Automobilemag.com: Acura Tl vs Audi S4
#121
Safety Car
Wow, on VW site they mention Audi in something like this:
"If you choose to register or receive products or materials from us, or to otherwise give us personal information, we may store some or all of that personal information and use it for marketing research and marketing purposes, which may include sharing it with Volkswagen or Audi authorized dealerships or with various suppliers that provide marketing, research, or other services for us. If you choose to save information, such as a vehicle configuration, on our website(s), we may contact you to follow up on your interest in our cars. In such cases, we may employ an outside research company to call you on our behalf."
Or here off VW site had a link that took me here which shows all of them. Wow......
http://www.volkswagengroupamerica.com/
"If you choose to register or receive products or materials from us, or to otherwise give us personal information, we may store some or all of that personal information and use it for marketing research and marketing purposes, which may include sharing it with Volkswagen or Audi authorized dealerships or with various suppliers that provide marketing, research, or other services for us. If you choose to save information, such as a vehicle configuration, on our website(s), we may contact you to follow up on your interest in our cars. In such cases, we may employ an outside research company to call you on our behalf."
Or here off VW site had a link that took me here which shows all of them. Wow......
http://www.volkswagengroupamerica.com/
#122
Instructor
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If Acura gave us all the good stuff then the price will go up....then everyone will be crying about the price. What you pay is what you get. If ur not happy with the car then pls look at buying something that makes you happy.
Last edited by Rugel; 07-23-2010 at 09:33 PM.
#123
Yeah sure. I've been to the Audi and VW factories. I can point out their histories. Portions of Audi predate VW significantly. Audi was formed of four companies that were NOT VW; the VW merger happened far later. Honda started Acura recently. Both the TL and Accord are built in the same plant in Marysville, Ohio. Which bit are you unable to understand?
Do you need proof that air exists, because you personally can't see it? If that's an example, in your mind, you have serious problems.
Do you need proof that air exists, because you personally can't see it? If that's an example, in your mind, you have serious problems.
If they made them in different plants with one saying Acura and the other Honda would that make them any different? Exactly and that is what VW and Audi do and it's really no different.
I also don't see how Honda coming before Acura makes a difference compared to Audi aquiring VW. They now practice a lot of the same sharing that goes on with other brands. It makes no difference since the concept is exactly the same, history has nothing to do with it. Audi parts trickle down to VW like Acura parts do to Honda, you seriously think that Audi predating VW somehow makes that any different or better?
Buying a mainstream VW Toureg is the same thing as buying a Honda Pilot compared to an Audi Q7 and Acura MDX. Affiliation has little to do with anything. The product defines the product not where it comes from or who builds it or what parts it shares.
#124
Gosh, this is almost like playing Whack-A-Mole at the arcade! ![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
Both Honda North America and Acura North America are headquartered at: 1919 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 90501.
It must be coincidental - Delaware was full, and New York charged too much for parking.
But I'm sure that they aren't even aware they're in the same building!![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
I don't disagree with your opinion that Acura should start a new platform. I don't mind the platform the TL is on, but differentiation would be good. I think they should:
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
Both Honda North America and Acura North America are headquartered at: 1919 Torrance Blvd., Torrance, CA 90501.
It must be coincidental - Delaware was full, and New York charged too much for parking.
But I'm sure that they aren't even aware they're in the same building!
![Too Cool](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/toocool.gif)
I don't disagree with your opinion that Acura should start a new platform. I don't mind the platform the TL is on, but differentiation would be good. I think they should:
- Buy back and scrap every Integra with neon or large mufflers installed
- Add the small luxuries that keep them "smart" instead of "real" luxury.
- Fix the beak.
#125
Thank you. Winstorlvtec can you show us any comparison anywhere with the TL against the competition YOU THINK it goes against? From what we have seen for over a decade is it competes with the entry level class and it is bigger for its class (a selling point for some). I don't think we have seen one comparison of any TL vs the 5 series etc.
