Genesis: G70 News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2019, 01:36 PM
  #281  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 16,244
Received 6,106 Likes on 4,007 Posts
Originally Posted by civicdrivr
Strangely, everyone that I know that has driven or owned a dual clutch Evo X has said that is absolutely horrendous. Small sample size, but still...it mostly comes down to how it handled daily driving duties - which is usually the driving force behind people option for the dual clutch in the first place.
To be fair, the Evo X (and the STI too for that matter) aren't that great for daily duties anyway. Both are pretty rough, clunky and overall unrefined.

Last edited by SamDoe1; 01-18-2019 at 01:39 PM.
Old 01-18-2019, 01:41 PM
  #282  
Whats up with RDX owners?
iTrader: (9)
 
civicdrivr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: VA
Age: 35
Posts: 36,239
Received 8,394 Likes on 4,939 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
To be fair, the Evo X (and the STI too for that matter) aren't that great for daily duties anyway. Both are pretty rough, clunky and overall unrefined.
Well yeah, but that's independent of the transmission choice
Old 01-18-2019, 01:53 PM
  #283  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
I guess I should have said that modern cars designed as an auto are better than the manual shoehorned in.
I maintain a brand spankin' new V6 TLX with a 6MT "shoehorned in" would be a far better can in every way than the current TLX.

Originally Posted by SamDoe1
Other than what pushes in the clutch pedal, the SMG is a manual in every other way. There are a lot of people that have swapped an E46 M3 from SMG to manual without changing the actual the transmission. Yes, I've driven one. Yes, they suck. It's not because it's an auto, it's because the software and tuning is terrible. FWIW, manuals are absolutely awful, and perform just like a SMG, if you can't drive one well because YOU end up being the software. The SMG just feels like a manual driven by a 16 year old first learning to drive a stick...and never improves.
Well no, untrue. If you follow the strict constructs of our language, which is very good at describing technical things, the SMG is a "semi-automatic" transmission; no other description is correct. Yes, the SMG shares the mechanical gearbox with cars with three pedals under the dash, that in no way makes it a "manual".

Originally Posted by SamDoe1
The ZF9 is just a bad design with worse software. There are several 10spd gear boxes that get great reviews, the number of gears really isn't that big of a deal.
Hmmm, I think you missed my point on this one. What I was trying to convey, is the cost (dollar and resource wise) and complexity of developing a very efficient transmission with good longevity and reliability and returning a good driving experience, is extremely high. Can it be done? Yeah, I'd imagine the ZF8 meets all of those requirements except for maybe longevity (jury is still out on that metric).

As with everything else, only time will tell if the latest breed of automatic transmissions are capable of equaling or exceeding the good driving experiences, efficiency, and longevity of manual transmission technology which is now decades old. I suspect there may be a very few which will be heralded a decade or two from now as being reliable over the long term. For cars with lesser automatics, the owner's will be saddled with cars which either return a piss poor driving experience, and/or needing to pony up thousands of dollars to get the transmissions replaced/repaired.
Old 01-18-2019, 01:56 PM
  #284  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
As with everything else, only time will tell if the latest breed of automatic transmissions are capable of equaling or exceeding the good driving experiences, efficiency, and longevity of manual transmission technology which is now decades old. I suspect there may be a very few which will be heralded a decade or two from now as being reliable over the long term. For cars with lesser automatics, the owner's will be saddled with cars which either return a piss poor driving experience, and/or needing to pony up thousands of dollars to get the transmissions replaced/repaired.
Autos are more efficient than manuals, particularly the CVT (which I hate, but come on man, you're just drawing non-conclusions)
Old 01-18-2019, 02:00 PM
  #285  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Originally Posted by kurtatx
Autos are more efficient than manuals, particularly the CVT (which I hate, but come on man, you're just drawing non-conclusions)
Some are, some are not. Yes, many achieve higher EPA ratings, but in the real world, I've yet to see any consistent indicators of that. Looking at Fuely and other web sites where folks post real-world mileage and you'll see what I mean.
Old 01-18-2019, 03:42 PM
  #286  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 16,244
Received 6,106 Likes on 4,007 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
I maintain a brand spankin' new V6 TLX with a 6MT "shoehorned in" would be a far better can in every way than the current TLX.
Yes but not because the auto is universally better than the manual, it's because of the ZF9 is a POS. If Acura dropped the ZF8 into that car it would be a different story.

