How many extra amps can the stock alternator handle?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 02:57 PM
  #1  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
How many extra amps can the stock alternator handle?

What kind of an amp load can we put on teh stock alternator battery without having to get it rewound...also how much would that go up with an Optima Yellow Top and I heard there were some issues with that battery?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 09:07 PM
  #2  
dnd2984's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 81
From: Tampa, FL
Dude your fine, you just got a 300/4 and a 500bd correct. My amps pull more amperage and i am still fine. your stock alt puts out 120 amps
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 09:29 PM
  #3  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
That is just it...the bd is gonne be either a 500/1 or 1000/1 VERY soon. I worry about that, I would like to stay with the 500/1 since that will let me stay with the single one farad cap. That 500 is more powerful than the BD, and it needs to be since the subs are now (2) 2 ohm Boston pro 10.5's in series.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #4  
dnd2984's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 81
From: Tampa, FL
that BD should have produced close to 600 watts. THe Jl500/1 will give u about 550 watts. As I am gettin older (hell only 19) 600 + watts of bass is just overkill
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2003 | 11:09 PM
  #5  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
if ur lights dont dim, ur ok.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 05:07 PM
  #6  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
I did, when it ran 2 ohms. Now with the Bostons in there, I needs to run 4 ohms and it was only giving me about 300 watts. Now I am back up to 550 with a more efficient sub, and its sounds way better, thanks to the sub and I think that the JL is cleaner. This is plenty of bass, it fights through the seat just fine. I had to do it to match the components, they were overpowering once the 500X came out and the 300/4 went in. The RF amps had the gains up pretty high and the deck was maxed, the new JL's sit at half or lower.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 08:53 PM
  #7  
shawhite's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,080
Likes: 2
From: Jax, FL
i have been told that as long as you are under 120 amps you will be fine...
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #8  
dnd2984's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 81
From: Tampa, FL
Originally posted by Gilgamesh
I did, when it ran 2 ohms. Now with the Bostons in there, I needs to run 4 ohms and it was only giving me about 300 watts. Now I am back up to 550 with a more efficient sub, and its sounds way better, thanks to the sub and I think that the JL is cleaner. This is plenty of bass, it fights through the seat just fine. I had to do it to match the components, they were overpowering once the 500X came out and the 300/4 went in. The RF amps had the gains up pretty high and the deck was maxed, the new JL's sit at half or lower.
Yea I had the same problem with RF the gains. All my gains where a lil over half way up. Amps got warm never over heated and never distorted but jus the fact that it was that far up.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2003 | 10:48 PM
  #9  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Originally posted by dnd2984


Yea I had the same problem with RF the gains. All my gains where a lil over half way up. Amps got warm never over heated and never distorted but jus the fact that it was that far up.
all amps are different. their input sensitivities are different, so that is no measurement of their capabilities or quality
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 09:22 AM
  #10  
SlyTLS's Avatar
Bada Bing
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,811
Likes: 0
From: Westchester, NY
I'm running 4 amps on the stock alternator but I am using a 15 farad cap to help with the deep bass notes. I've had no problems...lights don't dim, nothing cuts out and it's been just over a year and my battery has never died.

The amps are as follows:

Zapco 200
Zapco 350
Zapco 360
Zapco 750
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 01:31 PM
  #11  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
Originally posted by systek


all amps are different. their input sensitivities are different, so that is no measurement of their capabilities or quality
I know, but fact is with the JL I can get the volume I want without distortion, and I don't have to have the amp gain or the beck up very far to do it. I now have the range that I want, and there is still more roon to go on the amp gain dial, should I want more.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 10:51 PM
  #12  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Originally posted by Gilgamesh


I know, but fact is with the JL I can get the volume I want without distortion, and I don't have to have the amp gain or the beck up very far to do it. I now have the range that I want, and there is still more roon to go on the amp gain dial, should I want more.
in that case, you werent level matching your hu's output to the amp's input. thats a big nono cause as u stated, u will get distortion.

THE GAINS ARE NOT VOLUME KNOBS...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #13  
dnd2984's Avatar
Safety Car
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 81
From: Tampa, FL
Its like why mess with perfection. IF u are happy and your gains are down then thats good and just leave it alone. Like systek said its not a volume knob.

I really hate it when kids with no audio knowledge say "man my system can be alot louder I just need to turn my amps up".
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2003 | 11:03 PM
  #14  
systek's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: tx
Originally posted by dnd2984
I really hate it when kids with no audio knowledge say "man my system can be alot louder I just need to turn my amps up".
exactly...!

if u feel you need to turn ur "amps up" then what u really need is a better job which will afford ya the luxury to buy a more powerful amp
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2003 | 02:58 PM
  #15  
Gilgamesh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Safety Car
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,954
Likes: 22
From: SLC, UT
Originally posted by dnd2984
Its like why mess with perfection. IF u are happy and your gains are down then thats good and just leave it alone. Like systek said its not a volume knob.

I really hate it when kids with no audio knowledge say "man my system can be alot louder I just need to turn my amps up".
That was the point. I put in a new amp for the components, and when it was adjusted up to where I wanted it, where it sounded good, it began to overpower the old sub amp, because I pretty much double the power to the comps. The Diamonds did not like running on what the RF was giving em, it did not seem like it was enough to get them off of the ground. As for the sub amp, there were a few other things I did not like. For example, not being able to vary the subsonic filter, just On/Off...sorry I want more control than that.

Better yet, lets compare the amps that I used to run to what I run now, these are taken DIRECTLY from the manufacturers websites: www.rockfordfosgate.com and www.jlaudio.com

I am going to quote the 4 ohm numbers for the comp amp since that is how most people run a 4 channel amp.

500X:

62.5 W X 4 @ 4 Ohms RMS
Wire gauge - 8 (not a big deal, but I would like 4 thanks)
S/N 100dB A-weighted
Damping Factor >200
Slew Rate 30 Volts/ms
IM Distortion <.05%

300/4:

75 W RMS x 4 @ 1.5 ohm-4 ohm
THD: <0.03% @ 4 ohm
S/N >108.5 dB below rated power
Damping Factor:
>200 @ 4 ohm per ch./50 Hz
Wire Guage - 4
And a regulated PS.

Which amp do you think is better?

That got the compnents off the ground a little better, and the JL distorts less...I was not trying to effect the volume with the gain on the amp directly. The first RF amps were installed/tuned by a prefessional shop (Innovative) and the JL's by me. I did not want to do a waire drop nor did I want to try and fashion a faceplate for the 7998, so I just had them do it all at once. The sub switch was made so that I could get more out of them, and the BD could not push the new subs, that is it. I am sure that a 1000BD could have just fine, but since I was already on the JL 300/4 and the prices were similar on the 1000BD and the 500/1 I made my choice.

It seems that RF for 2003 has changed their cockeyed naming scheme, but it still seems odd to me. IMHO, if you have an amp with a 500 on it, that amp should be able to put out 500 watts of power at a 4 ohm load. Also, if RF wants us to run 2 ohm loads, I have to run 2 4 ohms subs in a parallel configuration, fine, great, but they only give you 1 block of outputs. JL gives you two so you don't have to twist two wires together or otherwise splice them to get the subs to run parallel.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rockyboy
2G RDX (2013-2018)
171
Aug 4, 2024 10:35 AM
handsom-hustla
Car Parts for Sale
70
Nov 13, 2015 05:04 PM
JarrettLauderdale
2G CL Dynograph Gallery
5
Sep 21, 2015 07:51 PM
Pegon95
3G TL Audio, Bluetooth, Electronics & Navigation
4
Sep 15, 2015 01:54 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM.