Chevrolet: Camaro News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2008 | 07:09 PM
  #561  
invisiblewar's Avatar
an asshole from florida
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,405
Likes: 17
From: GO GATORS!
im gona say that this has to be one of the best chevy interiors ever
Old 07-22-2008 | 11:00 PM
  #562  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
The new Camaro SS runs the Nurburgring in 8:20? at first I was like WTF, that's slow... until I checked out other lap times in the same range.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordsch...test_lap_times

Beats out a Cayman S, E46 M3 and R32 GTR and is 7 seconds behind the V10 M5. Not bad after all! I've just been so used to hearing 7:29, 7:42 and 7:26 being thrown around so often.

I'd say thats pretty impressive for how much it weighs.
Old 07-22-2008 | 11:13 PM
  #563  
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 4
I wonder what the SS is going to be priced at....its probably the only nice new car i'm remotely interested in.
Old 07-22-2008 | 11:19 PM
  #564  
FiveLiterCheater's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by AsianRage
The interior doesn't look bad at all. I wonder if it's available in other tones
OMG that side panel is hideous WTF is up with the door handle placement...this isn't a for explorer.....sigh..
Old 07-23-2008 | 06:15 PM
  #565  
West6MT's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,244
Likes: 166
From: Toronto
Short video (hope this isnt a repost)

http://www.dpccars.com/car-videos-08...ion-Camaro.htm
Old 07-23-2008 | 06:24 PM
  #566  
Moog-Type-S's Avatar
The sizzle in the Steak
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 71,436
Likes: 1,877
From: Southern California
Originally Posted by AsianRage
The interior doesn't look bad at all. I wonder if it's available in other tones
That's alot of hard plastic on the door panels

I'd like to see a little more chrome, or some other accent color.
It's a little monolithic with the color.

...but not a bad interior at all.
Old 07-24-2008 | 02:55 PM
  #567  
AsianRage's Avatar
Chloe @ 17mo
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
From: Snohomish, WA
Jalopnik has an article comparing the production car to the original concept, with commentary by the designer. As I had suspected, the majority of the changes was to make the car more realistic with regulations and guidelines.
http://jalopnik.com/399142/2010-chev...ept-to-reality
Old 07-24-2008 | 03:19 PM
  #568  
invisiblewar's Avatar
an asshole from florida
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,405
Likes: 17
From: GO GATORS!
damn the outside stayed pretty true i must say
Old 09-12-2008 | 12:44 AM
  #569  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026
Post 2009 Chevrolet Camaro SS

From Supercars...

Chevrolet have officially announced the specifications of their 2010 Chevrolet Camaro models. Two engines are on offer initially, a 3.6 litre V6 with direct petrol injection and a pushrod overhead valve 6.2 litre V8. A six speed manual or six speed automatic gearbox are available for both engine variants.

The retro-styled Camaro body measures 4836 mm in overall length, and sits on a 2852 mm wheelbase. This is slightly bigger overall than the original Camaro, which had an overall length of 4689 mm and a wheelbase measuring 2746 mm. A conventional front engine, rear drive platform is used.

The 3.6 litre V6 has a 94.0 mm bore and a 85.6 mm stroke for a displacement of 3564 cc. The 24 valves are operated by a dual overhead camshaft per bank, and fuel is delivered via a high pressure direct injection setup. Variable valve timing helps keep emissions lower and improve power. The engine features an 11.3 compression ratio. Power and torque for the 3.6 litre is said to be 300 bhp (224 kW) at 6000 rpm and 273 ftlb (370 Nm) at 5200 rpm. This engine is standard on the Camaro LS and LT models.

The 6.2 litre V8 has a bore of 103.25 mm and a stroke of 92.0 mm. Multiport indirect injection and a 10.7 compression ratio endows the Camaro SS with 422 bhp (315 kW) at 5000 rpm and 408 ftlb (553 Nm) of torque at 4500 rpm, for the manual version. The automatic makes do with Active Fuel Management, which allows the engine to run on just four cylinders in suitably undemanding circumstances, reducing consumption and emissions. This engine is known as the L99 and produces 400 bhp (298 kW) at 5000 rpm and 395 ftlb (535 Nm) at 4500 rpm.