Originally Posted by horseshoez
Well no, untrue. If you follow the strict constructs of our language, which is very good at describing technical things, the SMG is a "semi-automatic" transmission; no other description is correct. Yes, the SMG shares the mechanical gearbox with cars with three pedals under the dash, that in no way makes it a "manual".
If you follow the strict constructs of our language, which is very good at describing technical things, SMG literally stands for Sequential MANUAL Gearbox. It's literally in the name. Nowhere does it say it's a "semi-automatic" gearbox, even though that's what it actually is. Though I still maintain it's ability to work the clutch is akin to a teenager learning to drive.

Originally Posted by horseshoez
Hmmm, I think you missed my point on this one. What I was trying to convey, is the cost (dollar and resource wise) and complexity of developing a very efficient transmission with good longevity and reliability and returning a good driving experience, is extremely high. Can it be done? Yeah, I'd imagine the ZF8 meets all of those requirements except for maybe longevity (jury is still out on that metric).

As with everything else, only time will tell if the latest breed of automatic transmissions are capable of equaling or exceeding the good driving experiences, efficiency, and longevity of manual transmission technology which is now decades old. I suspect there may be a very few which will be heralded a decade or two from now as being reliable over the long term. For cars with lesser automatics, the owner's will be saddled with cars which either return a piss poor driving experience, and/or needing to pony up thousands of dollars to get the transmissions replaced/repaired.
We're going to find out if it's worth it or not because everyone is doing it whether you like it or not.

Originally Posted by horseshoez
Some are, some are not. Yes, many achieve higher EPA ratings, but in the real world, I've yet to see any consistent indicators of that. Looking at Fuely and other web sites where folks post real-world mileage and you'll see what I mean.
EPA ratings are done under controlled environments for a reason. Fuelly is done under a wide variety of conditions that are totally uncontrolled and inaccurate.
Old 01-18-2019, 03:51 PM
  #287  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
I maintain a brand spankin' new V6 TLX with a 6MT "shoehorned in" would be a far better can in every way than the current TLX.
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
Yes but not because the auto is universally better than the manual, it's because of the ZF9 is a POS. If Acura dropped the ZF8 into that car it would be a different story.
Also, a 6MT TLX doesn't exist, so, non-starter.
Old 01-18-2019, 05:35 PM
  #288  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
Thank you, another example of where the 6MT was not part of the initial design, and then added at a later date to yield a superior car.
I am not sure about that... Have you driven the E60 M5 6mt? I have and it sucked.
Old 01-18-2019, 05:39 PM
  #289  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
To be fair, you're living a bit in the past on this one. the 3G TL and the 7G Accord both used a flawed design transmission, similar to how the TLX (and others) use the flawed ZF9. On the flip side, cars that have a ZF8 transmission are lauded to be better to drive (faster and more efficient) than their manual counterparts without the issue of catastrophic failure. Technology has advanced incredibly far in the 10 years since the 3G TL and 7G Accord went out of production and modern automatics are FAR better than they used to be. Comparing a decade old Honda transmission to the best modern German box is a bit of a stretch.



You know that the SMG in the E60 M5 and the E46 M3 are manual transmissions with a computer actuated clutch right? That's what SMG stands for Sequential MANUAL Gearbox.

The SMG was, and is, a POS just by design and the lack of proper computing power and tuning to make it good. A modern DSG is also basically a computer actuated manual but the tuning of today is far better than before.


.
I know that... but to me if there is no clutch pedal near your left foot, then it is automatic. You can have 1 clutch, dual clutch and 3 clutches, it does not matter. if it is not manually engaged, then it is Automatic.

Last edited by oonowindoo; 01-18-2019 at 05:42 PM.
The following users liked this post:
horseshoez (01-18-2019)
Old 01-18-2019, 05:42 PM
  #290  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I know that... but to me if there is no clutch pedal near your left leg, then it is automatic. You can have 1 clutch, dual clutch and 3 clutches, it does not matter. if it is not manually engaged, then it is Automatic.
This. If it's not literally manual (aka, done by a man), it's not a manual. It's an Automatic.
The following users liked this post:
horseshoez (01-18-2019)
Old 01-18-2019, 05:51 PM
  #291  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
Yes but not because the auto is universally better than the manual, it's because of the ZF9 is a POS. If Acura dropped the ZF8 into that car it would be a different story.
Doesn't work that way, the ZF8 is designed exclusively for RWD based cars; the ZF9 is for FWD based cars. Cannot have it both ways.



Originally Posted by SamDoe1
If you follow the strict constructs of our language, which is very good at describing technical things, SMG literally stands for Sequential MANUAL Gearbox. It's literally in the name. Nowhere does it say it's a "semi-automatic" gearbox, even though that's what it actually is. Though I still maintain it's ability to work the clutch is akin to a teenager learning to drive.
Again, doesn't work that way; just because their marketing department calls it a "Manual", that in no way means it is. You can call a sow's ear a silk purse, does that actually make it one?



Originally Posted by SamDoe1
We're going to find out if it's worth it or not because everyone is doing it whether you like it or not.
Your point? That comment makes no sense.


Originally Posted by SamDoe1
EPA ratings are done under controlled environments for a reason. Fuelly is done under a wide variety of conditions that are totally uncontrolled and inaccurate.
Apparently you haven't been following EPA testing over the years. The EPA testing is an epic fail when it comes to replicating real world driving; if they did that in a repeatable way, the results might well be relevant; as the test stands now, it is more larceny than science.
Old 01-18-2019, 05:51 PM
  #292  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Also, a 6MT TLX doesn't exist, so, non-starter.
You missed the point as well.
Old 01-18-2019, 05:53 PM
  #293  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I am not sure about that... Have you driven the E60 M5 6mt? I have and it sucked.
I've driven both, a co-worker of mine bought an E60 M5 with the SMG, hated it, sold it, and bought one with the 6MT. While not as enjoyable as his previous E39 M5, the 6MT E60 was far superior to the SMG version.
Old 01-18-2019, 06:23 PM
  #294  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
I've driven both, a co-worker of mine bought an E60 M5 with the SMG, hated it, sold it, and bought one with the 6MT. While not as enjoyable as his previous E39 M5, the 6MT E60 was far superior to the SMG version.
SMG when working is very good. The issue with SMG is it does not work a lot of the time.

The issue with E60 M5 6mt, is they literally took the 6mt that is designed for another car and forced it to the M5, the result is the car always felt off.
Old 04-04-2019, 08:52 AM
  #295  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
Coupe Render

https://www.motor1.com/news/317504/g...-coupe-render/


A Genesis coupe might actually join the range at some point.

The Genesis brand is still growing, and a rendering from the Genesis G70 Forum imagines how the sedan might look if the luxury automaker ever decides that it wants to add a coupe to the range. The tweaks make for a handsome two-door.

In addition to slicing off two doors, the artist here gives the G70 Coupe the pointy grille like the G90. The roofline is also slightly different by gaining a more acute arch since rear passenger headroom is less of a concern, and the change makes the rear more attractive.

There are reasons to suspect that a G70 Coupe isn't too farfetched to join the lineup eventually. In 2015, execs said that the Genesis lineup would eventually include a "sports type coupe," and a leaked product roadmap in 2016 showed a "near luxury sport coupe" coming in 2020. A promo video in 2017 also briefly showed a clay model that was possibly the two-door.

The Genesis G70 might have a performance variant eventually that would sit above the existing top model with a 3.3-liter, 365-horsepower (272-kilowatt) twin-turbo V6. This would give the brand a natural competitor against the likes of the BMW M3 and other performance sedans. Creating a coupe with this powertrain would then make an M4 challenger.

A very different Genesis coupe might debut at the upcoming New York Auto Show. Luc Donckerwolke, head of Hyundai Group design, confirms that an electric concept is arriving there. We don't have any official details yet, but speculation suggests that it could be a new version of the Essentia concept EV. The current one is an electric supercar capable of hitting 60 miles per hour (96 kilometers per hour in about three seconds.
The following users liked this post:
1killercls (04-12-2019)
Old 04-04-2019, 08:52 AM
  #296  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
Very Q60-like, but looks good.
Old 04-04-2019, 08:57 AM
  #297  
Azine Jabroni
 
kurtatx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,156
Received 2,159 Likes on 1,387 Posts
Originally Posted by 00TL-P3.2
Very Q60-like, but looks good.
Credit where credit is due: It looks like a Mazda (because so does the Q60)
Old 04-06-2019, 07:26 PM
  #298  
Senior Moderator
 
F23A4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Age: 56
Posts: 17,900
Received 1,667 Likes on 931 Posts
Funny thing: I sat in both the G70 3.3T, Lexus RC-F and RC 350 today at the DC auto show. The G70 is clearly a more than viable alternative to the Lexus. A coupe version could seriously take it to the standard bearers in this segment. (For the record, both RCs have some seriously uncomfortable seats.)

