhaps the K24 does have "ridiculus" potential for modding. However, stock wise, for the price of the TSX, there just isn't the usual bang for the buck feel with Acura. Its kind of like a bmw 323, all nice and stuff, but under powered and pricey. THis is not to say that i think HP=price, but just a little disappointed, thats all.
#23
It's Always Shabbat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if you are willing to spend about $26k, you're better off getting an Audi, IMO.. I agree with the post above-- the quality/price is not there this time.. and yes, the handling felt exactly like my 2001 CL-S stock.. i didnt feel an improvement.. and that includes taking turns and pushing it a little
I still like the car, just not for myself.. that's all... i'm not putting it down, just giving it a review relative to my preferences
I still like the car, just not for myself.. that's all... i'm not putting it down, just giving it a review relative to my preferences
#24
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by elliot
if you are willing to spend about $26k, you're better off getting an Audi, IMO.. I agree with the post above-- the quality/price is not there this time.. and yes, the handling felt exactly like my 2001 CL-S stock.. i didnt feel an improvement.. and that includes taking turns and pushing it a little
I still like the car, just not for myself.. that's all... i'm not putting it down, just giving it a review relative to my preferences
if you are willing to spend about $26k, you're better off getting an Audi, IMO.. I agree with the post above-- the quality/price is not there this time.. and yes, the handling felt exactly like my 2001 CL-S stock.. i didnt feel an improvement.. and that includes taking turns and pushing it a little
I still like the car, just not for myself.. that's all... i'm not putting it down, just giving it a review relative to my preferences
#25
Not to knock the TSX (since I've never ridden in one)...I can only imagine the lack of TORQUE on that car...just like the S2000...pricing wise, damn, it's steeeeep...why not buy the new accord V6 w/MT? More power, more torque...styling is ok..but shit, the TSX rear looks just like a camry!
And what is this K24 potential? Man, in stock form, it's like what it is now...I'm sure if you dump enough money on any car, it will go faster than in stock form.
I almost bought an S2000 back before I purchased my 01 CLS. The Six speed transmission was a minor detraction for me, but the car was like $41,000 at a HONDA DEALER....FUCK THAT. I don't care how go-kart like the S2k is...for a no torque 4 banger for $41k? bullshit...same thing goes with the TSX..it's has a nice interior..but damn, $27k for that car is a bit pricey..considering a puny ass 2.4L 4banger no matter what "potential"...
And what is this K24 potential? Man, in stock form, it's like what it is now...I'm sure if you dump enough money on any car, it will go faster than in stock form.
I almost bought an S2000 back before I purchased my 01 CLS. The Six speed transmission was a minor detraction for me, but the car was like $41,000 at a HONDA DEALER....FUCK THAT. I don't care how go-kart like the S2k is...for a no torque 4 banger for $41k? bullshit...same thing goes with the TSX..it's has a nice interior..but damn, $27k for that car is a bit pricey..considering a puny ass 2.4L 4banger no matter what "potential"...
#26
It's Always Shabbat
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the tsx drives like an accord.. boring, yet comfortable. and it handles like an accord too.. paying 26k for that car is beyond me. i'd much rather an accord and save a couple bucks, or buy an a4 and deal with 170hp.
#27
The Third Ball
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Age: 45
Posts: 49,418
Received 5,079 Likes
on
2,696 Posts
Originally posted by elliot
the tsx drives like an accord.. boring, yet comfortable. and it handles like an accord too.. paying 26k for that car is beyond me. i'd much rather an accord and save a couple bucks, or buy an a4 and deal with 170hp.
the tsx drives like an accord.. boring, yet comfortable. and it handles like an accord too.. paying 26k for that car is beyond me. i'd much rather an accord and save a couple bucks, or buy an a4 and deal with 170hp.
IMHO I really like the TSX I think its a great looking car with an excellent interior and fun to drive. BUT since the only thing that really concerns when performance is in question is highway driving I would personally take the IS300. The V6 will still be a better performer at top end speeds on the highway. That and you just cant beat lexus service. I need to drive them again back to back i might be willing to change my opinion on that one cause i like both cars so damn much.
You also keep mentioning the A4 which is cool. Lots of people like it, but that is one car I dont like. Ive had a bad taste in my mouth for Audi ever since I almost bought a used A4 3.0 quattro 5spd. I dont care for the interior or the way they feel and i really dont trust their reliabilty. But that is just me and thats why there are so many different makes to choose from.