This makes absolutely no sense. 80-85% of the TLs sold are FWD models according to Acura. Most are like Lacrosse, ES buyers, they want a nice big entry level luxury car for a good price.
You are also forgetting the TL has always been Acura's volume sedan and in some years the best selling model. This model sadly has done very poorly in regards to sales.
And you really are all over the map here as we also know the TL is built alongside the Accord built by the same employees. Not sure where you are getting any of your information.
You are also forgetting the TL has always been Acura's volume sedan and in some years the best selling model. This model sadly has done very poorly in regards to sales.
And you really are all over the map here as we also know the TL is built alongside the Accord built by the same employees. Not sure where you are getting any of your information.
I have had plenty of TL's to know what the volume seller is. I also know that the sales have shifted in the TSX direction because of the transition from what the 3G was to what the 4G is. The TSX better resembles that now. The styling is a part of it but so is the adoption of SH, added size and price, which is a push upmarket. You are looking at the model, I am looking at the position like Acura does, which can be altered. The S4 can move down, the TSX can move up, I hope that helps.
Which info is that? Ok they are built in the same plant what does that have to do with building a FWD TL or not?
Last edited by winstrolvtec; 07-23-2010 at 10:05 PM.
#126
Racer
Wow, on VW site they mention Audi in something like this:
"If you choose to register or receive products or materials from us, or to otherwise give us personal information, we may store some or all of that personal information and use it for marketing research and marketing purposes, which may include sharing it with Volkswagen or Audi authorized dealerships...
"If you choose to register or receive products or materials from us, or to otherwise give us personal information, we may store some or all of that personal information and use it for marketing research and marketing purposes, which may include sharing it with Volkswagen or Audi authorized dealerships...
#127
Great but my point had nothing to do with how Honda/Acura compare to Audi/VW. However you want to look at it, Acura has quite a few exclusive models. The TSX and RL are the only rebagded products. Before this generation RL came out Acura had a $70k RL in works with RWD and V8, basically a real flagship for the North American market but Honda Japan shot it down saying it would cost too much and said here use the Legend instead. With the Legend out of the way, that means we will finally get an exclusive flagship.
Yeah, but the TL shares the Accord platform and thats not helping anything. At least starting with the 3G TL, Acura started making the TL look, feel, handle, ride, and perform very different from the Accord and the 4G TL is even a further departure from the current Accord, but they still share the same platform unfortunately and a lot of hard core enthusiast complain about it. I'm not one of them b/c I could care less, but I'm just saying I think it would be better if Acura took Infiniti's and Lexus's direction of have separate unique platforms to their vehicles.
For instance, the next gen ES is supposedly (that being the key word there) not share the Camry platform anymore and get its own unique one. Lexus must have gotten a message b/c people have always critized that vehicle as a rebadged Camry and why pay more for that, which I disagree with, but it still remains a complaint none the less.
For instance, the next gen ES is supposedly (that being the key word there) not share the Camry platform anymore and get its own unique one. Lexus must have gotten a message b/c people have always critized that vehicle as a rebadged Camry and why pay more for that, which I disagree with, but it still remains a complaint none the less.
Furthermore, it would be very expensive to put it on its own platform, especially as it's still selling very well even in a fairly old age against other stronger new cars like the Acura TL, Nissan Maxima, Cadillac CTS, Hyundai Genesis, etc. <<<< I'm not saying all of those are direct competitors but surely at least some of them get cross shopped.
#128
Safety Car
The other link I posted does. Get over it. Your Audis are VWs like Acuras are Hondas and Infinitis are Nissans. You make it seem like Audi is on this pedestal when it isn't. You have been proven wrong so go away.
#129
For example, if an A4 quatro with the Prestige Package and Nav system (closest config to a TL SH AWD Tech) can only be had with a 4 cyl engine, how much would it cost with a 300+ HP V6 (like the TL has)?
#130
Racer
Are you certain your 09 does? My 2010 does not. And it's been a hot topic here. Maybe you got a rebadged Accord? ![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Audi A4 from base and BMW 3-Series by option (everything in a BMW is an option), Lincoln, Cadillac, Mercedes (C-Class) all have folding rear seats.
