Monthly Car Sales news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-11-2009, 05:54 AM
  #321  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,306
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
Here we go
Old 09-01-2009, 12:48 PM
  #322  
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Southern California
Posts: 71,436
Received 1,877 Likes on 1,297 Posts
August Good, Bad....not so ugly

The good
Volkswagen’s Jetta TDI, which qualified for $4,500 in rebates for those taking advantage of the Clunkers program, was a virtual sell-out in August. The automaker says that the strong month essentially depleted 2009 TDI inventory. Tiguan, CC and, for the first time in months, Routan, also posted strong numbers for the month.

Ford’s Focus, one of the best sellers during the Clunkers program, saw a 56 percent increase in demand to 25,547 units, while Fusion sales hit their highest point ever at 21,010 units sold. Ford’s Escape was up 49 percent to 20,933. Of Ford’s retail models, only Taurus, Mustang, Expedition, Explorer and Econoline saw sales drop offs.

Mercury also posted a strong month thanks to a 112 percent increase in demand for its Milan (to 3,844) and a 50.3 percent increase for the Mariner (to 3,921 units).

The bad
Like most luxury brands, Lincoln’s sales weren’t so hot. All models posted at least a 20 percent drop in demand.

Mercedes-Benz also saw a 7.5 percent decrease in sales, although a 74.2 percent increase in demand (to 4,671) for the E-Class helped out.

The not-so-ugly
Ford, up 21.2 percent to 161,369.
Lincoln, down 38.4 percent to 5,874.
Mercedes-Benz, down 7.5 percent to 17,112.
Mercury, up 8.2 percent to 9,080.
Volkswagen, up 11.4 percent to 24,823.
http://www.leftlanenews.com/august-2...tml#more-20806

Wake up car makers!!!!! Americans want Diesel and they want it now!
Old 09-01-2009, 01:04 PM
  #323  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,803
Received 4,031 Likes on 2,507 Posts
http://www.hondanews.com/categories/1097/releases/5167

Honda numbers, some good some not so good.
Old 09-01-2009, 08:31 PM
  #324  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Old 09-01-2009, 08:58 PM
  #325  
OG Member
Thread Starter
 
DrewSRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sint Maarten
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

August 2009 Luxury Car Sales

Pre-Entry Level
1. Acura TSX - 2,925
2. Volvo C30/S40/V50 - 1,891
3. BMW 1-Series - 914
4. Lexus HS - 543
5. Audi A3 - 479

Entry Level
1. BMW 3-Series - 9,833
2. Infiniti G37 - 4,903
3. Lexus IS - 4,855
4. Audi A4/A5 - 4,700
5. Mercedes-Benz C-Class - 4,253
6. Acura TL - 3,003
7. Cadillac CTS - 2,584
8. Lincoln MKZ -1,621
9. Volvo S60/V70 - 655
10. Saab 9-3 - 352

Mid-Level
1. Mercedes-Benz E-Class - 4,671
2. BMW 5-Series - 3,536
3. Lincoln MKS - 1,370
4. Lexus GS - 669
5. Infiniti M - 618
6. Volvo S80 - 565
7. Audi A6- 561
8. Cadillac STS - 337
9. Acura RL - 149
10. Saab 9-5 - 52

Flagship
1. Mercedes-Benz S-Slass - 1,031
2. Lexus LS - 880
3. BMW 7-Series - 862
4. Audi A8 - 109

Entry-Level SUV
1. Mercedes-Benz GLK - 1,665
2. Audi Q5 - 1,496
3. Cadillac SRX - 1,401
4. Volvo XC60 - 767
5. Acura RDX - 728
6. BMW X3 - 670
7. Infiniti EX - 665

Mid-Level SUV
1. Lexus RX - 9,317
2. Acura MDX - 2,820
3. Mercedes-Benz M-Class - 2,577
4. BMW X5 - 2,295
5. Lincoln MKX - 2,132
6. Infiniti FX - 938
7. Volvo XC90 - 747
8. Lexus GX - 716
9. Audi Q7 - 394
10. BMW X6 - 344

Full-Size SUV
1. Mercedes-Benz GL-Class - 1,744
2. Cadillac Escalade - 1,726
3. Infiniti QX - 608
4. Lincoln Navigator - 471
5. Lexus LX - 249
6. Mercedes-Benz G-Class - 37
Old 09-01-2009, 09:18 PM
  #326  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by DrewSRX
August 2009 Luxury Car Sales

Pre-Entry Level
1. Acura TSX - 2,925
2. Volvo C30/S40/V50 - 1,891
3. BMW 1-Series - 914
4. Lexus HS - 543
5. Audi A3 - 479

Entry Level
1. BMW 3-Series - 9,833
2. Infiniti G37 - 4,903
3. Lexus IS - 4,855
4. Audi A4/A5 - 4,700
5. Mercedes-Benz C-Class - 4,253
6. Acura TL - 3,003
7. Cadillac CTS - 2,584
8. Lincoln MKZ -1,621
9. Volvo S60/V70 - 655
10. Saab 9-3 - 352

Mid-Level
1. Mercedes-Benz E-Class - 4,671
2. BMW 5-Series - 3,536
3. Lincoln MKS - 1,370
4. Lexus GS - 669
5. Infiniti M - 618
6. Volvo S80 - 565
7. Audi A6- 561
8. Cadillac STS - 337
9. Acura RL - 149
10. Saab 9-5 - 52

Flagship
1. Mercedes-Benz S-Slass - 1,031
2. Lexus LS - 880
3. BMW 7-Series - 862
4. Audi A8 - 109

Entry-Level SUV
1. Mercedes-Benz GLK - 1,665
2. Audi Q5 - 1,496
3. Cadillac SRX - 1,401
4. Volvo XC60 - 767
5. Acura RDX - 728
6. BMW X3 - 670
7. Infiniti EX - 665

Mid-Level SUV
1. Lexus RX - 9,317
2. Acura MDX - 2,820
3. Mercedes-Benz M-Class - 2,577
4. BMW X5 - 2,295
5. Lincoln MKX - 2,132
6. Infiniti FX - 938
7. Volvo XC90 - 747
8. Lexus GX - 716
9. Audi Q7 - 394
10. BMW X6 - 344

Full-Size SUV
1. Mercedes-Benz GL-Class - 1,744
2. Cadillac Escalade - 1,726
3. Infiniti QX - 608
4. Lincoln Navigator - 471
5. Lexus LX - 249
6. Mercedes-Benz G-Class - 37
who put Audi Q5 in entry level SUV? it is more expensive than RX/MDX/ML despite having 3.2L engine?
Old 09-01-2009, 10:37 PM
  #327  
OG Member
Thread Starter
 
DrewSRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sint Maarten
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
who put Audi Q5 in entry level SUV? it is more expensive than RX/MDX/ML despite having 3.2L engine?
The Q5 is where it belongs, with the GLK, XC60, RDX, X3, and EX. It has nothing to do with price.

The current SRX is larger, but will soon fit in as well. The Land Rover LR2 should be here too, but Tata does not publish monthly sales numbers.
Old 09-01-2009, 10:52 PM
  #328  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
who put Audi Q5 in entry level SUV? it is more expensive than RX/MDX/ML despite having 3.2L engine?
Yeah, they should have put the smaller Audi SUV in that comparison...oh wait...they don't have a cheaper model. I guess that is the definition of "Entry Level"
Old 09-01-2009, 11:29 PM
  #329  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by DrewSRX
The Q5 is where it belongs, with the GLK, XC60, RDX, X3, and EX. It has nothing to do with price.

The current SRX is larger, but will soon fit in as well. The Land Rover LR2 should be here too, but Tata does not publish monthly sales numbers.
yeah it belong to these junk category. look at point difference. and it is not even fully loaded.
http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...470fab3ecc.pdf

