R/D at Newport Beach
#321
Senior Moderator
I have a colleague at work who has a 530i. He frequently ogles over my (CHEAPER) lowered TL and, last time we spoke, was interested in purchasing an '03 for his wife. Mayhap he'll consider an '04? I'll try to convert him--I offered him a test drive in my car already.
I'm an Apple Mac guy, so I know something about "evangelizing".
I'm an Apple Mac guy, so I know something about "evangelizing".
#322
Prestige
German cars are prestiges, period. If I could afford a 2004 530i, then I would definitely get it over the 2004 TL. But I cannot, so it's a no-brainer for me to choose the TL.
Prestige is important to me, but so is the overall package. I had an opportunity to buy a demo (5,500 miles), 2003 530i w/18" rims for $38K but decided not to, because the 2004 TL offers much more for much less.
Another thing to consider on the new bimmers is that they will continue to use the current inline-6 engines. This is not at all a bad thing, but knowing that a new 275hp inline-6 will be in the 2006 model doesn't make me feel good about getting the 2004 model.
IMO, the biggest deal for the 2004 530i is the all aluminum front-end. The combination of an inline-6 and a manual transmission will yield a 50/50 weight distribution. The best the 2004 TL can do is 60/40. One thing that concerns me about the aluminum front-end is how much will it cost for repairs?
Prestige is important to me, but so is the overall package. I had an opportunity to buy a demo (5,500 miles), 2003 530i w/18" rims for $38K but decided not to, because the 2004 TL offers much more for much less.
Another thing to consider on the new bimmers is that they will continue to use the current inline-6 engines. This is not at all a bad thing, but knowing that a new 275hp inline-6 will be in the 2006 model doesn't make me feel good about getting the 2004 model.
IMO, the biggest deal for the 2004 530i is the all aluminum front-end. The combination of an inline-6 and a manual transmission will yield a 50/50 weight distribution. The best the 2004 TL can do is 60/40. One thing that concerns me about the aluminum front-end is how much will it cost for repairs?
#323
Senior Moderator
You have some good points, SFzip. However, I can afford a 530i, and yet find myself always gravitating towards the value of Acura cars. The fact I'm a Honda fan for the last 13 years obviously biases me, though.
Even so, the money I could spend for prestige can be invested in my mutual funds.
Even so, the money I could spend for prestige can be invested in my mutual funds.
#325
I'd just like to chime in and say that as the previous owner of a 1997 528i, BMWs are very nice vehicles and have a certain "intangible" quality about them. With that said, I personally believe the 5 series and 3 series to be some of the most overrated vehicles on the market. They are nice cars, don't get me wrong, all I'm saying is nearly all reviewers bestow so much "hype" upon the cars that when you actually buy one you think it's going to be some magic carpet ride of fun. My bimmer had rattles, a crappy stereo, and a ride that never really felt nimble and sporty even though the car handled well. I guess it's all about perspective. Since owning the 528i, I've since bought a house and cut back on my automotive spending habits. I currently own a Passat, which, all reliablity issues aside, I feel is about 80-85% the car my BMW was at about 45% less cost.
With that said, the new 530i is truly for the luxury car buyer who has cash to blow. With all options it tops out at over $63k and is quite ugly, in my not so humble opinion. Optioned out like the TL, it would be around $53k. If the new TL is as good or as close to as good as we have been hearing, the TL is a no brainer if you can live with it's slightly less sporty FWD nature. I personally consider myself a car enthusiast, but would never financially strap myself just to drive a vehicle that was nicer. If you have the money then the only thing you need to do is test drive both and buy the one that fits your needs/wants/desires.
With that said, the new 530i is truly for the luxury car buyer who has cash to blow. With all options it tops out at over $63k and is quite ugly, in my not so humble opinion. Optioned out like the TL, it would be around $53k. If the new TL is as good or as close to as good as we have been hearing, the TL is a no brainer if you can live with it's slightly less sporty FWD nature. I personally consider myself a car enthusiast, but would never financially strap myself just to drive a vehicle that was nicer. If you have the money then the only thing you need to do is test drive both and buy the one that fits your needs/wants/desires.