I presume Saab and Volvo too, but didn't check.
The 2010 TH SH-AWD does not have a flat trunk floor ,and clinks rather than clunks. Yes, I have one with 15,000 miles on it in about eight months.
This board has had quite a debate, with more than a few people thinking the previous gen TL (presumably your TL-S) was the best ever and the current one a step back. So I would believe it has better sounds and tiltable head rest. I think you're wrong about your 2009 having it though.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
I presume Saab and Volvo too, but didn't check.
This board has had quite a debate, with more than a few people thinking the previous gen TL (presumably your TL-S) was the best ever and the current one a step back. So I would believe it has better sounds and tiltable head rest. I think you're wrong about your 2009 having it though.
#131
Racer
- VAG owns VW cars, VW commercial and Audi... and Bugatti and others... at a very top level...
- And is over half-owned (in voting shares) by Porsche.
- Acura was created, not bought, by Honda.
- Acura NA and Honda NA are in the same office in Torrance, CA.
- Acura and Honda are on the same manufacturing line in Marysville, Ohio.
- Audi and VW do not share a manufacturing line or any HQ offices.
#132
We basically agree and are just saying many of the same stuff but I don't believe I am using a double standard cause where Acura is lacking in image and prestige is in part due to the global (not Accord) platform sharing and where Lexus and Infiniti lack is that many of their products are actually labled Nissan and Toyota in other parts of the world, maybe until just recently anyway. Even many of their NA luxury products have the Nissan and Toyota label on their windows, just as an example. I am not calling one a "rebadge" and the other not or that it means one is better than the other.
The best thing Acura should do as far as this aspect of appeal is to start to develop a new platform in the RL that can trickle down and to release the brand in more markets while Infiniti and Lexus should maybe start to develop more exclusive luxury division products or luxury brand distinction in their home market (Japan), which I believe Lexus has started.
I don't fault or think any less of any of these brands for doing this, I actually judge the final product not the branding or where else it's platform may be used. They all already build some of the best cars and in many cases this practice allows them to undercut the competition in pricing. If they can still make a superior product in ways that are a priority to me, why do I care if it uses it's own platform or not? Or if it's a Nissan in Japan? I don't buy cars because of other people's opinions of them and I don't want to pay more just because of a simple pointless facts. It's been proven that a seperate platform does not necessarily make for a better overall car in comparison.
The best thing Acura should do as far as this aspect of appeal is to start to develop a new platform in the RL that can trickle down and to release the brand in more markets while Infiniti and Lexus should maybe start to develop more exclusive luxury division products or luxury brand distinction in their home market (Japan), which I believe Lexus has started.
I don't fault or think any less of any of these brands for doing this, I actually judge the final product not the branding or where else it's platform may be used. They all already build some of the best cars and in many cases this practice allows them to undercut the competition in pricing. If they can still make a superior product in ways that are a priority to me, why do I care if it uses it's own platform or not? Or if it's a Nissan in Japan? I don't buy cars because of other people's opinions of them and I don't want to pay more just because of a simple pointless facts. It's been proven that a seperate platform does not necessarily make for a better overall car in comparison.
#133
I haven't heard this, but I doubt Lexus would do that. The only people complaining about it being a fancy Camry are generally not the buyer base anyway that Lexus is aiming for. The people that say that are likely to be shopping for a sport sedan in the ES350's price range.
Problem with the ES is, even though its dated and getting near to its current generation, its still sells pretty well for Lexus, despite the boring, blah look to it. Just goes to show, that even if a luxury vehicle shares a platform with a mainstream vehicle, if the company is able to differentiate is enough in every other aspect, it can sell really well. The 3G TL is another great example of that.
#134
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
For what's it worth, the perception out in the real world.
One of the big Toyota dealers here just opened a separate "Luxury Motors" lot for in their words, "pre-owned luxury cars".