why it scored full points in fit/finish and offroad ability? why it has 4400lbs tow ratings. They others are just car based SUV. this thing goes beyond that.
Old 09-01-2009, 11:32 PM
  #330  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Yeah, they should have put the smaller Audi SUV in that comparison...oh wait...they don't have a cheaper model. I guess that is the definition of "Entry Level"
MDX/RX/ML are already cheap. starting at $40k for 3.5L to 3.7L engines. if Q5 has to get 3.0T. its price will zoom pass $45K. and that without Prestige/drive select/S line.
Old 09-01-2009, 11:35 PM
  #331  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
Is that why you bought the TSX instead of the A4 - price difference?
Old 09-02-2009, 12:51 AM
  #332  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
MDX/RX/ML are already cheap. starting at $40k for 3.5L to 3.7L engines. if Q5 has to get 3.0T. its price will zoom pass $45K. and that without Prestige/drive select/S line.
It's that English language thing (again). Entry Level means your most affordable product. Therefor by definition, the Q5 is Audi's entry level SUV since there isn't one lower. Thus, it gets compared to other brand's 'entry level' SUVs. Simple huh?
Old 09-02-2009, 08:44 AM
  #333  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,803
Received 4,031 Likes on 2,507 Posts
The CRV sales increase to 30K/month up 58% from last year don't surprise me. I know a few CRV owner's, really versatile little SUV with some neat features.
Old 09-02-2009, 08:52 AM
  #334  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
It's that English language thing (again). Entry Level means your most affordable product. Therefor by definition, the Q5 is Audi's entry level SUV since there isn't one lower. Thus, it gets compared to other brand's 'entry level' SUVs. Simple huh?
what is more entry level than RX in lexus? how is its starting price?. does it have more wheel base?. total interior capacity has no more than 5% difference.
Old 09-02-2009, 09:00 AM
  #335  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,803
Received 4,031 Likes on 2,507 Posts
Those RX numbers are amazing, over 9K/month in this economy.
Old 09-02-2009, 12:47 PM
  #336  
OG Member
Thread Starter
 
DrewSRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sint Maarten
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SSFTSX
yeah it belong to these junk category. look at point difference. and it is not even fully loaded.
http://www.caranddriver.com/var/ezfl...470fab3ecc.pdf
Call the category whatever you like, the Q5 belongs there, period. Motor Trend, Car and Driver, and Edmunds put it there as well.

Originally Posted by SSFTSX
why it scored full points in fit/finish and offroad ability? why it has 4400lbs tow ratings. They others are just car based SUV. this thing goes beyond that.
The Q5 is based on the MLP platform which underpins the B8 A4 and A5/S5. This platform is also going to be used on the next generation A6, A7, and A8. The Q5 is "just" a 100% car based platform as well. Please get your facts correct. The Q7 uses a modified VAG PL71 platform, also used in the Touareg and Cayenne.

Last edited by DrewSRX; 09-02-2009 at 12:50 PM.
Old 09-02-2009, 08:56 PM
  #337  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,306
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
These numbers are slightly skewed by C4C. Look for a dive in sales this month.
Old 09-02-2009, 09:22 PM
  #338  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by DrewSRX
Call the category whatever you like, the Q5 belongs there, period. Motor Trend, Car and Driver, and Edmunds put it there as well.
They also put RX350 in same tests. so why put 5 seater RX in mid level category?


The Q5 is based on the MLP platform which underpins the B8 A4 and A5/S5. This platform is also going to be used on the next generation A6, A7, and A8. The Q5 is "just" a 100% car based platform as well. Please get your facts correct. The Q7 uses a modified VAG PL71 platform, also used in the Touareg and Cayenne.
What does have platform to do with offroad ability? Q5 is 100% car based but it has more Offroad ability than Q7/X5 or even ML-350. what is that A4/A6 allroader is about?
C&D is not stupid giving it 5 in offroad ability.

this is even without $5K offroad package.

http://www.sgcarmart.com/news/review.php?AID=103
But we weren't there to pit it against sports cars. Audi first wanted to demonstrate the Q5's terrain-bashing capabilities, so off we went to the Sepang-Silverstone Off-Road Park
There, the Q5 faced obstacles ranging from side-inclines to steep slopes. And you know that they're steep when even people have difficulty climbing or descending from them.

Fitted with its standard road-going tyres, the Q5 (with two passengers) was climbed up gradients 31 degrees-steep with ease. Descending from them, though, was more dramatic - for its passengers, at least.

