Why you should get 255/40-17 tires for your OEM rims !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-14-2009, 07:09 PM
  #641  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by Opel
it was only smth i experienced....and if u dont believe me...try it... on STIFF suspension.

i wasn't smth that no one should do... just a simple smth anyone will experience
I don't doubt there's a small difference. I may have come across harsh but I didn't mean it that way.

The difference won't be noticable to the average driver, especially on a moderately stiff suspension. I think the average a-ziner wouldn't know how to take advantage of a stiffer tire other than it "feels" like it corners better.

Sharper turn-in and better transitions from cornering to braking and back again are nice but again you have to know how to use it which 99% of the people will never experience.

Steady state cornering will barely be affected by sidewall differences.

And the main point is you will see more difference between manufacturers and brands than you will see from a 235/45 to a 255/40.

I do understand where you're coming from.
Old 07-14-2009, 09:11 PM
  #642  
Three Wheelin'
 
HQTL6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spring TX
Age: 37
Posts: 1,329
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
crap now I'm confused on what size I want , I'll be buying tires next week. I know that I want all season performance Continental ContiExtremeSport. I have them now, they're worn, but have been great.

I need to decide soon...
Old 07-16-2009, 03:33 PM
  #643  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by hqtl6spd
crap now i'm confused on what size i want , i'll be buying tires next week. I know that i want all season performance continental contiextremesport. I have them now, they're worn, but have been great.

I need to decide soon...
245/40/17
Old 01-24-2010, 12:26 AM
  #644  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
HRF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California (OC)
Age: 46
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for bumping an old thread, but I just recently put 255/40/17s on my stock TL-S wheels and they look and handle fine! We just had a week of storms in SoCal after I had these tires put on and there wasn't any hydroplaning or other problems using this setup in the rain.

I read this whole thread and decided I wanted to try this size and it makes the car look beefier with the wider tires.

It does enhance the wheel gap though, but I plan on lowering the car very soon so that's not too much of an issue.

Some quick pics:

Name:  IMG_5684.jpg
Views: 2330
Size:  132.0 KB
Name:  IMG_5686.jpg
Views: 2267
Size:  121.1 KB
Old 01-24-2010, 10:36 AM
  #645  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by HRF1
I just recently put 255/40/17s on my stock TL-S wheels and they look and handle fine!

It does enhance the wheel gap though, but I plan on lowering the car very soon so that's not too much of an issue.
Curious as to what tires they might be? Haven't been on this thread in quite a while, but I was ready for some action.
Old 01-24-2010, 05:49 PM
  #646  
Intermediate
 
Micha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Age: 42
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your 255's look really really narrow for a 10 inch wide tire.

My 245's look wider.
Old 01-25-2010, 01:42 PM
  #647  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
HRF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California (OC)
Age: 46
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Micha
Your 255's look really really narrow for a 10 inch wide tire.

My 245's look wider.
Yeah, I admit in those photos they look narrow. I think the gloomy rainy day contributed to the perception with the shadows because I took some shots yesterday in the sun, and the width is what I'd expect from a 255/40 tire and looks pretty beefy for a stock car.

Turbonut: They are NOS Yokohama AVSs.
Old 01-25-2010, 08:15 PM
  #648  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by HRF1
Yeah, I admit in those photos they look narrow. I think the gloomy rainy day contributed to the perception with the shadows because I took some shots yesterday in the sun, and the width is what I'd expect from a 255/40 tire and looks pretty beefy for a stock car.

Turbonut: They are NOS Yokohama AVSs.
If they are the Yoko AVS ES100, those suckers have a 9.8" wide tread, and a cross section width of 10.4". I'll agree with your statement, pretty beefy.
Old 03-06-2010, 03:16 PM
  #649  
Not a Blowhole
 
Road Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 13 Posts
A very thorough and informative post! Doubt there would be noticeable improvement, as one would likely get much better ROI by investing in better rubber rather than slightly lower profile rubber. This is especially true unless one has the ability to compare track times back to back, and make slight suspension alignment adjustments to ensure proper tracking, toe, and camber. Even a small change in these settings can result in greater slip angles. But since most of us just drive TL's and they are not really track cars, the look probably is more important than the "props".

Did not read all of the many replies, but it might not be a bad idea to replace the mini spare tire with something as close to your new effective diameter as possible (it may be there is no better size, so don't jump on me if that is the case). The only reason I bring that up is that if one tire is smaller than the others on the front axle, any LSD or LSD-type front axle may run at higher temps, since one wheel will be "spinning" faster than the one across the side, and that could be read as slip. I have seen a few cases (and even replaced a Ford 8.8" Traktion-Lok) where someone had jacked wheel/tires on the rear axle, had a flat, put on the spare, and then ran many miles at highway speed. The clutch packs burned and the carrier was ruined, and the fluid looked like tarry goo. Hey, it ain't likely, but a word to the wise is sufficient.
Old 03-06-2010, 05:19 PM
  #650  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Rage
Did not read all of the many replies, but it might not be a bad idea to replace the mini spare tire with something as close to your new effective diameter as possible (it may be there is no better size, so don't jump on me if that is the case). The only reason I bring that up is that if one tire is smaller than the others on the front axle, any LSD or LSD-type front axle may run at higher temps, since one wheel will be "spinning" faster than the one across the side, and that could be read as slip. I have seen a few cases (and even replaced a Ford 8.8" Traktion-Lok) where someone had jacked wheel/tires on the rear axle, had a flat, put on the spare, and then ran many miles at highway speed. The clutch packs burned and the carrier was ruined, and the fluid looked like tarry goo. Hey, it ain't likely, but a word to the wise is sufficient.
You make a very good point as many a transfer case has been rendered useless because of the difference in tire sizes, and with a posi, sure grip, etc, it certainly would make it more beneficial to have the correct sized spare on that axle.
Having said this, anyone that has a flat on the front, and is running larger or smaller diameter tires, it would probably behoove those people to place the spare on the back and move one from the back to the front, providing all the tires are the same size and in custom applications, hopefully the rear wheel/tire will fit the front.
Old 03-06-2010, 05:44 PM
  #651  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by Road Rage
A very thorough and informative post! Doubt there would be noticeable improvement, as one would likely get much better ROI by investing in better rubber rather than slightly lower profile rubber. This is especially true unless one has the ability to compare track times back to back, and make slight suspension alignment adjustments to ensure proper tracking, toe, and camber. Even a small change in these settings can result in greater slip angles. But since most of us just drive TL's and they are not really track cars, the look probably is more important than the "props".
I agree that the compound makes much more of a difference than the width. I guess with width you can have better traction with no penalty in wear. I've gone from a wider street tire to a narrower drag radial and there's absolutely no comparison in traction between the two. Even the NT05s I'm running run a little narrow but compared to the G-force Sports I had on here before it's a night and day difference in every performance category.

As for the sidewall, many on here seem to think that the lower the profile the better for performance. Not true. The 255/40 that I'm running is the absolute lowest I would go. The sidewall needs to be there to help absorb bumps. Not for comfort but to keep the tire in contact with the road. I have to laugh at the many threads of people with a 20" rim and a 235/35 or 225/35 on them talking about how good they handle. You won't find any serious track cars with these super low profile tires.

Nice to have you back!
Old 03-08-2010, 08:34 PM
  #652  
Burning Brakes
 
BostonSilverTypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Bean
Age: 42
Posts: 836
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
hmmm i think 255/40/17 will be my next set of tires...pretty good thread....also agreed that anything lower than 40series does not make performance better but worse IMHO.......
Old 05-12-2010, 08:39 AM
  #653  
Intermediate
 
wubstyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm getting 255/40/17s on my 07 TL-S this Friday. Went with BFG g-Force T/A KDW.

I'll post pics when theyre on.
Old 05-12-2010, 01:50 PM
  #654  
DANSOLOW
 
07TLTYPESex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ashville, Ohio
Age: 34
Posts: 156
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
where is everyone gettin theyre 255/40/17 tires? ive been searchin and cant find em
Old 05-12-2010, 11:57 PM
  #655  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
I always order my tires from www.tirerack.com

Not all brands make tires in this 255/40/17 size. Perhaps the brand that you wish to purchase does not offer this 255/40/17 size.

What brand & model of tire were in interested in ?
Old 06-20-2010, 12:55 PM
  #656  
DANSOLOW
 
07TLTYPESex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ashville, Ohio
Age: 34
Posts: 156
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
I always order my tires from www.tirerack.com

Not all brands make tires in this 255/40/17 size. Perhaps the brand that you wish to purchase does not offer this 255/40/17 size.

What brand & model of tire were in interested in ?

well i just didnt search very well lol but they discontinue the goodyears eagle 1s i wanted
, but im sure i can find something just as goood
Old 07-15-2010, 09:40 PM
  #657  
1st Gear
 
Gordon Kleber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why you should get 255/40-17

This is an awesome thread...will need to replace OEM tires soon. I live in Illionis with lots of pot holes. I think I'll go with 245/45 for my 07 to protect those rims. Anything I'm missing?
Old 07-19-2010, 12:34 PM
  #658  
7th Gear
 
Fu817Qua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea great tread, ill got 60k now and looking for new tires
Old 07-21-2010, 12:42 PM
  #659  
Advanced
 
ocdp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys I'm in a predicament. I need new tires bad (have 2 slow leaks) but I've been saving up for some new wheels. If I get 4 new tires that's gonna set me back like 400+ greatly cutting into my new wheel fund. But I'm trying to wait to find a good deal on some a-specs. What should I do???
Old 07-22-2010, 01:14 AM
  #660  
2016 E350 Sport
 
SweetJazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,953
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Micha
Your 255's look really really narrow for a 10 inch wide tire.

My 245's look wider.
My 245's look wider.
Old 07-22-2010, 08:32 AM
  #661  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by SweetJazz
My 245's look wider.
Yes, this is possible.

The rim width will have a large effect on the overall tire width (sectional width).

The 255 (for example) indicates the tire is 255 millimeters across from the widest point of its outer sidewall to the widest point of its inner sidewall when mounted and measured on a specified width wheel.

And to a much lesser extent, different tire brands will tend to be sized differently.
Old 07-25-2010, 01:17 PM
  #662  
One on the right for me
 
subinf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 40
Posts: 27,913
Received 271 Likes on 173 Posts
Round two despite my previous statement of going back to OEM size.
Old 08-01-2010, 04:34 PM
  #663  
Cruisin'
 
jpk7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've been looking at a 255/40/17 or a 245/45/17 ZP (zero pressure). How does ZP impact ride and performance? Has anyone tried the Extreme Contact DW by continental?
Old 08-02-2010, 01:05 AM
  #664  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
HRF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California (OC)
Age: 46
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 255s look pretty wide especially in the old Yoko AVS ES100 setup:

Name:  IMG_7257_2.jpg
Views: 4839
Size:  145.2 KB

The pics I posted above a few months ago in the rain don't do the 255s justice, as they are a really wide and beefy tire. After running the 255/40/17 setup the past 8 months, the only thing I dislike is the lower profile '40' sidewall. Going from stock 45 to 40 makes a real visible difference that I don't particulary care for, especially on the stock wheel, but I like the wider tire.
Old 08-18-2010, 09:22 AM
  #665  
Racer
 
jdmvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 278
Received 78 Likes on 54 Posts
Originally Posted by HRF1
My 255s look pretty wide especially in the old Yoko AVS ES100 setup:



The pics I posted above a few months ago in the rain don't do the 255s justice, as they are a really wide and beefy tire. After running the 255/40/17 setup the past 8 months, the only thing I dislike is the lower profile '40' sidewall. Going from stock 45 to 40 makes a real visible difference that I don't particulary care for, especially on the stock wheel, but I like the wider tire.
looks good. definately considering 255/40 next.
Old 08-18-2010, 09:38 AM
  #666  
Instructor
 