This being my first in-person examination of the G70, Acura should be ashamed of themselves for letting Hyundai completely leapfrog them like this.
The following 2 users liked this post by F23A4:
00TL-P3.2 (04-08-2019), fsttyms1 (04-10-2019)
Old 04-06-2019, 09:05 PM
  #299  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Wow, that G70 coupe render looks amazing (I know its just a fan render but still)! I could definitely see something like that finally offering real competition to the likes of the M4 and RS5 provided they did something special with the power train above and beyond the (already great) 3.3t in the sedan. Oh, and also needs a true manual version offered.
Old 04-09-2019, 04:13 PM
  #300  
Three Wheelin'
 
alex2364's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,667
Received 63 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Oh, and also needs a true manual version offered.
The rest of the segment has dropped their manuals so honestly there's no reason G70 needs one. There are even questions if the next M3/M4 will offer a manual in the top trim, Competition model.
Old 04-09-2019, 04:32 PM
  #301  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Originally Posted by alex2364
The rest of the segment has dropped their manuals so honestly there's no reason G70 needs one. There are even questions if the next M3/M4 will offer a manual in the top trim, Competition model.
I can think of a very good reason, market differentiation. I can think of another, cherry-picking us manual drivers with no other alternative. At some point someone is going to figure out there are still a lot of us out there and even some behind us (like both of my kids) who refuse to drive cars with fewer than three pedals under the dash (old school parking brake pedals don't count, if they did, then my 1970 challenger had four pedals under the dash).
Old 04-09-2019, 04:35 PM
  #302  
Moderator
 
Costco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Received 3,489 Likes on 2,089 Posts
I could see Hyundai offering a manual transmission in the coupe, if that happens.

I have actually never driven a manual Hyundai, how are their transmissions and more specifically, shifters?
Old 04-09-2019, 04:46 PM
  #303  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
It's been years, but I recall the 2.0T Genesis Coupe had a decent shifter. Not a Miata, but not a pickup either.
Old 04-11-2019, 08:33 AM
  #304  
Fahrvergnügen'd
 
charliemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Maryland
Age: 52
Posts: 13,494
Received 1,568 Likes on 985 Posts
What are leases like on these? Hyundai subsidizing them?
Old 04-11-2019, 11:49 AM
  #305  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
Wondering if they'll be like the Stinger, where the much better deal was to lease them. Stingers were getting something like $7,500 (GT2 Trim; Premium was only about $2k) in rebates on leases, but only $500 on finance.
Buyers were leasing them & flipping it into finance the next day to get the full discounts.
Old 04-11-2019, 12:17 PM
  #306  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
I just looked up Stinger's sales #.... i thought they would have sold a lot more....

Based on those sales #s.. it will be very hard to justify to offer manual, especially in G70...
Old 04-12-2019, 12:16 AM
  #307  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
Man, I dunno what you were expecting to be honest? Kia sold 17k Stingers in 2018 which is a pretty solid number considering its a niche vehicle ($40-$50k sport sedan/hatchback made by KIA!!!), everybody is buying SUVs right now, and it is not an established model like the M3, Q50, or the S4 etc. I'm also not sure why you think that the Stinger's overall sales numbers would be any influence to Genesis with regard to offering a manual transmission in the G70 (which they already do, just on the 4-cylinder)? All Stingers have auto transmissions, they are from a completely different brand, and different segment of the market.
Old 04-12-2019, 06:09 PM
  #308  
Team Owner
 
oonowindoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 23,362
Received 4,273 Likes on 3,050 Posts
So you think Hyundai will offer 6mt with the 6 cylinders? i am not sure what you are trying to say.

I would not call it a niche vehicle... it has 4 doors and seat 4-5 people... Just because it is made by KIA does not make it niche.
I think you just answered your own questions, in today's SUV market, why would Hyundai, KIA, or Genesis spend the $$ to implement 6mt with the 6 cylinders.
1 reason they would offer is if there is enough demand and 1 way to show that is through sales #. if Hyundai sees KIA's sales # (same company to me), i dont think they would want to spend the $$ to implement 6mt in the G70 6 cylinders. It just does not make any business sense...
and you and i both know that there is just not enough demand. With auto being as good as they are, DSG will be the next to go, let alone revive manuals.

