The Ultimate Cooling Mod

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2009, 10:46 AM
  #121  
2007 A-Spec Type S
iTrader: (5)
 
ReplayMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 51
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^^^yeah...cut up the cowl and insert some mesh grill.
Old 08-17-2009, 01:28 PM
  #122  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts



This is not the only drain holes (one per side) as I had originally thought. To test, I placed tape over this hole to block it. As quickly as I could, I poured a gallon of water from a pail into the gutter. The water rushed to the ground as fast I dumped it in. So, the gutter is able to drain water at a flow rate of at least one gallon per second (massive) per side. Obviously, there is a large crevice within the gutter/fender mating area.

I am no longer worried that a few leaves will plug-up the drain holes.

As suggested by "FlacoJ", a wire mesh over the gutter would help appearance and to prevent leaves from possibly plugging the drain. A course mesh, not a fine mesh, would need to be used. If the mesh was too fine, the water would flow across (as opposed to flow into) the fine mesh and enter the engine bay.
Old 08-20-2009, 11:52 AM
  #123  
Advanced
 
MDXin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tonight I am relocating my air filter to the inside of my car right next to my AC vent.
Old 08-20-2009, 11:59 AM
  #124  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by MDXin
Tonight I am relocating my air filter to the inside of my car right next to my AC vent.
LOL. You joke but I've seen some ricers in a civic with a CAI pipe routed through the passenger window with an airfilter on the end. I guess they've never heard an intake backfire. Certain to cause temporary hearing loss.
Old 08-20-2009, 01:00 PM
  #125  
Advanced
 
MDXin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't put it past someone to rig up the AC to cool the IM
Old 08-20-2009, 01:16 PM
  #126  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Better than that....just run a duct tube from the primary A/C discharge and feed the A/C output (duct tube) directly into the CAI pipe opening.

Anyone know the CFM rating of our HVAC ?


NOTE - This reply is meant as 100% joking.
Old 08-20-2009, 01:41 PM
  #127  
Advanced
 
MDXin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sounds like a SC and intercooler all in one!
Old 08-20-2009, 02:43 PM
  #128  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
We used to have a kit that submersed the stock intercooler in water that was constantly cooled using the AC compressor. It never caught on.

I would be willing to be the HVAC flows a good 200CFM. I doubt it would make up for the compressor drag.
Old 08-20-2009, 03:29 PM
  #129  
Racer
 
FlacoJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Behind the wheel
Posts: 358
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a short ram intake and no front lip, I’m thinking of fabbing up an under car spoiler from aluminum flashing, to scavenge the air from under the car and force it into the engine bay and the short ram intake with removed resonator. This should provide more high speed stability because air will not have as much pressure under the car, and it will force air into the engine bay, but i wonder if the drag coefficient out weighs the benefits, the reason why it might be worse than a front lip is because it traps the air against the engine and firewall with no where to really go causing more drag than a lip attached to the front bumper any input? On whether this cooling mod would be useful or just a debris catching shovel, I wasn’t going to make it hang any lower than my Cusco tie bar, suggestions, Constructive criticism, or plain ol complaining is welcome
Old 08-20-2009, 03:41 PM
  #130  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
From what you describe, I don't think drag would be an issue. I doubt that you do too much 120+ mph driving. Drag is more of an issue as speeds get up in that range.

The scoop would probably induce some helpful air circulation to help remove some of that hot air. Doubt the circulation would reach into the upper parts of the compartment. Doubt that the volume of fresh air would be enough to help. Plus as you mention, there is still no exit.

I would say it is worth a try. The benefits will not be nowhere near to the benefits of The Ultimate Cooling Mod (UCM)..... but, I can see some small benefit from the scoop.
Old 08-20-2009, 05:20 PM
  #131  
Drifting
iTrader: (13)
 
dwb993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Shrewsbury, PA
Age: 59
Posts: 2,957
Received 209 Likes on 170 Posts
OK
4 pages of great info, but where is the best place to take a dremel tool to the cowling to reap the benefits of the UCM?
Old 08-20-2009, 10:33 PM
  #132  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
The hack of the oem plastic cowl is looking like a no-go. The cowl is designed to really hug the hood. If the plastic was cut to open up the gap, there is little remaining of the original cowl. If we attempt to leave sufficient parts of the cowl in place, the gap is too small to be effective as an "ultimate cooling mod".
Old 08-21-2009, 12:52 AM
  #133  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
2 square holes on the hood, 2 scoops, call it a day
if u look underneath the hood, you will see where im talking about, the center squares which are surrounded by the hoods framing.

i dont have heatsoaking issues, with 9.7:1 compression
with the AC runing, in 90+ heat, full of humidity, it pulls off idle as if it was at 2500 rpm
Old 08-21-2009, 06:59 AM
  #134  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by Opel
2 square holes on the hood, 2 scoops, call it a day
if u look underneath the hood, you will see where im talking about, the center squares which are surrounded by the hoods framing.
Oh, you mean like this (yep, I did my homework) !

DIY: Vented Aluminum Hood (click here)










Old 08-21-2009, 09:29 AM
  #135  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
there ya go...similar to that
Old 08-21-2009, 09:44 AM
  #136  
Ryan Christopher
 
Black_05_TL_6SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Alabama
Age: 47
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Oh, you mean like this (yep, I did my homework) !

DIY: Vented Aluminum Hood (click here)










As usual, I can not see your images. But from the link you provided, you should try this one. It is only the back.



As for ours, there are a few possibilities if you wanted to do this.

Old 08-21-2009, 09:53 AM
  #137  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
^^^^^^i know there is...im close to hacking away....Innaccurate stopped me when i mentioned this, before he started the thread lol he said i have something better for you, so i says ok, and put my sawzall down lol
Old 08-21-2009, 02:27 PM
  #138  
Three Wheelin'
 
BukvaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Bergen, NJ
Age: 41
Posts: 1,670
Received 53 Likes on 36 Posts
what are the consequences by removing the cowl completely ?? besides that its gonna look ugly and no more spray nozzles. Can it be driven in rain safely ??
Old 08-21-2009, 03:00 PM
  #139  
Drifting
iTrader: (13)
 
dwb993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Shrewsbury, PA
Age: 59
Posts: 2,957
Received 209 Likes on 170 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
The hack of the oem plastic cowl is looking like a no-go. The cowl is designed to really hug the hood. If the plastic was cut to open up the gap, there is little remaining of the original cowl. If we attempt to leave sufficient parts of the cowl in place, the gap is too small to be effective as an "ultimate cooling mod".
Isn't any gap better than no gap at all?
I just do not have the cojones to take a saw to my hood.
Old 08-21-2009, 03:25 PM
  #140  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by dwb993
Isn't any gap better than no gap at all?
I just do not have the cojones to take a saw to my hood.
Don't take a saw...take a dremel! Lol
Old 08-21-2009, 03:53 PM
  #141  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Just to clarify -

The Ultimate Cooling Mod does NOT involve cutting the hood !!!

Please read the opening post (Post #1) for details.

The pics above of the cut hood was just us discussing what some other folks have done on other forums.
Old 08-21-2009, 04:03 PM
  #142  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by dwb993
Isn't any gap better than no gap at all?
I looked closely at the plastic cowl. It is shaped very awkwardly. The shape has many contours that hug the hood in many places. A person might be able to drill a series of holes along the length of the cowl, but I am not comfortable recommending this approach. I think that the series of holes would not allow enough volume of air to flow pass the cowl.

Originally Posted by dwb993
I just do not have the cojones to take a saw to my hood.
Don't cut the hood. The Ultimate Cooling Mod is NOT about cutting the hood. The UCM involves removing the cowl, and that's all. NO CUT HOODS.
Old 08-21-2009, 05:44 PM
  #143  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Relax man...I know what it involves and what it doesn't...lol... I choose to turn my hood into swiss cheese
Old 08-21-2009, 07:29 PM
  #144  
Advanced
 
hatchconversion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
this has been around for a while. Didnt know the tl had that type of problem semi factory... If you wanted to keep the cowl but raise the latches on the hood a half inch it will not look as ugly but create a smoother transition and the gap wont be 3 inches by no means but it will help.

just another idea
Old 08-21-2009, 09:18 PM
  #145  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Opel,

LOL. Sorry, that comment was not directed at you. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

People like to speed-read and/or read just the most recent page. People are already jumping to the conclusion that this UCM involves a cut hood. So, I made the bold, bright-colored text to catch the attention of these speed-readers.

BTW - did you really perform the swiss cheese mod? If so, got any pics.
Old 08-21-2009, 10:44 PM
  #146  
Three Wheelin'
 
HQTL6SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Spring TX
Age: 37
Posts: 1,329
Received 27 Likes on 21 Posts
Those s2000 hoods look pretty good! Even if it is effective, I'm not too sure it would look as good on a TL due to the way beams are sectioned from underneath...

Guess there's only one way to know for sure!
Old 08-21-2009, 11:04 PM
  #147  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by hatchconversion
If you wanted to keep the cowl but raise the latches on the hood a half inch it will not look as ugly but create a smoother transition and the gap wont be 3 inches by no means but it will help.
Hey..... it's not ugly. It's just "special".


Here is some reading for anyone interested in the Hood Spacers.

(Please remember that the Ultimate Cooling Mod has a much, much bigger gap than these hood spacers)

NEW: 06+ Civic CorSport Aluminum Hood Spacer Bushings (click here)
DIY - Installing Corsport Hood Spacers (click here)
DIY: $3.57 Hood Spacers (click here)
hood spacers or no hood spacers? (click here)
hood spacers. let me know what you think (click here)
Old 08-22-2009, 01:30 PM
  #148  
Drifting
iTrader: (13)
 
dwb993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Shrewsbury, PA
Age: 59
Posts: 2,957
Received 209 Likes on 170 Posts
Just to clarify, I have been reading the whole thread very carefully.
The hood mods look great on the S2K, but I just don't think that is the right way to go for me.
The cowl, on the other hand, would be the way to go, both to maintain the stock appearance and functionality of the washer jets. Just looking for some more data on temperature reduction without removing the whole thing.
I will stay tuned to this thread. Thanks for your efforts and sharing your results.
Old 08-24-2009, 12:10 AM
  #149  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Opel,

LOL. Sorry, that comment was not directed at you. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

People like to speed-read and/or read just the most recent page. People are already jumping to the conclusion that this UCM involves a cut hood. So, I made the bold, bright-colored text to catch the attention of these speed-readers.

BTW - did you really perform the swiss cheese mod? If so, got any pics.
ahahah its ok man i knew where it came from...sorry im confusing ur fans lol...

i haven't made the swiss cheese mod yet...right now im still toasting the bread lol
Old 08-24-2009, 06:49 AM
  #150  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Fans???? Haha..... not very supportive fans. No one has even stepped-up to do this mod. I had a PM from someone that said that they did the UCM mod. I asked that person to please post an opinion (good or bad) on how well the UCM worked for him. Still waiting...

But, yes I have "fans"..... Fans of "Shock and awe"

My fans faithfully read my threads because they are guaranteed to receive "shock and awe".
Old 08-24-2009, 09:14 AM
  #151  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Fans???? Haha..... not very supportive fans. No one has even stepped-up to do this mod. I had a PM from someone that said that they did the UCM mod. I asked that person to please post an opinion (good or bad) on how well the UCM worked for him. Still waiting...

But, yes I have "fans"..... Fans of "Shock and awe"

My fans faithfully read my threads because they are guaranteed to receive "shock and awe".
Believe it or not I read your thread very closely for the 3rd time when I was doing weight reduction on the GN a few months ago. Different car, yes, but the ideas are the same and I managed to get nearly 300lbs out of it to bring it to 3,000lbs even. I never would've thought of half the stuff I did on my own. So I owe you a thanks.
Old 08-24-2009, 09:35 AM
  #152  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Ok, so I do have *one* fan.

IHC - Seriously, I am happy to see that Acurazine has returned something to you in return for all of your time that you contribute to us.
Old 08-24-2009, 11:00 AM
  #153  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by BukvaMan
what are the consequences by removing the cowl completely ?? besides that its gonna look ugly and no more spray nozzles. Can it be driven in rain safely ??
What are the consequences by removing the cowl completely? Your underhood temps will be no existent (same as weather temps) and you won't loss power in the summer heat. Oh, you mean what are the disadvantages. Here are the disadvantages/compromises as I see them -

* No windshield washer.
* No fresh air option for your climate control (Recirculate only...or windows slightly lowered).
* Unattractive appearance when standing beside the car. However, it is not visible to other drivers on the road.
* Small risk of water entering thru the fresh-air inlet if not adequately sealed closed.

Since having the UCM, I have driven thru several heavy rain storms. The heaviest was thru 10 miles of very heavy rain. On the freeway, all traffic was doing 40 mph with wipers on "high". This was a non-stop intense downpour for 10 miles.

There has been no problems with the removed cowl. The engine compartment was completely dry after each episode. I did see a few drops of water sitting on top of the tape (red arrow in pic below). This means that the water, to some extent (?), could be blown/splattered into the exposed opening. Be sure to close-off this opening (red dashed line in pic below). I currently have just tape covering the opening. I plan to make a lid (cut to fit from some material?), paint it flat black, and affix the lid with sealant over this opening.






The UCM's ugliness is not too noticeable with the hood closed. Someone needs to be standing right next to the windshield to see it. The wipers camouflage the opening too.






Old 08-28-2009, 06:59 PM
  #154  
Cruisin'
 
luiscon14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Monterrey, MX
Age: 39
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dave_B
No matter what fancy steps you take reduce heat soak and loss of power in hot summer temps, the TRUE underlying reason why power diminishes in the warmer temps is a thing called density altitude or DA. In a nutshell, hot air is less dense than cold air. The more humid the air, the less available O2. The lower the barometric pressure, the less o2 that naturally gets pushed into the motor. On a humid (50%) 90 degree day in Kansas City (1100' above sea level) with 29.9 baro pressure (typical), the density altitude conditions are in the 4000' range or essentially sucking out about 10% of the available power compared to "standard conditions" at sea level. On a dry (30% humidity) and cold (40 degree) day, the DA is right around sea conditions (ie negating the true elevation of Kansas City).

DA is out of your control. You can wrap your intake pipes, add silly plastic spacers to your intake manifolds, ice the intake manifold, but the reality is the motor is going to heat soak in stop and go traffic. You can't stop heat soak in warm weather. You can slow down the heat soak process by a few minutes, but that's the best you're going to get. If you're on the highway, heat soak won't be as much as issue because a lot of air is moving through the engine bay. Hook up an OBDII datalogger and read the air intake sensor values. You'll see what I'm talking about. Also, hot compression chambers (ie block/heads) with a cold air charge create the most power and are the most efficent. Not a cool engine with hot summer air.

Yanking and cutting all these parts off the car really hasn't improved the motors ability to shed heat and has most likely increased drag. Those lower bumper ducts are designed to funnel air to the raditator, tranny cooler, and AC cooler. Apparently you didn't know that. Now you've made a setup that makes the incoming air turbulent and not directed towards probably the most critcal components of a car. I'd strongly reconsider this modification.

These fenderwell CAIs are silly as well. Do you guys not realize that ambient temps at near street surfaces approach 130+ degrees on 90+ degree days? Expose the filter like Inaccurate did and now you open up the potential for all sort of debris to pummel and lodge itself in the filter media. The OEM intakes on your cars, while quiet, are very efficent and become pressurized at speed due to the location and the way the ducting is shaped. More importantly, the air brought in is ambient and not as influenced by street temps. I have yet to see anyone post a 3rd party dyno of a CAI either. From what I can tell, everyone is apparently buying these things based on what the aftermarket companies say and the incorrect notion that the OEM intake is restrictive because it's "ugly". It's so far from the truth.

