2003 Audi A4 Cabrio cool photos
Trending Topics
#9
Suzuka Master
Originally posted by Zapata
Three letters.......FWD on an audi....what's the point? Fit and finish looks awesome but then so does every audi
Three letters.......FWD on an audi....what's the point? Fit and finish looks awesome but then so does every audi
#11
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by 2001AudiS4
I read the reasoning behind the FWD only on this car is from Audi doing their research. They claim that the majority of people that buy convertibles live in warm, dry climates. They feel there is no need to put AWD on cars that will be driven in those types of climates. I guess I agree with that part, but I feel they should give the option to the buyer. AWD is what made Audi famous.
I read the reasoning behind the FWD only on this car is from Audi doing their research. They claim that the majority of people that buy convertibles live in warm, dry climates. They feel there is no need to put AWD on cars that will be driven in those types of climates. I guess I agree with that part, but I feel they should give the option to the buyer. AWD is what made Audi famous.
Notice that the photos are of an Audi version only sold in Europe. It "wears" a 2.4 liter engine making about 170 or so HP.
The 170HP, 1.8 liter 4, will also be introduced here in the USA later but I just dont see how it will be sufficient for the weight of this car. It's weak even in the coupe. This car is much heavier than the coupe. Audi needs to enlarge its engines. What do you think?
#13
Suzuka Master
Originally posted by gavriil
Exactly. And they added that 90% chose the auto tranny so they did not bother with the manual tranny for the USA market.
Notice that the photos are of an Audi version only sold in Europe. It "wears" a 2.4 liter engine making about 170 or so HP.
The 170HP, 1.8 liter 4, will also be introduced here in the USA later but I just dont see how it will be sufficient for the weight of this car. It's weak even in the coupe. This car is much heavier than the coupe. Audi needs to enlarge its engines. What do you think?
Exactly. And they added that 90% chose the auto tranny so they did not bother with the manual tranny for the USA market.
Notice that the photos are of an Audi version only sold in Europe. It "wears" a 2.4 liter engine making about 170 or so HP.
The 170HP, 1.8 liter 4, will also be introduced here in the USA later but I just dont see how it will be sufficient for the weight of this car. It's weak even in the coupe. This car is much heavier than the coupe. Audi needs to enlarge its engines. What do you think?
#14
I really don't like it. It looks too much like any other Audi. Also, the body is way too high, IMO. I thinkt tha the plastic trim that runs along the sides should be higher. It looks too narow too
#15
Moderator Alumnus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally posted by 2001AudiS4
If you are talking about the 1.8t (turbocharged) engine, then it will be ok. It is a rather smooth engine capable of putting some decent power out. The main problem is the lack of a manual IMO.
If you are talking about the 1.8t (turbocharged) engine, then it will be ok. It is a rather smooth engine capable of putting some decent power out. The main problem is the lack of a manual IMO.
#16
Instructor
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2 problems with that car!
1.too expensive..!
2.No Quattro!
thats what audi is famous for..if that car had quattro im sure ppl will be driving there convertibles more in other seasons!
1.too expensive..!
2.No Quattro!
thats what audi is famous for..if that car had quattro im sure ppl will be driving there convertibles more in other seasons!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
07-16-2017 07:33 AM