C&P Random Thread -
12-29-2014 | 03:53 PM
#8005
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,349
Likes: 2,827
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
The following 4 users liked this post by stogie1020:
01-14-2015 | 05:49 PM
#8008
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
damn - they are literally taking the D750's off of store shelves because of this flare issue. I haven't looked into it too much.
The Nikon D750 is Disappearing From Stores Shelves. A Quiet Recall is Underway
It appears that the Nikon’s response to the D750 flare issue is much more than an offer for a free repair. The camera is currently disappearing from stores, both online ones and brick-and-mortar ones, suggesting that some kind of recall or delay has been implemented while Nikon fixes the defect. [Update: We have confirmed that there is a recall.]
The camera has completely disappeared from Amazon search results:
Adorama and B&H both show the camera as being out of stock and backordered:
We have also been hearing reports from photographers in Japan that major camera stores in Tokyo no longer carry the D750 on their shelves. It appears to be “a factory recall” and the stores are saying the camera will be back in stock in about a month.
Over in the DPReview forums, photographers are confirming that many stores in Japan and in the US seem to be having their stock recalled.
We’ll update you if/when we hear more about this from Nikon and/or major camera stores.
<hr> Update: We have confirmed with a source that it is indeed a Nikon-issued recall that’s underway. We’ve updated the post title to reflect this.
The Nikon D750 is Disappearing From Stores Shelves. A Quiet Recall is Underway
- Published on January 14, 2015 by Michael Zhang
-
It appears that the Nikon’s response to the D750 flare issue is much more than an offer for a free repair. The camera is currently disappearing from stores, both online ones and brick-and-mortar ones, suggesting that some kind of recall or delay has been implemented while Nikon fixes the defect. [Update: We have confirmed that there is a recall.]
The camera has completely disappeared from Amazon search results:
Adorama and B&H both show the camera as being out of stock and backordered:
We have also been hearing reports from photographers in Japan that major camera stores in Tokyo no longer carry the D750 on their shelves. It appears to be “a factory recall” and the stores are saying the camera will be back in stock in about a month.
Over in the DPReview forums, photographers are confirming that many stores in Japan and in the US seem to be having their stock recalled.
We’ll update you if/when we hear more about this from Nikon and/or major camera stores.
<hr> Update: We have confirmed with a source that it is indeed a Nikon-issued recall that’s underway. We’ve updated the post title to reflect this.
The following users liked this post:
Mizouse (01-15-2015)
01-14-2015 | 08:36 PM
#8011
My first Avatar....
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,486
Likes: 7,114
From: NJ
01-15-2015 | 07:18 AM
#8014
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
What camera did you use? I used an old Yashica Electro 35 GSN when I visited a radio telescope that didn't allow electronic devices in its vicinity a few months ago - when I got the shots back I was reminded about that unique film look that no filter can really replicate
01-15-2015 | 07:41 AM
#8015
My first Avatar....
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,486
Likes: 7,114
From: NJ
It is. When shooting into the sun, or other intense light source, and you want the light just out of frame but you want the flare of the source in frame. Apparently an "un-flared" bar appears across the top of the frame interupting the flare from the light source.
That's what I think they are doing. I tried to replicate it last night in my house but couldn't. I'll try again if we ever get to see the sun again. 
winter...
winter...
01-15-2015 | 12:39 PM
#8016
Needs more Lemon Pledge
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 52,768
Likes: 2,000
From: Phoenix, AZ
Not sure about where you are but I had a hell of a time finding a lab that did it in DC. And forget about 1-hour shops - I think those are extinct!
What camera did you use? I used an old Yashica Electro 35 GSN when I visited a radio telescope that didn't allow electronic devices in its vicinity a few months ago - when I got the shots back I was reminded about that unique film look that no filter can really replicate
What camera did you use? I used an old Yashica Electro 35 GSN when I visited a radio telescope that didn't allow electronic devices in its vicinity a few months ago - when I got the shots back I was reminded about that unique film look that no filter can really replicate
I just found a facility that rents darkroom time at $12/hour, so if I get ambitious, I can do it myself.
I remember your radio telescope shot and thought it was cool!
I am using a Nikkormat FtN with a 55mm Macro lens (my dad's) although I would love to pick up a 50mm or 35mm prime for it if I can find one for cheap.
When I got the camera, the leather case has crumbled around it, the light seals in the door were rotted and the foam mirror bumper was crumbled all over the shutter, mirror and interior.
A lot of black yarn (film door seal), some adhesive foam for the door latch and mirror bumper and a LOT of air and qtips and alcohol and the inside was cleaned up and now light leak free!
P9060489 by Jefford_E, on Flickr
The following users liked this post:
Undying Dreams (01-29-2015)
01-22-2015 | 07:41 PM
#8020
Thread Starter
Senior Moderator
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,071
Likes: 11,069
From: Chicago
btw I'm happy to announce I'm getting into the video scene. I think it's about time, I am not sure why it took me this long to get interested in it.
I did some sample B&W videos just with the RX100 last week and was thrilled from the capability even there.
I did some sample B&W videos just with the RX100 last week and was thrilled from the capability even there.
01-29-2015 | 09:17 PM
#8024
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
So after much paperwork and back and forths with a media company, I just finished signing the contract for my biggest photo sale yet! Three images, single print 20” x 38” editions to be displayed in the hallways of a hotel here in DC. Pretty exciting!
The following 9 users liked this post by einsatz:
asianspec (01-30-2015),
is300eater (01-29-2015),
jupitersolo (01-29-2015),
Mizouse (01-29-2015),
pttl (01-29-2015),
and 4 others liked this post.
01-29-2015 | 09:57 PM
#8027
nnInn
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 1,084
01-30-2015 | 05:45 PM
#8031
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
Thanks! They found via Flickr. All images are from this set:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ep_jhu...7628125083226/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ep_jhu...7628125083226/
01-31-2015 | 12:42 AM
#8035
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 63,349
Likes: 2,827
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
interesting, i just noticed i got a request on flickr that someone wants to use one of my images on a non-profit website.
Its dated Jan 21st, but i didnt see it because the email my flickr uses i never check.
legit? or how should i go about this?
this is the image they want to use
Eastern Span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge by mizouse, on Flickr
Its dated Jan 21st, but i didnt see it because the email my flickr uses i never check.
Hello,
I am seeking permission to use one of your photo's in a small carousel on the home page of a non-profit website. They are changing their name and wanted some images in the new header to represent the east bay. Such region specific imagery is difficult to find in stock photography so I am hoping you will consider this request. I am willing to negotiate reasonable terms if necessary.
The photo of yours I would like to use is of the new eastern span of the oakland-bay bridge.
Client's current site is:
Development site is:
This staging site was created to develop the animation for them and to select images for the carousel that they liked. It is not searchable or indexable anywhere and if you deny the request I will remove your image immediately and find another.
I can best be reached by email at or by phone at
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thank you for your time and consideration,
I am seeking permission to use one of your photo's in a small carousel on the home page of a non-profit website. They are changing their name and wanted some images in the new header to represent the east bay. Such region specific imagery is difficult to find in stock photography so I am hoping you will consider this request. I am willing to negotiate reasonable terms if necessary.
The photo of yours I would like to use is of the new eastern span of the oakland-bay bridge.
Client's current site is:
Development site is:
This staging site was created to develop the animation for them and to select images for the carousel that they liked. It is not searchable or indexable anywhere and if you deny the request I will remove your image immediately and find another.
I can best be reached by email at or by phone at
I look forward to hearing from you!
Thank you for your time and consideration,
legit? or how should i go about this?
this is the image they want to use
Eastern Span of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge by mizouse, on Flickr
Last edited by Mizouse; 01-31-2015 at 12:47 AM.
01-31-2015 | 07:21 AM
#8036
I miss my 03 CL-S :(
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,140
Likes: 445
From: Washington, DC
Well they don't offer money so I it's up to you on whether you feel OK giving it away or not. Check out their page and see if you agree with what they're doing, and if you do then consider it like a donation (not for tax purposes).
They will likely want to host the image themselves - don't give them a full-res photo. Also ask for a credit link that goes back to your flickr/website.
Usually if the non-profit is for things I don't support I either say no or ask for ridiculous sums of money. If they want to host a full-res image, or not give attribution, I usually also say no.
They will likely want to host the image themselves - don't give them a full-res photo. Also ask for a credit link that goes back to your flickr/website.
Usually if the non-profit is for things I don't support I either say no or ask for ridiculous sums of money. If they want to host a full-res image, or not give attribution, I usually also say no.
The following users liked this post:
Undying Dreams (01-31-2015)
01-31-2015 | 02:35 PM
#8038
My first Avatar....
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 25,486
Likes: 7,114
From: NJ
So...I'll open this up the brain trust here to get your impressions...
As you all probely know Nikon has recalled the D750 for a flare issue:
PT wrote:
I called on 1/27 and spoke to "Sa...." at Nikon who asked for a repair number. I told her I had NOT been contacted by Nikon as of that time, and therefore did not have a repair #. She went to check by my serial # and said that, as of that day, the service dept. were still working on the D750's that were received on 1/20/15 and mine had not been gotten to. give it a couple of days.
Well I asked friend of mine who also sent his D750 in. This is what he said"
I've sent them 2 more emails and "updated my question" on the Nikon site twice. I've heard nothing.
What am I left to think?
I'm so offing pissed i could kill!
Lawyer time?
As you all probely know Nikon has recalled the D750 for a flare issue:
PT wrote:
On 1/21/15 I sent my D750 - serial #30xxxx - into Nikon as per the recall. I followed all the steps of printing a shipping label, enclosing the printed packing slip and shipping through UPS - tracking #1Z5F63X39098445347. The camera was delivered on 1/22/15 at 8:26 to "the office" and signed for by "Lomxxxxx"
I called on 1/27 and spoke to "Sa...." at Nikon who asked for a repair number. I told her I had NOT been contacted by Nikon as of that time, and therefore did not have a repair #. She went to check by my serial # and said that, as of that day, the service dept. were still working on the D750's that were received on 1/20/15 and mine had not been gotten to. give it a couple of days.
Well I asked friend of mine who also sent his D750 in. This is what he said"
Originally Posted by jb
"I Shipped my D750 off on 1/26, delivered to Nikon on 1/28 and got a email from Nikon, on 1/29, with a order number to check on the camera's status. I followed the link that Nikon included in the email and my D750 is currently under the "shop" status"
What am I left to think?
I'm so offing pissed i could kill!
Lawyer time?