Honda: S2000 News
#361
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
I found his lap times when he was stockish...
1:42.50 05/25/2003 mafia 2002 S2000 Panther Plus and ATE blue, stock otherwise (S02's have maybe 50-65% tread left). Cool weather... With a passenger
This is the guy whom my buddy Neal knows:
1:36.95 05/28/2002 Mike Pendola 2000 Honda S2000 A032R's, Coilovers, brake pads, motul fluid.
The M3 in the pics look sick!! I was just asking because I was curious and wasn't trying to call you out as a liar.
1:42.50 05/25/2003 mafia 2002 S2000 Panther Plus and ATE blue, stock otherwise (S02's have maybe 50-65% tread left). Cool weather... With a passenger
This is the guy whom my buddy Neal knows:
1:36.95 05/28/2002 Mike Pendola 2000 Honda S2000 A032R's, Coilovers, brake pads, motul fluid.
The M3 in the pics look sick!! I was just asking because I was curious and wasn't trying to call you out as a liar.
#362
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
dont know why he would have posted a time with a passenger... that fool. :P with R-compounds and no passenger, he is much faster, I assure you. Also that is pretty old, he continually improved over the course of many sessions at Gman.
#363
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
Has he ever run any of the courses at Autobahn CC?
#364
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by Maximized
Either answer my simple questions that you've avoided in the last handful of posts, or either quit posting.
#366
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by biker
It's all subjective - I don't find my 99 Accord LX 5 sp a torqueless wonder.
#367
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
Has he ever run any of the courses at Autobahn CC?
#368
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by F23A4
I take it your previous ride was a Toyota Tercel then?!? That would make the F23A ostensibly a torque monster.
My neighbor has a 2003 4cyl Accord. A few months ago, he broke his ankle, and didn't commute to work - long story short, the battery in the Accord died because it wasn't started for a while. I drove him to Autozone in his accord to get it replaced, and on the way back revved to approx. 5k (I guess I was used to the pull of the S2k ). He exclaimed and said that he'd never ever taken the car above 4000rpms My point is, this guy commutes 1.5 hours one way to work everyday, and found his accord more than adequate even though he barely revved it over 4000rpms. Different strokes for different folks I guess, but I'm positive you'll find this to be the case with 90% of the car driving public.
#369
#370
Senior Moderator
nice vid. too bad the GTR was in the way in the beginning, pretty clear that the S2000 would have got around the Z in the corners. And, if you think that isn't "real" racing - you're on crack thx. I know there are certain BM episodes where they have a "feature" car and they let it "shine" - this isn't one of them. Did you see how close the S2k was to the M3 in that one hairpin.. he was about 6 inches from the bumper. Also - rare mistake by Gan-San!! yeah you pretty much never see that.
#372
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by vishnus11
F23A4, with all due respect, you're obviously an enthusiast that prefers a lot more "ooooompf" in your cars (Maxima, Murano). But for 90% of people out there, the average NA 4cyl does the job just fine.
My neighbor has a 2003 4cyl Accord. A few months ago, he broke his ankle, and didn't commute to work - long story short, the battery in the Accord died because it wasn't started for a while. I drove him to Autozone in his accord to get it replaced, and on the way back revved to approx. 5k (I guess I was used to the pull of the S2k ). He exclaimed and said that he'd never ever taken the car above 4000rpms My point is, this guy commutes 1.5 hours one way to work everyday, and found his accord more than adequate even though he barely revved it over 4000rpms. Different strokes for different folks I guess, but I'm positive you'll find this to be the case with 90% of the car driving public.
My neighbor has a 2003 4cyl Accord. A few months ago, he broke his ankle, and didn't commute to work - long story short, the battery in the Accord died because it wasn't started for a while. I drove him to Autozone in his accord to get it replaced, and on the way back revved to approx. 5k (I guess I was used to the pull of the S2k ). He exclaimed and said that he'd never ever taken the car above 4000rpms My point is, this guy commutes 1.5 hours one way to work everyday, and found his accord more than adequate even though he barely revved it over 4000rpms. Different strokes for different folks I guess, but I'm positive you'll find this to be the case with 90% of the car driving public.
#373
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by vishnus11
F23A4, with all due respect, you're obviously an enthusiast that prefers a lot more "ooooompf" in your cars (Maxima, Murano). But for 90% of people out there, the average NA 4cyl does the job just fine.
My point is, this guy commutes 1.5 hours one way to work everyday, and found his accord more than adequate even though he barely revved it over 4000rpms. Different strokes for different folks I guess, but I'm positive you'll find this to be the case with 90% of the car driving public.