LuvMyRDX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix
Age: 48
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I've got the Yokohama YK520's in a 245/45/17 and I'm very pleased. Not exactly a performance tire, but for all-around use they've been fantastic. I live in CO and can use all the winter traction I can get. And the size change is quite significant to the eye. My sis has an '04 and she's still running the 235 45. Line them up side by side and you can see quite the difference in width though actual size on paper it's not much different. Same with height. Only 2" taller, but fills the wells up a little more visually. I did eye-ball the 255 40, but the prices were a little higher and the all-season performance style selection was less. Just my 2cents
Old 08-18-2010, 04:21 PM
  #667  
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
 
Steven Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes on 5,162 Posts
HRF1-give us a side shot.
Old 08-19-2010, 10:33 PM
  #668  
Road Racer / Solo Addict
 
EL BAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 778
Received 293 Likes on 141 Posts
Thanks all for taking your time to give all your feedback.

I read ALL the pages.. all the replies..

I have about 4k-5k more miles to go before changing tires and will definitely go with 255/40's

Now its about deciding which tire..

Again thanks all..

All the ones in favor of the size and the ones also vouching for the 245's..
Old 08-20-2010, 10:31 AM
  #669  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by EL BAN
Thanks all for taking your time to give all your feedback.

I read ALL the pages.. all the replies..

I have about 4k-5k more miles to go before changing tires and will definitely go with 255/40's

Now its about deciding which tire..

Again thanks all..

All the ones in favor of the size and the ones also vouching for the 245's..
Nitto NT05 if you want the absolute highest performance in a streetable tire. Nothing short of a full "R" compound will come close.

Old 08-20-2010, 05:41 PM
  #670  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
HRF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California (OC)
Age: 46
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steven Bell
HRF1-give us a side shot.
Here are two side shots with the 255/40/17s:

Name:  IMG_7150.jpg
Views: 3260
Size:  128.0 KB
Name:  IMG_7301.jpg
Views: 4415
Size:  187.8 KB
Old 08-21-2010, 05:48 PM
  #671  
Team Owner
iTrader: (2)
 
Steven Bell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO (Overland Park, KS)
Posts: 36,545
Received 6,470 Likes on 5,162 Posts
Originally Posted by HRF1
My 255s look pretty wide especially in the old Yoko AVS ES100 setup:



The pics I posted above a few months ago in the rain don't do the 255s justice, as they are a really wide and beefy tire. After running the 255/40/17 setup the past 8 months, the only thing I dislike is the lower profile '40' sidewall. Going from stock 45 to 40 makes a real visible difference that I don't particulary care for, especially on the stock wheel, but I like the wider tire.
Originally Posted by HRF1
Here are two side shots with the 255/40/17s:




Nice! I like the set-up, especially with the wide stance. I'll need tires soon and I really like the way the 2nd photo looks. I like how it fills out the wheel wells-that is the 255/40's? If it is, it doesn't look low profile to me. I'm trying to fill out my wheel wells without having to drop the car....maybe this would work. I know most guys suggest the 245/40's, but I'm kind of liking this setup better....how is the ride and handling?
Old 08-22-2010, 10:43 AM
  #672  
Instructor
iTrader: (1)
 
HRF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California (OC)
Age: 46
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steven Bell
Nice! I like the set-up, especially with the wide stance. I'll need tires soon and I really like the way the 2nd photo looks. I like how it fills out the wheel wells-that is the 255/40's? If it is, it doesn't look low profile to me. I'm trying to fill out my wheel wells without having to drop the car....maybe this would work. I know most guys suggest the 245/40's, but I'm kind of liking this setup better....how is the ride and handling?
Yeah, both photos are of the 255/40/17 setup.

If you're on the stock suspension, the 255/40s will increase the wheel gap. The small difference in a 40 v. 45 sidewall is pretty noticeable. I'm lowered on Eibachs and Koni SP3s so I'm able to negate some of the extra wheel gap the lower profile 40s give which is probably why it looks as though the 255/40s fill out the wheel wells.

