2015 Acura TLX Official Specs
#1
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 40
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
2 Posts
2015 Acura TLX Official Specs
New Pics, Specs, and features!!!
Interesting finds....Lane Keeping Assist is on the Tech Package. There is a new Cross Traffic Monitor and Road Keeping Assist feature as well. Gas mileage looks good. Its peculiar to me that there is more than 1 cubic foot more room in the trunk with the Advanced Packages...where did that come from?
Check it out:
http://www.tlxthrill.com
Interesting finds....Lane Keeping Assist is on the Tech Package. There is a new Cross Traffic Monitor and Road Keeping Assist feature as well. Gas mileage looks good. Its peculiar to me that there is more than 1 cubic foot more room in the trunk with the Advanced Packages...where did that come from?
Check it out:
http://www.tlxthrill.com
The following 9 users liked this post by Acurafiend:
A4toTL (07-05-2014),
Acura_Dude (07-05-2014),
internalaudit (07-05-2014),
motegi (07-06-2014),
nore03 (07-12-2014),
and 4 others liked this post.
Trending Topics
#8
I don't see any specification. I highly doubt it has TSX rear legroom. or turning radius so close to RLX which uses 245/19 size rims as standard on longer wheel base.
http://www.hondanews.com/channels/ac...specifications
http://www.hondanews.com/channels/ac...specifications
#9
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 40
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
2 Posts
I don't see any specification. I highly doubt it has TSX rear legroom. or turning radius so close to RLX which uses 245/19 size rims as standard on longer wheel base.
http://www.hondanews.com/channels/ac...specifications
http://www.hondanews.com/channels/ac...specifications
#10
#11
Intermediate
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Age: 40
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes
on
2 Posts
I am with an Acura Dealer in Kansas City, and this is what Acura gave us as an "E-Brochure" to share with our customers. Some of the points you bring up are interesting for sure, perhaps they are typos on Acura's part, but this is not some unofficial guess work.
#12
If the source is official, this car is a lot smaller inside, some compact competitors will be larger inside while maybe even smaller outside. If true, the TLX is a compact now but to be fair, unlike 6 or more years ago, most of these models in that range have grown substantially and even ones yet to come out, so finding a competitive mid size sedan or larger compact at that price range or less is a bit less of an issue today than it was in the past but still fearful that is one core attribute that may alienate some of the base but in terms of mainstream and TSX buyers, that may be a good move nonetheless but personally hope that is wrong.
SH appears to just be simply an AWD version, as good as SH is, still nothing else going on there other than different steering ratios. Even the gearing is listed the same, where most brands will use a shorter final to help make up for the weight and power loss, so unless there is some different software for the SH and this version of SH-AWD really frees up power, this SH is probably slower at all speeds than the FWD.
Hopefully that is done to save room for a sport trim, everything else is in place. New engine, transmissions, lighter, smaller, improved aero, revised SH (jury still out on this though), lower stance, etc, to along with all the added tech and features, aggressive pricing and overall refinements. SH is yet to be showcased on a more aligned and potentially better sport sedan dedicated build like this model could be vs the better of the competition in range, still we know how well the 4G (mostly 6MT) fared regardless. Shame if it did not happen, good for the model and the brand, IMO.
SH appears to just be simply an AWD version, as good as SH is, still nothing else going on there other than different steering ratios. Even the gearing is listed the same, where most brands will use a shorter final to help make up for the weight and power loss, so unless there is some different software for the SH and this version of SH-AWD really frees up power, this SH is probably slower at all speeds than the FWD.
Hopefully that is done to save room for a sport trim, everything else is in place. New engine, transmissions, lighter, smaller, improved aero, revised SH (jury still out on this though), lower stance, etc, to along with all the added tech and features, aggressive pricing and overall refinements. SH is yet to be showcased on a more aligned and potentially better sport sedan dedicated build like this model could be vs the better of the competition in range, still we know how well the 4G (mostly 6MT) fared regardless. Shame if it did not happen, good for the model and the brand, IMO.
Last edited by winstrolvtec; 07-05-2014 at 01:47 PM.