My point is, this guy commutes 1.5 hours one way to work everyday, and found his accord more than adequate even though he barely revved it over 4000rpms. Different strokes for different folks I guess, but I'm positive you'll find this to be the case with 90% of the car driving public.
My mom doesnt take it over 4k either BUT she can tell a big difference going from a 97 maxima to a 98 altima. Lets say she still mad about that.
#374
Liquid Ice
One thing that people don't really mention is the gearing on the S2000. First gear is short, really short ... The short gearing really helps to get the car moving without torque. It requires that you upshift quicker, especially if you're looking to keep the revs low ...
I was driving in stop and go traffic yesterday and I still don't think there's anything wrong with the car. No need to rev the crap out of the car in stop and go traffic, or merging. If you want to have some fun though the revs are there.
BTW- Here is a link to a dyno graph of my car. The torque is nothing impressive at all, but it is relatively flat. Link
Here's the vid too incase anyone is curious: Dyno Vid
I have some mods, but the power delivery wouldn't look too much different on a stock car.
The argument that seems to be going on here is that the car has no torque ... and people are saying for a car enthusiast its low. While thats true, there's a lot of other stuff that the S2K has going for it for a car enthusiast. While some of you have complained about the high redline, I think as someone who's looking for a performance car, the high redline isn't a bad thing, its a good thing. Infiniti fans were hailing the new 7600 rpm redline as a good thing for the new G35.
In the end, like I said before it depends what you want out of a car. The S2000 is certainly not a superb commuter car. Its not a grand touring car. You shouldn't expect the S2000 to give you a cushy ride on the highway at 80mph. The car isn't intended for that. You wouldn't buy a VW Bug for its enormous cargo space, you shouldn't buy an S2000 for its highway cruising ability.
Its also not a drag racer. In no way is it intended to be run down the 1/4 mile strip. It does OK at the track (a 13.9 @ 101mph is decent I think), but lets be honest here, it isn't an American Muscle car. The car does well on the track, and at autox's. Its a relatively low priced sports car that like the NSX, when it was released did extrodinarily well against cars more expensive than it. Its getting long in the tooth now, but it certainly isn't a slouch still. I wouldn't be surprised to see the re-design putitng the S2000 at the top of its class again.
The car isn't for everyone, and visnus, you'll spend the rest of your life trying to defend the car to people who the car isn't for. I think you, I and the other S2000 owners can appreciate the car for what it is, and for us the positives outweigh the negatives.
For me, the car puts a huge smile on my face everytime I drive it. I could have the worst day of my life, but cruising around top down on a warm sunny day and I'm all smiles.
I was driving in stop and go traffic yesterday and I still don't think there's anything wrong with the car. No need to rev the crap out of the car in stop and go traffic, or merging. If you want to have some fun though the revs are there.
BTW- Here is a link to a dyno graph of my car. The torque is nothing impressive at all, but it is relatively flat. Link
Here's the vid too incase anyone is curious: Dyno Vid
I have some mods, but the power delivery wouldn't look too much different on a stock car.
The argument that seems to be going on here is that the car has no torque ... and people are saying for a car enthusiast its low. While thats true, there's a lot of other stuff that the S2K has going for it for a car enthusiast. While some of you have complained about the high redline, I think as someone who's looking for a performance car, the high redline isn't a bad thing, its a good thing. Infiniti fans were hailing the new 7600 rpm redline as a good thing for the new G35.
In the end, like I said before it depends what you want out of a car. The S2000 is certainly not a superb commuter car. Its not a grand touring car. You shouldn't expect the S2000 to give you a cushy ride on the highway at 80mph. The car isn't intended for that. You wouldn't buy a VW Bug for its enormous cargo space, you shouldn't buy an S2000 for its highway cruising ability.
Its also not a drag racer. In no way is it intended to be run down the 1/4 mile strip. It does OK at the track (a 13.9 @ 101mph is decent I think), but lets be honest here, it isn't an American Muscle car. The car does well on the track, and at autox's. Its a relatively low priced sports car that like the NSX, when it was released did extrodinarily well against cars more expensive than it. Its getting long in the tooth now, but it certainly isn't a slouch still. I wouldn't be surprised to see the re-design putitng the S2000 at the top of its class again.
The car isn't for everyone, and visnus, you'll spend the rest of your life trying to defend the car to people who the car isn't for. I think you, I and the other S2000 owners can appreciate the car for what it is, and for us the positives outweigh the negatives.
For me, the car puts a huge smile on my face everytime I drive it. I could have the worst day of my life, but cruising around top down on a warm sunny day and I'm all smiles.