A convertible Camaro is slated to join the lineup at some stage.
Old 09-12-2008 | 12:44 AM
  #570  
Yumcha's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 167,734
Likes: 23,026


Old 09-12-2008 | 02:52 AM
  #571  
gavriil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
Something is wrong with the Jalopnik's statement of power figures. It says that the engine makes 422HP at 5000 rpm and 408 lb/ft of torque at 4500 rpm. That sounds off.

If this engine makes 408 lb/ft at 4500 rpm, that means it makes 349.6 HP at 4500 rpm. So that means it makes 72 HP more in just 500 rpm? Sounds off.
Old 09-12-2008 | 01:53 PM
  #572  
msl82's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gavriil
Something is wrong with the Jalopnik's statement of power figures. It says that the engine makes 422HP at 5000 rpm and 408 lb/ft of torque at 4500 rpm. That sounds off.

If this engine makes 408 lb/ft at 4500 rpm, that means it makes 349.6 HP at 4500 rpm. So that means it makes 72 HP more in just 500 rpm? Sounds off.

Your wrong. There is nothing wrong with the Jalopnik's power figures. It is very accurate.

http://www.chevrolet.com/camaro/pdf/...ifications.pdf
Old 09-14-2008 | 06:55 PM
  #573  
gavriil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 16,399
Likes: 8
From: Washington DC (NOVA)
I am guessing that when the LS3 is dynoed, we will see very different numbers than what's claimed. At least with respect to the rpm these peak hp and torque numbers appear.
Old 09-15-2008 | 07:02 PM
  #574  
majin ssj eric's Avatar
Punk Rocker
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 79
From: St Simons Island, GA
Though at first glance the concept and production cars look very similar, I can't help but feel that something has been lost in translation. Maybe its the huge wheels on the concept but the production car just doesn't look as impressive to me...
Old 09-15-2008 | 09:14 PM
  #575  
sho_nuff1997's Avatar
I disagree with unanimity
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,035
Likes: 27
From: WI
I like it. The SS needs HIDs, though.
Old 09-16-2008 | 02:50 AM
  #576  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
that cheesy GM 'Badge of excellence' has to go
Old 09-16-2008 | 04:47 AM
  #577  
ThermonMermon's Avatar
Safety Car
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,068
Likes: 111
From: NYC
IDK...car has great styling and performance, but i cannot overlook the fit/finish quality of GM interiors.

It is like a supermodel with STDs. I want it so badly, but i just cant bring myself to come to fruition.

Last edited by ThermonMermon; 09-16-2008 at 04:50 AM.
Old 09-16-2008 | 04:58 AM
  #578  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,069
Likes: 11,068
From: Chicago
I don't know if I've had a change of heart or what, but I think the interior looks dreadful. The exterior has also been compromised compared to the concept car, I give it 2.25 out of 4 stars lol.
Old 09-16-2008 | 07:11 AM
  #579  
Doom878's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,003
Likes: 1,322
From: Miami, FL
Hold judgement until you see them in person. I think the Challenger looks really good in person and I wasn't impressed in the photos.
Old 09-16-2008 | 08:42 AM
  #580  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Still not overly impressed with the exterior; interior is as crappy as before.

Here's how I see the market:

Camaro: performance
Mustang: exterior
Challenger: exterior

Pretty sad that none of them can bring two plusses to the table.
Old 09-16-2008 | 12:13 PM
  #581  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,069
Likes: 11,068
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Doom878
Hold judgement until you see them in person. I think the Challenger looks really good in person and I wasn't impressed in the photos.
the problem is, the Challenger stayed quite true to its concept origins. and I saw one the other day and was quite happy with how it looked. I can tell from these pics that the Camaro is not going to have "the look" the concept had. The concept had this mean aura about it that screamed "new retro Camaro". It was just right. I didn't expect the production model to look exactly the same, but I did expect it to look close. It does not.
Old 09-16-2008 | 01:38 PM
  #582  
Doom878's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,003
Likes: 1,322
From: Miami, FL
Irregardless if close to the roots or not, the car might look great in person. I hear your concern of keeping it real. Sometimes we gotta move forward.
Old 09-16-2008 | 03:37 PM
  #583  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,069
Likes: 11,068
From: Chicago
uh.. if they're doing a retro design, no, they don't have to move forward
Old 09-16-2008 | 04:15 PM
  #584  
majin ssj eric's Avatar
Punk Rocker
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,579
Likes: 79
From: St Simons Island, GA
Its odd, when looking at them sid by side I can't really pinpoint any major differences, yet on the whole the production car is just missing that certain something that the concept had. I know they narrowed the production car considerably, maybe its the dimensions that are throwing it off??
Old 09-16-2008 | 04:34 PM
  #585  
srika's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 59,069
Likes: 11,068
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Its odd, when looking at them sid by side I can't really pinpoint any major differences, yet on the whole the production car is just missing that certain something that the concept had. I know they narrowed the production car considerably, maybe its the dimensions that are throwing it off??
yeap I feel the same way. It's not a huge difference, but it's enough of a difference to make it different.
Old 09-17-2008 | 07:09 AM
  #586  
Doom878's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,003
Likes: 1,322
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by srika
uh.. if they're doing a retro design, no, they don't have to move forward
Then they might as well copy the exact same thing as before inch by inch.
Old 09-17-2008 | 08:38 AM
  #587  
invisiblewar's Avatar
an asshole from florida
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,405
Likes: 17
From: GO GATORS!
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Its odd, when looking at them sid by side I can't really pinpoint any major differences, yet on the whole the production car is just missing that certain something that the concept had. I know they narrowed the production car considerably, maybe its the dimensions that are throwing it off??
it certainly needs a drop. thats the only thing im noticing
Old 09-17-2008 | 08:48 AM
  #588  
SiGGy's Avatar
Moderator Alumnus
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,263
Likes: 2
From: Lenexa, KS
Originally Posted by srika
I don't know if I've had a change of heart or what, but I think the interior looks dreadful. The exterior has also been compromised compared to the concept car, I give it 2.25 out of 4 stars lol.
I was thinking the same thing, the gauge cluster seems too cheesy. I don't like the angles of the gauges or the trim used around them.

Maybe it'll look better in person from the drivers seat, either way I had the same thoughts looking at the pictures.

To other comments; the Challenger is a nice looking car, but it's way too heavy. 425hp and it's still pretty slow. Not to mention the premium price to go with it.

Lets hope the new Camaro takes off where the other one left off.
Old 09-17-2008 | 09:15 AM
  #589  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by majin ssj eric
Its odd, when looking at them sid by side I can't really pinpoint any major differences, yet on the whole the production car is just missing that certain something that the concept had. I know they narrowed the production car considerably, maybe its the dimensions that are throwing it off??


I must be missing something. They look 98.9% identical to me.
Old 09-17-2008 | 04:51 PM
  #590  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
Originally Posted by dom


I must be missing something. They look 98.9% identical to me.
Me too

Aside from the small vents in the corners of the front bumper, the headlights and fogs..... they look nearly the same. I think the problem is that GM put out the concept YEARS ago and finally here is the final product after tons of media (over)exposure, and now its as if the Camaro's actually been out for 5 years, thus it already looks aged.

Well, that's just how I feel... it still wows me, but it doesn't seem like a new car to me anymore.
Old 09-17-2008 | 07:17 PM
  #591  
invisiblewar's Avatar
an asshole from florida
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,405
Likes: 17
From: GO GATORS!
they are the total opposite of honda when it comes to showing their cars
Old 09-17-2008 | 07:57 PM
  #592  
zguy95135's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,132
Likes: 19
From: Pleasant Hill, CA
I'm surprised it looks as close to the concept car as it does, I was expecting them to pull a Buick Envicta on us.
Old 10-06-2008 | 07:57 AM
  #593  
fsttyms1's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 81,383
Likes: 3,063
From: Appleton WI
Latest Motor Trend drove one and even though it was still a test mule, they loved it. Nothing but praises. They said "Mustang? Nah. The new Camaro feels more akin to an American G37. And remember thus far our driving has been limited to the base V-6 version".


Car sounds promising. great ride and handling.
Old 10-06-2008 | 08:31 AM
  #594  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
C&D loves it as well and praises the handling.

The V6 should be enough for most buyers. Unlike the Mustang and Challenger.
Old 10-06-2008 | 08:44 AM
  #595  
EL19's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,340
Likes: 194
From: DC
i was quite suprised with the power output #s of the V6. Im sure it will sell like hotcakes. Especially with a 6psd Manual or Auto
Old 10-06-2008 | 09:29 AM
  #596  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
I'm not disappointed about the performance, but I am with how much it weighs. And it looks like 245/275 is looking pretty wide already for stock tire width. I saw an SS, same gen as mine, 315s in the back with a good looking Mexican chick driving it (and it was stick)

315s would look ridiculous on the new Camaro.
Old 10-06-2008 | 09:33 AM
  #597  
dom's Avatar
dom
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 47,710
Likes: 801
From: Toronto, Canada
10/06/2008, 9:06 AM
Chevrolet News
2010 Camaro options leaked

The 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is still several months away from showing up in dealer showrooms, but prospective buyers have something to tide them over before they take delivery. An enthusiast website leaked what is believed to be an accurate list of standard and optional equipment for each of the new Camaro’s trim levels.

Leaked by Camaro5.com, the options list reveals few surprises, though it does confirm that the V8 engine - expected to make up just a small portion of overall sales - will apparently only be available on the SS trim levels. GM has long been downplaying the V8’s power and the automaker is expected to heavily market the more efficient V6 versions. The RS appearance package will be available on all but the base LS variant.

We haven’t heard pricing yet, but expect the Camaro to be competitive with the Ford Mustang and Dodge Challenger.

LS
Standard Equipment
- 3.6L SIDI V6 engine
- Dual exhaust
- 18-inch steel wheels
- Onstar Safe & Sound
- XM radio
- Stabilitrak
- 6 air bags: front, side and curtain
- 6-speaker base audio system

Optional Equipment
- Floor mats

1LT
Standard Equipment (includes or replaces LS equipment)
- 18-inch aluminum Wheels
- Fog lights
- Driver information center
- Power driver seat

Optional Equipment
- Floor mats
- 19-inch aluminum wheels
- Power Sunroof
- Boston Acoustics 245watt 9-speaker premium audio
- Convenience & Connections package
- RS package

2LT
Standard Equipment (includes or replaces 1LT equipment)
- 19 inch aluminum wheels
- Leather heated seats
- Ambient lighting
- Boston Acoustics 245watt 9-speaker premium audio
- Auxiliary gauges (center console)
- Auto dimming interior and exterior mirrors
- Bluetooth and USB connections
- Remote start (automatic transmission only)
- Leather steering wheel with controls
- Rear parking assist (late availability)
- Head-up display (late availability)

Optional Equipment
- Floor mats
- 19-inch polished aluminum wheels
- Inferno orange accent interior
- Power sunroof
- Dual vinyl rally stripes in white or cyber gray
- RS package

1SS
Standard Equipment
- 6.2L V8 engine
- 20 inch aluminum wheels
- Brembo brakes including 4-piston calipers on all 4 wheels
- Engine oil cooler
- Transmission oil cooler
- Limited slip differential
- SS gauge cluster
- SS spoiler
- SS grille badge
- Leather steering wheel and shift knob
- Power driver’s seat

Optional Equipment
- Floor mats
- 20 inch polished aluminum wheels
- Power sunroof
- Boston Acoustics 245watt 9-speaker premium audio
- Convenience & Connections package
- RS package

2SS
Standard Equipment (includes or replaces 1SS equipment)
- Leather heated seats
- Ambient lighting
- Boston Acoustics 245watt 9-speaker premium audio
- Auxiliary gauges (center console)
- Auto dimming interior and exterior mirrors
- Bluetooth and USB connections
- Remote start (Automatic transmission only)
- Leather steering wheel with controls
- Rear parking assist (late availability)
- Head-up display (late availability)

Optional Equipment
- Floor mats
- 19-inch polished aluminum wheels
- Inferno orange accent interior
- Power sunroof
- Dual vinyl rally stripes in white or cyber gray
- RS package

RS Package Available to be added to Either SS or LT trim levels
- HID lamps
- Spoiler on LT Model
- 20 inch 5 spoke wheel
- Midnight silver paint finish
- Optional polished finish
- RS unique tail lamps (darkened lenses)
- Body colored roof ditch molding
- Special RS Badging
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2010-cam...ns-leaked.html
Old 10-06-2008 | 09:41 AM
  #598  
Costco's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 29,869
Likes: 3,489
the world is coming to an end

parking assist, auto dimming mirrors, HUD, heated leather seats, and remote start on a Camaro?!

The 09 TL doesn't even have some of the latter options available
Old 10-06-2008 | 09:49 AM
  #599  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Wow, nice standards/options. Pricing will be reasonable, I'm sure. Too bad it isn't the greatest looking car out there. Maybe it will grow on me.
Old 10-06-2008 | 10:08 AM
  #600  
Doom878's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,003
Likes: 1,322
From: Miami, FL
They've had remote start on even the Malibu for a while.


Quick Reply: Chevrolet: Camaro News



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.