The TV, radio & newspaper adds list late model Mercedes, Lexus, BMW & Audi as available. The inventory looks to be mostly low mileage 2007/8 so I expect they are cars coming off lease. The one exception is a 2003 "G" with low mileage for its age. Although TL's are a dime a dozen here so far they are not advertised or listed in the inventory.
All the rest of their used cars are on what the call the big lot.
One of the big Toyota dealers here just opened a separate "Luxury Motors" lot for in their words, "pre-owned luxury cars".
The TV, radio & newspaper adds list late model Mercedes, Lexus, BMW & Audi as available. The inventory looks to be mostly low mileage 2007/8 so I expect they are cars coming off lease. The one exception is a 2003 "G" with low mileage for its age. Although TL's are a dime a dozen here so far they are not advertised or listed in the inventory.
All the rest of their used cars are on what the call the big lot.
#135
Racer
I've always viewed it a little differently. If Audi, Mercedes, BMW...the european competition to the TL, would cut the amount of money out of their cars to compete price-wise with the TL, what would you end up with?
For example, if an A4 quatro with the Prestige Package and Nav system (closest config to a TL SH AWD Tech) can only be had with a 4 cyl engine, how much would it cost with a 300+ HP V6 (like the TL has)?
For example, if an A4 quatro with the Prestige Package and Nav system (closest config to a TL SH AWD Tech) can only be had with a 4 cyl engine, how much would it cost with a 300+ HP V6 (like the TL has)?
- Base TL starts at $35,105 according to the Acura site
- Base A4 (also FWD) starts at $31,450 according to the Audi site
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Do you know what a $31K Acura TL is called? It's called an Accord EX-L V6 with Sat Link. At $31.105. And it's a nice full-featured sedan too. Made on the same factory line as the TL.
#136
Safety Car
Wait, the 09 moves for crash cushion and doesn't adjust but my 07 does adjust. It adjusts forward which is nice.
Between our 09, and 07, the 07 seems to be a little more solid than the 09.
Between our 09, and 07, the 07 seems to be a little more solid than the 09.
Are you certain your 09 does? My 2010 does not. And it's been a hot topic here. Maybe you got a rebadged Accord? ![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Audi A4 from base and BMW 3-Series by option (everything in a BMW is an option), Lincoln, Cadillac, Mercedes (C-Class) all have folding rear seats.
I presume Saab and Volvo too, but didn't check.
The 2010 TH SH-AWD does not have a flat trunk floor ,and clinks rather than clunks. Yes, I have one with 15,000 miles on it in about eight months.
This board has had quite a debate, with more than a few people thinking the previous gen TL (presumably your TL-S) was the best ever and the current one a step back. So I would believe it has better sounds and tiltable head rest. I think you're wrong about your 2009 having it though.
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Audi A4 from base and BMW 3-Series by option (everything in a BMW is an option), Lincoln, Cadillac, Mercedes (C-Class) all have folding rear seats.
I presume Saab and Volvo too, but didn't check.
The 2010 TH SH-AWD does not have a flat trunk floor ,and clinks rather than clunks. Yes, I have one with 15,000 miles on it in about eight months.
This board has had quite a debate, with more than a few people thinking the previous gen TL (presumably your TL-S) was the best ever and the current one a step back. So I would believe it has better sounds and tiltable head rest. I think you're wrong about your 2009 having it though.
#137
Drifting
I think it's time to put on the big boy pants and buy an S4.
http://bit.ly/a7G2F9
Enjoy it in good health. I don't know why people seem to take pleasure in being dissatisfied with what they spend their money on. I guess some people are only happy when they are un-happy.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#138
Safety Car
TL has those - use the same switch you use to adjust the side mirrors, left or right to select which side you want to tilt down when you reverse. I believe that the Germans only tilt down the passenger side mirror and down allow you that option, they must not have any one way roads to park on across the pond... How dare those other car manufacturers not build in the ability for me to select which mirror I want to be tilted down.