Ride and handling are just fine; no issues at all.
Old 11-11-2010, 01:05 PM
  #673  
3rd Gear
 
apetros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: CHICAGO, IL
Age: 42
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi, i drive a 2004 TL 5AT but have Type-s wheels on it. Looking for a good set of All-Season Tires. I haven't decided what tire size to go with before looking for what brand i want to buy. I live in Chicago. What do you guys think about 255/45/17 size instead of 255/40/17 any noticable difference in driving? I'd appreciate any advice
Old 01-08-2011, 09:37 PM
  #674  
Saysdamnalot
 
MofroS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 140
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by HRF1
Yeah, both photos are of the 255/40/17 setup.

If you're on the stock suspension, the 255/40s will increase the wheel gap. The small difference in a 40 v. 45 sidewall is pretty noticeable. I'm lowered on Eibachs and Koni SP3s so I'm able to negate some of the extra wheel gap the lower profile 40s give which is probably why it looks as though the 255/40s fill out the wheel wells.

Ride and handling are just fine; no issues at all.
Did you happen to grab side shots pre-drop? Not sure that I want to drop mine, but am worried about the added wheel gap and would love to see what it looked like on a TLS.

TIA.

Drop looks great btw.
Old 01-08-2011, 11:45 PM
  #675  
Road Racer / Solo Addict
 
EL BAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 778
Received 293 Likes on 141 Posts
Well, time to get new tires came up.. and ended up getting the 255's

Toyo Proxes to be exact.. lowered on Eibach Pro Kit..



Car is dirty and pic is shitty.. should get better ones in a couple of weeks after some detailing..
Old 01-12-2011, 01:13 AM
  #676  
6th Gear
 
Sm0hsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nicee.... ive got some thinking to do. awesome info
Old 01-30-2011, 08:53 PM
  #677  
Burning Brakes
iTrader: (6)
 
vp55's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NoVA
Posts: 875
Received 59 Likes on 55 Posts
Great thread, so much info but need some advice/recommendations.

I am looking for better handling/stiffer steering to replace the OEM Michelins on my TL-S.

Which ultra-high performance tire would you all go with? Would the 245 be a better option for handling? I was thinking of the BF Goodrich A/S but heard they were just "ok" and I would rather spend a little more if needed. TIA.
Old 02-14-2011, 12:21 PM
  #678  
'05 TL NBP/Ebony Auto
 
BigTone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've loved reading this thread. I am in desperate need of new tires and was planning on 235 or 245/45/17 size (Continental ExtremeContact DW), but I love the look of the 255/40/17 I've seen here. Mind you I have original 2005 OEM rims, and all factory suspension etc. With that being said, I would appreciate any updates from someone with factory suspension who went with the 255/40s. I read a lot of recommendations to get the Goodyear Eagle f1-d3, but it doesn't appear tirerack carries them in 255/40? I appreciate any help steering me in the right direction for tires, I am ready to purchase this week. Also I saw about the Nitto NT05, but where do I purchase them and how much per tire? A lot of people mentioned unusual gap in the wheel wells with the 255/40 on stock suspension, were there any side view photos of what that would look like? How about performance at highway speeds, I recall reading someone saying the car didn't feel very responsive, more of a "floaty" feel to it. I'm in NorCal, looking for a quiet, great looking wider tire, that's max performance in D/W conditions.

Thanks so much for any feedback 255/40/17 tire users.
Old 02-14-2011, 11:44 PM
  #679  
e92TL
iTrader: (1)
 
Whdrms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 89
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
yep 255's are good, i was running 255/45/17 though never had problem. 235/45/17... i have 245/40/18 and i miss having 255s :/
Old 02-15-2011, 06:01 AM
  #680  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Just thought I'd add, for the guys wondering what the 255/40-17 might look like on the car, it's the same diameter as the temporary spare in the 6M/T 145/70-17, 25" tall. So if you're interested in seeing the gap, put the spare on and that will be the new diameter of the tires. The AT spare is smaller (24.5") so that won't work.


Quick Reply: Why you should get 255/40-17 tires for your OEM rims !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.