#28
Originally posted by DDT-TypeS
Not to knock the TSX (since I've never ridden in one)...I can only imagine the lack of TORQUE on that car...
Not to knock the TSX (since I've never ridden in one)...I can only imagine the lack of TORQUE on that car...
Originally posted by elliot
if you are willing to spend about $26k, you're better off getting an Audi,
if you are willing to spend about $26k, you're better off getting an Audi,
#29
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by JRock
$26k will barely get you an A4 1.8t auto without Quattro, and without ANY options packages. If you load it out the way the TSX comes standard, you'd be pushing $30-31k easily. Bang-for-the-buck, the TSX is all over the A4. Not to mention the MUCH roomier rear seating in the TSX and I think the trunk is bigger too.
$26k will barely get you an A4 1.8t auto without Quattro, and without ANY options packages. If you load it out the way the TSX comes standard, you'd be pushing $30-31k easily. Bang-for-the-buck, the TSX is all over the A4. Not to mention the MUCH roomier rear seating in the TSX and I think the trunk is bigger too.
Get can i get an amen!
#30
TQ > MPG
I drove a 6 speed, and to be honest wasn't mightily impressed. For someone who doesn't need a whole lot of power it's a decent car. The one I drove was $27k. 200hp isn't really enough to make people go from a BMW to an Acura. In the end it boils down to that most people will pay a couple extra grand for the BMW name and a torquey I-6. Just my thoughts though, and I'm sure the people who buy the TSX will be very pleased with it.
#31
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by jtkz13
I drove a 6 speed, and to be honest wasn't mightily impressed. For someone who doesn't need a whole lot of power it's a decent car. The one I drove was $27k. 200hp isn't really enough to make people go from a BMW to an Acura. In the end it boils down to that most people will pay a couple extra grand for the BMW name and a torquey I-6. Just my thoughts though, and I'm sure the people who buy the TSX will be very pleased with it.
I drove a 6 speed, and to be honest wasn't mightily impressed. For someone who doesn't need a whole lot of power it's a decent car. The one I drove was $27k. 200hp isn't really enough to make people go from a BMW to an Acura. In the end it boils down to that most people will pay a couple extra grand for the BMW name and a torquey I-6. Just my thoughts though, and I'm sure the people who buy the TSX will be very pleased with it.
2. A pretty loaded TSX comes in at $26.5K. A base 325 starts at $27.8K. Get any options and you're looking at way over thirty. So "most people will pay a couple extra grand for the BMW" will actually boil down to quite a few thousand.
But that's just my two cents.
#32
TQ > MPG
From the small amount of research I just did it looks like C&D got a 15.5 1/4 mile for the TSX, and for a 2001 325i they got a 15.4. So, I wouldn't make assumptions just yet. The BMW I-6's are known to run strong for their hp level.
#33
For C&D numbers those actually sound believable. In general though, don't bother quoting C&D numbers around here because they can't drive.
Btw the exact prices in my area are $26990 for non-navi, $28990 for navi.
Btw the exact prices in my area are $26990 for non-navi, $28990 for navi.
#35
Originally posted by jtkz13
From the small amount of research I just did it looks like C&D got a 15.5 1/4 mile for the TSX
From the small amount of research I just did it looks like C&D got a 15.5 1/4 mile for the TSX
i'm curious how the 325i- 27k+ can be tsx competition, yet the g35 isn't included as competition- 27k+.
#36
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by heyitsme
C/D-estimated performance (6-sp)
i'm curious how the 325i- 27k+ can be tsx competition, yet the g35 isn't included as competition- 27k+.
C/D-estimated performance (6-sp)
i'm curious how the 325i- 27k+ can be tsx competition, yet the g35 isn't included as competition- 27k+.
g35 is a full size sedan.
#37
ehh, speaking for myself, if i have 30k to spend, i'm not going to eliminate cars because they aren't in the same 'physical size' class.
think the tsx's saving grace is the aftermarket, if it takes off like the rsx.
think the tsx's saving grace is the aftermarket, if it takes off like the rsx.
#38
Cost Drivers!!!!
Originally posted by heyitsme
ehh, speaking for myself, if i have 30k to spend, i'm not going to eliminate cars because they aren't in the same 'physical size' class.
think the tsx's saving grace is the aftermarket, if it takes off like the rsx.
ehh, speaking for myself, if i have 30k to spend, i'm not going to eliminate cars because they aren't in the same 'physical size' class.
think the tsx's saving grace is the aftermarket, if it takes off like the rsx.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TLDude876
Car Talk
134
12-28-2016 03:18 PM