I think it's time to put on the big boy pants and buy an S4.
http://bit.ly/a7G2F9
Enjoy it in good health. I don't know why people seem to take pleasure in being dissatisfied with what they spend their money on. I guess some people are only happy when they are un-happy.![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
I think it's time to put on the big boy pants and buy an S4.
http://bit.ly/a7G2F9
Enjoy it in good health. I don't know why people seem to take pleasure in being dissatisfied with what they spend their money on. I guess some people are only happy when they are un-happy.
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
Missed that. Both our TL's have the electronic reverse side mirrors that go down. I don't use it though.
#139
Safety Car
That's a fascinating question, because I don't think you'd wind up in the same place. A basic A4 is less expensive than a basic TL...
), the Audi has nicer materials (except the TL seat leather is fantastic when leather is in both cars), better finishing, a more refined engine and more small luxuries.
Do you know what a $31K Acura TL is called? It's called an Accord EX-L V6 with Sat Link. At $31.105. And it's a nice full-featured sedan too. Made on the same factory line as the TL.
- Base TL starts at $35,105 according to the Acura site
- Base A4 (also FWD) starts at $31,450 according to the Audi site
![Wink](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Do you know what a $31K Acura TL is called? It's called an Accord EX-L V6 with Sat Link. At $31.105. And it's a nice full-featured sedan too. Made on the same factory line as the TL.
#140
Well that is why I used the word supposedly. Nothing is set in stone, but I've read several reviews and inside rumors from Lexus people online stating that Lexus is thinking of going that route. Does that mean they will, no, though I think they should, just like I think it can only help Acura to begin making separate unique platforms for some of their models, from Honda vehicles.
Problem with the ES is, even though its dated and getting near to its current generation, its still sells pretty well for Lexus, despite the boring, blah look to it. Just goes to show, that even if a luxury vehicle shares a platform with a mainstream vehicle, if the company is able to differentiate is enough in every other aspect, it can sell really well. The 3G TL is another great example of that.
Problem with the ES is, even though its dated and getting near to its current generation, its still sells pretty well for Lexus, despite the boring, blah look to it. Just goes to show, that even if a luxury vehicle shares a platform with a mainstream vehicle, if the company is able to differentiate is enough in every other aspect, it can sell really well. The 3G TL is another great example of that.
However, I have heard on a few sites that Lexus is considering scapping the ES altogether. Again, that makes no real sense. It would make more sense for them to scrap the Avalon, which is in a somewhat similar market with slipping sales.
So it's stories like that which make me suspect that it's just bloggers and the like yapping about nonsensical stuff.
Last edited by MyCarIsntInMyWifesName; 07-24-2010 at 12:46 PM.
#141
Yeah I don't mean that you think it would happen. I'm just rather shocked that Lexus would consider it at all. It sells very well and there is just no reason for Lexus to even consider it....it's like saying that the Cayenne and Touareg are going their separate ways. No real reason to.
However, I have heard on a few sites that Lexus is considering scapping the ES altogether. Again, that makes no real sense. It would make more sense for them to scrap the Avalon, which is in a somewhat similar market with slipping sales.
So it's stories like that which make me suspect that it's just bloggers and the like yapping about nonsensical stuff.
However, I have heard on a few sites that Lexus is considering scapping the ES altogether. Again, that makes no real sense. It would make more sense for them to scrap the Avalon, which is in a somewhat similar market with slipping sales.
So it's stories like that which make me suspect that it's just bloggers and the like yapping about nonsensical stuff.
#142
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
I've always viewed it a little differently. If Audi, Mercedes, BMW...the european competition to the TL, would cut the amount of money out of their cars to compete price-wise with the TL, what would you end up with?
For example, if an A4 quatro with the Prestige Package and Nav system (closest config to a TL SH AWD Tech) can only be had with a 4 cyl engine, how much would it cost with a 300+ HP V6 (like the TL has)?
For example, if an A4 quatro with the Prestige Package and Nav system (closest config to a TL SH AWD Tech) can only be had with a 4 cyl engine, how much would it cost with a 300+ HP V6 (like the TL has)?
I expect they have a very nice profit margin on their cars & see no reason to cut it just for a part share of the 2500 or so TL's sold each month.
