Just lowered my TL (wheels spacers or camber kit)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2016 | 06:24 PM
  #1  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Just lowered my TL (wheels spacers or camber kit)?

I couldn't really find the answer to my questions so here goes:

I lowered my TL on Tein Basis, (don't mind the bumper being off, waiting on my headlights from JnC). I've yet to dial in the ride height, I think I will drop the back another 1/4" to match the front so it's flush with the fender.

Lowering the car obviously produced some negative camber, i don't know how much yet as the car hasn't been aligned but I am assuming around -2 degrees. I am ok driving with that amount of camber, however I am trying to figure out how to resolve the issue of my wheels being too "inside" the fender.

Obvious answer is to get spacers (running 8" a specs), but I was thinking if I got camber kits front and back I would essentially get a similar result as a spacers with the wheel being more vertical it would bring the top of the wheel closer to the fender (which is all I want). In all honesty I don't like how cars look with spacers, as my goal isn't for the entire wheel to stick out, but to minimize the space between fender and top of wheel which gives the illusion that the wheel is further in the wheel well than it is.

Any thoughts or experiences how the wheels will look with less negative camber and this drop?


Old 03-10-2016 | 06:31 PM
  #2  
usdmJON's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 6,511
Likes: 849
Camber over spacers means your tires will be marginally closer to the fender.

Example... if the wheel with -4 camber is 8mm away from the fender the top of the tire may actually be 12mm from the fender.

Tilting the wheel with a camber kit to then have 0 camber will bring the wheel 4mm away from the fender but now the wheel and tire are even so the tire too is that close to the fender.

Negative camber is going to allow your wheel to get closer to the fender without the tire getting as close.

So while you are right, just be sure your tires have the clearance they need.
Old 03-10-2016 | 07:04 PM
  #3  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2









Old 03-10-2016 | 09:46 PM
  #4  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
I have a follow up question...why does everyone do 15mm front and 20mm rear spacers?

I measured the distance between the sidewall of the tire to the edge of the front fender and I also measured the same distance between the rear tire and edge of the 1/4 panel and it was the same. If I was to put a 20mm in the rear it would make the wheel stick out more than the front, is there a reason people do this?
Old 03-10-2016 | 09:50 PM
  #5  
Oh Sickest TL's Avatar
Jeff
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,728
Likes: 816
From: Port City, New Brunswick Canada
to give the wider aggressive stanced look in the rear. there is a thread somewhere with a CBP TL-S with 25mm all around on stock wheels, fuck it looks really good
Old 03-10-2016 | 10:35 PM
  #6  
Alex.Leslie's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 194
Likes: 47
From: Alberta, Canada
It sounds like you have a pretty good handle on all the working parts. It also sounds like the look you want is probably only going to be achieved by getting both. A camber kit will make your wheels neutral, but not move them out much. Spacers will move them out but keep them angled.

PS, you should look in to getting that alignment done ASAP. Camber is visually impactful and can cause uneven wear if its extreme, but I think you should worry more about toe. It's very difficult to see with the naked eye, and it'll eat your rubber if it's not corrected.
Old 03-10-2016 | 11:40 PM
  #7  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
At stock height I poked about 7mm, then dropped the car, maybe a bit more than you, and I'm now inboard with about 5mm to spare. My front camber is -1.5°, and stock it was almost nothing, so you could say that -1.5° is somewhere around 10mm of movement (on my car). A camber kit is the way to go, it gives you control, is safer than spacers, and will allow you to get the negative camber back to stock if you want, but it's more expensive than spacers, which is why few do it.
Old 03-11-2016 | 06:58 AM
  #8  
Slpr04UA6's Avatar
-------Tim-------
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 611
From: Tampa, Fl
If you do get a camber kit, get the Upper SPC camber kit, For the rear.
Old 03-11-2016 | 08:15 AM
  #9  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
I used an online right angle calculator and calculated that 1.5 negative camber correction is equivalent to 7mm of movement at the top of the tire to the fender. This is assuming my negative camber is at -2 because if I do a correction of 1.5 I still need a tiny bit of negative camber I feel.


So it seems even if I was to get a camber kit I would still need to run spacers.


I am going to start with spacers 15mm all around and take it from there. After I get an alignment with actual numbers I will have a better idea.


I am trying to avoid having to roll fenders, I am assuming with 8" a spec 235/40/18 tires, my current drop and 15mm spacers I shouldn't have to roll....based on my calcs.
Old 03-11-2016 | 09:13 AM
  #10  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
No need to reinvent the wheel man, there are only 11tybillion guys on this forum that have done what you are doing, just do some searches.

Lastly, keep in mind that all tires are not created equal, so there really is no such thing as a 235/40/18, it all depends on the manufacturer. Pay particular attention to the tread-width, which is where the shoulder is. Some tires, like the Toyo Proxes R888, run very wide. Some, like the Goodyear Eagle F1 AS2 run very narrow.
Old 03-11-2016 | 09:16 AM
  #11  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
Originally Posted by 202009
I have a follow up question...why does everyone do 15mm front and 20mm rear spacers?

I measured the distance between the sidewall of the tire to the edge of the front fender and I also measured the same distance between the rear tire and edge of the 1/4 panel and it was the same. If I was to put a 20mm in the rear it would make the wheel stick out more than the front, is there a reason people do this?
Every car is a little different, but from the factory most TL's have 5mm more room outboard in the rear than in the front, and 5/8" more wheel gap in the front than in the rear.
Old 03-11-2016 | 09:19 AM
  #12  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
I hear you and I probably am over analyzing this, but to some extent it's because a lot of the information online is not correct or because some critical facts are not posted.


I ordered the 15mm ichiba v2 spacers, we will see how it goes. If my negative camber at my current height comes in at -1.5 to -1.7 front and back I will leave everything as is as I think I will accomplish what I set out to get out of this. Tires being close to the edge, no rubbing, no fender rolling, and not too much camber (hopefully).


And good point on the tires as they are all different regardless of being the same size.
Old 03-11-2016 | 09:21 AM
  #13  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by VisualEchos
Every car is a little different, but from the factory most TL's have 5mm more room outboard in the rear than in the front, and 5/8" more wheel gap in the front than in the rear.


This is what prompted me to measure out the distance between sidewall to edge of fender/quarter panel...I read the exact same thing somewhere, but my measurements say otherwise. I also find it odd because based on alignment sheets I've seen posted here if the car is lowered the same all around the rear usually has more negative camber, which I think is the misconception leading to people believing that the rear is more inboard when in reality it may not be, it's the additional negative camber compared to the front that's giving off that illusion.
Old 03-11-2016 | 09:57 AM
  #14  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
Originally Posted by 202009
I'm over analyzing this because a lot of the information online is not correct or because some critical facts are not posted.
Fixed.

Not truer words have ever been spoken sir!


Originally Posted by 202009
This is what prompted me to measure out the distance between sidewall to edge of fender/quarter panel...I read the exact same thing somewhere, but my measurements say otherwise.
I was really late to the game, never even looked online, just measured my car, which is where I found the 5mm and 5/8" discrepancy. Again, every car is slightly different, so it's prudent for us to measure what we have.

Originally Posted by 202009
I also find it odd because based on alignment sheets I've seen posted here if the car is lowered the same all around the rear usually has more negative camber, which I think is the misconception leading to people believing that the rear is more inboard when in reality it may not be, it's the additional negative camber compared to the front that's giving off that illusion.
Yes, exactly, the car has more negative camber in the rear from the factory, and when dropped to make the front and rear even, I had -1.5° up front, and -2.6° in the rear! Since the front tucked perfectly, I just got a camber kit for the rear and made it -1.5° like the front, and all was well.