I can't remember the last time, or any time at all when I was in the driver's seat, with absolutely no view of the ground in front of me. And to move off from such a point seems... a bit suicidal, to say the least. A Germany lady guide at the top of the hill waved me on. I nodded, released my foot off the brakes and took in a deep breath - the same kind you take when you're right at the top of a roller-coaster, knowing it's going to plunge in the next second.

But in the Q5, instead of rolling freely down the slope, its electronic stabilisation programme (ESP) took over and carefully guided the car to ground level, calmly and accurately as a trained parachutist would to make a perfect landing. The electronics cleverly managed its wheels, preventing any lock-up and unwanted sliding about, while allowing the driver to maintain control over its steering.
Old 09-03-2009, 01:36 AM
  #339  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,492
Received 834 Likes on 518 Posts
^^ I believe DrewSRX was only saying the Q5 is also a car-based SUV. In your last post, you made it sound like it's a truck-based SUV. Perhaps it's only a little misunderstanding. Relax.
Old 09-03-2009, 01:00 PM
  #340  
Hello!
 
LessisBestmakingendsmeet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DrewSRX
August 2009 Luxury Car Sales

Pre-Entry Level
1. Acura TSX - 2,925
2. Volvo C30/S40/V50 - 1,891
3. BMW 1-Series - 914
4. Lexus HS - 543
5. Audi A3 - 479

Entry Level
1. BMW 3-Series - 9,833
2. Infiniti G37 - 4,903
3. Lexus IS - 4,855
4. Audi A4/A5 - 4,700
5. Mercedes-Benz C-Class - 4,253
6. Acura TL - 3,003
7. Cadillac CTS - 2,584
8. Lincoln MKZ -1,621
9. Volvo S60/V70 - 655
10. Saab 9-3 - 352

Mid-Level
1. Mercedes-Benz E-Class - 4,671
2. BMW 5-Series - 3,536
3. Lincoln MKS - 1,370
4. Lexus GS - 669
5. Infiniti M - 618
6. Volvo S80 - 565
7. Audi A6- 561
8. Cadillac STS - 337
9. Acura RL - 149
10. Saab 9-5 - 52

Flagship
1. Mercedes-Benz S-Slass - 1,031
2. Lexus LS - 880
3. BMW 7-Series - 862
4. Audi A8 - 109

Entry-Level SUV
1. Mercedes-Benz GLK - 1,665
2. Audi Q5 - 1,496
3. Cadillac SRX - 1,401
4. Volvo XC60 - 767
5. Acura RDX - 728
6. BMW X3 - 670
7. Infiniti EX - 665

Mid-Level SUV
1. Lexus RX - 9,317
2. Acura MDX - 2,820
3. Mercedes-Benz M-Class - 2,577
4. BMW X5 - 2,295
5. Lincoln MKX - 2,132
6. Infiniti FX - 938
7. Volvo XC90 - 747
8. Lexus GX - 716
9. Audi Q7 - 394
10. BMW X6 - 344

Full-Size SUV
1. Mercedes-Benz GL-Class - 1,744
2. Cadillac Escalade - 1,726
3. Infiniti QX - 608
4. Lincoln Navigator - 471
5. Lexus LX - 249
6. Mercedes-Benz G-Class - 37
Some observations
Where are Buicks? Where is the Enclave, that is a great SUV. Where is the new Lacrosse?
Any Jaguar numbers?
The HS starts at 34k, its not pre entry level, thats only a grand less than the TL. Where is the ES?
Where is the Hyundai Genesis? That may lack the badge but it surely is at least an entry level luxury vehicle.
Old 09-03-2009, 01:16 PM
  #341  
Go Big Blue!
 
SpicyMikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FLA
Posts: 2,700
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I don't care what category you put the RX in. Those are amazing numbers! Almost seems like a typo. No wonder I see so many of them around.
Old 09-03-2009, 01:23 PM
  #342  
Senior Moderator
 
LuvMyTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NY
Age: 44
Posts: 14,667
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I am amazed at the RX. Those are some incredible numbers.

