Cameras & Photography Because there aren't already enough ways to share photos...

C&P Random Thread -

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 10:34 AM
  #6041  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Rubin is such a pusher! Stop it..I don't need any more stankin camera gear!
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 10:40 AM
  #6042  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
can't I be a camera collector?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 10:42 AM
  #6043  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
You can. I can also be ing you.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 10:44 AM
  #6044  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Because you keep posting things I want to buy.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 10:45 AM
  #6045  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330



one of the coolest things about this NX1000 - and something I don't have on any other camera - is the Wi-fi and social media sharing options. If it works as advertised, you *can* share a photo from this APS-C sensor camera directly to Facebook. It's something I even recall talking about with someone on FB the other day (whether there was any APS-C camera that could upload directly to FB) - and I think the gist of the convo was that there was no way to do that - I didn't know about this camera. You can also set the camera up as a wifi hotspot, and then your phone connects to it via Wifi - and you can then upload images to the phone or use the phone as a remote trigger. This wifi functionality is something I've desired, and I think this will fill the bill well. Also the menu system looks great. I have read some negative things about it, such as slow AF and startup time, but honestly at this price, I'm ok with some shortcomings.

Finger on the trigger, I am not sure yet.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 10:57 AM
  #6046  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
This is why I let things like this "sit" for a while.... I forgot I have a much higher priority item on my wish list:

Amazon Amazon

and by higher priority I mean I actually NEED this, whereas with the NX1000 I totally do not need it.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 11:07 AM
  #6047  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Lots of new wifi enabled cameras can upload directly to FB.

Hell with my eyefi card my 1Dmk2n can as well (in a way)
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 11:09 AM
  #6048  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
we were talking about cameras with a APS-C sensor. I would guess there aren't too many of those that can do it.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 11:17 AM
  #6049  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Nex-6 can
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 11:27 AM
  #6050  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Nex-5r, gh3, 6D

Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 11:29 AM
  #6051  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Or get an eye-fi card and any camera with a SD slot canz
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 11:41 AM
  #6052  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
damn, NEX-5R looks good

lol
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 12:00 PM
  #6053  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
I wouldn't mind a NSX-5
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 12:01 PM
  #6054  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Err nex 5... Well a NSX would still be nice to have
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 12:58 PM
  #6055  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Rubin, can you please fix my new thread title to read "Natural" instead of "Natrural?"
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:26 PM
  #6056  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)



Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:41 PM
  #6057  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,086
Likes: 3,701
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Mizouse
I wouldn't mind a NEX-5
The original 5 was okay, there was huge improvement with the sensor from 5 to 5N and the added hybrid contrast/phase detection on the 5R, but I think the phase detection only works with some lenses.

For some reason, the 5N still does a slight better in low lighting/high ISOs, but IMO the wifi feature of the 5R can be handy, especially if you have a phone that can hotspot
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:47 PM
  #6058  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Originally Posted by Mizouse



I am so jetlagged...
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:50 PM
  #6059  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by is300eater
The original 5 was okay, there was huge improvement with the sensor from 5 to 5N and the added hybrid contrast/phase detection on the 5R, but I think the phase detection only works with some lenses.

For some reason, the 5N still does a slight better in low lighting/high ISOs, but IMO the wifi feature of the 5R can be handy, especially if you have a phone that can hotspot
I still want the 6 thou.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:51 PM
  #6060  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Originally Posted by wndrlst
I am so jetlagged...
Well the way I was reading that was like "el natrural" as in chicks who don't shave their legs and arm pits etc etc
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:51 PM
  #6061  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
Originally Posted by wndrlst
Rubin, can you please fix my new thread title to read "Natural" instead of "Natrural?"


ok, butterfingers
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:54 PM
  #6062  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Originally Posted by srika


ok, butterfingers
Thank you very mucho.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 01:59 PM
  #6063  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,086
Likes: 3,701
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by Mizouse
I still want the 6 thou.
Yeah, basically the same camera, the 6 has a EVF, hotshoe AND popup flash but no touchscreen and bigger body. IQ wise, they are identical
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #6064  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
I dont feel like spending $900 or whatever on that.

$330 is so much nicer.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:00 PM
  #6065  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
I thought "Nat-rural" was some new genre of photography..
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:01 PM
  #6066  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Originally Posted by srika
I thought "Nat-rural" was some new genre of photography..
It is. And I have trademarked it, so you must pay me 50 pesos every time you use it.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:03 PM
  #6067  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,086
Likes: 3,701
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by srika
I dont feel like spending $900 or whatever on that.