Unfortunately, when I go to fit my 275 tire I'll need to be at -1.8° both front and rear, which means I'll need a camber kit for the front.
Old 03-11-2016 | 10:09 AM
  #15  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
You are starting to convince me that I should probably order a rear camber kit as well because chances are I will end up with more negative camber than I originally thought. It would also give me that 5mm or so that I am looking for to bring the rear tire closer to the edge of the quarter panel after I put the 15mm spacers.


Any recommendation on rear camber kits?
Old 03-11-2016 | 10:09 AM
  #16  
mvp2765's Avatar
Racer
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 489
Likes: 96
From: Chicago
^ SPC Rear Camber kit. . Anyone know the front and rear oem camber specs?
Old 03-11-2016 | 10:15 AM
  #17  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
Originally Posted by 202009
You are starting to convince me that I should probably order a rear camber kit as well because chances are I will end up with more negative camber than I originally thought. It would also give me that 5mm or so that I am looking for to bring the rear tire closer to the edge of the quarter panel after I put the 15mm spacers.


Any recommendation on rear camber kits?
Man, when I dropped my car I was meticulous about getting it perfect to the mm, and still had -2.2° on one side of the rear, and -2.6° on the other side. And even though my toe was perfect, I saw wear on my tires after just 10,000 miles, so I got the SPC camber kit.

You can see where the car was riding in this shot.


Beef, it's what's for dinner. (Explore)
by Andrew Thompson, on Flickr

Contact the XLR8 rep here on the board for the kit.
The following users liked this post:
treal512 (10-26-2017)
Old 03-11-2016 | 10:17 AM
  #18  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
After the camber adjustment it looks better, and will wear better for sure.


Carbon Dark.
by Andrew Thompson, on Flickr

Last edited by VisualEchos; 03-11-2016 at 10:20 AM.
Old 03-11-2016 | 10:40 AM
  #19  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
wow that's gorgeous.


Do you have more side shots?


Reading up online (yay more contradicting shit) the reviews say to stay away from ball joint rear camber kit (SPC) and go for the adjustable arms. wtf
Old 03-11-2016 | 10:44 AM
  #20  
202009's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 26
Likes: 2
Is this the one? Is $150 a fair price?


SPC Rear Camber Kit Full Set 67095 Pair | eBay
Old 03-11-2016 | 11:15 AM
  #21  
VisualEchos's Avatar
Andrew
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 532
Originally Posted by 202009
Do you have more side shots?
Sure man, here's my folder.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/visual...57657995549346

The new shots are dropped, and the car wears 265/35 tires. Some of the older ones show it with the 255/40 tire and drop, and the oldest ones show the 255/40 with no drop.


Originally Posted by 202009
Reading up online (yay more contradicting shit) the reviews say to stay away from ball joint rear camber kit (SPC) and go for the adjustable arms. wtf
Contact Tom, the XLR8 rep here on the board, he's awesome, and will give you the complete low-down. Awesome guy.

Last edited by VisualEchos; 03-11-2016 at 11:18 AM.
Old 03-11-2016 | 11:21 AM
  #22  
DarkTower19's Avatar
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 676
Likes: 228
From: Bucks County, PA
Originally Posted by 202009
Is this the one? Is $150 a fair price?


SPC Rear Camber Kit Full Set 67095 Pair | eBay
^^yes that is it and that price seems about right.
Old 03-11-2016 | 11:39 AM
  #23  
Oh Sickest TL's Avatar
Jeff
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 5,728
Likes: 816
From: Port City, New Brunswick Canada
you can get the whole shebang at heeltoe , front and both rear kits
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flipster23
Norcal
262
05-04-2023 03:47 PM
jamestheunderdog
3G TL (2004-2008)
12
10-23-2016 07:38 PM
yonimation
Car Parts for Sale
26
04-14-2016 12:37 AM
Skier4lyfe303
Car Parts for Sale
7
02-18-2016 02:23 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:25 PM.