Maybe i forgot to mention, i was talking about the 6 cylinders mt.... i personally dont care about the 4 cylinders.
if you asked me what i was really expecting from the Stinger? i honestly thought it was going to sell close to 3k a month when it first came out....

Last edited by oonowindoo; 04-12-2019 at 06:12 PM.
Old 04-13-2019, 01:09 AM
  #309  
Punk Rocker
 
majin ssj eric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: St Simons Island, GA
Age: 45
Posts: 3,579
Received 79 Likes on 57 Posts
You have to remember that the Stinger is (overall) a pretty expensive car, it is in no way conservatively styled to appeal to a mass audience, and Kia itself is still trying to reverse the stigma and brand perception they have here in the US. Given all of that, I think they sold more than enough units to consider the product a significant success. My main point above about the manual transmission thing was just that the Stinger sales don't necessarily affect Genesis or the G70; a brand and model that is going for a completely different portion of the market. Do I personally think they will ever offer a manual with the 6-cylinder? Of course not, almost nobody does. I'm just saying that if they truly wanted to make a statement with a proposed G70 coupe the fastest way to attain sports car legitimacy would be to offer a MT.
Old 04-13-2019, 01:36 AM
  #310  
Null and proud of it
 
Midnight Mystery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Metairie, LA
Age: 27
Posts: 10,377
Received 899 Likes on 789 Posts
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
I'm just saying that if they truly wanted to make a statement with a proposed G70 coupe the fastest way to attain sports car legitimacy would be to offer a MT.

There is much truth in that!
Old 04-16-2019, 12:30 AM
  #311  
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
 
iforyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes on 524 Posts
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
I just looked up Stinger's sales #.... i thought they would have sold a lot more....

Based on those sales #s.. it will be very hard to justify to offer manual, especially in G70...
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Man, I dunno what you were expecting to be honest? Kia sold 17k Stingers in 2018 which is a pretty solid number considering its a niche vehicle ($40-$50k sport sedan/hatchback made by KIA!!!), everybody is buying SUVs right now, and it is not an established model like the M3, Q50, or the S4 etc. I'm also not sure why you think that the Stinger's overall sales numbers would be any influence to Genesis with regard to offering a manual transmission in the G70 (which they already do, just on the 4-cylinder)? All Stingers have auto transmissions, they are from a completely different brand, and different segment of the market.
Originally Posted by oonowindoo
So you think Hyundai will offer 6mt with the 6 cylinders? i am not sure what you are trying to say.

I would not call it a niche vehicle... it has 4 doors and seat 4-5 people... Just because it is made by KIA does not make it niche.
I think you just answered your own questions, in today's SUV market, why would Hyundai, KIA, or Genesis spend the $$ to implement 6mt with the 6 cylinders.
1 reason they would offer is if there is enough demand and 1 way to show that is through sales #. if Hyundai sees KIA's sales # (same company to me), i dont think they would want to spend the $$ to implement 6mt in the G70 6 cylinders. It just does not make any business sense...
and you and i both know that there is just not enough demand. With auto being as good as they are, DSG will be the next to go, let alone revive manuals.

Maybe i forgot to mention, i was talking about the 6 cylinders mt.... i personally dont care about the 4 cylinders.
if you asked me what i was really expecting from the Stinger? i honestly thought it was going to sell close to 3k a month when it first came out....
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
You have to remember that the Stinger is (overall) a pretty expensive car, it is in no way conservatively styled to appeal to a mass audience, and Kia itself is still trying to reverse the stigma and brand perception they have here in the US. Given all of that, I think they sold more than enough units to consider the product a significant success. My main point above about the manual transmission thing was just that the Stinger sales don't necessarily affect Genesis or the G70; a brand and model that is going for a completely different portion of the market. Do I personally think they will ever offer a manual with the 6-cylinder? Of course not, almost nobody does. I'm just saying that if they truly wanted to make a statement with a proposed G70 coupe the fastest way to attain sports car legitimacy would be to offer a MT.
Kia sold about 1700 Stingers last month.

