Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

Off Camera Flash

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:23 PM
  #81  
klepto's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 12,005
Likes: 10
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Dan Martin
+1

I have tried it and it worked. That being said, I never use it that way since I use Skyports for the triggering.
I almost bought skyports. It came down to that and cybersyncs but I ended up getting the cybersyncs.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #82  
PimpCL23's Avatar
contrarian in fashion
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,861
Likes: 19
From: Los Angeles / Highland Park
Originally Posted by klepto
I almost bought skyports. It came down to that and cybersyncs but I ended up getting the cybersyncs.
im gonna have to borrow ur gf .... k thanx bye
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:52 PM
  #83  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,101
Likes: 3,353
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by Billiam
Why would using the flash off camera make any difference to battery life or recycle time compared to using it in the hot shoe? You obviously may have to bump the power a a stop or two if you're shooting through an umbrella or softbox but I think that's relatively insignificant for today's flashes.

BTW, while researching this very subject over the weekend I came to the complete realization that you lose ETTL when working off camera with most light modifiers such as an umbrella or softbox.
i was talking about since you are running off batteries that they will eventually lose power and start having longer and longer recycle times whether it be on the hot shoe or off.

whereas with a traditional flash setup, they are plugged in and have consistent recycle times.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:53 PM
  #84  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Billiam
Skyports are already on the shopping list.

I don't foresee myself wanting or needing two light sources anytime soon. Not to mention I don't think the master/slave setup would even work with an umbrella or softbox. I just wanted to make certain of the EX master, EX II slave thing ahead of time so I could know up front if that was going to be another eventual expense.

What I'm trying to find now is the hardware for holding a reflector when using a single light source. Alas, I have no assistant.
See youtube video above (with minor adaption). You know you want to try it...
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 10:23 PM
  #85  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Billiam
Skyports are already on the shopping list.

I don't foresee myself wanting or needing two light sources anytime soon. Not to mention I don't think the master/slave setup would even work with an umbrella or softbox. I just wanted to make certain of the EX master, EX II slave thing ahead of time so I could know up front if that was going to be another eventual expense.

What I'm trying to find now is the hardware for holding a reflector when using a single light source. Alas, I have no assistant.
Yes, reflectors are a bitch to manage if you're by yourself. They all like to fold up like potato chips if you don't hold them flat, and it's critical to keep them flat because they rapidly lose their efficiency when they're bent.

The skyports have worked great since I bought them. I've never had range issues and the receivers seem to last a long time between recharges. I can't say I've ever had one die on me, I just plug them in every now and then when I feel like it's been a long time, so I have no idea how long they really last. I really like the lightweight and compact design of these units because I take them everywhere with me.

My only complaints about the system are related to the design of the receivers. They have a very tiny pushbutton on top to turn them on or off. It's very easy to turn them on accidentally if they bump into something while you're carrying them in your bag. Likewise, it's easy to turn them off if you're moving light stands around.

Although the lithium batteries in the receivers last a long long time, they're not replaceable. That's a big oversight should you forget to charge them before a big shoot and find out they're dead. That's never happened to me, but it's always something I'm cautious of, especially with that small pushbutton for power. The weird thing is the transmitter takes a standard CR-2032 lithium coin cell and it has a lever switch that is much less likely to be turned on accidentally. It's like they thought it could be a problem for the transmitter but for some reason decided to go a different route with the receivers. I now keep the receivers in the nice hard case provided by Elinchrom and haven't had one turn on accidentally since.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 10:26 PM
  #86  
deltaboxxx's Avatar
Registered speed offender
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 52
what about the fact that they only trigger 1 light? (at least thats what i got from reading)

arent the pocket wizards kind of a better buy in this case?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 10:35 PM
  #87  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
You need one skyport receiver per strobe, just like pocket wizards. You can trigger as many lights as you wish in up to 4 groups. You can decide which of the four groups fires from the transmitter or you can fire all four groups together. You can even put a camera in a group if you want to trigger it from a remote location, although you'll need a special cable to trigger a camera.

Edit: high-end studio strobes are fired from a centralized power source which may have two or more strobe heads plugged into it. You could use one skyport to trigger all the strobes connected to that power pack.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #88  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
OK, I've had a handle on the equipment involved with off camera flash for a while now. What I haven't had my head around is exposure metering. If you're using one or two speedlights off camera with umbrellas or soft boxes, then you're presumably not going to have ETTL functionality. Or so it seems. So that leaves you with using the flash in manual mode. OK fine. So you have to manually set the flash power and zoom setting. But still, how do you know what to set them at if you don't have a dedicated flash meter? After a bit of searching, I found this post over at Strobist which finally made the application of guide number make some sense. I don't know why he doesn't include this in his Lighting 101 articles.

http://strobist.blogspot.com/2007/12...ash-meter.html

OK, so I pull out my 580EX (non-II) and start fiddling with it to find the guide number calculator like the one shown on the SB800 at Strobist. Nothing. With the flash in manual mode, all that's in the display are the power and zoom settings. No ISO or f-stop setting and the distance scale always remains blank. I then did some searching and found this article over at the Canon DLC.

http://www.usa.canon.com/dlc/control...&articleID=946

Apparently, one of the improvements made with the 580EX II is the addition of its own self-contained exposure sensor. With this new feature, you can set the II series flash to "external metering mode" which then apparently gives you a functional GN calculator. In the mean time, it appears that my > $300 580X flash doesn't offer the same convenience of a GN calculator which you can get on sub-$90 Vivitar flash designed in the 70's. It looks like I'd need to keep a copy of the table from the flash's manual in my bag.

Reply
Old Feb 1, 2009 | 02:30 PM
  #89  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Damn, some really good info in this thread...
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 10:27 AM
  #90  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
Very likely something worth considering should it make a stop at a city near you. I know I'll be there if it comes to Chicago.

http://www.kelbytraininglive.com/fla...aphy-tour.html
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #91  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
^I can't wait until they post dates for this one!

Come on Phoenix!! Big money big money no whammie....
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2009 | 05:23 PM
  #92  
Billiam's Avatar
Big Block go VROOOM!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,578
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
In case anyone hasn't caught wind of the "teaser" release, PocketWizard is supposed to announce something new next Monday (2/16) on the opening day of the WPPI show. It's being mentioned in conjunction with Profoto (a studio strobe company) so the new PW goodies may only have to do with control of Profoto's products.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/con...id=7-9884-9899
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #93  
EuRTSX's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 23,588
Likes: 106
From: District of Corruption
Stogz did those triggers work for you?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 01:06 AM
  #94  
stogie1020's Avatar
Thread Starter
Needs more Lemon Pledge
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Just a quick question for those of you who have used the off camera CORD with an external flash:

If you handhold the flash (no bracket), does the light source pretty much always end up "camera left" or "above the camera" since you are holding the camera in your right hand?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 10:49 AM
  #95  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Technically, yes. But unless you have really long arms, or your subject is really close I'm not sure how difference that makes.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #96  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,085
Likes: 14,235
good bump, I have had a question on my mind regarding handheld off-camera for a while. I see photogs in the club frequently holding the camera in one hand and flash in the other, and not always looking into the viewfinder, even for regular group shots. What about composition? What if you have to re-adjust and zoom? What if you have to double-check the focus? What about holding it steady so that things appear clear? It seems to me that all of these VITAL aspects of the shot are thrown out of the window with handheld off-camera shots. What has been your experience, or what you have seen, in regard to these things?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 11:48 AM
  #97  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
I can't say I have much experience but here are my guesses...

If they don't have Live View, then they are probably zoomed out enough to cover the group and may crop later if the composition is off.

AF should get close enough even without looking (as long as the right AF points get used).

Camera shake isn't a big concern with flash photography as long as you are using reasonable exposures (~ 1/4 sec may even be okay) since the flash will "freeze" the subject even if using some ambient light. Things further in the background may not be clear, but that's not really a bid deal.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 12:24 PM
  #98  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,085
Likes: 14,235
All true. Regarding background objects not being clear, this is subjective but to me a shot like that is "messy". There is a way to do it artistically and that is fine and leads to dramatic results, but if you have background shake due to not holding the camera steady, I think its a messy pic. Having to compose after the fact is added work. My 2 cents.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #99  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
^ Your points are valid. I was just trying to reply to your questions.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #100  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,101
Likes: 3,353
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Waiting for dans response
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 02:02 PM
  #101  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,085
Likes: 14,235
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #102  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Mizouse
Waiting for dans response
Glad I could help.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #103  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,101
Likes: 3,353
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by moeronn
Glad I could help.
saw him in here and thought he was going to post something ... Didn't mean to attack you or anything
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 02:23 PM
  #104  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,085
Likes: 14,235
yea I wanna see a REAL response! haha

Zouse always instigating.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 02:38 PM
  #105  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
I was kidding. Like I said, I had no real experience with this, so I was just taking a guess.

Now if you ever question me about something I think I know about, then





Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #106  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,085
Likes: 14,235
Zouse you are an attacker
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #107  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto


I've used the flash at arms length a few times and it's pretty awkward, but the results can be good. I still prefer to look through the viewfinder, but if it's just casual snaps, you can go wide angle and crop heavily if your composition is off. Live view might help in some cases, but there are a few consequences when using a flash with live view.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 07:13 PM
  #108  
srika's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,085
Likes: 14,235
A-ha!!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 07:23 PM
  #109  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Dan Martin


I've used the flash at arms length a few times and it's pretty awkward, but the results can be good. I still prefer to look through the viewfinder, but if it's just casual snaps, you can go wide angle and crop heavily if your composition is off. Live view might help in some cases, but there are a few consequences when using a flash with live view.





What types of consequences to using a flash with live view are you referring to?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009 | 08:09 PM
  #110  
Dan Martin's Avatar
Photography Nerd
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21,489
Likes: 11
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by moeronn
What types of consequences to using a flash with live view are you referring to?
Slow autofocus focus is one consequence.

Also, if you happen to use one of the silent shooting modes in live view, the flash won't fire. More specifically, it won't fire if it's in the hotshoe or if it's being triggered by anything in the hotshoe (off-camera cord, pocket wizard, etc.). However, it will fire if you're using a sync cord or a pocket wizard that's connected via the sync port. If you use the disable the silent shooting modes and use the default live view mode, it seems to work well.

Last edited by Dan Martin; Apr 23, 2009 at 08:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 07:53 AM
  #111  
ludachrisvt's Avatar
Wants an M3 in
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 3
www.strobist.com
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 09:21 AM
  #112  
moeronn's Avatar
is learning to moonwalk i
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 15,520
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
BTW, my stands and umbrellas just came from B&H yesterday. I don't know if I'll really be using them much until next month, but will be playing around with them a little.
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 01:26 AM
  #113  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,101
Likes: 3,353
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)




i did not know that the Nikon SC 29 - Flash synchro cable has an AF assist beam on the part that attaches to your hot shoe on the camera!
Reply
Old May 12, 2009 | 09:15 AM
  #114  
jupitersolo's Avatar
nnInn
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
Yes, that's why the damn thing cost $80 or more.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 12:56 AM
  #115  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,101
Likes: 3,353
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
question, say im using my 430ex off camera attached to a light stand with a translucent shoot thru umbrella.

what setting should i set the zoom head to? 24mm? 35mm? 105mm? leave it on automatic?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2009 | 01:24 AM
  #116  
lcrazyaznl's Avatar
CL9 ABP
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,528
Likes: 245
From: Commack, Long Island -> Queens NY
I usually leave it 24 for wide but you could change it depending if you want it to spread less.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
navtool.com
Sponsored Sales & Group Buys
87
Jan 23, 2016 01:25 PM
navtool.com
3G MDX (2014-2020)
32
Jan 20, 2016 11:43 AM
navtool.com
5G TLX Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
31
Nov 16, 2015 08:30 PM
thegipper
3G TL (2004-2008)
5
Sep 28, 2015 01:01 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:01 PM.