Ported/Polished Upper Intake Manifold and Runners!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2012, 12:14 PM
  #881  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ turbulence....

it will happen if you have the MDX spacer....i feel the same way.....the MDX spacer adds some low end torque but you loose high end TQ....its a better idea to take the MDX spacer out if you have everything pnp-ed....

i will be dyno-ing with and without the spacer for some concrete proofs....i might ask Keith to ship me his spacer as well to further confirm how much gains you make when stock and with a spacer in there....
Old 03-19-2012, 12:45 PM
  #882  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
^ I seee. This is also why I don't port the lower runners to match the gasket that goes on the head. There will be a fat ass lip that is 2-4mm thick that will also cause turbulence since not everyone is willing to port the head to make the gasket.
Old 03-19-2012, 12:58 PM
  #883  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ yes....i have that area just polished and not ported as well....

when i will be pnp-ing my heads, will match them with the runners.....
Old 03-19-2012, 01:30 PM
  #884  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
^ nice are you planing to do a 5 angle head job also? You should consider doing oversize valve and bench flowing it since you will have the J&R ecu to fine tune everything
Old 03-19-2012, 02:28 PM
  #885  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts


get on my build thread
Old 03-19-2012, 03:40 PM
  #886  
Racer
 
MayorMcCheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North Jersey
Age: 34
Posts: 366
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
I thought it was the turbulence .. its nothing bad but ive noticed it a couple of times the past few times i went WOT at higher speeds.. i had though putting it 89 octane instead of 87 to help the issue but i dont think the cleaner gas will help unless i use 93 which my engine doesnt require unless im tuned
Old 03-19-2012, 03:43 PM
  #887  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ i would stick to what your car says....87 or 93.....

on a side note, try running seafoam in your vac port and in your gas tank when its nearly empty
Old 03-19-2012, 03:49 PM
  #888  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
Originally Posted by swoosh


get on my build thread
im lazy and last time I was there you guys were talking about chairs.
Old 03-19-2012, 04:04 PM
  #889  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ hahah yeah....gotta lighten that weight and then add some ponies....

i just spoke with KMS again and might get a hookup for couple people in AZINE !!!
Old 03-19-2012, 04:20 PM
  #890  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
haha you guys are crazy. lol I would never gut my car kinda want to keep it sleeper, and pack 4 other girls in the car. muahah
Old 03-19-2012, 04:34 PM
  #891  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ am married bro....so cant do that no more....hence took the shit out

btw:

WHO WANTS RACE HEADS FROM KMS ENGINEERING ??? RACE HEAD WILL BE GOOD FOR ~50WHP AND WILL INCLUDE:

Extreme Port Job - 5 angle intake 3 angle exhaust
Glass Bead
Fly Cut Head
Valve Job
Gasket Matched
Valves Lightened
New Radius on Valves
Extreme Reshaping of Valves
Dual Titanium Race Springs
Titanium retainers
Black Nitride Valves
Custom Cam setup so it wont be as lopey
Decked head by flycutting it, you can get increased compression if you will

If interested PM me....

PS: this is not a group buy....i spoke to KMS engineering and they said they can hook us up if I get them couple people.....so i will save $$$ and so will you
Old 03-19-2012, 04:42 PM
  #892  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
^ I pm you and no kids? No more back seat for the baby recaro seats. lol
Old 03-19-2012, 04:45 PM
  #893  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ i am quick....pm-ed you back LOL

and no plans of kid as of now....and i dont wanna shatter the kids bones by taking em for a ride in my car LOL....too many vibrations from the engine mounts LOL....

but yeah wifey has a lexus es300 sedan so kids will go in there....and when we have kids might get a suv/minivan depending if my parents are here
Old 03-19-2012, 09:14 PM
  #894  
Burning Brakes
 
BostonSilverTypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Bean
Age: 42
Posts: 836
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by MayorMcCheese
I thought it was the turbulence .. its nothing bad but ive noticed it a couple of times the past few times i went WOT at higher speeds.. i had though putting it 89 octane instead of 87 to help the issue but i dont think the cleaner gas will help unless i use 93 which my engine doesnt require unless im tuned
def stick with 93octane!!! anything lower and you are probable knocking like crazy!!!! our motors stock have knock from factory!!! espicially the 3.5L. Don't know how much more different the accord 3.5L is tune wise from factory compared to TL-S but TL-S with it's 11:5:1 compression doesnt like anything lower than 93!! I went to Maine and all they had was 91octane and it was not happy about it
Old 03-20-2012, 07:50 AM
  #895  
Instructor
 
flexer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 42
Posts: 174
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by BostonSilverTypeS
def stick with 93octane!!! anything lower and you are probable knocking like crazy!!!! our motors stock have knock from factory!!! espicially the 3.5L. Don't know how much more different the accord 3.5L is tune wise from factory compared to TL-S but TL-S with it's 11:5:1 compression doesnt like anything lower than 93!! I went to Maine and all they had was 91octane and it was not happy about it
He has an accord though which were tuned for 87.
The following users liked this post:
BostonSilverTypeS (03-20-2012)
Old 03-20-2012, 08:07 AM
  #896  
Chapter Leader (NY/NJ)
iTrader: (10)
 
InFaMouSLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rahway, NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,596
Received 187 Likes on 147 Posts
Originally Posted by flexer
He has an accord though which were DEtuned for 87.

fixed.
The following 2 users liked this post by InFaMouSLink:
BostonSilverTypeS (03-20-2012), Inaccurate (03-20-2012)
Old 03-20-2012, 08:48 AM
  #897  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
^ Good one InFaMouSLink
The following users liked this post:
InFaMouSLink (03-20-2012)
Old 03-20-2012, 03:28 PM
  #898  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Lol oh snap! The 8G Accords are a bit faster than the Type S though stock for stock. Interesting considering the difference in CR.
Old 03-20-2012, 05:57 PM
  #899  
Burning Brakes
 
BostonSilverTypeS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: The Bean
Age: 42
Posts: 836
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by flexer
He has an accord though which were tuned for 87.
ok got you...that makes sense....but I would still keep 87octane out of my tank just my



@ sonnick

yeah they are pretty sweet I almost considered trading my TL-S for a 8g Accord 6mt coupe......they look so damn good!!!
Old 03-20-2012, 09:00 PM
  #900  
Chapter Leader (NY/NJ)
iTrader: (10)
 
InFaMouSLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rahway, NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,596
Received 187 Likes on 147 Posts
Dont mind the wheel hop.It was part of the test..check out the chirp to 4th tho. Still n/a...


Old 03-20-2012, 09:15 PM
  #901  
Chapter Leader (NY/NJ)
iTrader: (10)
 
InFaMouSLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rahway, NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,596
Received 187 Likes on 147 Posts
Took it easy on first gear.
Old 03-20-2012, 09:47 PM
  #902  
Chapter Leader (NY/NJ)
iTrader: (10)
 
InFaMouSLink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Rahway, NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 2,596
Received 187 Likes on 147 Posts
E-cutout open 2nd gear start from 20mph roll

www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKfaI5Vir1A
Old 03-21-2012, 12:05 AM
  #903  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
damn Alex....you quick
Old 03-21-2012, 07:13 AM
  #904  
Racer
 
Atlas.46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: York, PA
Posts: 392
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
ok back to the turbulence with the mdx spacer. Do you think that you will have turbulence running an ported/polished intake manifold, taper bored/polished spacer, and stock runners?

Since I already order the mdx spacer im going to use it. So I was thinking that with wanting to get the intake manifold ported and polished, why not also have the mdx spacer ported/polished on the intake manifold side and taper to the stock intake runners. Also would want to have the gasket between the spacer and manifold bored to match the port work.

Do you guys think this will remove some of, maybe all the turbulence ? Im about to start looking for another intake manifold soon. Also when this happens I plan to do the coolant bypass on the TB.
Old 03-21-2012, 11:44 AM
  #905  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
I still think that you will lose some top end. You saw cubano dyno on . he gain tq but lost top end since the power band shifted more to the left *lower rpm to mid range*
Old 03-21-2012, 11:54 AM
  #906  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ bro can you find me the dyno....so i wont waste time and money trying to reinvent the wheel ???
Old 03-21-2012, 11:56 AM
  #907  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
You will gain low/midrange with the spacer but lose top end. As ^ said, Paul has confirmed dyno results.
Old 03-21-2012, 12:06 PM
  #908  
Racer
 
Atlas.46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: York, PA
Posts: 392
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
has anyone ported the mdx spacer before?
Old 03-21-2012, 12:17 PM
  #909  
Burning Brakes
 
callahan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Age: 35
Posts: 990
Received 73 Likes on 71 Posts
swoosh has, I believe he said he get turbulence/ loses power with it installed. He has yet to prove it but plans on dyno with and without the spacer. At least I think he said he pnped it. lol
Old 03-21-2012, 12:51 PM
  #910  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas.46
has anyone ported the mdx spacer before?
yes, i have the MDX spacer bored as callahan mentioned.....its 46.xmm in diameter as compared to the stock 44.xmm....

Originally Posted by callahan
swoosh has, I believe he said he get turbulence/ loses power with it installed. He has yet to prove it but plans on dyno with and without the spacer. At least I think he said he pnped it. lol
True words !!!

i have been procrastinating the dyno but i know i need to do it with and without the spacer !!!.....

this spacer might come in handy after you do cams work as with the cams you loose low end TQ and gain massive high end and the spacer might counter the low end losses....
Old 03-21-2012, 01:07 PM
  #911  
Racer
 
Atlas.46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: York, PA
Posts: 392
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
didnt know your spacer was ported...
Old 03-21-2012, 01:42 PM
  #912  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ Spacer + P2R Gaskets sandwiching it !!!
Old 03-21-2012, 04:16 PM
  #913  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
wtf who deleted my post!!! At least PM telling me why!!!

Here the dyno agian



here the question asked on. Removed the red X

http://vX6perXformanceX.net/forums/7g-performance-discussion/212842-mdx-spacer-ported-polished-runners.html
The following users liked this post:
swoosh (03-21-2012)
Old 03-21-2012, 04:46 PM
  #914  
takin care of Business in
iTrader: (5)
 
swoosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kansas City, MO
Age: 40
Posts: 30,994
Received 4,732 Likes on 4,064 Posts
^^^ ahhh 5WTQ low end or 4 WHP top end hmm
Old 03-21-2012, 05:01 PM
  #915  
Pro
iTrader: (7)
 
gwiffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: KS
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 39 Posts
WHP accelerates the car. It looks like 2-3WHP is gained between 3500 and 6000 RPM...not worth the time or expense.
Old 03-21-2012, 05:17 PM
  #916  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
Originally Posted by swoosh
^^^ ahhh 5WTQ low end or 4 WHP top end hmm
You guys worry too much about peak number. look at mid range its almost 10 ft/lbs. Dont tell me you drive at redline 24/7
Old 03-21-2012, 05:49 PM
  #917  
B A N N E D
 
phatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 34
Posts: 229
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by thisaznboi88
You guys worry too much about peak number. look at mid range its almost 10 ft/lbs. Dont tell me you drive at redline 24/7
Yes but when you do a run, where do you sit the most in gears? Above 5k, close to redline. I'm sure most of these people do these mods to be quicker than other cars that WILL run them on the street. It's a hard choice to make cause you either have a quicker launch & lower gear pull, or more pull once the power evens out.
Old 03-21-2012, 06:05 PM
  #918  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
How often do you run someone? Not 24/7 I hope. How about running someone from a dig as in in a track setting? Think about this when your shifting from red where does the RPM drop to? Tq keeps the acceleration going, HP helps with faster speed as in MPH.

http://www.houseofthud.com/cartech/t...horsepower.htm

also take into account gear ratio. On some car changing the gear ratio makes the car extremely fast.

Last edited by thisaznboi88; 03-21-2012 at 06:08 PM.
Old 03-21-2012, 07:56 PM
  #919  
B A N N E D
 
phatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Age: 34
Posts: 229
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
Yea but you know these people aren't putting these mods in so they can be fast ALL the time. They're doing it specifically for the case in the event that they do run someone. As said before, running from a dig is different and WILL benefit from this.

Now put it this way.

60mph, 3rd gear, starting at 3k -> redline -> shift -> 5.5k.

Isn't that all high end HP?

Not trying to be difficult just proving a point. I thought low end torque would be beneficial too, cause thats where the car is the most sluggish, but in a sense when you do redline pulls it's not often you are in that range. Just the starting gear. You know?
Old 03-21-2012, 09:02 PM
  #920  
Safety Car
iTrader: (7)
 
thisaznboi88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Jose, CA/ Charleston, WV
Posts: 4,045
Received 619 Likes on 459 Posts
^ but if that the case. Then wouldn't you have more power with the MDX spacer since there is an increase up in 5.5k which help the car pull. Your only losing the top top end power 6.3k to 6.7k?

Not trying to pick a fight but that the way I see it. You shift at red line yes, but the RPM drops and to where there is an increase from the MDX spacer that wasn't there without it. So in theory shouldn't it be faster? Its just like what the J&R ecu did when you swap the vtec cross over to 5k, but then again top end tq and hp kinda sucks. with the MDX spacer you started with Less top end tq then you did without it.

lol. damn decision decision decisions.


Quick Reply: Ported/Polished Upper Intake Manifold and Runners!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.