#13
Also the weight difference between V6 EX-L Accord and EX-L 4 cylinder is about 200 lbs. with identical tires.
for TLX it is 100lbs weight difference between V6 and 4 cylinder. despite V6 having 18 inch rims. how they manage only 100lbs difference?
Also the stabilizer bars are too huge on TLX in rear. size of RLX/TL both for 4cylinder and V6.
rear leg space way smaller than Accord.
This data does not seem right.
for TLX it is 100lbs weight difference between V6 and 4 cylinder. despite V6 having 18 inch rims. how they manage only 100lbs difference?
Also the stabilizer bars are too huge on TLX in rear. size of RLX/TL both for 4cylinder and V6.
rear leg space way smaller than Accord.
This data does not seem right.
#14
▒JDM ¥ KING▒
^Obviously bunch of typo on that thrill site.
18x7.5 rim for SHAWD?! hmm
18x7.5 rim for SHAWD?! hmm
#15
Burning Brakes
So, apparently someone random made a website and then attached some links to the official Acura website. Very nice job with the graphics... maybe next time they will pay close attention to spelling and grammar... not a credible source.
#18
From a bit of elementary sleuthing, that domain is registered to/by Nicole Neopolitan... who works for Mullen ... which is an ad agency/marketing company that does work for Acura... they apparently did the horse race commercial :
http://www.mullen.com/client/acura/
http://www.mullen.com/client/acura/
#19
Burning Brakes
From a bit of elementary sleuthing, that domain is registered to/by Nicole Neopolitan... who works for Mullen ... which is an ad agency/marketing company that does work for Acura... they apparently did the horse race commercial :
http://www.mullen.com/client/acura/
http://www.mullen.com/client/acura/
So here's a portion of the site regarding P-AWS:
"Turning used to be solely the job of the front wheels. The TLX has changed all that with the world's first Precision All-Wheel Steer (P-AWS) system."
But... the RLX first introduced this. ?
And if you don't have the page maximized, the wording doesn't fit on the screen... I wonder if they just weren't ready to release this site to the public yet.
Last edited by randomRon82; 07-05-2014 at 05:21 PM.
#20
Finally some technical specs for the 2015 TLX!
2015 TLX
2014 TL
2015 TLX
Exterior Measurements
Interior Measurements
EPA Passenger Volume = 93.3 cu ft
EPA Cargo Volume = 13.2 cu ft for base and Tech (14.3 cu ft for Advance)
EPA Total Interior Volume = 106.5/107.6 cu ft
Compared to- WIDTH 73 in.
- LENGTH 190.3 in.
- FRONT TRACK 62.8 in.
- REAR TRACK 63.1 in.
- WHEEL BASE 109.3 in.
Interior Measurements
- FRONT HEAD ROOM 42.6 in.
- FRONT HIP ROOM 55.3 in.
- FRONT LEG ROOM 42.6 in.
- FRONT SHOULDER ROOM 57.5 in.
- REAR HIP ROOM 54.9 in.
- REAR HEAD ROOM 36.7 in.
- REAR LEG ROOM 34.5 in.
- REAR SHOULDER ROOM 55.4 in.
EPA Passenger Volume = 93.3 cu ft
EPA Cargo Volume = 13.2 cu ft for base and Tech (14.3 cu ft for Advance)
EPA Total Interior Volume = 106.5/107.6 cu ft
2014 TL
Exterior Measurements
Interior Measurements
EPA Passenger Volume = 98.2 cu ft
EPA Cargo Volume = 13.1 cu ft
EPA Total Interior Volume = 111.3 cu ft
Based on numbers it looks like the TLX is somewhat smaller for the passengers than the outgoing TL to the tune of almost 5 cubic feet. Rear seat legroom and front and rear shoulder room appear to have been trimmed the most.
- WIDTH 74 in.
- LENGTH 194 in.
- FRONT TRACK 63.2 in.
- REAR TRACK 63.8 in.
- WHEEL BASE 109.3 in.
Interior Measurements
- FRONT HEAD ROOM 38.4 in.
- FRONT HIP ROOM 55.7 in.
- FRONT LEG ROOM 42.5 in.
