2003 Infiniti G35 Dyno graph
2003 Infiniti G35 Dyno graph
2003 infinity g35
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 228.7 @ 6240 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 221.5 @ 4670 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 272 @ 6240 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 264 @ 4670 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.60 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:09:36
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 228.7 @ 6240 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 221.5 @ 4670 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 272 @ 6240 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 264 @ 4670 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.60 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:09:36
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
Here is another one
2003 infinity g35
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 231.9 @ 6200 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 222.9 @ 4660 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 276 @ 6200 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 265 @ 4660 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.51 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:10:00
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
2003 infinity g35
Engine Specs: 3.5Liter dohc (6Cyl)
Mileage: 0 miles
Aspiration: normally aspirated[0 psi]
Transmission: 6M
Max (RW/FW)HP: 231.9 @ 6200 rpms
Max (RW/FW)TQ: 222.9 @ 4660 rpms
Estimated Fly Wheel Horsepower: 276 @ 6200 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Estimated Fly Wheel Torque: 265 @ 4660 rpms [assuming 16 % drivetrain loss]
Room temp / Inlet Temp (F): 0.0 / 30.1
Pressure (kPa): 30.1
Humidity (%): 0.0
Condition Details: Gear Ratio : 59.51 RPM/MPH Correction Factor : 0.97 SAE
Fan: off
Date and Time: 2003-03-22 - 22:10:00
Dyno Correction Factor SAE Corrected
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Python2121
how much more power will you get broken in?
how much more power will you get broken in?
Originally posted by Scrib
The coupe 6mt dyno looks better!!!
I've heard the VQ gets stronger with increased mileage. How much? No clue! :o
The coupe 6mt dyno looks better!!!

I've heard the VQ gets stronger with increased mileage. How much? No clue! :o

Ruf
Originally posted by darrinb
i've seen better dynos than that for the G. where can we line up at?? i'm more interested in 1/4 slips than dyno graphs
i've seen better dynos than that for the G. where can we line up at?? i'm more interested in 1/4 slips than dyno graphs
Originally posted by Scrib

I'm trying to figure out why Gavrill was trying to achieve by posting the dyno.

I'm trying to figure out why Gavrill was trying to achieve by posting the dyno.
Oh nothing specific. We were talking about how much power the SRT4 puts to the ground in a different thread and I found those dynos as well, so I thought it'd be intersting to open a thread with them.
That's all.
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
Originally posted by typeR
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
acceleration is not all about high rpm's. just look at the vette.
Originally posted by typeR
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
i dont know why there's so much down play on this...im very interested in the dyno's of our closest competition the one thing know ones mentioned is...the car only goes to 6250 we get another 1000 turns of the motor on them
Originally posted by gavriil
Where is the power made in the rev band is irelevant in an acceleration competition. As long as you are able to put the power on the ground, the revs dont matter.
Where is the power made in the rev band is irelevant in an acceleration competition. As long as you are able to put the power on the ground, the revs dont matter.
Well I got to drive a G35 6spd Coupe just a few days ago, a friend bought one and came down from Dallas.
Let me tell you, that car has balls written all over it. I want oen so bad now, but its not the car I need for work at the moment. So damn. Anyways, I think its faster than a CL-S 6spd imho from what I remember the test drive being.
Let me tell you, that car has balls written all over it. I want oen so bad now, but its not the car I need for work at the moment. So damn. Anyways, I think its faster than a CL-S 6spd imho from what I remember the test drive being.
i was looking at these. :P
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=80369
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=86332
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=80369
http://www.acura-cl.com/forums/showt...threadid=86332


