2003 Audi A4 Cabrio cool photos
Trending Topics
Originally posted by Zapata
Three letters.......FWD on an audi....what's the point? Fit and finish looks awesome but then so does every audi
Three letters.......FWD on an audi....what's the point? Fit and finish looks awesome but then so does every audi
Originally posted by 2001AudiS4
I read the reasoning behind the FWD only on this car is from Audi doing their research. They claim that the majority of people that buy convertibles live in warm, dry climates. They feel there is no need to put AWD on cars that will be driven in those types of climates. I guess I agree with that part, but I feel they should give the option to the buyer. AWD is what made Audi famous.
I read the reasoning behind the FWD only on this car is from Audi doing their research. They claim that the majority of people that buy convertibles live in warm, dry climates. They feel there is no need to put AWD on cars that will be driven in those types of climates. I guess I agree with that part, but I feel they should give the option to the buyer. AWD is what made Audi famous.
Notice that the photos are of an Audi version only sold in Europe. It "wears" a 2.4 liter engine making about 170 or so HP.
The 170HP, 1.8 liter 4, will also be introduced here in the USA later but I just dont see how it will be sufficient for the weight of this car. It's weak even in the coupe. This car is much heavier than the coupe. Audi needs to enlarge its engines. What do you think?
Originally posted by gavriil
Exactly. And they added that 90% chose the auto tranny so they did not bother with the manual tranny for the USA market.
Notice that the photos are of an Audi version only sold in Europe. It "wears" a 2.4 liter engine making about 170 or so HP.
The 170HP, 1.8 liter 4, will also be introduced here in the USA later but I just dont see how it will be sufficient for the weight of this car. It's weak even in the coupe. This car is much heavier than the coupe. Audi needs to enlarge its engines. What do you think?
Exactly. And they added that 90% chose the auto tranny so they did not bother with the manual tranny for the USA market.
Notice that the photos are of an Audi version only sold in Europe. It "wears" a 2.4 liter engine making about 170 or so HP.
The 170HP, 1.8 liter 4, will also be introduced here in the USA later but I just dont see how it will be sufficient for the weight of this car. It's weak even in the coupe. This car is much heavier than the coupe. Audi needs to enlarge its engines. What do you think?
Originally posted by 2001AudiS4
If you are talking about the 1.8t (turbocharged) engine, then it will be ok. It is a rather smooth engine capable of putting some decent power out. The main problem is the lack of a manual IMO.
If you are talking about the 1.8t (turbocharged) engine, then it will be ok. It is a rather smooth engine capable of putting some decent power out. The main problem is the lack of a manual IMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM







Yeah I can't explain it either.