- FRONT SHOULDER ROOM 58.2 in.
- REAR HIP ROOM 54.8 in.
- REAR HEAD ROOM 36.7 in.
- REAR LEG ROOM 36.2 in.
- REAR SHOULDER ROOM 56.2 in.
EPA Passenger Volume = 98.2 cu ft
EPA Cargo Volume = 13.1 cu ft
EPA Total Interior Volume = 111.3 cu ft
Last edited by motegi; 07-05-2014 at 05:50 PM.
#21
New Pics, Specs, and features!!!
Interesting finds....Lane Keeping Assist is on the Tech Package. There is a new Cross Traffic Monitor and Road Keeping Assist feature as well. Gas mileage looks good. Its peculiar to me that there is more than 1 cubic foot more room in the trunk with the Advanced Packages...where did that come from?
Check it out:
http://www.tlxthrill.com
Interesting finds....Lane Keeping Assist is on the Tech Package. There is a new Cross Traffic Monitor and Road Keeping Assist feature as well. Gas mileage looks good. Its peculiar to me that there is more than 1 cubic foot more room in the trunk with the Advanced Packages...where did that come from?
Check it out:
http://www.tlxthrill.com
As for the 1 cubic foot of more room in the Advance package, I recall reading that the Advance package has 2 hidden compartments for additional storage (why it's only in the Advance package, I have no clue). That could account for the extra space.
#22
Just for completeness sake
2014 TSX
Perhaps there is something wrong with these TLX numbers as others have suggested.
2014 TSX
EPA Passenger Volume = 94.5 cu ft
EPA Cargo Volume = 14 cu ft
EPA Total Interior Volume = 108.5 cu ft
So it would appear that the 2015 TLX interior passenger volume is even under that of the 2014 TSX that it replaces.EPA Cargo Volume = 14 cu ft
EPA Total Interior Volume = 108.5 cu ft
Perhaps there is something wrong with these TLX numbers as others have suggested.
Last edited by motegi; 07-05-2014 at 06:27 PM.
#23
...shows a cloudy sky on the NAVI. I wonder if the GPS is connected with the local weather to display appropriate sky texture.
(not a big fan of bird's eye view... makes me look twice.)
#24
Burning Brakes
If these figures are official, I'm disappointed with the interior room. I owned a '10 TSX V6 before I got my '12 TL Advance and the TSX had considerably less room than my TL. I like the room I have in the TL and don't want less.
#25
Midnight Marauder
Just for completeness sake
2014 TSX
Perhaps there is something wrong with these TLX numbers as others have suggested.
2014 TSX
EPA Passenger Volume = 94.5 cu ft
EPA Cargo Volume = 14 cu ft
EPA Total Interior Volume = 108.5 cu ft
So it would appear that the 2015 TLX interior passenger volume is even under that of the 2014 TSX that it replaces.EPA Cargo Volume = 14 cu ft
EPA Total Interior Volume = 108.5 cu ft
Perhaps there is something wrong with these TLX numbers as others have suggested.
#26
*EDIT* : Nevermind, I see what you may be worried about.
Last edited by Rocketsfan; 07-05-2014 at 09:59 PM.
#28
I thought that the TLX would slot right in between the TL and TSX in terms of size as clearly this was their target with the pricing as well.
I think that this new car will be an upgrade for existing TSX owners in terms of features/quality/value despite the small drop in size. I'm just not sure if it would be as much for current TL owners.
Perhaps they really needed to shrink the TL so that it wouldn't impede the sales of it's sibling, RLX. Especially now that the TLX Advance gets all of the latest active safety features formerly limited to the RLX and MDX.
At 106.5/107.6 cu ft EPA total interior volume for the 2015 TLX it now falls below the 110 cu ft lower limit of the EPA "Midsize car" classification. So technically the TLX is a "Compact car".
Now if an Acura customer wants a midsize car they will need to move up to the RLX.
Last edited by motegi; 07-06-2014 at 12:15 AM.
#29
Most of the individual numbers are very close. But a fraction of an inch here and there apparently makes a difference.
