2019 TLX changes -to dealers 4/4/18

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2018 | 12:18 PM
  #41  
StealthTL-S's Avatar
08 TL type-S
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 671
Likes: 117
From: coastal South Carolina
Car looks beautiful, just lacks the engine it needs (the future 3.0L DOHC V6 TLX turbo engine). I own a 2008 TL type S 6 speed and will wait for the next TLX....
Old 04-18-2018 | 02:07 AM
  #42  
JDM_809's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 26
Likes: 42
Prettty much aspec wheels with a different shade of color.
Old 04-19-2018 | 10:49 AM
  #43  
JackRydden224's Avatar
not superchaged
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 40
From: Orange County, CA
It looks like we will have to wait for the gen 2 TLX for the 3.0L V6 TT. That's the car I want.

If the 2018 Accord Sport is any indication the gen 2 TLX just might get a 6MT with the same 2.0T engine that's in the Accord and RDX.

Originally Posted by StealthTL-S
Car looks beautiful, just lacks the engine it needs (the future 3.0L DOHC V6 TLX turbo engine). I own a 2008 TL type S 6 speed and will wait for the next TLX....
The following users liked this post:
StealthTL-S (04-23-2018)
Old 04-19-2018 | 08:48 PM
  #44  
Treblig's Avatar
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,334
Likes: 218
From: Indiana
Are those 19’s?
Old 04-23-2018 | 08:38 PM
  #45  
StealthTL-S's Avatar
08 TL type-S
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 671
Likes: 117
From: coastal South Carolina
Originally Posted by JackRydden224
It looks like we will have to wait for the gen 2 TLX for the 3.0L V6 TT. That's the car I want.

If the 2018 Accord Sport is any indication the gen 2 TLX just might get a 6MT with the same 2.0T engine that's in the Accord and RDX.
it will be a 3.0 DOHC
The following users liked this post:
JackRydden224 (04-26-2018)
Old 04-24-2018 | 08:51 PM
  #46  
Yikes's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 422
Likes: 39
From: Newport News, VA
Originally Posted by StealthTL-S
it will be a 3.0 DOHC
Mind posting a source for that? I’ve been keeping my eye on what’s coming down the pipe for the next TLX and haven’t seen any mention of a power train other than it will be a twin turbo v6. I really hope you’re right about this...
Old 04-24-2018 | 09:18 PM
  #47  
theredia92's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 115
Likes: 54
Originally Posted by Yikes


Mind posting a source for that? I’ve been keeping my eye on what’s coming down the pipe for the next TLX and haven’t seen any mention of a power train other than it will be a twin turbo v6. I really hope you’re right about this...
​​​​​​​Temple of VTEC Rumors and News - New Honda DOHC V6 Patent reveals some details on the successor to the J-series V6. Also, I keep hearing about a Twin Turbo V6. Honda has never said the word "twin". Only Turbo V6.
The following 3 users liked this post by theredia92:
JackRydden224 (04-26-2018), StealthTL-S (04-27-2018), Yikes (04-25-2018)
Old 04-26-2018 | 10:48 AM
  #48  
JackRydden224's Avatar
not superchaged
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 40
From: Orange County, CA
I think Honda will do the same if other luxury brands go with twin turbo 6 cylinder. It just doesn't make sense to develop a new engine that's going to be less powerful than what the competition offer at the moment.

Mercedes, BMW, Audi, Infiniti and even Lexus all have a twin turbo 6 cylinder in their line up for the higher trims.

