Ask a cop anything v2.0 "brakejob lives"
Originally Posted by crazymjb
But do MP5s really have stopping power against any heavy armor? Do they come in more than just a 9mm Variant?
Mike
Mike
Originally Posted by Scottman111
This made me think of another question... 
If you pull someone over for say, speeding, and they happen to have a radar detector...does that affect your decision to give/not give them a ticket? What I mean is, does that change your attitude about the person at all?? Thanks again...

If you pull someone over for say, speeding, and they happen to have a radar detector...does that affect your decision to give/not give them a ticket? What I mean is, does that change your attitude about the person at all?? Thanks again...
OK i know im gonna get alot of
for this, but check the name. its what i do. anyway my friend and i have always talked about dressing up in matrix style or ninja clothes and walking through the mall with swords strapped to our backs just to get peoples reactions on tape. (another friend would be filming from a distance). basically just "jackass" type stuff. could we get arrested for the swords. i wouldnt think so considering its not a weapon you have to register, and its in plain sight. oh yeah in SC if that matters. Thanks.
for this, but check the name. its what i do. anyway my friend and i have always talked about dressing up in matrix style or ninja clothes and walking through the mall with swords strapped to our backs just to get peoples reactions on tape. (another friend would be filming from a distance). basically just "jackass" type stuff. could we get arrested for the swords. i wouldnt think so considering its not a weapon you have to register, and its in plain sight. oh yeah in SC if that matters. Thanks.
I was wondering, in CA, what does the law say about letting people into the lane you are in if they are obvsouly screwed where they are and they have thier signal on? This was in january, in Sand Dog. It was raining hard (yah, that one day) and i was down visiting friends. I was driving on I-5 tring to get out of town and thought the comuter lane i was in was going to exit to somewhere i did not want to go. So, with little time, I slowed down, and signaled right to change lanes. As i was coming over, the guy in the right land speed up and I veered left to avoaid the accident. That is when the guy to my left spead up beacuse he thought I was vacating the lane and had slowed down to about 45. So I was suddenly in the V between the exit ramp and the freeway. I finally got behind the right-hand axxhole but had so little room that I scrapped the medean with my mirror before it popped back. Did he have the legal obglation to let me in or was i just screwed?
PS this is also why I sold that and got something with Navi so i do not get lost as much.
PS this is also why I sold that and got something with Navi so i do not get lost as much.
Originally Posted by crazymjb
Work for a PD, most arent overfunded by any means. It costs a lot to run a law enforcment system. We hate any tactic cops use to take more of our money 
Mike

Mike
The really sad thing is that most of your ticket money does NOT go to the cops or any law enforcement. It usually goes into the states/ counties general fund or something else. I would at least want my money going toward catching/ procucting/ housing real criminals (i.e. rapists, murders, Neon owners, etc...)
ok, shortly after posting here, i get a ticket... the irony...
enviroment: light to moderate traffic, speed of surrounding cars would be about 70mph. sun was setting and headlights weren't necessary but mine were still on. time was 730pm, but the officer checked both am and pm ??? we were switching lanes but not in a dangerous way either if that detail is worth noting. we weren't cutting anyone off.
officer: the officer was straight forward and polite. just mentioned that i was driving dangerously. he said he was following me and no radar was used, so i'm assuming i was being paced.
anyways, here they are:
vc 22349 (4?)- speeding in a 65:
i was cited going 85 in a 65 following my gf back up to davis on 680 north in the walnut creek area. i won't deny the speeding part, but i wasn't going 85. i averaged about 75 on the way up but not once did i pass 80mph. considering i was following my gf, she can also affirm this. is that worth mentioning and going to court over? and if my gf comes to be a witness, will she be in trouble for admitting her speed was also above 65 but below 80 to confirm my beliefs? if so, i'll leave her at home.
and vc 21703- following too close:
this is the one that bothers me. is there a standard to how close is too close? i never went more than 1.5 car lengths close to my gf's car which was in front of me. she even told me that she never felt pressured or endangered by me following. she also mentioned that the when viewing the rear mirror, my headlights never disappeared in them and my headlights were on too so it's kinda hard to make them completely disappear in the mirror.
and i haven't received a ticket in over 3 years. would traffic school cover both citations? or just one of them? if just one of them...
enviroment: light to moderate traffic, speed of surrounding cars would be about 70mph. sun was setting and headlights weren't necessary but mine were still on. time was 730pm, but the officer checked both am and pm ??? we were switching lanes but not in a dangerous way either if that detail is worth noting. we weren't cutting anyone off.