I thought that the TLX would slot right in between the TL and TSX in terms of size as clearly this was their target with the pricing as well.
I think that this new car will be an upgrade for existing TSX owners in terms of features/quality/value despite the small drop in size. I'm just not sure if it would be as much for current TL owners.
Perhaps they really needed to shrink the TL so that it wouldn't impede the sales of it's sibling, RLX. Especially now that the TLX Advance gets all of the latest active safety features formerly limited to the RLX and MDX.
At 106.5/107.6 cu ft EPA total interior volume for the 2015 TLX it now falls below the 110 cu ft lower limit of the EPA "Midsize car" classification. So technically the TLX is a "Compact car".
Now if an Acura customer wants a midsize car they will need to move up to the RLX.
I thought that the TLX would slot right in between the TL and TSX in terms of size as clearly this was their target with the pricing as well.
I think that this new car will be an upgrade for existing TSX owners in terms of features/quality/value despite the small drop in size. I'm just not sure if it would be as much for current TL owners.
Perhaps they really needed to shrink the TL so that it wouldn't impede the sales of it's sibling, RLX. Especially now that the TLX Advance gets all of the latest active safety features formerly limited to the RLX and MDX.
At 106.5/107.6 cu ft EPA total interior volume for the 2015 TLX it now falls below the 110 cu ft lower limit of the EPA "Midsize car" classification. So technically the TLX is a "Compact car".
Now if an Acura customer wants a midsize car they will need to move up to the RLX.
The outgoing TL is only rated at 38.4" of headroom. The TLX, according to tlxthrills, is rated at 42.6." To suddenly gain 4"+ of headroom, while losing .2" of exterior height is quite a magic trick, especially as ground clearance hasn't changed by any significant amount.
For reference, even the MDX doesn't have that much headroom. Nor does the RLX. Definitely not the ILX. Not the TSX. Nor the RDX. No Honda, either (not even the Fit).
Which brings back the original point. They are likely measured differently. Interior volume is measured in one strange way [<-- this is a URL, but search for it], and it's not 100% required to always use the latest version.
Last edited by jshaw; 07-06-2014 at 01:05 AM. Reason: grammar
#30
Of course others have noticed some fishiness with these "specs" so perhaps there are some typographical errors that we are seeing.
I agree with you that the SAE specs and their interpretation can be confusing but I think that Acura would be well aware of the overall EPA volume rating and how it affects the way that their cars are categorized. Compact/Midsize/Large car differences are clear to most consumers and especially those who have rented cars before. It affects all kinds of vehicle comparisons including the IIHS crash test categorization and rankings such as the JD Power Initial Quality and Vehicle Dependability Survey, Consumer Reports Ratings, and US News and World Report Vehicle Quality listings.
I think Acura wanted the TLX to be categorized as a Compact car both in terms of where it sits in the model line as well as for marketing purposes.
I agree with you that the SAE specs and their interpretation can be confusing but I think that Acura would be well aware of the overall EPA volume rating and how it affects the way that their cars are categorized. Compact/Midsize/Large car differences are clear to most consumers and especially those who have rented cars before. It affects all kinds of vehicle comparisons including the IIHS crash test categorization and rankings such as the JD Power Initial Quality and Vehicle Dependability Survey, Consumer Reports Ratings, and US News and World Report Vehicle Quality listings.
I think Acura wanted the TLX to be categorized as a Compact car both in terms of where it sits in the model line as well as for marketing purposes.
Last edited by motegi; 07-06-2014 at 02:19 AM.
The following users liked this post:
Tonyware (07-06-2014)
#32
For the way these cars are priced and positioned, it would make sense to have the ILX as the new typical smaller compact, the TLX a larger compact/small or borderline mid, and the RLX your normal mid sized. The problem however, is that the RLX is a full sized sedan and Acura is still marketing the TLX as a mid size competitor (although a lower end to middle version only), even more so now than in the past.
In previous years, they were fine with compact and low end mid competitor and marketed as such, now all the mentioning has been mid sized and so far it appears the car is a compact. Differentiation in the lineup has improved but not any better in terms of aligning for competition and placement at least in marketing material so far and the size of the RLX.