Just imagine 400hp and 400 ft/lb with SH-AWD (even 350/350 would be a huge improvement over the the current TLX)

Originally Posted by theredia92
Temple of VTEC Rumors and News - New Honda DOHC V6 Patent reveals some details on the successor to the J-series V6. Also, I keep hearing about a Twin Turbo V6. Honda has never said the word "twin". Only Turbo V6.
Old 04-26-2018 | 08:22 PM
  #49  
Speed_Racer's Avatar
6 Forward 1 Back
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 312
From: Bay Area CA
I'm still hoping for at least 400hp, but won't hold my breath. They might try to get away with 350hp but still out perform the C43 they appeared to be testing with that mule a few weeks back.
Old 04-26-2018 | 09:44 PM
  #50  
ZipSpeed's Avatar
There are four lights!
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 509
Likes: 215
From: Calgary, Canada
I could "live" with 350hp, but torque needs to be in the 380+ range.
Old 04-26-2018 | 11:59 PM
  #51  
mondster's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 890
Likes: 164
They should put the hybrid engine from the rlx in the tlx. 377hp and 341 torque. Maybe bump it up a bit. Add to that the dual clutch
Old 04-27-2018 | 06:32 PM
  #52  
mlody's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 90
From: Chicagoland
Originally Posted by StealthTL-S
Car looks beautiful, just lacks the engine it needs (the future 3.0L DOHC V6 TLX turbo engine). I own a 2008 TL type S 6 speed and will wait for the next TLX....
If Acura had gone with 8-speed ZF like most of the other manufacturers, the TLX V6 would have been a much better car.
Old 04-27-2018 | 08:25 PM
  #53  
alpha0's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 99
Originally Posted by mlody
If Acura had gone with 8-speed ZF like most of the other manufacturers, the TLX V6 would have been a much better car.
8zf would need longitudinal layout.. Not sure whether Acura will go for that for future sedans? I have doubts...I think they just thought 9zf will be equally good and were caught off guard...
Old 04-27-2018 | 09:18 PM
  #54  
Yikes's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 422
Likes: 39
From: Newport News, VA
Originally Posted by Speed_Racer
I'm still hoping for at least 400hp, but won't hold my breath. They might try to get away with 350hp but still out perform the C43 they appeared to be testing with that mule a few weeks back.
Yeah, don’t hold your breath... Honda can’t even get 300 out of 3.5 liters, meanwhile the Lexus 3.5 L in the GS350 makes over 300 HP & more torque than the Acura V6.

I’m gonna put my money on somewhere between 315 and 340, since displacement is bumping down to 3 liters.
Old 04-30-2018 | 01:02 PM
  #55  
JackRydden224's Avatar
not superchaged
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 40
From: Orange County, CA
Infiniti, Lincoln, Mercedes, Audi and BMW all get more than 350hp out of their twin turbo 3.0L 6 cylinders.

I'm really hoping Honda can step up their game and join the ranks.

When I bought my Gen2 TSX I should have spent the extra $5000 and gotten a TL. The 4 banger just didn't have enough power. The next time I buy an Acura I will make sure I get more than enough power

Originally Posted by Yikes


Yeah, don’t hold your breath... Honda can’t even get 300 out of 3.5 liters, meanwhile the Lexus 3.5 L in the GS350 makes over 300 HP & more torque than the Acura V6.

I’m gonna put my money on somewhere between 315 and 340, since displacement is bumping down to 3 liters.
Old 04-30-2018 | 02:40 PM
  #56  
FLYGUY31's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 431
Likes: 97
From: Valley Forge, PA
I went from a 2004 TL with over 250 HP ( I think it was 270 ish?) to the 4 banger TSX. It took me a long time to get used to the 201 HP. I didn't like the new TL's and that was the reason I didn't buy. Anything around 250-270 HP would be fine with me and how I drive. Plus additional torque doesn't hurt.
Old 04-30-2018 | 02:47 PM
  #57  
svtmike's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 3,866
From: Chicago
3G TL was originally spec’d at 270 and then corrected to 259.
The following users liked this post:
FLYGUY31 (04-30-2018)
Old 04-30-2018 | 04:04 PM
  #58  
FLYGUY31's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 431
Likes: 97
From: Valley Forge, PA
Originally Posted by svtmike
3G TL was originally spec’d at 270 and then corrected to 259.
That's right..I remember when that went down.
Old 04-30-2018 | 05:39 PM
  #59  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,904
Likes: 1,673
Originally Posted by Yikes


Yeah, don’t hold your breath... Honda can’t even get 300 out of 3.5 liters, meanwhile the Lexus 3.5 L in the GS350 makes over 300 HP & more torque than the Acura V6.

I’m gonna put my money on somewhere between 315 and 340, since displacement is bumping down to 3 liters.
Agreed. If the Accord 2.0T is any indicator, I’m expecting about 325-330hp out of the 3.0T Type S model.

While it’ll probably have a decent torque band and respectable acceleration, I suspect peak horsepower to be at fairly conservative levels.
Old 04-30-2018 | 08:02 PM
  #60  
JackRydden224's Avatar
not superchaged
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 40
From: Orange County, CA
That 2.0T motor makes 306hp in the Type R and I think Hondata got 270hp from the Accord on their dyno with 91 Octane gas. I’m very optimistic that the 3.0TT V6 will make more than 350hp closer to 400hp.

Originally Posted by F23A4


Agreed. If the Accord 2.0T is any indicator, I’m expecting about 325-330hp out of the 3.0T Type S model.

While it’ll probably have a decent torque band and respectable acceleration, I suspect peak horsepower to be at fairly conservative levels.
Old 04-30-2018 | 08:14 PM
  #61  
Speed_Racer's Avatar
6 Forward 1 Back
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 312
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by JackRydden224
That 2.0T motor makes 306hp in the Type R and I think Hondata got 270hp from the Accord on their dyno with 91 Octane gas. I’m very optimistic that the 3.0TT V6 will make more than 350hp closer to 400hp.
That's in a tuned state though. I"m sure we can agree that the V6T (not confirmed TT) can get to 350-400hp with a tune. We've been debating stock from the factory hp numbers since not everyone will pay for a Hondata tune or expect Acura to milk every hp out of the V6T like Honda does with the Type R.
The following users liked this post:
F23A4 (05-01-2018)
Old 05-01-2018 | 11:20 AM
  #62  
JackRydden224's Avatar
not superchaged
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 40
From: Orange County, CA
Sorry I got my sources mixed yup last night.

The 2.0T in the RDX makes 272hp and 280 ft/lb of torque using premium fuel. Those numbers are factory numbers provided by Acura not Hondata numbers. I think this is a pretty good indicator what the next gen TLX will get.

Originally Posted by Speed_Racer
That's in a tuned state though. I"m sure we can agree that the V6T (not confirmed TT) can get to 350-400hp with a tune. We've been debating stock from the factory hp numbers since not everyone will pay for a Hondata tune or expect Acura to milk every hp out of the V6T like Honda does with the Type R.
Old 05-01-2018 | 01:36 PM
  #63  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,904
Likes: 1,673
Something to keep in mind is that Type S model Acuras historically have not been substantially more powerful than non-Type S models, and only marginally better performers at that. So, I’m expecting the S model to have 50-60 more horsepower than the non-S model. So if the RDX 2.0T is in a base level TLX...
Old 05-01-2018 | 03:20 PM
  #64  
Speed_Racer's Avatar
6 Forward 1 Back
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 312
From: Bay Area CA
Originally Posted by F23A4
Something to keep in mind is that Type S model Acuras historically have not been substantially more powerful than non-Type S models, and only marginally better performers at that. So, I’m expecting the S model to have 50-60 more horsepower than the non-S model. So if the RDX 2.0T is in a base level TLX...
Yup, I hope they buck that trend though. This new V6T engine has 50% more (is my math right?) displacement than the "base" 2.0T (can't see them using the 1.5T). On paper that does seem like more than 350+hp, but again I'm not holding my breath. I'm thinking the S4 and C43 are possible benchmark targets which means 354hp and 362hp goals respectively. Come on Acura, prove us all wrong and blow us away with 400hp!
Old 05-01-2018 | 03:33 PM
  #65  
F23A4's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 17,904
Likes: 1,673
Old 05-01-2018 | 03:52 PM
  #66  
reddogTL's Avatar
Volvo Defector
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 322
Likes: 72
From: NJ
I like the new wheels. They look almost identical to the BMW 330/340 M Sport package wheels which I have always liked. 40 series tires makes me cringe since I'm still recovering from my own pothole experience here in NJ with 50 series.