#326
You are absolutely correct. I had a 2003 tl type-s which I sold last week. I had this car for 1.5 year and 6000 miles and there is not one bad thing I can say about that car. It is just that my heart is out for BMR. I am just finding it hard to convince myself that it is worth all that extra money, especially after seeing and hearing all those good things about 2004TL.
#327
Intresting you guys are talking about converting from BMW to Acura. I was dead set on purchasing a 04 530i myself and once I saw the price list I had 2nd doubts. The one I wanted was in the area of 54K!
I then looked at my latest autoweek magazine, saw the review on the new TL, went to my local Acrua dealer, read about the new TL from fourm's like this and the rest is history. It's a "no brainer" as far as I can tell.
I ordered a 6 speed/Navi/HPT in silver & ebony!
Mine is due in November, waiting for the build date from my dealer.
I think that overall new TL offers MORE for LESS when you compare it to the new BMW 5.
I then looked at my latest autoweek magazine, saw the review on the new TL, went to my local Acrua dealer, read about the new TL from fourm's like this and the rest is history. It's a "no brainer" as far as I can tell.
I ordered a 6 speed/Navi/HPT in silver & ebony!
Mine is due in November, waiting for the build date from my dealer.
I think that overall new TL offers MORE for LESS when you compare it to the new BMW 5.
#328
Senior Moderator
Originally posted by stanleythecat
I think that overall new TL offers MORE for LESS when you compare it to the new BMW 5.
I think that overall new TL offers MORE for LESS when you compare it to the new BMW 5.
#329
has been here awhile
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 1SICKLEX
Maybe an ES 250. Mark Levinson ownsz you. Hell stock ownsz You.
Maybe an ES 250. Mark Levinson ownsz you. Hell stock ownsz You.
#330
Race Director
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow, Many Reviewers joked on how funny it is that the TL is Compared to the 5 Series by Acura, But Looking at this forum, It looks as though people are seriously considering the TL over the 5 Series because its the best bang for the buck
#331
Race Director
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 11,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by EmuMessenger
Well put.
I think the CAPS guy is just upset it is not yet October!
BTW to all that have been listening to my ventilated seat rant, for 04 the Q45, XLR and Deville all have them as standard equipment. Maybe the TL is not too far away.
Well put.
I think the CAPS guy is just upset it is not yet October!
BTW to all that have been listening to my ventilated seat rant, for 04 the Q45, XLR and Deville all have them as standard equipment. Maybe the TL is not too far away.
Did you forget the MSRP for the Q45, XLR, and Deville are more close to MSRP of the new RL coming out?
Did forget those cars compete with RL?
I mean I would understand if you were mad if the THE NEW RL didn't come with ventilated seats, but dont expect it on the TL
#332
Originally posted by 2004TL
Wow, Many Reviewers joked on how funny it is that the TL is Compared to the 5 Series by Acura, But Looking at this forum, It looks as though people are seriously considering the TL over the 5 Series because its the best bang for the buck
Wow, Many Reviewers joked on how funny it is that the TL is Compared to the 5 Series by Acura, But Looking at this forum, It looks as though people are seriously considering the TL over the 5 Series because its the best bang for the buck
About the video: Did the aspect ratio seem a little off? It seemed as if the car was really long and "squatty." It just looked....different.
#333
Suzuka Master
Originally posted by 2004TL
Did you forget the MSRP for the Q45, XLR, and Deville are more close to MSRP of the new RL coming out?
Did forget those cars compete with RL?
I mean I would understand if you were mad if the THE NEW RL didn't come with ventilated seats, but dont expect it on the TL
Did you forget the MSRP for the Q45, XLR, and Deville are more close to MSRP of the new RL coming out?
Did forget those cars compete with RL?
I mean I would understand if you were mad if the THE NEW RL didn't come with ventilated seats, but dont expect it on the TL
You haven't heard me say I wish the TL had a trunk like an Avalon, right?
#334
Originally posted by 2004TL
Wow, Many Reviewers joked on how funny it is that the TL is Compared to the 5 Series by Acura, But Looking at this forum, It looks as though people are seriously considering the TL over the 5 Series because its the best bang for the buck
Wow, Many Reviewers joked on how funny it is that the TL is Compared to the 5 Series by Acura, But Looking at this forum, It looks as though people are seriously considering the TL over the 5 Series because its the best bang for the buck
Realistically, those that have dismissed it or aren't giving it a chance aren't going to bother coming here to tell us that.
I drove an 03 530i and have to say it was the best test drive I've ever had. I just am don't like the cost of admission. But if I could pick a car, any car, that would be it. That said, I have a strong dislike for the new ones. To my eyes, they look like a bavarian Grand Am. I thought the E class was way overpriced, but if I had to coin to outfit an 04 5 series 'properly', I'd look at MB instead. JMHO.
I think Justin's statement of the BMW-TL-Accord value proposition was spot on. Especially when it comes to the question of an TL being 10k better than an Accord V6. We all define 'value' differently.
#335
Team NBP Stealth Fighter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 48
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by EmuMessenger
Well put.
I think the CAPS guy is just upset it is not yet October!
BTW to all that have been listening to my ventilated seat rant, for 04 the Q45, XLR and Deville all have them as standard equipment. Maybe the TL is not too far away.
Well put.
I think the CAPS guy is just upset it is not yet October!
BTW to all that have been listening to my ventilated seat rant, for 04 the Q45, XLR and Deville all have them as standard equipment. Maybe the TL is not too far away.
Anyone have spy photos?
#336
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Lake Hartwell, SC
Age: 77
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone heard when the brochures are showing up? I think they are due next week. If someone gets one, I would like their impression of the Abyss blue compared to current blues. My hope is that it is somewhere between the Eternal and the Aegean.
On order 04 TL Abyss/quartz 6MT
On order 04 TL Abyss/quartz 6MT
#337
Suzuka Master
No flaming please..... Did anyone on the ride and drive happen to open the glove comparment or center console to compare size?
I also remember reading somewhere that there would not be a roof-mounted sunglass holder, but it is going to be in the door somewhere?
I also remember reading somewhere that there would not be a roof-mounted sunglass holder, but it is going to be in the door somewhere?
#341
Team NBP Stealth Fighter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 48
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by EmuMessenger
Man... You are at my throat today...
Man... You are at my throat today...
#342
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by justinjsw
Just my personal ratings on the 4 cars at the drive.........
Interior comfort/rear
04TL-8.0
330i-7.7
ES300-8.4
G35-8.0.......
Just my personal ratings on the 4 cars at the drive.........
Interior comfort/rear
04TL-8.0
330i-7.7
ES300-8.4
G35-8.0.......
I know this goes back a ways (p. 9 on this thread), but, as someone who always wonders about "methodology" I couldn't help asking:
Since you didn't sit in the back (as you had mentioned earlier on that same page), how did you have "personal ratings" on this? I imagine maybe this means some of your ratings were based on what you heard from other people, rather than what you observed personally?
Also: No surprise, I think I disagree with what you said about TL not being that much bigger of a car than the TSX. I don't want to make a big thing about this since I've already made my point on this, at least as much as I should before I actually try the car, and anyway it's obviously subjective what we mean by "not that much bigger," but.... It would seem that the most meaningful criterion for "not that much bigger" would be, not enough bigger to affect the feeling and handling. And, you seem to acknowledge that the TL's handling won't quite match that of the TSX. I just wonder, if the TL's handling isn't as good, wouldn't that have to be basically because it's BIGGER? And wouldn't that in turn mean that we'd have to consider the size difference significant???? (No need to answer; I'm basically just thinking out loud.)
BTW: Regarding significance of the size difference, my guess is the width difference would contribute much more than the length difference.
#343
OG
Thread Starter
Originally posted by larchmont
Thanks as usual for all the great info, Justin.
I know this goes back a ways (p. 9 on this thread), but, as someone who always wonders about "methodology" I couldn't help asking:
Since you didn't sit in the back (as you had mentioned earlier on that same page), how did you have "personal ratings" on this? I imagine maybe this means some of your ratings were based on what you heard from other people, rather than what you observed personally?