#143
Yeah, I have heard about the scrapping rumor too and I think like you that would be a mistake since it sells well for Lexus. But who knows what they are going to do. It will be interesting, if they do redesign it and not scrap it, to see what Lexus does since the new LaCrosse is aimed at it and they'll have to keep that vehicle in close mind when designing.
I don't remember if it was in this thread or not but recently I mentioned I think the next ES needs to go for the taut suppleness of the Lacrosse (which has the comfort of the Lexus but much more control and lacks the wallowy feel of the syrupy Lexus). I think all wheel drive is an option to consider offering as the Buick has that point, and design and quality will be crucial.
They also need to watch for features too, because I really do feel like some of these upscale cars could be losing some sales to the very advanced new sedans in the family car class. Now you can get those cars with similar power, 6-speed transmissions, heated/cooled seats and heated in back, the fancy sunroofs, pushbutton start, surround sound audio, remoteless entry, and the list goes on and on.
#144
I absolutely agree. The ES was also one of the most cross shopped vehicles with the Lacrosse, at least according to one article. I'll have to go search for it, but so many companies say people are going to compare X to Y and it never happens. For example, Kia saying the Borrego compares to luxury SUVs like the M-Class and GX Lexus. Yeah, right.
I don't remember if it was in this thread or not but recently I mentioned I think the next ES needs to go for the taut suppleness of the Lacrosse (which has the comfort of the Lexus but much more control and lacks the wallowy feel of the syrupy Lexus). I think all wheel drive is an option to consider offering as the Buick has that point, and design and quality will be crucial.
They also need to watch for features too, because I really do feel like some of these upscale cars could be losing some sales to the very advanced new sedans in the family car class. Now you can get those cars with similar power, 6-speed transmissions, heated/cooled seats and heated in back, the fancy sunroofs, pushbutton start, surround sound audio, remoteless entry, and the list goes on and on.
I don't remember if it was in this thread or not but recently I mentioned I think the next ES needs to go for the taut suppleness of the Lacrosse (which has the comfort of the Lexus but much more control and lacks the wallowy feel of the syrupy Lexus). I think all wheel drive is an option to consider offering as the Buick has that point, and design and quality will be crucial.
They also need to watch for features too, because I really do feel like some of these upscale cars could be losing some sales to the very advanced new sedans in the family car class. Now you can get those cars with similar power, 6-speed transmissions, heated/cooled seats and heated in back, the fancy sunroofs, pushbutton start, surround sound audio, remoteless entry, and the list goes on and on.
#145
Yeah, I mean if Lexus, and Toyota for that matter, could keep their supple ride quality, but improve their handling and floaty/wallowy characteristics they would really have something to brag about and a lot more people, like us, would be willing to try that. I've looked at Lexus and Toyota extensively, and those were the two big things that turned me away from getting any of their products!
I think Toyota's 30-45K sedan box is too cluttered now, like GM of the past. There the loaded Camry, Avalon, ES, HS, and IS. Many with very different personalities, but I think some more variety could be had. The HS isn't working so I'm in favor of integreting the hybrid Camry drivetrain with the ES like Lincoln is doing with the MKZ. The Avalon isn't a great success anymore so maybe Toyota could try a new set of customers by bringing us something like the Mark X.
#146
Racer
RE: Electrical tilt mirrors
I mis-named them. On the Audis, you can twist the knob and the entire mirrors fold against the car. On the TL, you do that by hand, reaching out the window. It's for parking in tight spaces or pulling up to your mailbox safely.
I mis-named them. On the Audis, you can twist the knob and the entire mirrors fold against the car. On the TL, you do that by hand, reaching out the window. It's for parking in tight spaces or pulling up to your mailbox safely.
#147
Racer
For the A3 and Golf, I fully agree. And in general I don't disagree anyhow. I have been making the case that Acura is not really a separate entity, but I did buy one knowing that. I don't think it actually matters.