I am disappointed there are no powertrain changes. Not even the 10spd trans mated to the existing 3.5L? I didn't think that would take much as I thought the Odyssey got that combo already.
Old 05-01-2018 | 04:07 PM
  #67  
ZipSpeed's Avatar
There are four lights!
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 509
Likes: 215
From: Calgary, Canada
Originally Posted by Speed_Racer
Yup, I hope they buck that trend though. This new V6T engine has 50% more (is my math right?) displacement than the "base" 2.0T (can't see them using the 1.5T). On paper that does seem like more than 350+hp, but again I'm not holding my breath. I'm thinking the S4 and C43 are possible benchmark targets which means 354hp and 362hp goals respectively. Come on Acura, prove us all wrong and blow us away with 400hp!
I think Acura is serious about their Precision Crafted Performance slogan. There was a spyshot TLX test mule seen along with a NSX and possibly a C43 not too long ago. Why bring those two vehicles in if they aren't serious about performance?

https://jalopnik.com/this-mystery-ac...ome-1823334563
Old 05-01-2018 | 04:52 PM
  #68  
JackRydden224's Avatar
not superchaged
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 168
Likes: 40
From: Orange County, CA
You are thinking exactly what I'm thinking. The S4/C43 will be excellent benchmarks.

If there is no replacement for the ILX then I can see a tuned up 1.5T engine as the base engine (kinda like the 320i) for those that value MPG, tech and luxury features over performance.

The V6T or V6TT will need to produce at least 350hp to be competitive and also to give the buyers enough reason to upgrade. The Germans offer significantly more performance with their upgraded engines. You get more than 100hp increase compared to the base engine when you go from the A4/C300 to the S4/C43.


Originally Posted by Speed_Racer
Yup, I hope they buck that trend though. This new V6T engine has 50% more (is my math right?) displacement than the "base" 2.0T (can't see them using the 1.5T). On paper that does seem like more than 350+hp, but again I'm not holding my breath. I'm thinking the S4 and C43 are possible benchmark targets which means 354hp and 362hp goals respectively. Come on Acura, prove us all wrong and blow us away with 400hp!
Old 05-02-2018 | 11:23 PM
  #69  
Colorado Guy AF Ret.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Car Crazy for Sure!
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 445
From: Colorado
Exclamation 3.5 hp

Originally Posted by Yikes


Yeah, don’t hold your breath... Honda can’t even get 300 out of 3.5 liters, meanwhile the Lexus 3.5 L in the GS350 makes over 300 HP & more torque than the Acura V6.

I’m gonna put my money on somewhere between 315 and 340, since displacement is bumping down to 3 liters.
Honda/Acura can easily get over 300 hp out of the 3.5...NA. They tuned it the way they decided. The RLX is 310 hp in the FWD P-AWS version with 272 lb ft of torque.
So, that makes your statement totally false. The MDX is 290...but, again could easily be 310 or more...IF that is what they wanted to do with the MDX. That 3.5 is very capable and strong.
Just because the "numbers" of HP ratings are less than 300 doesn't mean that is the "MAX" HP they
are able to get. Again, it's what the engineers did based on what the "brass" wanted and it's largely dictated by fuel mileage and meeting CAFE standards.

And I mean a 3.5 that is naturally aspirated...NA. No turbos, etc. If there were NO CAFE standards to worry about I know Honda Motor Corp can get well over 300 hp out of the 3.5.