$330 is so much nicer.
Wait, which camera is $330? The Samsung?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:06 PM
  #6068  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
Samsung NX1000 + 20-50mm lens is $330
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:06 PM
  #6069  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,086
Likes: 3,701
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by srika



one of the coolest things about this NX1000 - and something I don't have on any other camera - is the Wi-fi and social media sharing options. If it works as advertised, you *can* share a photo from this APS-C sensor camera directly to Facebook. It's something I even recall talking about with someone on FB the other day (whether there was any APS-C camera that could upload directly to FB) - and I think the gist of the convo was that there was no way to do that - I didn't know about this camera. You can also set the camera up as a wifi hotspot, and then your phone connects to it via Wifi - and you can then upload images to the phone or use the phone as a remote trigger. This wifi functionality is something I've desired, and I think this will fill the bill well. Also the menu system looks great. I have read some negative things about it, such as slow AF and startup time, but honestly at this price, I'm ok with some shortcomings.

Finger on the trigger, I am not sure yet.
I actually have a Samsung P&S sitting around that can do that, it was one of the first to have those features. I bought it because at the time my phone wasn't taking pictures right, wouldn't focus right, of course the issue was fixed after a update. But yeah, I DO believe Samsung was the first to come up with it
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:06 PM
  #6070  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,348
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Originally Posted by srika
I dont feel like spending $900 or whatever on that.

$330 is so much nicer.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:07 PM
  #6071  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
Originally Posted by wndrlst
It is. And I have trademarked it, so you must pay me 50 pesos every time you use it.
if it still said that on the thread title, you might have something there
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:08 PM
  #6072  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
I'm quite late to the wifi / sharing on cameras game.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:11 PM
  #6073  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,086
Likes: 3,701
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by srika
I'm quite late to the wifi / sharing on cameras game.
I've never checked, but I would think it's NOT full resolution that's being transferred via Wifi though.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:12 PM
  #6074  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
yeah I don't know the detail on that - but for sharing I would assume it's a smaller size.

The Samsung does also have a copy function, where you could actually copy the original files over wi-fi to your computer if you want.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:14 PM
  #6075  
wndrlst's Avatar
Earth-bound misfit
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 31,704
Likes: 608
Originally Posted by srika
if it still said that on the thread title, you might have something there
Foiled again.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:15 PM
  #6076  
is300eater's Avatar
I Shoot with a Camera
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,086
Likes: 3,701
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by srika

The Samsung does also have a copy function, where you could actually copy the original files over wi-fi to your computer if you want.
Yup, and they have a "cloud" service too.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:18 PM
  #6077  
srika's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
20 Year Member
Community Influencer
Loved
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 64,187
Likes: 14,330
Originally Posted by is300eater
Wait, which camera is $330? The Samsung?
btw just to clarify, I'm not saying I think the NEX is overpriced or anything like that. From all the reviews I've seen it has a superior sensor, it's faster with AF and other things like that. I mean it costs that much for a reason. This is more of a toy for me, I mean if I get it - so that is why I would be interested in the Samsung and not the NEX. The NEX is a more 'serious' purchase.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:22 PM
  #6078  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
Srika just get an eye-fi card. Your rx100 is eye-fi compatible (meaning it has a built in menu to make changes in camera and your camera will remain powered on until all images are transferred)

You can upload directly to numerous websites of your choice when at a hotspot. It can even upload automatically to your computer when you get to your home wifi network.

And with direct mode you can auto transfer them to your iPhone/iPad. Do quick edits and upload to FB/Twitter/Instagram etc (it saves to your camera roll)
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:22 PM
  #6079  
asianspec's Avatar
Senior Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 25,348
Likes: 1,100
From: Photography Forum.
Hey guys, Ive been thinking i need to go back to basics with photography and thinking about getting a Canon A2E Film camera. They are pretty cheap and use EF lenses. What do you guys think? I have a Minolta SRT200, but don't want to buy more lenses for it.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2013 | 02:23 PM
  #6080  
Mizouse's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 64,139
Likes: 3,386
From: Not Las Vegas (SF Bay Area)
The pro x2 8gb is $70 and the 16gb is $100
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.