officer: the officer was straight forward and polite. just mentioned that i was driving dangerously. he said he was following me and no radar was used, so i'm assuming i was being paced.
anyways, here they are:
vc 22349 (4?)- speeding in a 65:
i was cited going 85 in a 65 following my gf back up to davis on 680 north in the walnut creek area. i won't deny the speeding part, but i wasn't going 85. i averaged about 75 on the way up but not once did i pass 80mph. considering i was following my gf, she can also affirm this. is that worth mentioning and going to court over? and if my gf comes to be a witness, will she be in trouble for admitting her speed was also above 65 but below 80 to confirm my beliefs? if so, i'll leave her at home.
and vc 21703- following too close:
this is the one that bothers me. is there a standard to how close is too close? i never went more than 1.5 car lengths close to my gf's car which was in front of me. she even told me that she never felt pressured or endangered by me following. she also mentioned that the when viewing the rear mirror, my headlights never disappeared in them and my headlights were on too so it's kinda hard to make them completely disappear in the mirror.
and i haven't received a ticket in over 3 years. would traffic school cover both citations? or just one of them? if just one of them...
Last edited by mr5parkle; Sep 4, 2006 at 11:02 PM.
Originally Posted by htown
if i get pulled over while smoking a cigarette, would you ticket me if i flicked my butt out the window, does that count as littering?
Originally Posted by GreenMonster
No questions from me, I just like reading this stuff...
Welcome back...
Welcome back...
Like the others said.....Welcome back
Hey brakejob, I have a question.
I just got a ticket on my way to vegas in a rental car. I did not purchase insurance and did not have my insurance card with me. I got pulled over in bakersfield for speeding (vc 22349b) and no insurance (vc 16028a>00). I got the ticket in the mail and it is for $1131!! I have insurance on my car and I live in Milpitas. What should I do now? Do I really have to drive down to bakersfeild to show them that I have insurance? Is there an easy way out of this?
Thanks in advance and I think this thread is great!
I just got a ticket on my way to vegas in a rental car. I did not purchase insurance and did not have my insurance card with me. I got pulled over in bakersfield for speeding (vc 22349b) and no insurance (vc 16028a>00). I got the ticket in the mail and it is for $1131!! I have insurance on my car and I live in Milpitas. What should I do now? Do I really have to drive down to bakersfeild to show them that I have insurance? Is there an easy way out of this?
Thanks in advance and I think this thread is great!
Hey breakjob,
How come in my past 3 speeding tickets, officers never asked questions like "Do you know how fast you were going?" Instead, they ask for my ID and registration and tells me they'll be back with ticket. I never had chance to explain anything! I wasn't speeding much either, 70 in 60 all three times..
How come in my past 3 speeding tickets, officers never asked questions like "Do you know how fast you were going?" Instead, they ask for my ID and registration and tells me they'll be back with ticket. I never had chance to explain anything! I wasn't speeding much either, 70 in 60 all three times..
Originally Posted by mr5parkle
are there hot lady officers in your dept.? b/c ladies in uniform
and if so

and if so

Originally Posted by stogie1020
Sure.
If you APPEAR to be commiting a crime or civil traffic violation, you will be pulled over/detained/questioned.
If you APPEAR to be commiting a crime or civil traffic violation, you will be pulled over/detained/questioned.
Originally Posted by StuntMonkey
OK i know im gonna get alot of
for this, but check the name. its what i do. anyway my friend and i have always talked about dressing up in matrix style or ninja clothes and walking through the mall with swords strapped to our backs just to get peoples reactions on tape. (another friend would be filming from a distance). basically just "jackass" type stuff. could we get arrested for the swords. i wouldnt think so considering its not a weapon you have to register, and its in plain sight. oh yeah in SC if that matters. Thanks.
for this, but check the name. its what i do. anyway my friend and i have always talked about dressing up in matrix style or ninja clothes and walking through the mall with swords strapped to our backs just to get peoples reactions on tape. (another friend would be filming from a distance). basically just "jackass" type stuff. could we get arrested for the swords. i wouldnt think so considering its not a weapon you have to register, and its in plain sight. oh yeah in SC if that matters. Thanks.fucking penal code man... sword? legal. Billy club? Illegal....