Last edited by Colorado Guy AF Ret.; 05-02-2018 at 11:28 PM. Reason: Add material
The following users liked this post:
Gen4MDX (05-03-2018)
Old 05-06-2018 | 08:19 AM
  #70  
Bo_Darville's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by JackRydden224
Infiniti, Lincoln, Mercedes, Audi and BMW all get more than 350hp out of their twin turbo 3.0L 6 cylinders.
which bmw model are you referencing?
Old 05-06-2018 | 11:29 AM
  #71  
Denali05's Avatar
I love spreadsheets.
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 84
Likes: 52
From: Baton Rouge / Red Stick
Originally Posted by Bo_Darville
which bmw model are you referencing?
Some models using BMW's B58 engine are over that mark at 355HP (i.e 340i, 440i, 540i). M3/M4 models which uses the S55 engine (performance version of the B58's predecessor, N55) are well beyond that at 425 HP.
Old 05-06-2018 | 01:59 PM
  #72  
Bo_Darville's Avatar
Advanced
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by Denali05
Some models using BMW's B58 engine are over that mark at 355HP (i.e 340i, 440i, 540i). M3/M4 models which uses the S55 engine (performance version of the B58's predecessor, N55) are well beyond that at 425 HP.
i am not familiar with the S55, but the B58 is definitely not a twin turbo, which is why i asked
Old 05-06-2018 | 03:59 PM
  #73  
Denali05's Avatar
I love spreadsheets.
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 84
Likes: 52
From: Baton Rouge / Red Stick
Originally Posted by Bo_Darville
i am not familiar with the S55, but the B58 is definitely not a twin turbo, which is why i asked
Correct, B58 is a twin scroll single turbo. S55, however, has a twin turbo setup.
Old 05-11-2018 | 11:33 PM
  #74  
mapleloaf's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,494
Likes: 869
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Not to interrupt the turbo discussion, I just noticed that unlike the 2018 TLX, there is not a 2.4 Elite or 2.4 Elite ASpec for the 2019 Canadian version, just base, Tech, and Tech ASpec. The 2019 3.5 SH-AWD still has the five versions - base, Tech, Tech ASpec, Elite, and Elite ASpec. Kinda sad for us 2.4 fans.
Old 05-12-2018 | 11:00 AM
  #75  
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,600
From: Raleigh, NC - USA
Originally Posted by Bo_Darville
i am not familiar with the S55, but the B58 is definitely not a twin turbo, which is why i asked
The S55 is a higher end 3.0L DOHC engine used in the M3/M4 & other upper price range cars. Base engine is rated by BMW at 425BHP dynos at 427WHP.

DynoJet WHP numbers can be multiplied by 15% to get estimated power at the crankshaft.

BMW is infamous for playing games with their published power numbers. These are all B58 Twin Scroll factory stock rated numbers & DynoJet rear wheel dyno numbers.

Base B58 in the 340/440 is rated at 320BHP Dynos at 331WHP, The 340/440 MPPSK option is rated at 355BHP & Dynos at 369WHP. The M240 is rated at 335BHP Dynos at 262WHP The M140i is rated by BMW at 340 BHP Dynos at 368WHP. The M2 is rated at 370BHP Dynos at 376WHP.

This is a Double overhead camshaft 24 valve inline 6 cylinder 3.0 liter engine. The numbers are typical of slightly different tunes giving different power figures. Depending on what they decide Honda can give the TLX 300 to 450WHP without much risk of catastrophic engine failure in a 3.0L DOHC engine.

Its all about marketing once you build these types of motors.

Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 05-12-2018 at 11:08 AM.
Old 05-13-2018 | 12:54 PM
  #76  
svtmike's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 37,670
Likes: 3,866
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
DynoJet WHP numbers can be multiplied by 15% to get estimated power at the crankshaft.
Or 115% for an even better estimate.
The following users liked this post:
BEAR-AvHistory (05-13-2018)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dcmodels
1G RDX DIY & FAQ
11
03-24-2018 08:35 PM
TLXV6Guy
5G TLX Problems & Fixes
8
01-28-2018 03:24 PM
neuronbob
5G TLX (2015-2020)
5
01-14-2018 02:57 PM
trinida3
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
4
10-16-2014 07:28 PM
Rocket_man
5G TLX (2015-2020)
23
02-08-2014 12:59 PM



Quick Reply: 2019 TLX changes -to dealers 4/4/18



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.