A lot of times the brand measures out one figure and the EPA comes back with another, maybe that is a part of it. Maybe they will change their market position and aim in their literature with the official press release. I was under the impression that they wanted to make plus sized vehicles for each "class" but perhaps the lack of RLX sales has made them shrink the packaging to push some sales up to the larger RLX instead or maybe that was the plan all along and the reason for the FWD RLX in the first place. Maybe it also creates a little less cross shopping with the Accord and some added differentiation there.
I will reserve final judgement until I sit in one but based on these specs, the 5 cu ft has been a deal breaker for me in the past with regards to smaller competitors and is noticeable and not insignificant IMO so I don't know why it would be any less of a disappointment in terms of the TLX, perhaps the price but that's about it. It seems Acura does not in fact have an actual mid sized vehicle in it's line now, again maybe for how the Accord fits in that makes sense and it's better for the brand and others which I applaud but I'm not sure they are necessarily attracting the same core buyers as the 4G or even 3G but what do I know? Maybe for some the size and mid size distinction were not prime selling points.
In previous years, they were fine with compact and low end mid competitor and marketed as such, now all the mentioning has been mid sized and so far it appears the car is a compact. Differentiation in the lineup has improved but not any better in terms of aligning for competition and placement at least in marketing material so far and the size of the RLX.
A lot of times the brand measures out one figure and the EPA comes back with another, maybe that is a part of it. Maybe they will change their market position and aim in their literature with the official press release. I was under the impression that they wanted to make plus sized vehicles for each "class" but perhaps the lack of RLX sales has made them shrink the packaging to push some sales up to the larger RLX instead or maybe that was the plan all along and the reason for the FWD RLX in the first place. Maybe it also creates a little less cross shopping with the Accord and some added differentiation there.
I will reserve final judgement until I sit in one but based on these specs, the 5 cu ft has been a deal breaker for me in the past with regards to smaller competitors and is noticeable and not insignificant IMO so I don't know why it would be any less of a disappointment in terms of the TLX, perhaps the price but that's about it. It seems Acura does not in fact have an actual mid sized vehicle in it's line now, again maybe for how the Accord fits in that makes sense and it's better for the brand and others which I applaud but I'm not sure they are necessarily attracting the same core buyers as the 4G or even 3G but what do I know? Maybe for some the size and mid size distinction were not prime selling points.
#33
Summer is Coming
I'll wait to see what the official specs out of Acura say. If these are true than the Accord is larger inside than the TLX (Accord has 100.8 Cu ft pf passenger vol) and 15.5 cu ft of trunk space.
But one thing that jumped out at me... even in the Advanced trim the passenger seat is only 4-way adjustable. That means NO HEIGHT adjustment. Not again Acura?!?!?!? WTF? A $42K car with no passenger height adjustment? This can't be correct. Please say is isn't so.
But one thing that jumped out at me... even in the Advanced trim the passenger seat is only 4-way adjustable. That means NO HEIGHT adjustment. Not again Acura?!?!?!? WTF? A $42K car with no passenger height adjustment? This can't be correct. Please say is isn't so.
#34
Burning Brakes
Which figure(s) are you worried about? From the looks of it, most all of the figures are about the same or better in the TLX except possibly rear seating? I only casually glanced at the numbers, so I may have missed something obvious.
*EDIT* : Nevermind, I see what you may be worried about.
*EDIT* : Nevermind, I see what you may be worried about.
#35
I have to admit, that'd suck for a lot of people. It'd be kind of cheesy to me, but since I'll be the only one in my car most of the time, I wouldn't care as much. Isn't the RDX like this, too? I remember thinking something about its seating was lame, and I think this was it. I believe the ILX is the same way.
#36
#37
Burning Brakes
#38
Ah, there you go, too many years to remember them all. However, it just goes to show how many times that has been a customer question in the last 5 years. To most, it's not an issue. More frequent questions are "does this have bluetooth?"
#39
In one of the videos the designer mentions that even though the exterior dimensions shark, they kept the interior same as out going TL. So I am confident that at a min they match the out going TL.
#40
Summer is Coming