#148
My personal experience (I could generalize it to all cars everywhere but will try to resist the urge... and probably fail):
I have owned several Volkswagens, and heavily modified a couple. The one thing they all had in common was that many parts failed (even before my modifications stressed them beyond their intended tolerances, so don't blame that!). I do not want a car which uses those parts, no matter who makes it, what it's called, who owned what when... yadda yadda. I have owned three Hondas (well, they were my wife's, but same diff), total mileage more than 400,000, and had exactly ONE repair other than usual maintenance stuff (distributor cap failed at 130000 miles on the 95 Accord).
I cross-shopped extensively now that I finally had the money to buy a fancy car. I drove TL SH-AWD 6MT twice, 5AT once. I drove G37S and xS once each. I drove S4 manual and DCT (manual twice). I drove 335i and 335iX, regrettably both with the slushbox (BMW salesman, who was in general a dick: "Our customers prefer the refinement of an automatic. We usually don't get many manuals." Shame if you want to sell a car to someone who actually enjoys driving. They did have the 328i with a manual, which I was not impressed with, clutch wasn't great either). Lexus IS350 (doesn't even have a manual option, you have to go down an engine class to get that) once. All of these drives were at least 45 minutes. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire process and found something to like in all the cars (though the Lexus and BMW sales guys were tools, which I will admit would have made me shop different dealers even if I had decided on those cars).
335i arguably the best sheer driving car. Great handling dynamics, wonderful engine (gorgeous, awesome, etc etc it really is an incredible engine). Marred by weak gearbox. I enjoy the racetrack and, despite it's subjectively superior steering/cornering cannot imagine it would beat a TL around anything with more than a few corners, and just as much because of tranny as lack of torque-vectoring.
TL close second in dynamics, maybe technically a better performer in cornering due to technological superiority (or electronic cheating, depending on your perspective; I just like to go around curves faster and don't particularly care how). Manual trans was fantastic (as good a trans as the N54 is an engine), clutch excellent but just a bit vague in terms of takeup.
G37 manual and auto trans were both abominable. Didn't look much past that. I can't even describe what the xS tried to do when I attempted a 5th to 2nd downshift using the paddles... it was like when a boat's engine quits.
I would have driven the Maxima but no manual trans and my job sort-of requires a "luxury" car.
S4 looks like a brick and drives like one (how can the same company make this and the S5?). It is fast-ish in a straight line, and I do like the clutch, but the transmission throws were VW-length and the steering and cornering were much more "luxury" than "sport," which makes no sense for a "sport" model of a luxury car. Like if the M3 handled like a 7-series.
IS350... well, I just don't get it, but lots of people around where I live buy them, and the even less comprehensible 250s, in droves.
In terms of the Automobile mag article itself, I wonder if they drove a different S4 than I did. Would love to settle it on the track, which is really the only scoresheet that matters to me. Unfortunately, real life demands a certain practicality, and I was unable to arrange a side-by-side of the TL and S4. Anyway, if Ct Engineering ever finishes supercharger kit for TL, I can reinvest some of my savings on not buying overpriced German car and be even happier than I already am.
For years I smoked the crack of "German engineering," but I am beginning to believe it was just a lot of hype. That being said, if I had the funds available, I would certainly buy an M3 or Cayman S (or maybe even Corvette Z06). That is the niche I would love to see Acura attack. If their effort was anything like the TL, it would probably save me 10000-20000 bucks on my next car.
Or maybe I will just put an LS7 in an MDX... no one's done that yet, that I know of.
I have owned several Volkswagens, and heavily modified a couple. The one thing they all had in common was that many parts failed (even before my modifications stressed them beyond their intended tolerances, so don't blame that!). I do not want a car which uses those parts, no matter who makes it, what it's called, who owned what when... yadda yadda. I have owned three Hondas (well, they were my wife's, but same diff), total mileage more than 400,000, and had exactly ONE repair other than usual maintenance stuff (distributor cap failed at 130000 miles on the 95 Accord).