Also: No surprise, I think I disagree with what you said about TL not being that much bigger of a car than the TSX. I don't want to make a big thing about this since I've already made my point on this, at least as much as I should before I actually try the car, and anyway it's obviously subjective what we mean by "not that much bigger," but.... It would seem that the most meaningful criterion for "not that much bigger" would be, not enough bigger to affect the feeling and handling. And, you seem to acknowledge that the TL's handling won't quite match that of the TSX. I just wonder, if the TL's handling isn't as good, wouldn't that have to be basically because it's BIGGER? And wouldn't that in turn mean that we'd have to consider the size difference significant???? (No need to answer; I'm basically just thinking out loud.)
Thanks as usual for all the great info, Justin.
I know this goes back a ways (p. 9 on this thread), but, as someone who always wonders about "methodology" I couldn't help asking:
Since you didn't sit in the back (as you had mentioned earlier on that same page), how did you have "personal ratings" on this? I imagine maybe this means some of your ratings were based on what you heard from other people, rather than what you observed personally?
Also: No surprise, I think I disagree with what you said about TL not being that much bigger of a car than the TSX. I don't want to make a big thing about this since I've already made my point on this, at least as much as I should before I actually try the car, and anyway it's obviously subjective what we mean by "not that much bigger," but.... It would seem that the most meaningful criterion for "not that much bigger" would be, not enough bigger to affect the feeling and handling. And, you seem to acknowledge that the TL's handling won't quite match that of the TSX. I just wonder, if the TL's handling isn't as good, wouldn't that have to be basically because it's BIGGER? And wouldn't that in turn mean that we'd have to consider the size difference significant???? (No need to answer; I'm basically just thinking out loud.)
After close to a yr of posting I don't recall having post something I have heard from someone else.
I have no further comments on your thoughts in regards to size issues. The handling is MUCH better than the current TL and CAN come VERY close to the TSX. So rather the TL is 2.95" longer or 2.99" longer is really besides the point.
#344
Originally posted by larchmont
And, you seem to acknowledge that the TL's handling won't quite match that of the TSX. I just wonder, if the TL's handling isn't as good, wouldn't that have to be basically because it's BIGGER? And wouldn't that in turn mean that we'd have to consider the size difference significant???? (No need to answer; I'm basically just thinking out loud.)
And, you seem to acknowledge that the TL's handling won't quite match that of the TSX. I just wonder, if the TL's handling isn't as good, wouldn't that have to be basically because it's BIGGER? And wouldn't that in turn mean that we'd have to consider the size difference significant???? (No need to answer; I'm basically just thinking out loud.)
First of all, I need to step up to the plate and mention that I was wrong about the length of the car. I really thought 189-190 was what it would be.
Regarding expected handling comparisons to the TSX. I would assume (this without seeing or driving the car yet) that the TSX has a more favorable "tire width to weight ratio" To me this, along with the much heavier engine up front, will take its toll on handling, though the HPT package should tip the scales back in favor of the TL.
#345
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by justinjsw
...whether the TL is 2.95" longer or 2.99" longer is really besides the point.
...whether the TL is 2.95" longer or 2.99" longer is really besides the point.
I know I split hairs, but neither I nor anybody else was talking about anything like that.
It seems you missed the point. I didn't say anything about the amount of the difference. That was an OLD debate, before we knew what the difference is. Now, we DO know, and it is what it is.....
I was just saying: If the TL handles less well than the TSX, and if this is because of it being bigger than the TSX (which I would think it HAS to be, unless somebody can suggest another possible reason), wouldn't we have to say that the size difference is significant?
As I also said, no need to answer -- I was mostly just thinking out loud. And indeed it doesn't matter to anybody but us "theoreticians."
#346
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Colin
Larch,
First of all, I need to step up to the plate and mention that I was wrong about the length of the car. I really thought 189-190 was what it would be.....
Larch,
First of all, I need to step up to the plate and mention that I was wrong about the length of the car. I really thought 189-190 was what it would be.....
But what NOBODY anticipated was that the proportions would be so unusual.
What I'd love to see is some analysis of how the unusualness of the proportions affects the car -- the handling, the sportiness (or lack thereof), the experience of the interior, perhaps the aerodynamics. It surprises me that this, which is arguably the most striking and innovative aspect of the car, has gone essentially without comment. Honda/Acura usually know what they are doing, and what they did here was create an extremely unusually proportioned car -- in fact, a uniquely proportioned car. And obviously they had something in mind. The question is -- What was it? And, does it work? And how does it affect the aspects that we care about?
I know Justin isn't too interested in this question, and maybe not too many other people are either. But it's the first thing I'm going to be trying to figure out when I try the car. And I doubt I'll get very far, because I just don't know enough about cars. But I wish some of our more knowledgeable people could get interested in this too.
#347
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,641
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
What I'd love to see is some analysis of how the unusualness of the proportions affects the car -- the handling, the sportiness (or lack thereof)
What I'd love to see is some analysis of how the unusualness of the proportions affects the car -- the handling, the sportiness (or lack thereof)
#348
Team NBP Stealth Fighter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 48
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Colin
Larch,
First of all, I need to step up to the plate and mention that I was wrong about the length of the car. I really thought 189-190 was what it would be.
Larch,
First of all, I need to step up to the plate and mention that I was wrong about the length of the car. I really thought 189-190 was what it would be.
#349
Team NBP Stealth Fighter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 48
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
What I'd love to see is some analysis of how the unusualness of the proportions affects the car -- the handling, the sportiness (or lack thereof), the experience of the interior, perhaps the aerodynamics. It surprises me that this, which is arguably the most striking and innovative aspect of the car, has gone essentially without comment.
What I'd love to see is some analysis of how the unusualness of the proportions affects the car -- the handling, the sportiness (or lack thereof), the experience of the interior, perhaps the aerodynamics. It surprises me that this, which is arguably the most striking and innovative aspect of the car, has gone essentially without comment.
Let's look at this:
Previous Gen TL:
Objective: Offer a value priced near luxury sedan for those looking for BMW and Audi amenities
Pros: "Superior" value/price, quality, reliability, refinement
Cons: Styling, performance, handling namely, leaves a lot to be desired
Current Gen TL
Objective: Elevate the TL's competitive position, offer superior amenities and features
Pros (speculative): "Exceptional" value/price, reliability, styling, refinement, features and amenities
Cons (perceived/speculative): FWD, smaller interior/cargo volume, anything else you wish to add here.
So why make it wide? If Acura expects to be considered a legitimate competitor to the BMW 3-Series, Infiniti G35, Mercedes, etc. from a performance standpoint, it probably required some creative engineering to match or exceed the handling characteristics of the competition.
A wider stance makes the car flatter. What's the biggest knock against FWD cars? Everyone say it at once "Understeer"! What does understeer produce? A car that leans at the limit. So, making the TL wider makes it less prone to lean. Making it shorter translates into less rear end to carry around during cornering. And from what I would imagine, less susceptibility to leaning. Remember, in some reviews, understeer on the TL is only noted at the limit.
Anyway, that's just a theory I have. I'm not an engineer. We'll see how well this formula works then the comparisons come out. Based on the initial reviews, we know that the TL's handling characteristics have been well received.
#350
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ryder1650
How can you assume that this car lacks sportiness......Why would Honda give the car such unusual proportions if it adversely effects the performance of the car......
How can you assume that this car lacks sportiness......Why would Honda give the car such unusual proportions if it adversely effects the performance of the car......
I'm trying really hard to shut up for a while, at least until I try the car, but it's hard. It never ceases to amaze me how easy it is for people to misunderstand stuff. Maybe my next obsession should be about how every problem in the world starts with a simple misunderstanding. (Maybe it does?)
I never said the car lacks sportiness. I just noted that JUSTIN said the TL's handling probably won't equal the TSX's, and I said the main possible reason for that would seem to be the larger size. I also said the size of a car AFFECTS qualities such as sportiness -- but so do other factors.
And I wondered how the unusual proportions affect the characteristics of the car. There must be some effect -- maybe positive or negative, maybe neither positive nor negative but just something subtle -- and I'm just wondering what those effects are.
Honda/Acura has created a very unusually-proportioned car. They must have had reasons -- reasons that translate into how the car is. And I'm wondering what that amounts to.
Actually, ryder's post does begin to address this subject. I hope other people will too, and I hope that soon we'll have some solid impressions about this.
Edit: I see Vtec is addressing this too. Sounds great to me.
#351
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 1,641
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by larchmont
Hey, ryder, you misunderstood me.
I'm trying really hard to shut up for a while, at least until I try the car, but it's hard. It never ceases to amaze me how easy it is for people to misunderstand stuff. Maybe my next obsession should be about how every problem in the world starts with a simple misunderstanding. (Maybe it does?)
I never said the car lacks sportiness. I just noted that JUSTIN said the TL's handling probably won't equal the TSX's, and I said the main possible reason for that would seem to be the larger size. I also said the size of a car AFFECTS qualities such as sportiness -- but so do other factors.
And I wondered how the unusual proportions affect the characteristics of the car. There must be some effect -- maybe positive or negative, maybe neither positive nor negative but just something subtle -- and I'm just wondering what those effects are.
Honda/Acura has created a very unusually-proportioned car. They must have had reasons -- reasons that translate into how the car is. And I'm wondering what that amounts to.
Actually, ryder's post does begin to address this subject. I hope other people will too, and I hope that soon we'll have some solid impressions about this.
Edit: I see Vtec is addressing this too. Sounds great to me.
Hey, ryder, you misunderstood me.
I'm trying really hard to shut up for a while, at least until I try the car, but it's hard. It never ceases to amaze me how easy it is for people to misunderstand stuff. Maybe my next obsession should be about how every problem in the world starts with a simple misunderstanding. (Maybe it does?)
I never said the car lacks sportiness. I just noted that JUSTIN said the TL's handling probably won't equal the TSX's, and I said the main possible reason for that would seem to be the larger size. I also said the size of a car AFFECTS qualities such as sportiness -- but so do other factors.
And I wondered how the unusual proportions affect the characteristics of the car. There must be some effect -- maybe positive or negative, maybe neither positive nor negative but just something subtle -- and I'm just wondering what those effects are.
Honda/Acura has created a very unusually-proportioned car. They must have had reasons -- reasons that translate into how the car is. And I'm wondering what that amounts to.
Actually, ryder's post does begin to address this subject. I hope other people will too, and I hope that soon we'll have some solid impressions about this.
Edit: I see Vtec is addressing this too. Sounds great to me.
Hmmm, Ok. All I say is lets put this topic, specifically, aside until October 6th.
#352
Originally posted by VtecMW
So why make it wide? If Acura expects to be considered a legitimate competitor to the BMW 3-Series, Infiniti G35, Mercedes, etc. from a performance standpoint, it probably required some creative engineering to match or exceed the handling characteristics of the competition.
So why make it wide? If Acura expects to be considered a legitimate competitor to the BMW 3-Series, Infiniti G35, Mercedes, etc. from a performance standpoint, it probably required some creative engineering to match or exceed the handling characteristics of the competition.
The "incidental" benefits were better handling due to the wider track. Didn't I notice that the car uses an aluminium subframe up front? I'm sure this contributes to better weight distrubution. FWIW, the original 3.2 TL (1995 1/2 to 1998) used some aluminum up front while the 2.5 used steel.
#353
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by justinjsw
I was the driver of the TL when we left the hotel to go over to the fairgrounds for testing...thats what I meant by I didn't sit in the back. I did sit in the back of the one they had in the meeting room. Just long enough to see what it felt like but not long enough to remember if the car had a hump in the center. Is that more clear? After close to a yr of posting I don't recall having post something I have heard from someone else.......
I was the driver of the TL when we left the hotel to go over to the fairgrounds for testing...thats what I meant by I didn't sit in the back. I did sit in the back of the one they had in the meeting room. Just long enough to see what it felt like but not long enough to remember if the car had a hump in the center. Is that more clear? After close to a yr of posting I don't recall having post something I have heard from someone else.......
#354
Instructor
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Colin
I submit that the car is wide because Acura learned something from the MDX. This is only 188 long and 77 wide! This offers 3 wide seating in the middle row without making a "huge" car.