#375
Senior Moderator
great points LiQiCE, I agree with pretty much everything you said. Nice point about the redline too, in fact when they reduced the S2k's from 9k to 8k it had many people frowning.. until they realized that the change was for the better overall performance of the car.
#376
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
oh yeah he ran 1:28.1 at Gingerman in that M3. He also had an '04 Z06, he ran 1:31. Only mod was Hoosier slicks.
What's his times for Autobahn? Your buddy might know my friend Pete and his dad. They have a E46 BMW M3 track car with a M5 V8 engine in it. The car was built by Fall Line and was campaigned in a few pro races by Mark Boden(sp?). I was out there about a month ago and my friend Pete offered me a ride, but I couldn't stay any longer. The car is a work of art!
#377
S2000 Owner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Orlando, Fl, USA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
...For me, the car puts a huge smile on my face everytime I drive it. I could have the worst day of my life, but cruising around top down on a warm sunny day and I'm all smiles.
Well said for all your points...the part I quoted can't be more true!!!
#378
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,085
Received 740 Likes
on
309 Posts
Maximized-Do you drive from stoplight to stoplight running 1/4 mile times that you're so worried about the the so called lack of power that the S2000 has? All you keep talking about it 1/4 mile times. Day to day driving isn't about how fast you can run 1/4's. Let's put it into perspective: S2k will run rings all over the Mustang (among a bunch of other cars) straight out of the box in an Autocross course or a track other than something going in a straight line. How much power is needed to do that? The Mustang is all power, and not much handling (without heavy modification), so the Mustang is more likely to be a more solid 1/4 mile track car, not to mention having a MUCH stronger rear end than the S2k, which would lead to increased durability on a 1/4 mile track.
Granted, you have some valid info, but in every day driving, the S2k has more than ample power to accelerate, if you are driving normally. I drive my car every day in traffic and don't have any problems at all with not having enough power. Yes, the torque isn't as much as many other comparable cars out there, but day to day drivers of the S2k learn how to drive it well, and usually know what gear they need to be in to get the right amount of power in any situation. I thoroughly enjoy shifting in this car, considering it's among the best shifters on the road.
Granted, you have some valid info, but in every day driving, the S2k has more than ample power to accelerate, if you are driving normally. I drive my car every day in traffic and don't have any problems at all with not having enough power. Yes, the torque isn't as much as many other comparable cars out there, but day to day drivers of the S2k learn how to drive it well, and usually know what gear they need to be in to get the right amount of power in any situation. I thoroughly enjoy shifting in this car, considering it's among the best shifters on the road.
#379
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
That's smokin. My friend ran lower 1:20's in his Van Diemen. That time you posted for the Z06 is a bit fast. Your buddy must have had Race pads too or somethings suspect. The reason why I say that is because my friend had 2 Bondurant Pro drivers into town and had them out in his 02 Z06 at Gman. The car had 01 PF Pads, Cryo treated rotors(they cracked all the time), Harness bar, and Harnesses. Maybe the conditions were vastly different, but there's I can say with almost 100 percent certainty that these guys are better drivers than your friend. If the car had race pads, then it's definetly in line with what a well driven Z06 runs there.
What's his times for Autobahn? Your buddy might know my friend Pete and his dad. They have a E46 BMW M3 track car with a M5 V8 engine in it. The car was built by Fall Line and was campaigned in a few pro races by Mark Boden(sp?). I was out there about a month ago and my friend Pete offered me a ride, but I couldn't stay any longer. The car is a work of art!
What's his times for Autobahn? Your buddy might know my friend Pete and his dad. They have a E46 BMW M3 track car with a M5 V8 engine in it. The car was built by Fall Line and was campaigned in a few pro races by Mark Boden(sp?). I was out there about a month ago and my friend Pete offered me a ride, but I couldn't stay any longer. The car is a work of art!
I will get his times for Autobahn and ask him about that M3 with the M5 V8.
Last edited by srika; 10-05-2006 at 10:01 PM.
#380
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
I wish you could see my friend drive. And, quite sure his Z06 was stock except for tires. He made it a point to run all of his cars stock, he wanted to see how fast he could go with a mechanically 100% stock car, save for tires. If everything works out, you may be able to see him race next year on Speed.
I will get his times for Autobahn and ask him about that M3 with the M5 V8.
I will get his times for Autobahn and ask him about that M3 with the M5 V8.
#381
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoofin
Maximized-Do you drive from stoplight to stoplight running 1/4 mile times that you're so worried about the the so called lack of power that the S2000 has? All you keep talking about it 1/4 mile times. Day to day driving isn't about how fast you can run 1/4's. Let's put it into perspective: S2k will run rings all over the Mustang (among a bunch of other cars) straight out of the box in an Autocross course or a track other than something going in a straight line. How much power is needed to do that? The Mustang is all power, and not much handling (without heavy modification), so the Mustang is more likely to be a more solid 1/4 mile track car, not to mention having a MUCH stronger rear end than the S2k, which would lead to increased durability on a 1/4 mile track.
Granted, you have some valid info, but in every day driving, the S2k has more than ample power to accelerate, if you are driving normally. I drive my car every day in traffic and don't have any problems at all with not having enough power. Yes, the torque isn't as much as many other comparable cars out there, but day to day drivers of the S2k learn how to drive it well, and usually know what gear they need to be in to get the right amount of power in any situation. I thoroughly enjoy shifting in this car, considering it's among the best shifters on the road.
Granted, you have some valid info, but in every day driving, the S2k has more than ample power to accelerate, if you are driving normally. I drive my car every day in traffic and don't have any problems at all with not having enough power. Yes, the torque isn't as much as many other comparable cars out there, but day to day drivers of the S2k learn how to drive it well, and usually know what gear they need to be in to get the right amount of power in any situation. I thoroughly enjoy shifting in this car, considering it's among the best shifters on the road.
#382
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by LiQiCE
For me, the car puts a huge smile on my face everytime I drive it. I could have the worst day of my life, but cruising around top down on a warm sunny day and I'm all smiles.
The head of our FSAE program who's used to hauling ass in our little formula sae car just drove mine today. He said that after 6k rpms he was "all smiles"
#383
Senior Moderator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Brooklyn, NY USA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,085
Received 740 Likes
on
309 Posts
Originally Posted by Maximized
No, I usually race at the track. My problem was that if you didn't beat the snot out of the car, you'd get smoked by a Maxima or comparable family sedan. I know my car isn't the greatest handler, but who cares? I can make up for that with experience. The driver is the most important part of the equation.
#384
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
No offense to your friend, but I have a hard time believing that time in the Z06. He might not have conveyed all that was done to the car, but I can tell you that the guy driving my friend's car was .1 slower than Buddy Rice PIR(Bondurant). I would almost bet the house that he had at least race pads. Why would you slap on Hoosiers and not run race pads? After a few laps of hard driving, the OEM pads are fade city.
#385
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Shoofin
but you're still trying to relate to street racing, but you say you usually race on the track. Where else would I get "smoked" by a maxima or comparable family sedan? If I were on the track, I would be beating the snot out of my car to extract every ounce of power to win the race, as you would in your car....So still, what are you trying to prove?
#388
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by Maximized
No offense to your friend, but I have a hard time believing that time in the Z06. He might not have conveyed all that was done to the car, but I can tell you that the guy driving my friend's car was .1 slower than Buddy Rice PIR(Bondurant). I would almost bet the house that he had at least race pads. Why would you slap on Hoosiers and not run race pads? After a few laps of hard driving, the OEM pads are fade city.
for best results rightclick and save as..
http://www.bmwcca.org/files/roundel/...ctober2006.pdf
hope that's believable, lol!!!
#389
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by gavriil
OK I am back from a three-week Euro vacation with no access to Acurazine and this is what I missed? LOL Come on guys....
#390
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by srika
hey Maximized, here's some reading on my friend
for best results rightclick and save as..
http://www.bmwcca.org/files/roundel/...ctober2006.pdf
hope that's believable, lol!!!
for best results rightclick and save as..
http://www.bmwcca.org/files/roundel/...ctober2006.pdf
hope that's believable, lol!!!
I didn't believe that he was on the OEM brakes in the Z06 for one second Didn't make any sense and I knew what the car is capable in professional hands.
Here is a pic of my friend's newest toy(Bought last Fall)
It's 796 lbs dry and has a ~190hp Kawasaki motorcycle engine. He was going to race it in the AMLS Lites Series this year, but the car caught fire and burned up pretty good. I was shocked to hear how much some of the CF was to repair.
#391
Team Owner
Originally Posted by Maximized
Honda made the suspension easier for novices to drive and not find trees. For an experienced driver, the cars was dumbed down. Honda tuned the snap oversteer characteristics out of the car.
Ap2 suspension is more ACCEPTable for daily uses. yet.. it handles just as good as AP1 if not BETTER than AP1. Proven on the tracks (Bottonwillow by me and my friends)
more STIFF doesnt mean better handling.
