Mercedes-Benz: Development and Technology News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2023 | 09:24 AM
  #361  
SamDoe1's Avatar
Ex-OEM King
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 17,829
Likes: 7,010
From: Minnesnowta
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
The main difference here is that in 33 months you would have paid $2k for the 60hp bump or 22 months for the 80hp bump - and then kept paying. And worse yet - the hardware is there but that license is likely non-transferrable.

I bet there's minimal impact to the wear and tear of the drivetrain, so that warranty claim is likely bs. This is nothing more than a cash grab to cover loss of revenue that is typically driven by parts and service on their ICE vehicles.
There's an option to pay $2k for a permanent upgrade. I agree that the subscription thing is stupid.

There absolutely is additional wear and tear on a drivetrain as a result of more power being applied. That's just basic engineering. Even if the drivetrain is designed for it, which it most definitely is, applying more load will always result in more stress on the drivetrain.

Last edited by SamDoe1; May 3, 2023 at 09:28 AM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2023 | 01:08 PM
  #362  
civicdrivr's Avatar
Team Owner
15 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 36,856
Likes: 8,746
From: VA
I did say minimal.

But look at the Model 3 LR w/ Boost. From the owner groups (which I would admit is a small sample size), none of the failures have been attributed to the boost upgrade.
Reply
Old May 3, 2023 | 01:39 PM
  #363  
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,516
Likes: 6,477
From: Spring, TX
I can't imagine any mfg offering any OE/warrantied performance upgrade that would be outside the normal operating range of the vehicle.
Reply
Old May 3, 2023 | 02:22 PM
  #364  
SamDoe1's Avatar
Ex-OEM King
10 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 17,829
Likes: 7,010
From: Minnesnowta
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
I did say minimal.

But look at the Model 3 LR w/ Boost. From the owner groups (which I would admit is a small sample size), none of the failures have been attributed to the boost upgrade.
That you know of... I don't think anyone has done a large scale pareto of failure modes for cars with and without AB...but I would assume that Tesla has that and did it as part of development.

They may say that AB has a reasonable chance, not definite, of adding ~$1500 (made this up) in warranty cost potential to a given unit, sell it for $2k to cover that plus R&D cost. If a given unit doesn't realize those warranty costs, they pocket that cash.

Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
I can't imagine any mfg offering any OE/warrantied performance upgrade that would be outside the normal operating range of the vehicle.
Normal operating windows and associated acceptable rates of failure can shift with different use conditions and operating parameters.

We do this all the time. For example, a range of implants may have the same delivery system but varying levels/modes of failure (and acceptance criteria) depending on what implant is being delivered.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2023 | 10:45 AM
  #365  
Legend2TL's Avatar
AZ Community Team
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,090
Likes: 4,757
From: Maryland
THE SECRETS OF LUXURY SEDANS: How S-Class, Maybach and EQS are made | WELT Documentar

Impressive that laser cutting is used exclusively instead of cutting with a press cutting die. Those 6-stage huge presses are massive

Reply
Old Aug 7, 2023 | 09:56 AM
  #366  
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,516
Likes: 6,477
From: Spring, TX
https://www.carscoops.com/2023/08/me...d-e63-by-2026/


The demise of AMG’s twin-turbo V8 from the Mercedes C-Class and E-Class lineups certainly didn’t please enthusiasts, but a new report brings back hope. Insider sources suggest that the V8 could return in both sedans as part of a plug-in hybrid system, as early as 2026.

Currently, the Mercedes-AMG C63 S E Performance produces a combined 671 hp (500 kW / 680 PS) from a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder and a rear-mounted electric motor. Likewise, the upcoming AMG E63 variant of the new E-Class is expected to come fitted with an inline-six PHEV. While both will offer significantly higher outputs than their V8-powered predecessors, there is always room for improvement.

Citing senior engineers “directly involved in the matter, ” Georg Kacher from Car And Driver suggests that the M177 4.0-liter V8 engine is being reworked to meet the significantly stricter Euro 7 emission standards. According to the report, the current generations of the C-Class and the E-Class need “minor bodywork changes” in order to be compatible with a V8-based PHEV.

A similar plug-in hybrid powertrain is already used in the E Performance variants of the Mercedes-AMG GT63 S four-door coupe and S63 sedan flagships, offering a combined 831 hp (620 kW / 843 PS) and 791 hp (590 kW/ 802 PS) respectively. Add the upcoming SL63 E Performance and the entire family of Aston Martin PHEVs into the mix and you’ll get that it makes perfect sense for Mercedes to continue evolving the good-old V8, keeping it up to date with emission regulations.

We don’t know the name of the V8 PHEVs in the C-Class and E-Class lineups, but Mercedes has already trademarked the E73 moniker which sounds like a good candidate for the new performance king. This model could rival the upcoming BMW M5 which is also expected to come fitted with an electrified V8.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2023 | 09:57 AM
  #367  
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 120 Days
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,516
Likes: 6,477
From: Spring, TX
Still staggering to have that from a 4pot
combined 671 hp (500 kW / 680 PS) from a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder and a rear-mounted electric motor.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2023 | 03:15 PM
  #368  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,944
Likes: 11,744
From: Florida
The requirements for these autonomy levels are ridiculous, they don't differentiate between city and highway driving or weather conditions, the loopholes are massive and as a result you get this


"Level 3"


Last edited by #1 STUNNA; Sep 27, 2023 at 03:18 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2023 | 05:41 PM
  #369  
#1 STUNNA's Avatar
Sanest Florida Man
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 45,944
Likes: 11,744
From: Florida
Highway only
max speed 40MPH

that’s like saying it can only drive in the dark but not between the hours of 6pm-6am
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vthree
1G TSX Racing & Competition
8
May 24, 2007 01:56 AM
smiko21
2G CL (2001-2003)
3
Oct 24, 2005 10:15 PM
Sir
1G CL (1997-1999)
31
May 16, 2004 08:00 PM
Sir
1G CL (1997-1999)
14
Mar 2, 2004 08:05 PM
Zapata
2G CL (2001-2003)
9
Oct 23, 2003 03:22 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:08 PM.