I cross-shopped extensively now that I finally had the money to buy a fancy car. I drove TL SH-AWD 6MT twice, 5AT once. I drove G37S and xS once each. I drove S4 manual and DCT (manual twice). I drove 335i and 335iX, regrettably both with the slushbox (BMW salesman, who was in general a dick: "Our customers prefer the refinement of an automatic. We usually don't get many manuals." Shame if you want to sell a car to someone who actually enjoys driving. They did have the 328i with a manual, which I was not impressed with, clutch wasn't great either). Lexus IS350 (doesn't even have a manual option, you have to go down an engine class to get that) once. All of these drives were at least 45 minutes. I thoroughly enjoyed the entire process and found something to like in all the cars (though the Lexus and BMW sales guys were tools, which I will admit would have made me shop different dealers even if I had decided on those cars).
335i arguably the best sheer driving car. Great handling dynamics, wonderful engine (gorgeous, awesome, etc etc it really is an incredible engine). Marred by weak gearbox. I enjoy the racetrack and, despite it's subjectively superior steering/cornering cannot imagine it would beat a TL around anything with more than a few corners, and just as much because of tranny as lack of torque-vectoring.
TL close second in dynamics, maybe technically a better performer in cornering due to technological superiority (or electronic cheating, depending on your perspective; I just like to go around curves faster and don't particularly care how). Manual trans was fantastic (as good a trans as the N54 is an engine), clutch excellent but just a bit vague in terms of takeup.
G37 manual and auto trans were both abominable. Didn't look much past that. I can't even describe what the xS tried to do when I attempted a 5th to 2nd downshift using the paddles... it was like when a boat's engine quits.
I would have driven the Maxima but no manual trans and my job sort-of requires a "luxury" car.
S4 looks like a brick and drives like one (how can the same company make this and the S5?). It is fast-ish in a straight line, and I do like the clutch, but the transmission throws were VW-length and the steering and cornering were much more "luxury" than "sport," which makes no sense for a "sport" model of a luxury car. Like if the M3 handled like a 7-series.
IS350... well, I just don't get it, but lots of people around where I live buy them, and the even less comprehensible 250s, in droves.
In terms of the Automobile mag article itself, I wonder if they drove a different S4 than I did. Would love to settle it on the track, which is really the only scoresheet that matters to me. Unfortunately, real life demands a certain practicality, and I was unable to arrange a side-by-side of the TL and S4. Anyway, if Ct Engineering ever finishes supercharger kit for TL, I can reinvest some of my savings on not buying overpriced German car and be even happier than I already am.
For years I smoked the crack of "German engineering," but I am beginning to believe it was just a lot of hype. That being said, if I had the funds available, I would certainly buy an M3 or Cayman S (or maybe even Corvette Z06). That is the niche I would love to see Acura attack. If their effort was anything like the TL, it would probably save me 10000-20000 bucks on my next car.
Or maybe I will just put an LS7 in an MDX... no one's done that yet, that I know of.
![Yum](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yum.gif)
#149
Btw, all this begs the question, what are we hoping to get out of car magazine comparos? There is no substitute for having one's ass in the pilot seat. That being said, I do love car magazines. Maybe it's like porno for car nuts...
#150
You'll Never Walk Alone
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 9,511
Received 842 Likes
on
524 Posts
The article mentioned that the S4's steering is numb, so I guess that's why you felt the S4 was "more luxury than sport." As for handling, perhaps the one you drove did not have the torque vectoring system?
Then, looking at the lap times, the TL and S4 are only 0.4s apart. The S4 is way faster in the straight line, but for the TL to get that close to the S4, the TL's handling must be really good.
Then, looking at the lap times, the TL and S4 are only 0.4s apart. The S4 is way faster in the straight line, but for the TL to get that close to the S4, the TL's handling must be really good.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BobbyGraham388
4G TL (2009-2014)
12
10-22-2015 05:05 PM
BlkTxAcuraTypeS
Member Cars for Sale
3
10-18-2015 08:05 PM
sockr1
Car Parts for Sale
22
10-01-2015 01:31 AM
asahrts
Member Cars for Sale
0
09-04-2015 05:55 PM