I'm all for Shade Tree mods, but sometimes you need to step back and research and understand why highly paid engineers do the things they do.
You are absolutely right!

I'm a private pilot, and for the plane throttle and fuel efficiency all depends on outside air conditions (Pressure, Density, Temperature, Humidity, all of them dependes on the altitude).

Want more power and cooler ride, go live on a high altitude city with temperatures around 60ºF and not much rain or near to the beach. The dryer, the cooler, the higher, the better.
Old 08-28-2009, 10:49 PM
  #155  
runnin a little boost
iTrader: (3)
 
Hi speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,227
Received 255 Likes on 207 Posts
Originally Posted by luiscon14
You are absolutely right!

I'm a private pilot, and for the plane throttle and fuel efficiency all depends on outside air conditions (Pressure, Density, Temperature, Humidity, all of them dependes on the altitude).

Want more power and cooler ride, go live on a high altitude city with temperatures around 60ºF and not much rain or near to the beach. The dryer, the cooler, the higher, the better.
Isn't the air less dence the higher in altitude you go, everything else sounds right.
Old 08-29-2009, 08:45 AM
  #156  
Three Wheelin'
 
ChucksCL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Millersville, Md.
Posts: 1,649
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by luiscon14
You are absolutely right!

I'm a private pilot, and for the plane throttle and fuel efficiency all depends on outside air conditions (Pressure, Density, Temperature, Humidity, all of them dependes on the altitude).

Want more power and cooler ride, go live on a high altitude city with temperatures around 60ºF and not much rain or near to the beach. The dryer, the cooler, the higher, the better.
Close. For more power you want LOW altitude for better cylinder filling. This is because barometric pressure is higher at low altitudes, i.e. the weight of the atmosphere from the ground up. I say it is lower, cooler and dryer for maximum power. The higher the better in aircraft terms refers I think to safety AND performance; higher is cooler and the air is less dense which helps add speed but altitude also gives glide time in case of engine failure.
Old 08-30-2009, 09:18 PM
  #157  
practicing nihilist
 
NedShneebly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
the less dense air at higher altitudes produces less drag, also. it's easier for planes to move faster through the air but lower density means less efficient combustion. Props & helicopters also don't get as big a bite of air at higher altitudes, which is why helicopters generally have pretty low density altitude limits except for the over-powered rigs, like Chinooks.

good refresher
Old 08-30-2009, 09:37 PM
  #158  
Three Wheelin'
 
Opel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 42
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 33 Posts
i thought an airplane (gas powered turbines) makes its own atmospheric pressure, and isn't affected by altitude, like a fuel injected NA motor does...same thing applies to turbo applications, they're not affected by altitude the way a NA application is, since they generate their own "pressure"

now temp is a whole different issue.
Old 08-30-2009, 10:06 PM
  #159  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by Opel
i thought an airplane (gas powered turbines) makes its own atmospheric pressure, and isn't affected by altitude, like a fuel injected NA motor does...same thing applies to turbo applications, they're not affected by altitude the way a NA application is, since they generate their own "pressure"

now temp is a whole different issue.
Turbo cars aren't as effected but they still lose a little power at high altitudes. Only reason is the pressure differential goes up for the same boost level so the turbo works harder, the same as if it were making more boost at sea level and heats the air a little more.
Old 08-30-2009, 10:19 PM
  #160  
practicing nihilist
 
NedShneebly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Jax, FL
Posts: 990
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
never heard of jet turbine engines making their own "pressure". The reduction in performance at altitude due to air density is negligible when compared to the aerodynamic benefit. Jet's go high when they want to cruise and save gas.

Helo's (not sure about props) suffer from lack of performance and lack of air to push at altitude.


Quick Reply: The Ultimate Cooling Mod



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12 PM.