XM sounds like crap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 12:46 AM
  #1  
Grinch80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
XM sounds like crap

XM sounds muffled, all low/mid range, no high end. Sounds like it cuts out at 12-14 kHz. Under the same EQ settings, all other inputs sound fine.

Any ideas?
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 01:08 AM
  #2  
wasupdog's Avatar
My Garage not
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 4
From: Westsiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide
yea, this is the "problems and fixes" sub-forum and yea, this is a problem. no, there is no fix other than adjusting the eq on the stereo unit.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2007 | 01:49 AM
  #3  
Grinch80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
That's clear enough, thanks. I'm not all that impressed with XM programming (except for O&A), and with the crappy sound, it's a no-brainer for me not to continue my 3 month promo.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #4  
KeithL's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,172
Likes: 740
From: Atlanta, GA
Welcome to XM, I had Sirius for a while and found their sound quality to be somewhat better, cleaner and clearer, unfortunatley their signal sucked and I woudl get drop out all the time.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #5  
dampfnudel's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
It's definitely not worth the "regular" price. Maybe HD radio will be better.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 09:04 PM
  #6  
Grinch80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
You guys have probably been over this already, but...

I did some digging and it appears XM is severly bandwidth limited. Quantity over quality I suppose.

Since XM doesn't publish its bitrates, most folks are speculating 48-96 kbps per channel (good enough for spoken broadcasts, certainly not for music). And I don't care how good the compression is at these bitrates.

So I tested with my iPod over AUX. Even 128 kbps sounded a tad muffled, whereas 192 kbps sounded great. Both of my tests employed AAC; no idea what compression XM uses.

All subjective of course, but I still can't get over how bad XM actually sounds. No wonder why its merging to stay alive...if the fidelity was high, you'd have audiophiles flocking to pay $13/month.

I'm just glad, as a new owner, that it's not my TL at fault.
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
Grinch80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Intermediate
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Grinch80
So I tested with my iPod over AUX. Even 128 kbps sounded a tad muffled, whereas 192 kbps sounded great.
P.S. I could not tell a difference between 192 AAC and lossless with the stock TL stereo. Which is good since I only have 8GB storage (less actually) with my nano.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlody
5G TLX (2015-2020)
85
Dec 4, 2019 02:11 PM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
Nov 15, 2015 05:52 PM
blacktsxwagon
5G TLX (2015-2020)
42
Oct 27, 2015 10:12 PM
xsilverhawkx
2G TL Problems & Fixes
4
Oct 5, 2015 11:00 AM
hashbrown
4G TL (2009-2014)
2
Sep 29, 2015 12:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:11 AM.