The Stinger starts at $33k before considering any deals. You can also lease one for $300/month. While the Stinger GT is probably like $40k+, the 1700 Stingers sold would include the base 2.0T model. Given that it's a $30k+ car that is reasonably new, I think 1700 cars sold seems a little low. It's essentially in the same price range as a 3 series, C Class, TLX, A4, IS, etc.
Old 04-16-2019, 08:29 AM
  #312  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
True, but I don't imagine the average C/3/A4 shopper to cross shop a Kia, regardless of MSRP. TLX & IS maybe, but not the badge shoppers.
Old 04-30-2019, 12:15 PM
  #313  
Race Director
 
nanxun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: DMV
Posts: 10,908
Received 3,317 Likes on 2,049 Posts

2019 Genesis G70 Sport Review – Handsome Anachronism

Attached Thumbnails Genesis: G70 News-g70placement-1534275267.jpg  
Old 09-26-2019, 12:52 PM
  #314  
Moderator
Thread Starter
 
00TL-P3.2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Spring, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 26,203
Received 5,488 Likes on 3,746 Posts
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a2...sis-g70-price/

The Genesis G70 sports sedan is entering its second model year with a few minor changes and a slight price uptick. The good news is that the manual transmission remains part of the lineup, although we had heard initially that it might be a single-year proposition.

Even though very few people bought it—Genesis says the six-speed manual has made up only 4 percent of all G70 2.0T sales so far—we think it's admirable that the company is keeping it around. It's the only car in its segment that offers a stick shift anymore, now that the BMW, Audi, Cadillac, and others have dropped their manual options. (Of course, now that we've driven the G70 6MT we know that the six-speed that pairs with the standard 2.0-liter is not much to write home about, but that's besides the point; we appreciate its existence regardless.)

The rest of the lineup is much the same as before, with prices going up a few hundred dollars for most trim levels. The 2.0T model starts at $36,445, a $550 uptick, the 3.3T model starts at $47,095, a $600 rise, and the stand-alone 2.0T Sport M/T trim level with the manual transmission starts at $39,495, $600 more than before. All-wheel drive remains a $2000 option for all automatic-transmission models, and the various Elite, Prestige, and Sport trim levels remain.

Newly available is a brown leather interior option, performance brakes for 2.0T Sport models, a slightly different wheel finish for the 18-inch wheels, and a power trunk lid for the 3.3T Prestige model.
Old 09-26-2019, 01:18 PM
  #315  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 16,244
Received 6,106 Likes on 4,007 Posts
^ As expected, the resale value of these is total dogshit. You can already snag a used 2.0T for low 30's all day long.
Old 09-26-2019, 02:07 PM
  #316  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by SamDoe1
^ As expected, the resale value of these is total dogshit. You can already snag a used 2.0T for low 30's all day long.
A car that MSRPs for $36K and can now be had for low $30K (I'm seeing RWD 2.0T Advanced for $32K to $34K) is dogshit resale value?

The lowest priced 2.0T Sport with MT (MSRP $39K) is $37K
The following users liked this post:
alex2364 (09-26-2019)
Old 09-26-2019, 02:22 PM
  #317  
Latent car nut
iTrader: (2)
 
horseshoez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland
Age: 68
Posts: 7,864
Received 2,017 Likes on 1,414 Posts
Hmmm, I don't find the leather option available for the 6MT models on the Genesis web site.
Old 09-26-2019, 02:30 PM
  #318  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Originally Posted by horseshoez
Hmmm, I don't find the leather option available for the 6MT models on the Genesis web site.
If I remember correctly, they never offered the 6MT version with option for leather interior. That was one of the complaints about the 6MT
Old 09-26-2019, 03:21 PM
  #319  
Ex-OEM King
 
SamDoe1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Minnesnowta
Posts: 16,244
Received 6,106 Likes on 4,007 Posts
Originally Posted by AZuser
A car that MSRPs for $36K and can now be had for low $30K (I'm seeing RWD 2.0T Advanced for $32K to $34K) is dogshit resale value?

The lowest priced 2.0T Sport with MT (MSRP $39K) is $37K
https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...2277/overview/

https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...0625/overview/

https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...0757/overview/

Here's a manual one for $33k

https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/d...2278/overview/

And seeing as though these are a year old and have less than 100 miles on the clock...yeah I'd call that dogshit depreciation.
Old 09-26-2019, 03:38 PM
  #320  
_
 
AZuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 18,692
Received 3,097 Likes on 1,867 Posts
Up to $3,731 price difference between your area and mine. Lowest for me is $33,730 for a 2.0T Advanced. I would definitely fly out there if I was in the market.


Quick Reply: Genesis: G70 News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.