The TSX is also doing nicely in its category.
Old 09-03-2009, 10:16 PM
  #343  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
That's a pretty strong start for the HS considering I don't think I saw ads for it until sometime in August.
Old 09-03-2009, 10:32 PM
  #344  
Safety Car
 
SSFTSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,581
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by iforyou
^^ I believe DrewSRX was only saying the Q5 is also a car-based SUV. In your last post, you made it sound like it's a truck-based SUV. Perhaps it's only a little misunderstanding. Relax.
this pretty old way of measuring offroad performance and truck based SUVs are generally heavy. so most of the time they stuck in soft grounds. thats why Toyota Landcruiser always had electric wench in front. Now with modern torque and weight distribution along with wide band torquier engines. there is no need of truck base SUV in most situations.
Old 09-04-2009, 06:59 AM
  #345  
AZ Community Team
 
Legend2TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 17,803
Received 4,031 Likes on 2,507 Posts
Originally Posted by biker
These numbers are slightly skewed by C4C. Look for a dive in sales this month.
Just learned yesterday my boss traded in a mid-90's Jeep Grand Cherokee for RX350, so that's at least 1 out of 9K+ RX's for C4C.

He originally wanted a Highlander (none to be found in the area), then a MDX (gas mileage too low for C4C), then settled on the RX.
Old 09-04-2009, 10:00 AM
  #346  
Pro
 
vybzkartel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 49
Posts: 679
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Legend2TL
Those RX numbers are amazing, over 9K/month in this economy.
Originally Posted by LuvMyTSX
I am amazed at the RX. Those are some incredible numbers.

The TSX is also doing nicely in its category.
Well, since fewer women than men are losing jobs, the girly RX continues to sell well, compared to the macho looking MDX, ;-)!
Old 09-04-2009, 10:41 AM
  #347  
Suzuka Master
 
mrdeeno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lower Nazzie, Pa
Age: 46
Posts: 5,349
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by vybzkartel
Well, since fewer women than men are losing jobs, the girly RX continues to sell well, compared to the macho looking MDX, ;-)!
Uh, I think men should start fighting for equal rights. We've been discriminated against long enough.
Old 10-02-2009, 03:36 PM
  #348  
OG Member
Thread Starter
 
DrewSRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Sint Maarten
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
September 2009 - Luxury Car Sales

Entry CUV
1. GLK - 1,558
2. Q5 - 1,106
3. X3 - 1,000
4. XC60 - 828
5. RDX - 752
6. EX - 563

Pre-Entry-Level
1. TSX - 2,103
2. C30/S40/V50 - 1,593
3. 1-Series - 1,509
4. HS - 1,242
5. A3 - 362

Entry-Level
1. 3 - 6,523
2. C - 5,002
3. G - 4,112
4. A4/5 - 3,932
5. CTS - 3,485
6. IS - 3,346
7. ES - 3,046
8. TL - 2,034
9. MKZ - 1,536
10. 9-3 - 279
11. S60 - 277

Mid-Level
1. E - 3,812
2. 5 - 2,861
3. MKS - 1,316
4. A6 - 623
5. S80 - 502
6. GS - 501
7. M - 447
8. STS - 434
9. RL - 150
10. 9-5 - 67

Flagship
1. S-Class - 1,101
2. LS - 777
3. 7-Series - 739
4. A8/S8 – 187

Pre-Lux
1. Maxima - 5,901
2. Lucerne - 4,324
3. LaCrosse - 2,383
4. CC - 2,290
5. Avalon - 1,939
6. Genesis - 1,665
7. G8 - 1,005
8. Passat - 664
Old 10-02-2009, 03:55 PM
  #349  
TMQ
Pro
 
TMQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North by Northwest
Age: 47
Posts: 608
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What about midsize CUVs?

Again, it seems that TSX saves the day for Acura.
Old 10-02-2009, 05:18 PM
  #350  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
ah, finally the TL's sales numbers are where they belong. Hopefully Acura sees the err in its ways and turns around this ridiculous styling trend.
Old 10-02-2009, 06:08 PM
  #351  
Race Director
 
biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 14,306
Received 624 Likes on 503 Posts
Originally Posted by I Go To Costco
ah, finally the TL's sales numbers are where they belong. Hopefully Acura sees the err in its ways and turns around this ridiculous styling trend.
The panic may be setting in at Honda about now and the MMC redesign of the TL might take a more substantial turn like the 06 Accord did.
Old 10-02-2009, 07:03 PM
  #352  
I'm the Firestarter
 
Belzebutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 11,981
Received 641 Likes on 395 Posts
The guy who designed that plenum grille should have his head stuck inside one and be displayed in the village square as an example to others.
Old 10-02-2009, 07:09 PM
  #353  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,612 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by Belzebutt
The guy who designed that plenum grille should have his head stuck inside one and be displayed in the village square as an example to others.
Power Phlegm FTL. :thumbsdow

....except on the TSX, which looks as if it was designed for that grille and actually looks good.
Old 10-02-2009, 07:11 PM
  #354  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Most here won't remember, but back in '93 when Acura moved to the round headlights for the Integra, people screamed. 6-7 years later, people loved it. Maybe Acura should leave this generation TL in production for two product cycles.....
Old 10-03-2009, 01:52 PM
  #355  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Belzebutt
The guy who designed that plenum grille should have his head stuck inside one and be displayed in the village square as an example to others.
Old 10-03-2009, 01:54 PM
  #356  
dom
Senior Moderator
 
dom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 47
Posts: 47,710
Received 801 Likes on 662 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Most here won't remember, but back in '93 when Acura moved to the round headlights for the Integra, people screamed. 6-7 years later, people loved it. Maybe Acura should leave this generation TL in production for two product cycles.....
I guess I was one of the few that liked it. Bought a 98. Although that was the year the styling was ever so slightly revised.

IMO, they can keep the plenum. Just make it smaller and don't make it extend into the damn hood. Make it level with the headlights. Such a simple change makes such a huge difference.
Old 10-03-2009, 02:19 PM
  #357  
Suzuka Master
 
Colin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,802
Received 1,012 Likes on 567 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
I guess I was one of the few that liked it. Bought a 98. Although that was the year the styling was ever so slightly revised.

IMO, they can keep the plenum. Just make it smaller and don't make it extend into the damn hood. Make it level with the headlights. Such a simple change makes such a huge difference.
Heh, we had 94, 97, and 2000 GS-R sedans so we loved them too. I wasn't working there in 93-94, but the older guys told me how there was a HUGE rush on the 93s when spy pics of the 94's came out. Don't you remember those guys changing the front for the JDM one piece headlights?

I agree 1000% on the plenum. In and of itself, it's not a big problem. Its the part going into the hood and the way it doesn't match the lines of the car. I was looking at a used '08 TL yesterday and can see how they've been trying to prepare is for this new look. It has a small grill extension on the hood, and the center 'spline' (with the logo) is so large, it almost touches the top of the hood. It doesn't take a lot of imagination to fill in the small bit of open grill space between the hood and the "A" logo. If you do, voila! Power Plenum
Old 10-03-2009, 09:19 PM
  #358  
Senior Moderator
 
neuronbob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cleveland area, OH
Posts: 20,015
Received 4,612 Likes on 2,193 Posts
Originally Posted by dom
IMO, they can keep the plenum. Just make it smaller and don't make it extend into the damn hood. Make it level with the headlights. Such a simple change makes such a huge difference.
Agree. The Plenum must be changed to be more proportional.
Old 10-03-2009, 10:12 PM
  #359  
2G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
Originally Posted by neuronbob
Agree. The Plenum must be changed to be more proportional.
x2.
Old 10-03-2009, 10:16 PM
  #360  
2G TLX-S
 
Edward'TLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: YVR
Posts: 10,172
Received 1,133 Likes on 813 Posts
Originally Posted by Colin
Most here won't remember, but back in '93 when Acura moved to the round headlights for the Integra, people screamed. 6-7 years later, people loved it. Maybe Acura should leave this generation TL in production for two product cycles.....
Power plenum for two more product cycles ??!!

I doubt if all the Honda stock investors will let the Acura brand will last this long with the two top-most sedans suffering continuing poor sales.

Back in '93 with the Integra, people screamed but sales kept flying. But this time people scream and sales sliding. Not quite the same.


Quick Reply: Monthly Car Sales news



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.