Kikazz Acura TL Type S Jandr Turbo Kit Transformation begins in 3 days 550 whp goal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2011, 07:20 AM
  #241  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
The original design dumps into the exhaust, that's what threw me. What are the advantages of going straight out?
Old 04-21-2011, 07:24 AM
  #242  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
What is the total cost so far?
Kikazz mentions 25K including the build. Not sure if it included Rodney going back again unexpectedly.
Old 04-21-2011, 07:51 AM
  #243  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
pass427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: florida
Age: 51
Posts: 769
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
As with kikazz build its hard to compare to his price build. ,reason is he was determined to reach his goal so on parts we recommended and didn't have as yet or tested he actually help and funded us on most of parts for his car ,no to mention quite a few overtime bac and fourth ,piston on rush order just a bunch of stuff.....

A quick break down turbo kit 5799+200 shipping
Minus 340 of total which takes aem fic out of equation
Ecu is 1395 shipped lowest cost we can offer
That above price will bring you to 420 whp pump gas...

Now to accommodate kikazz setup more attention and money is needed
Clutch 2000
Pistons est....1100
Rods est ....1100-1300
Full valvetrain......1175
Fuel return kit .....mm
Old 04-21-2011, 08:12 AM
  #244  
Pro
iTrader: (3)
 
bmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 619
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
I know there are going to be a lot of people looking at that sort of price tag and thinking that it's outrageous... But I can attest to the fact that reaching a goal like this (and beyond) is very, very expensive. There are things like rod & main bearings, gasket kits, timing belt kit, motor mounts, head bolts/studs... the list goes on and on and that's before you get to other performance items like bigger injectors, meth kit, head work, cams, tuning, etc...

One factor that plays big into the final price tag is just how much can you do yourself versus how much are you going to need to send out to a shop to have them do. The shop rate could be anywhere from $70/hr to $150/hr.

It all depends on what your end goals are. If you want to max out at 560, you could probably do it for less. But I have a feeling that we haven't yet seen the limit of the numbers this car is capable of pushing out.
Old 04-21-2011, 08:32 AM
  #245  
Safety Car
iTrader: (3)
 
KN_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Posts: 4,396
Received 435 Likes on 328 Posts
Even with moderate goals, it is an expensive task. I have done everything myself and have at least $10K into just the turbo project.

This doesn't include the wheels, tires and suspension upgrades purchased to support the increase in power.
Old 04-21-2011, 08:34 AM
  #246  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,261 Likes on 11,972 Posts
Good job to every one who contributed to this project.
Old 04-21-2011, 08:42 AM
  #247  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 38
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
gawd damn those videos are clutch. thanks for sharing them with us.

your TL is completely rowdy, i really admire the amount of work and dedication you and everyone involved has put into it. well done guys.

i'm getting even more interested in the new ECU, keep us posted on release dates for public. thanks.
Old 04-21-2011, 09:25 AM
  #248  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by bmeyer
I know there are going to be a lot of people looking at that sort of price tag and thinking that it's outrageous... But I can attest to the fact that reaching a goal like this (and beyond) is very, very expensive. There are things like rod & main bearings, gasket kits, timing belt kit, motor mounts, head bolts/studs... the list goes on and on and that's before you get to other performance items like bigger injectors, meth kit, head work, cams, tuning, etc...

One factor that plays big into the final price tag is just how much can you do yourself versus how much are you going to need to send out to a shop to have them do. The shop rate could be anywhere from $70/hr to $150/hr.

It all depends on what your end goals are. If you want to max out at 560, you could probably do it for less. But I have a feeling that we haven't yet seen the limit of the numbers this car is capable of pushing out.
That's exactly it. I think this TL has a LOT left in it and even if he never decides to push it to it's max, being overbuilt, it should be very reliable. They did things the correct way instead of an unreliable hack job.
Old 04-21-2011, 09:54 AM
  #249  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
pass427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: florida
Age: 51
Posts: 769
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
Originally Posted by SharksBreath
gawd damn those videos are clutch. thanks for sharing them with us.

your TL is completely rowdy, i really admire the amount of work and dedication you and everyone involved has put into it. well done guys.

i'm getting even more interested in the new ECU, keep us posted on release dates for public. thanks.
The wait is over for the manual guys wanting the ecu we are just in process of assembling the ecus so bmeyer and kntl are first on the list as they paid months in advanced to help us proceed with testing ,we will be testing the auto model next week as we do have a Tl types auto which will be receiving our turbo kit and ecu .......
Old 04-21-2011, 09:58 AM
  #250  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 38
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
^great news.

i'm in the A/T crowd so i'll be subscribed to this thread and future ones with info on this.

thanks.
Old 04-21-2011, 09:59 AM
  #251  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Age: 41
Posts: 15,510
Received 1,090 Likes on 767 Posts
sick work fellas... keep up the great work... revolutionizing the way ppl will look at the TL... especially some exotics on the road...
Old 04-22-2011, 09:01 PM
  #252  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
Would the new ECU do anything for a bolt on TL? Sorry for the newb question.
Old 04-22-2011, 09:05 PM
  #253  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
pass427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: florida
Age: 51
Posts: 769
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
Definetly will without changing vtec crossover and with primary cats in place we've seen 27+ whp and 35+ lb tq ....more usable power in low rpm range and power doesn't fall off as quick with new ecu
Old 04-22-2011, 09:10 PM
  #254  
Former Whiner
 
Souljah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,368
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
You can but it doesn't justify the price. There's no real parameters needing to be changed with basic NA setup.
Old 04-22-2011, 09:28 PM
  #255  
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
pass427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: florida
Age: 51
Posts: 769
Received 48 Likes on 26 Posts
Everyone is entitled to there own opinion but the ecu will be effective in any setup ,the ecu cost is very reasonable judging its all a plug and play unit all luxury functions still works drivebywire still in place pretuned map ,any real performance enthusias knows the power and ability to adjust parameters example instead of 250whp @6700 this is can be made at 5000 rpm ,making power where you drive car daily is one big difference which we've experience here at jandr ,the price was kept at lowest cost possible ,we didn't just price it because nothing is out there that's not the case as a matter a fact we understand why no one probably bother as car is quite a bit complicated and somewhat hard to keep.everything working ..
Old 04-22-2011, 09:44 PM
  #256  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
25 hp for 1k sounds like a good deal to me. That's peak power too. I'm sure the power curve is fatter all around!
Old 04-22-2011, 10:34 PM
  #257  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
With all of these new gains, I'm going to have to look the other way and ignore it if I see one of these turbo TLs in the GN lol.
Old 04-22-2011, 11:48 PM
  #258  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
anx1300c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: 633 Stag Trail Rd
Posts: 5,020
Received 930 Likes on 612 Posts
Originally Posted by Souljah
You can but it doesn't justify the price. There's no real parameters needing to be changed with basic NA setup.
How do you figure? Roughly the same price as a catback and intake combined, with much better gains. Personally though, I think I'll do cams and some porting first, and then see how I sit power-wise at that point.

Last edited by anx1300c; 04-22-2011 at 11:50 PM.
Old 04-23-2011, 01:05 AM
  #259  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
greco9885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: long island, new york
Age: 35
Posts: 2,587
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
forget the gains, i just want my car to stop running pig rich....
Old 04-23-2011, 09:08 AM
  #260  
Instructor
iTrader: (4)
 
TLdream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Age: 40
Posts: 248
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Souljah
You can but it doesn't justify the price. There's no real parameters needing to be changed with basic NA setup.

Please elaborate a little. There are so many poeple that spend close to $2k on an exhaust setup to gain 15-25 whp, how does spending $1400 to gain 27whp and 35 ft/lbs of torque not cost effective?
Old 04-23-2011, 09:14 AM
  #261  
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
SharksBreath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: baltimore
Age: 38
Posts: 10,054
Received 2,885 Likes on 1,784 Posts
Originally Posted by pass427
Definetly will without changing vtec crossover and with primary cats in place we've seen 27+ whp and 35+ lb tq ....more usable power in low rpm range and power doesn't fall off as quick with new ecu
alright so i'll admit it, i'm interested.

my 07 tl type-s is fully bolted. precats, jpipe, exhaust, etc...what will this new ECU do for me?

any testing been done on something like this yet? any more info you can give me?
Old 04-23-2011, 02:56 PM
  #262  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
Can't wait. You made me want to sell the Challenger I just got to build my TL to a 500whp reliable daily driver.
Old 04-23-2011, 04:56 PM
  #263  
Instructor
iTrader: (4)
 
TLdream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Age: 40
Posts: 248
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SharksBreath
alright so i'll admit it, i'm interested.

my 07 tl type-s is fully bolted. precats, jpipe, exhaust, etc...what will this new ECU do for me?

any testing been done on something like this yet? any more info you can give me?

I will update when i get mine in. I will let you know what it will do on a full bolt on 07 tl type s engine.
Old 04-23-2011, 05:09 PM
  #264  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
TLDream is Dallas far from Tulsa? If you get it done I don't mind meeting up in Dallas to see it.
Old 04-23-2011, 06:32 PM
  #265  
Instructor
iTrader: (4)
 
TLdream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tulsa, OK
Age: 40
Posts: 248
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
TLDream is Dallas far from Tulsa? If you get it done I don't mind meeting up in Dallas to see it.
dallas is about 4 1/2 hours from me. I will be in Dallas and Houston again later this year. I will be taking the car there to race. I dont mind meeting up.
Old 04-26-2011, 02:00 PM
  #266  
Pro
 
AtlM5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Age: 31
Posts: 525
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
It doesn't make 1001hp at the crank..if you research it the engineers think it makes closer to 2000 at the crank and i think 1200-1400 at the wheels
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
So youre telling me that the car has 300 more wheel horsepower than at the crank? Lol
Old 04-26-2011, 08:16 PM
  #267  
I got the Shifts
iTrader: (5)
 
phee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 35
Posts: 14,203
Received 230 Likes on 163 Posts
Originally Posted by AtlM5
It doesn't make 1001hp at the crank..if you research it the engineers think it makes closer to 2000 at the crank and i think 1200-1400 at the wheels
i think YOU should do some research. the Veyron makes 1001 Ps at the crank--thats about 987hp CRANK but they round it off...

your reasoning is way off.. 2000 crank hp and the car only puts down 1400 to the wheels? thats a 30-40% power loss....more than our TL's...

the stock veyron puts down a 10.4 quarter mile at 139 mph.
in a 4486lb car that translates to 788.22HP roughly using the following formula
Hp=(Weight) / ((ET/5.825)^3)

This leaves us with a more reasonable amount of powertrain loss of 21.28% using the 1001 crank hp figure and the 788hp estimated WHP using trap time.

if the veyron in fact made 1400whp it would run a 1/4 at about 8.5-9@14X-15xmph...a time NO veryron has put down.

bye bye now
Old 04-26-2011, 08:23 PM
  #268  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by phee
i think YOU should do some research. the Veyron makes 1001 Ps at the crank--thats about 987hp CRANK but they round it off...

your reasoning is way off.. 2000 crank hp and the car only puts down 1400 to the wheels? thats a 30-40% power loss....more than our TL's...

the stock veyron puts down a 10.4 quarter mile at 139 mph.
in a 4486lb car that translates to 788.22HP roughly using the following formula
Hp=(Weight) / ((ET/5.825)^3)

This leaves us with a more reasonable amount of powertrain loss of 21.28% using the 1001 crank hp figure and the 788hp estimated WHP using trap time.

if the veyron in fact made 1400whp it would run a 1/4 at about 8.5-9@14X-15xmph...a time NO veryron has put down.

bye bye now
All I know is this makes me happy as I should be able to beat one pretty bad with my current setup and 3,000lb curb weight.
Old 04-27-2011, 09:39 AM
  #269  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
All I know is this makes me happy as I should be able to beat one pretty bad with my current setup and 3,000lb curb weight.
Is that your most up-to-date run in your sig? If so, Idk since the Veyron traps 12mph more and ET is very similar. Either way I'd supposed it'd be a good run
Old 04-27-2011, 10:15 AM
  #270  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonnick
Is that your most up-to-date run in your sig? If so, Idk since the Veyron traps 12mph more and ET is very similar. Either way I'd supposed it'd be a good run
That was nearly 10 years ago with 100hp less and an extra 450lbs. Its never been to the track with the current combo. I know what it should run but until it runs the number its not worth mentioning.
Old 04-27-2011, 12:53 PM
  #271  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
So you haven't been to the track in 10 years? :o
Old 04-27-2011, 01:21 PM
  #272  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
That was nearly 10 years ago with 100hp less and an extra 450lbs. Its never been to the track with the current combo. I know what it should run but until it runs the number its not worth mentioning.
Thinking to myself.......

10.60
Less 450 lbs = Less 0.45 seconds
Extra 100 hp = