0-60 !!!
#1
0-60 !!!
<6 sec 0-60 was a big factor me going for my '12 TL SHAWD
I am yet to stretch her legs as I just bought it last saturday.
But thought of starting this post to understand other's experience
Please mention
0-60:
Year:
Model: TL off course
FWD or AWD:
MT or AT:
Where (Track or Public Road or Somewhere else) :
Hope it should be fun recording this
I am yet to stretch her legs as I just bought it last saturday.
But thought of starting this post to understand other's experience
Please mention
0-60:
Year:
Model: TL off course
FWD or AWD:
MT or AT:
Where (Track or Public Road or Somewhere else) :
Hope it should be fun recording this
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
#2
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Should be interesting.
![Popcorn](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/popcorn.gif)
#3
2009
TL-SH
0-60...
![Name: 5mEAU.gif
Views: 1763
Size: 494.8 KB](https://acurazine.com/forums/attachments/4g-tl-2009-2014-123/90410d1501791993-0-60-5meau.gif)
I actually have no clue. I don't even look at the car like its some 0-60 machine. I'm afraid to stomp on it leaving a light in fear that the diffs will go Hiroshima.
But in the snow... I killed everyone off the line.
In the snow... I could smoke a Ferrari F40.
TL-SH
0-60...
![Name: 5mEAU.gif
Views: 1763
Size: 494.8 KB](https://acurazine.com/forums/attachments/4g-tl-2009-2014-123/90410d1501791993-0-60-5meau.gif)
I actually have no clue. I don't even look at the car like its some 0-60 machine. I'm afraid to stomp on it leaving a light in fear that the diffs will go Hiroshima.
But in the snow... I killed everyone off the line.
In the snow... I could smoke a Ferrari F40.
![Tongue](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
The following users liked this post:
Alexander. (03-23-2013)
#4
Burning Brakes
Oh man not again, the TL is a luxury sedan with 305 Horses and maybe the best AWD system I'm the market, it does everything well and doesn't under or over achieve in any way shape or form. It's just a well balanced machine not a hot rod. So do your 0-60 runs and let us now the outcome, hope u don't fuck something up.
#5
8 seconds...lmmfao...what he said above...except for fking up something...unless you are running drag radials you will have tire spin and thats about it...I have launched the wifes 6MT SHAWD very hard all while under warrenty of course..
#7
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Not far enough from Chicago
Age: 46
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 190 Likes
on
119 Posts
https://acurazine.com/forums/4g-tl-performance-parts-modifications-295/2013-tl-sh-6at-vbox-results-882639/
The car is fast given its size and power plant - a turbo or SC would put it at the top of its class, hell for its weight a V8 would be justified
The car is fast given its size and power plant - a turbo or SC would put it at the top of its class, hell for its weight a V8 would be justified
Trending Topics
#9
anything this size and luxury clocking 0-60 in 5 something seconds is what that let me make my decision - and I am happy I did that
but from response guess people don't try to clock 0-60 in tl's - but ill try hoping I wont ruin my car
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#10
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
You might want to look in the racing section here at Acurazine. You will find that a lot of guys have spent a lot of money trying to equal the times posted in the two main magazines for TL's.
Its a nice comfy car that preforms well for its size & power but if 0-60 was an important criteria you would have done better looking elsewhere.
Its a nice comfy car that preforms well for its size & power but if 0-60 was an important criteria you would have done better looking elsewhere.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 03-21-2013 at 01:20 PM.
#13
Racer
I don't know if this is accurate but it is on this website.
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
2009 Acura TL 0-60 mph 5.4
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.4
2010 Acura TL SH-AWD (manual) 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7
2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
2009 Acura TL 0-60 mph 5.4
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.4
2010 Acura TL SH-AWD (manual) 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7
2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4
#15
Burning Brakes
#16
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
I don't know if this is accurate but it is on this website.
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
2009 Acura TL 0-60 mph 5.4
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.4
2010 Acura TL SH-AWD (manual) 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7
2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
2009 Acura TL 0-60 mph 5.4
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.4
2010 Acura TL SH-AWD (manual) 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7
2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4
Real life including some Acurazine members like JB Bearcat
http://www.dragtimes.com/Acura--TL-Drag-Racing.html
#17
Burning Brakes
#18
6G TLX-S
I don't know if this is accurate but it is on this website.
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
2009 Acura TL 0-60 mph 5.4
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.4
2010 Acura TL SH-AWD (manual) 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7
2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4
http://www.zeroto60times.com/Acura-0-60-mph-Times.html
2009 Acura TL 0-60 mph 5.4
2009 Acura TL SH-AWD 0-60 mph 5.4
2010 Acura TL SH-AWD (manual) 0-60 mph 5.2 Quarter mile 13.7
2012 Acura TL SH-AWD 3.7 V6 0-60 mph 5.4
#19
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
They are all 6MT claims all 5/6AT are 6+. Think C&D got 6.2 out of the 6MT last tested.
Last edited by BEAR-AvHistory; 03-21-2013 at 11:02 PM.
#20
Don't know why it matters, when is last time anyone went from a dead stop to 60 mph and exactly for what reason? I would suggest using 5-60 as a measure for relative performance and one that actually makes sense for normal everyday driving but I'll add my 2 cents anyway, since it was brought up.
Generally only used in a race setting but FWIW, the TL AT's don't brake torque which would otherwise yield a slight advantage in the numbers. Nontheless, some mags and independent track results have still recorded the 5AT at 5.9-6.0 as a best. Don't know how easily that would be replicated, but IMO since there is no brake torquing, there is not any extra room for driver error, actually less, so as long as the conditions were right, should be feasible.
Plus, when you look at the car's other acceleration data, it's in line with other cars that also exhibit similar straightline performance, often repeated at a track and generally by a more enthusiastic consumer base. Even the dragtimes link is pretty indicitive of realistic 0-60 expectations. Other cars that usually run those mid to high 14's and high 96's-99 traps are capable of 5.9- low 6's, the SH especially because AWD's have a slight tendency to overachieve in 0-60 due to traction advantages. So, those are good, safe guesses, on the better/best end of the spectrum IMO.
As far as that 5.4 0-60 for an 09 5AT (since there was no 09 6MT, came out as a 2010), that's seems more like wishful thinking. I wouldn't totally rule it out for the 6AT TL, which in theory should be that much better than a 5AT, however I've only seen the one official test for the 6AT from C&D and it was no better, if not worse, than the previously tested 5AT from the same source, so it's just a summation on my part, who really knows?
Generally only used in a race setting but FWIW, the TL AT's don't brake torque which would otherwise yield a slight advantage in the numbers. Nontheless, some mags and independent track results have still recorded the 5AT at 5.9-6.0 as a best. Don't know how easily that would be replicated, but IMO since there is no brake torquing, there is not any extra room for driver error, actually less, so as long as the conditions were right, should be feasible.
Plus, when you look at the car's other acceleration data, it's in line with other cars that also exhibit similar straightline performance, often repeated at a track and generally by a more enthusiastic consumer base. Even the dragtimes link is pretty indicitive of realistic 0-60 expectations. Other cars that usually run those mid to high 14's and high 96's-99 traps are capable of 5.9- low 6's, the SH especially because AWD's have a slight tendency to overachieve in 0-60 due to traction advantages. So, those are good, safe guesses, on the better/best end of the spectrum IMO.
As far as that 5.4 0-60 for an 09 5AT (since there was no 09 6MT, came out as a 2010), that's seems more like wishful thinking. I wouldn't totally rule it out for the 6AT TL, which in theory should be that much better than a 5AT, however I've only seen the one official test for the 6AT from C&D and it was no better, if not worse, than the previously tested 5AT from the same source, so it's just a summation on my part, who really knows?
Last edited by winstrolvtec; 03-22-2013 at 12:52 AM.
#21
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
1/8 & 1/4 mile numbers are more fun because driver error can be introduced to make things interesting. Have no idea what my 0-60 is, its quick, but 90mph comes up in 8 seconds from a start. Expect to push that up to 94mph this summer.
#22
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
Just took a look & the guys name was Tom McCahill of Mechanix Illustrated & the father of auto tests in magazines. Came up with 0-60 in the 1940’s to test performance of cars since 60mph, a mile a minute, was a big deal back then & the NHRA with the 1/4 mile did not yet exist.
#23
Burning Brakes
A number of highways have to stop to yield to oncoming traffic on certain entrances. Therefore mashing the gas to get to 60 from a dead stop is the way to go.
#24
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
#25
You would not be brake torquing at a stop sign and you likely wouldn't excessively launch your car either, in other tranny formats. Furthermore, there is no roll out, when applicable.
In everyday instances, the difference between 5.9 and 6.2 should not really be a deal breaker, however the difference between 6 seconds and 7 seconds could easily matter, which is more to your point, where I agree.
In the context of 0-60 and what is the absolute best anyone has recorded or seen for this car or that car, that doesn't have the same type of real world bearance that you speak of. Interesting discussion either way, I just so happen to think there is a distinction to be made.
Perhaps I should have better worded it as - when is the last time you tried to get the absolute best 0-60 time out of your car and for what reason?
Last edited by winstrolvtec; 03-23-2013 at 03:03 PM.
#26
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Not far enough from Chicago
Age: 46
Posts: 893
Likes: 0
Received 190 Likes
on
119 Posts
The non track, average driver will never get close to the 0-60's the pro's achieve, and would most likely sit and spin their tires in any situation requiring them to get the EFF out of the way before something bad happens. That's why God gave us AWD
#27
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
and articulated feet, the original traction control
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#29
Suzuka Master
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes
on
1,581 Posts
This might be of interest for some 0-60 perspective.
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-2004-2008-93/4-cylinder-bmw-328-0-60-4-6-seconds-883562/
https://acurazine.com/forums/3g-tl-2004-2008-93/4-cylinder-bmw-328-0-60-4-6-seconds-883562/
#30
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes
on
5,162 Posts
No worries Laptimus-welcome to Acurazine. If you ever need anything, feel free to send me a Personal Message (PM). As you can see, there's been some good links and information here. I hope that helps you.
The following users liked this post:
laptimus (03-24-2013)
#31
My best run has been on a 1/4 tank and holding the brake while quickly stepping on the gas till the revs hit 1800, the brakes are only holding the car back for a half second if that.... not fully brake torquing.
as my car approaches 1200 miles its been getting a bit fast over the brand new tests. I have a drop in filter and TB coolant bypass
My best run to date has been a 5.53
1.9 60'
8.8 @ 81.5mph 1/8th mile
I think with a Jpipe and some more miles it can run a 5.2-5.3 no problem.
If you want to spend the money go buy a Vbox - I use it on my other cars.
But I've messed around with the new dynolicious app and its been within a tenth or two of the Vbox when used correctly.
#32
Good info dturbo, thanks for sharing. I'm curious if you can confirm the suspicions of whether the 6AT definitely upshift to 2nd gear (and may or may not shift back to 1st) when applying fully brake torque, like the former 5AT?
Also have you had your Vbox calibrated or know how well it corresponds with a local track? Those numbers look great for a car with 1200 miles on it, makes me wonder what it is about the auto TL's that C&D has a hard time testing, provided that you are getting reasonably accurate test results, that is.
Also have you had your Vbox calibrated or know how well it corresponds with a local track? Those numbers look great for a car with 1200 miles on it, makes me wonder what it is about the auto TL's that C&D has a hard time testing, provided that you are getting reasonably accurate test results, that is.
#33
Good info dturbo, thanks for sharing. I'm curious if you can confirm the suspicions of whether the 6AT definitely upshift to 2nd gear (and may or may not shift back to 1st) when applying fully brake torque, like the former 5AT?
Also have you had your Vbox calibrated or know how well it corresponds with a local track? Those numbers look great for a car with 1200 miles on it, makes me wonder what it is about the auto TL's that C&D has a hard time testing, provided that you are getting reasonably accurate test results, that is.
Also have you had your Vbox calibrated or know how well it corresponds with a local track? Those numbers look great for a car with 1200 miles on it, makes me wonder what it is about the auto TL's that C&D has a hard time testing, provided that you are getting reasonably accurate test results, that is.
My local track is Atco,compared to the track it was .08 off and within 1mph with a 12" roll out. - on another vehicle.
Next time I'm at the track I might bring the Acura along just to see what it really runs.
I always use the same stretch of private industrial park road for my tests. - 1.5 miles of pure flat vacant road.
As far as full brake torque I'll run a test on it to confirm as soon as the weather clears up, but I've been able to get 1800-1900 rpm brake torque launches and remain in 1st gear.
- but the best runs I've gotten was a quick stab on the throttle while still on the brakes, as soon as the rpm hit 1900 I let off the brake - This was .25 seconds faster than the full brake torque method for me. I have noticed some inconsistency on the first gear upshift, sometimes it will shift @5900 other times it will shift up @6500. - the early shift can slow it down a few tenths.
#34
#35
Good info dturbo, thanks for sharing. I'm curious if you can confirm the suspicions of whether the 6AT definitely upshift to 2nd gear (and may or may not shift back to 1st) when applying fully brake torque, like the former 5AT?
Also have you had your Vbox calibrated or know how well it corresponds with a local track? Those numbers look great for a car with 1200 miles on it, makes me wonder what it is about the auto TL's that C&D has a hard time testing, provided that you are getting reasonably accurate test results, that is.
Also have you had your Vbox calibrated or know how well it corresponds with a local track? Those numbers look great for a car with 1200 miles on it, makes me wonder what it is about the auto TL's that C&D has a hard time testing, provided that you are getting reasonably accurate test results, that is.
it will hold first till about 6400 and upshift into second, this was full brake torque @2400-2500 rpm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54P_1...ature=youtu.be
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1SICKLEX
Automotive News
18
09-24-2003 10:30 AM