If u think AP2 has no torque, wait till you drive an Ap1...
usually more torque = lower redline... i would take a 8/9k redline s2k than a 6.5k redline with 200lbs of torque. you cant have the best of both worlds (high end, low end)
my g35c has more torque than E46 M3... but it is pretty much dead after reaching 6.5k rpm.
#392
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
um... No.
Ap2 suspension is more ACCEPTable for daily uses. yet.. it handles just as good as AP1 if not BETTER than AP1. Proven on the tracks (Bottonwillow by me and my friends)
more STIFF doesnt mean better handling.
If u think AP2 has no torque, wait till you drive an Ap1...
usually more torque = lower redline... i would take a 8/9k redline s2k than a 6.5k redline with 200lbs of torque. you cant have the best of both worlds (high end, low end)
my g35c has more torque than E46 M3... but it is pretty much dead after reaching 6.5k rpm.
Ap2 suspension is more ACCEPTable for daily uses. yet.. it handles just as good as AP1 if not BETTER than AP1. Proven on the tracks (Bottonwillow by me and my friends)
more STIFF doesnt mean better handling.
If u think AP2 has no torque, wait till you drive an Ap1...
usually more torque = lower redline... i would take a 8/9k redline s2k than a 6.5k redline with 200lbs of torque. you cant have the best of both worlds (high end, low end)
my g35c has more torque than E46 M3... but it is pretty much dead after reaching 6.5k rpm.
#393
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
um... No.
Ap2 suspension is more ACCEPTable for daily uses. yet.. it handles just as good as AP1 if not BETTER than AP1. Proven on the tracks (Bottonwillow by me and my friends)
more STIFF doesnt mean better handling.
If u think AP2 has no torque, wait till you drive an Ap1...
usually more torque = lower redline... i would take a 8/9k redline s2k than a 6.5k redline with 200lbs of torque. you cant have the best of both worlds (high end, low end)
my g35c has more torque than E46 M3... but it is pretty much dead after reaching 6.5k rpm.
Ap2 suspension is more ACCEPTable for daily uses. yet.. it handles just as good as AP1 if not BETTER than AP1. Proven on the tracks (Bottonwillow by me and my friends)
more STIFF doesnt mean better handling.
If u think AP2 has no torque, wait till you drive an Ap1...
usually more torque = lower redline... i would take a 8/9k redline s2k than a 6.5k redline with 200lbs of torque. you cant have the best of both worlds (high end, low end)
my g35c has more torque than E46 M3... but it is pretty much dead after reaching 6.5k rpm.
#394
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
Ap2 suspension is more ACCEPTable for daily uses. yet.. it handles just as good as AP1 if not BETTER than AP1. Proven on the tracks (Bottonwillow by me and my friends)
more STIFF doesnt mean better handling.
#395
Originally Posted by Maximized
A classic case of 18 year old magazine racer syndrome. I used to be a bit like you when I was young. Take your car to the track and post some times, then come talk to me. Again, I track my car fairly often and have seen numerous S2K times with my own eyes. You aren't going to change my opinion on the car. Again, I think it's a great handling car, but it's slow.
Fact: The 350Z is a faster car.
Fact: You are a magazine racer, whom has little real life experience.
Fact: You are a S2000 nut-swinger.
Fact: The 350Z is a faster car.
Fact: You are a magazine racer, whom has little real life experience.
Fact: You are a S2000 nut-swinger.
I'm enjoying posts and all the sudden a flurry of flames.....just not what I'm looking for during my break in the middle of a work day.
Ignore me if I'm alone in that department....I can scroll the wheel faster next time I see the name.
#396
Three Wheelin'
Originally Posted by FlyingPig
Can someone ban this maximized kid from the thread or forum?
I'm enjoying posts and all the sudden a flurry of flames.....just not what I'm looking for during my break in the middle of a work day.
Ignore me if I'm alone in that department....I can scroll the wheel faster next time I see the name.
I'm enjoying posts and all the sudden a flurry of flames.....just not what I'm looking for during my break in the middle of a work day.
Ignore me if I'm alone in that department....I can scroll the wheel faster next time I see the name.
#398
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Age: 43
Posts: 5,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vishnus11
Glad to see I'm not the only one who thinks retardness and unwarranted personal attacks in lieu of facts, warrants banning.
#399
Moderator Alumnus
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Washington DC (NOVA)
Age: 52
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
I was starting to get worried about you... Welcome back !!
Thank you.
Yeah, sorry. This time I neglected to post in the appropriate board that I'd be gone for 3 weeks.