I submit that the car is wide because Acura learned something from the MDX. This is only 188 long and 77 wide! This offers 3 wide seating in the middle row without making a "huge" car.
#355
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by JeffPhx
I would have to agree here. The car shunk over 6 inches in length, but by making it wider and taller you can make the passenger space as large or larger, or at least appear to be as roomy. This added width and height also helped add cubic feet to the total interior volume therefore offsetting the loss in length for overall space.
I would have to agree here. The car shunk over 6 inches in length, but by making it wider and taller you can make the passenger space as large or larger, or at least appear to be as roomy. This added width and height also helped add cubic feet to the total interior volume therefore offsetting the loss in length for overall space.
About the handling part -- This discussion is clarifying something that we might sometimes forget, that "handling" isn't just one thing, it involves various different aspects. VtecMW says that maybe a reason to make the TL wider was that this could reduce body lean, and it sounds like he's right. But, that wouldn't cover "nimbleness" in a more general sense, and it does seem that this part of it would almost have to be adversely affected by greater width. Anyway, it does seem to me that even with just a few posts on this, we're closing in on what this "wide" stuff is about and how it might affect the car. I don't know about you, but even without having driven the car, I'm getting more and more of a "hands-on" feel for the car through these discussions, although of course not with total confidence about its accuracy.
I love this stuff!
#356
Well, in the overall scheme of things I don't think a couple of inches in width (and f/r track) is going to make a huge difference in handling. Though all else being equal, IMHO it would improve the handling some.
I believe effects due to the suspension, tires, the center of gravity, polar moment of inertia, body rigidity, weight, and steering, could easily make a much larger difference in the handling, and/or sportiness.
I think that the 6MT with the A-Spec tires/wheels/springs will handle very well, with a sacrifice in ride comfort. The 5AT version should still handle better than the TL-S and CL-S based on the wider tires and other revisions, including width.
Even for people where FWD is a negative, myself included, there are a lot of pluses for the 04TL.
-r
I believe effects due to the suspension, tires, the center of gravity, polar moment of inertia, body rigidity, weight, and steering, could easily make a much larger difference in the handling, and/or sportiness.
I think that the 6MT with the A-Spec tires/wheels/springs will handle very well, with a sacrifice in ride comfort. The 5AT version should still handle better than the TL-S and CL-S based on the wider tires and other revisions, including width.
Even for people where FWD is a negative, myself included, there are a lot of pluses for the 04TL.
-r
#357
Team NBP Stealth Fighter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 48
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know how much of a difference two inches makes in the agility of a car. I don't think it's going to be a lumbering car, because the car is shorter, with relatively good weight distribution, and a wide stance.
The slalom numbers show that the TL is a relatively nimble car, so I don't think the dimensions make it all that unusual.
It's obvious that Acura had some goals with making the TL as wide as it is. I don't think it's worth the mental energy trying to determine the logic behind increasing width 2 inches.
The slalom numbers show that the TL is a relatively nimble car, so I don't think the dimensions make it all that unusual.
It's obvious that Acura had some goals with making the TL as wide as it is. I don't think it's worth the mental energy trying to determine the logic behind increasing width 2 inches.
#358
More On
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Larchmont, NY
Posts: 4,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Despite the mild bitching about my fascination over this , I think this is a great discussion, and that we're really pinning down what this car's going to be like.
BTW -- A lot of you keep saying "2 inches." First of all, every bit of difference can make a difference, or else they wouldn't pay attention to it, and you know they do. But anyway, it's not a question of "2 inches." Taking account of the shrunken length, the width difference is magnified.
The relative proportions of the car have been changed by a very great amount --
I would bet it's more than has ever been done on any car model, anywhere, ever.
BTW -- A lot of you keep saying "2 inches." First of all, every bit of difference can make a difference, or else they wouldn't pay attention to it, and you know they do. But anyway, it's not a question of "2 inches." Taking account of the shrunken length, the width difference is magnified.
The relative proportions of the car have been changed by a very great amount --
I would bet it's more than has ever been done on any car model, anywhere, ever.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post