Originally Posted by DiveforTL-s
I was wondering, in CA, what does the law say about letting people into the lane you are in if they are obvsouly screwed where they are and they have thier signal on? This was in january, in Sand Dog. It was raining hard (yah, that one day) and i was down visiting friends. I was driving on I-5 tring to get out of town and thought the comuter lane i was in was going to exit to somewhere i did not want to go. So, with little time, I slowed down, and signaled right to change lanes. As i was coming over, the guy in the right land speed up and I veered left to avoaid the accident. That is when the guy to my left spead up beacuse he thought I was vacating the lane and had slowed down to about 45. So I was suddenly in the V between the exit ramp and the freeway. I finally got behind the right-hand axxhole but had so little room that I scrapped the medean with my mirror before it popped back. Did he have the legal obglation to let me in or was i just screwed?
PS this is also why I sold that and got something with Navi so i do not get lost as much.
PS this is also why I sold that and got something with Navi so i do not get lost as much.
Originally Posted by DiveforTL-s
The really sad thing is that most of your ticket money does NOT go to the cops or any law enforcement. It usually goes into the states/ counties general fund or something else. I would at least want my money going toward catching/ procucting/ housing real criminals (i.e. rapists, murders, Neon owners, etc...)
Originally Posted by mr5parkle
ok, shortly after posting here, i get a ticket... the irony...
enviroment: light to moderate traffic, speed of surrounding cars would be about 70mph. sun was setting and headlights weren't necessary but mine were still on. time was 730pm, but the officer checked both am and pm ??? we were switching lanes but not in a dangerous way either if that detail is worth noting. we weren't cutting anyone off.
officer: the officer was straight forward and polite. just mentioned that i was driving dangerously. he said he was following me and no radar was used, so i'm assuming i was being paced.
anyways, here they are:
vc 22349 (4?)- speeding in a 65:
i was cited going 85 in a 65 following my gf back up to davis on 680 north in the walnut creek area. i won't deny the speeding part, but i wasn't going 85. i averaged about 75 on the way up but not once did i pass 80mph. considering i was following my gf, she can also affirm this. is that worth mentioning and going to court over? and if my gf comes to be a witness, will she be in trouble for admitting her speed was also above 65 but below 80 to confirm my beliefs? if so, i'll leave her at home.
and vc 21703- following too close:
this is the one that bothers me. is there a standard to how close is too close? i never went more than 1.5 car lengths close to my gf's car which was in front of me. she even told me that she never felt pressured or endangered by me following. she also mentioned that the when viewing the rear mirror, my headlights never disappeared in them and my headlights were on too so it's kinda hard to make them completely disappear in the mirror.
and i haven't received a ticket in over 3 years. would traffic school cover both citations? or just one of them? if just one of them...
enviroment: light to moderate traffic, speed of surrounding cars would be about 70mph. sun was setting and headlights weren't necessary but mine were still on. time was 730pm, but the officer checked both am and pm ??? we were switching lanes but not in a dangerous way either if that detail is worth noting. we weren't cutting anyone off.
officer: the officer was straight forward and polite. just mentioned that i was driving dangerously. he said he was following me and no radar was used, so i'm assuming i was being paced.
anyways, here they are:
vc 22349 (4?)- speeding in a 65:
i was cited going 85 in a 65 following my gf back up to davis on 680 north in the walnut creek area. i won't deny the speeding part, but i wasn't going 85. i averaged about 75 on the way up but not once did i pass 80mph. considering i was following my gf, she can also affirm this. is that worth mentioning and going to court over? and if my gf comes to be a witness, will she be in trouble for admitting her speed was also above 65 but below 80 to confirm my beliefs? if so, i'll leave her at home.
and vc 21703- following too close:
this is the one that bothers me. is there a standard to how close is too close? i never went more than 1.5 car lengths close to my gf's car which was in front of me. she even told me that she never felt pressured or endangered by me following. she also mentioned that the when viewing the rear mirror, my headlights never disappeared in them and my headlights were on too so it's kinda hard to make them completely disappear in the mirror.
and i haven't received a ticket in over 3 years. would traffic school cover both citations? or just one of them? if just one of them...
for 21703
The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway.
traffic school will only cover one of the violations. sorry
Originally Posted by Jleev6
Hey brakejob, I have a question.
I just got a ticket on my way to vegas in a rental car. I did not purchase insurance and did not have my insurance card with me. I got pulled over in bakersfield for speeding (vc 22349b) and no insurance (vc 16028a>00). I got the ticket in the mail and it is for $1131!! I have insurance on my car and I live in Milpitas. What should I do now? Do I really have to drive down to bakersfeild to show them that I have insurance? Is there an easy way out of this?
Thanks in advance and I think this thread is great!
I just got a ticket on my way to vegas in a rental car. I did not purchase insurance and did not have my insurance card with me. I got pulled over in bakersfield for speeding (vc 22349b) and no insurance (vc 16028a>00). I got the ticket in the mail and it is for $1131!! I have insurance on my car and I live in Milpitas. What should I do now? Do I really have to drive down to bakersfeild to show them that I have insurance? Is there an easy way out of this?
Thanks in advance and I think this thread is great!
for the insurance, 16028 is different than a regular fixit ticket... you have to show or mail the court a copy of your insurance information -and- the payment before they will take care of it, you can't just have an officer sign it off... contact the courthouse for help...
Originally Posted by n3ok318
Hey breakjob,
How come in my past 3 speeding tickets, officers never asked questions like "Do you know how fast you were going?" Instead, they ask for my ID and registration and tells me they'll be back with ticket. I never had chance to explain anything! I wasn't speeding much either, 70 in 60 all three times..
How come in my past 3 speeding tickets, officers never asked questions like "Do you know how fast you were going?" Instead, they ask for my ID and registration and tells me they'll be back with ticket. I never had chance to explain anything! I wasn't speeding much either, 70 in 60 all three times..
Originally Posted by btsilver
What happens if APPEARING to commit a crime means driving the speed limit and not doing any civil traffic violation?
with car stops and such i profile the car... and not ricemobiles, but hoopties with rims that cost 10,000... total shitbox cars, etc...
the average driver violates the vehicle code like once every .75 miles or something like that... there are plenty of legal reasons to pull people over
Originally Posted by brakejob
how fast were you going?!?
for the insurance, 16028 is different than a regular fixit ticket... you have to show or mail the court a copy of your insurance information -and- the payment before they will take care of it, you can't just have an officer sign it off... contact the courthouse for help...
for the insurance, 16028 is different than a regular fixit ticket... you have to show or mail the court a copy of your insurance information -and- the payment before they will take care of it, you can't just have an officer sign it off... contact the courthouse for help...
Originally Posted by Jleev6
83mph in a 55mph. Is that really bad? Is that worse than a normal speeding ticket?
Originally Posted by Jleev6
83mph in a 55mph. Is that really bad? Is that worse than a normal speeding ticket?
Having said that, I FREQUENTLY used a civil traffic offense to conduct a stop and interact with the driver/passengers. Does anyone in the car refuse to make eye contact? Does someone in the car confess to having warrants? Are there indications of drugs/alcohol in the car? The ticket was almost irrelevant, and often not issued if there were no problems with the occupants of the car.
Remember, police officers realize that catching a murderer is a little more important than writing you a ticket for 10 over. Unfortunately, some officers are not good INVESTIGATORS and cant "process" the contents of the car on a traffic stop. These officers try to make themselves look like effective workers by writing a lot of tickets. I always felt like that was a cop out (pardon the pun).
I would always have rather let fifteen people go with warnings and arrest one burglar on his way to/from a crime than write a bunch of people tickets, when the truth is that the traffic stop often corrected the bad driving without needing to add salt to the wound (citation).
Just my thoughts, others may see things differently.
Originally Posted by stogie1020
Let's get tp the root of the issue for a minute here. No police officer WANTS to spend all day writing tickets (except Motor officers). Civil traffic violations are about the least important thing a police officer cares about.
Having said that, I FREQUENTLY used a civil traffic offense to conduct a stop and interact with the driver/passengers. Does anyone in the car refuse to make eye contact? Does someone in the car confess to having warrants? Are there indications of drugs/alcohol in the car? The ticket was almost irrelevant, and often not issued if there were no problems with the occupants of the car.
Remember, police officers realize that catching a murderer is a little more important than writing you a ticket for 10 over. Unfortunately, some officers are not good INVESTIGATORS and cant "process" the contents of the car on a traffic stop. These officers try to make themselves look like effective workers by writing a lot of tickets. I always felt like that was a cop out (pardon the pun).
I would always have rather let fifteen people go with warnings and arrest one burglar on his way to/from a crime than write a bunch of people tickets, when the truth is that the traffic stop often corrected the bad driving without needing to add salt to the wound (citation).
Just my thoughts, others may see things differently.
Having said that, I FREQUENTLY used a civil traffic offense to conduct a stop and interact with the driver/passengers. Does anyone in the car refuse to make eye contact? Does someone in the car confess to having warrants? Are there indications of drugs/alcohol in the car? The ticket was almost irrelevant, and often not issued if there were no problems with the occupants of the car.
Remember, police officers realize that catching a murderer is a little more important than writing you a ticket for 10 over. Unfortunately, some officers are not good INVESTIGATORS and cant "process" the contents of the car on a traffic stop. These officers try to make themselves look like effective workers by writing a lot of tickets. I always felt like that was a cop out (pardon the pun).
I would always have rather let fifteen people go with warnings and arrest one burglar on his way to/from a crime than write a bunch of people tickets, when the truth is that the traffic stop often corrected the bad driving without needing to add salt to the wound (citation).
Just my thoughts, others may see things differently.

I'd do pretty much anything to avoid being pulled over (although my tinted windows, chronic cig butt littering and occasional - okay, frequent - speeding may say otherwise).
BrakeJob-
Are the police relived that the blanket handgun ban got repealed (thank god for the NRA) or did they care? I would think you all would have been all up in arms (no pun intended) over it. As i understand it, it applied to off duty police, too if you lived in SF. Why would your city try to make their city full of only illegal, unregersterd guns? What is going on ofer there?
Are the police relived that the blanket handgun ban got repealed (thank god for the NRA) or did they care? I would think you all would have been all up in arms (no pun intended) over it. As i understand it, it applied to off duty police, too if you lived in SF. Why would your city try to make their city full of only illegal, unregersterd guns? What is going on ofer there?
Originally Posted by DiveforTL-s
BrakeJob-
Are the police relived that the blanket handgun ban got repealed (thank god for the NRA) or did they care? I would think you all would have been all up in arms (no pun intended) over it. As i understand it, it applied to off duty police, too if you lived in SF. Why would your city try to make their city full of only illegal, unregersterd guns? What is going on ofer there?
Are the police relived that the blanket handgun ban got repealed (thank god for the NRA) or did they care? I would think you all would have been all up in arms (no pun intended) over it. As i understand it, it applied to off duty police, too if you lived in SF. Why would your city try to make their city full of only illegal, unregersterd guns? What is going on ofer there?
it was unclear if it does/did not apply to off duty police and retired police, but I can assure you if they did try to apply it to police it would be stopped immediatley by a combined force of police unions.
Originally Posted by stogie1020
Let's get tp the root of the issue for a minute here. No police officer WANTS to spend all day writing tickets (except Motor officers). Civil traffic violations are about the least important thing a police officer cares about.
Having said that, I FREQUENTLY used a civil traffic offense to conduct a stop and interact with the driver/passengers. Does anyone in the car refuse to make eye contact? Does someone in the car confess to having warrants? Are there indications of drugs/alcohol in the car? The ticket was almost irrelevant, and often not issued if there were no problems with the occupants of the car.
Remember, police officers realize that catching a murderer is a little more important than writing you a ticket for 10 over. Unfortunately, some officers are not good INVESTIGATORS and cant "process" the contents of the car on a traffic stop. These officers try to make themselves look like effective workers by writing a lot of tickets. I always felt like that was a cop out (pardon the pun).
I would always have rather let fifteen people go with warnings and arrest one burglar on his way to/from a crime than write a bunch of people tickets, when the truth is that the traffic stop often corrected the bad driving without needing to add salt to the wound (citation).
Just my thoughts, others may see things differently.
Having said that, I FREQUENTLY used a civil traffic offense to conduct a stop and interact with the driver/passengers. Does anyone in the car refuse to make eye contact? Does someone in the car confess to having warrants? Are there indications of drugs/alcohol in the car? The ticket was almost irrelevant, and often not issued if there were no problems with the occupants of the car.
Remember, police officers realize that catching a murderer is a little more important than writing you a ticket for 10 over. Unfortunately, some officers are not good INVESTIGATORS and cant "process" the contents of the car on a traffic stop. These officers try to make themselves look like effective workers by writing a lot of tickets. I always felt like that was a cop out (pardon the pun).
I would always have rather let fifteen people go with warnings and arrest one burglar on his way to/from a crime than write a bunch of people tickets, when the truth is that the traffic stop often corrected the bad driving without needing to add salt to the wound (citation).
Just my thoughts, others may see things differently.
i don't know if this was covered or not, but is the radar gun effective in the rain. i wasn't sure if the state police would be able to get a good read in the rain or drizzle like they can when it is clear
Originally Posted by dallison
i don't know if this was covered or not, but is the radar gun effective in the rain. i wasn't sure if the state police would be able to get a good read in the rain or drizzle like they can when it is clear
how often do cops pull over bikes and how often do they not have a license and insurance? what happens if i dont have a M1 license and bike insurace? arrested? bike impounded? what?
just curious cause im thinking of picking up a cheapo ninja or other 250cc bike to learn on before i go for the M1 license
just curious cause im thinking of picking up a cheapo ninja or other 250cc bike to learn on before i go for the M1 license






thanks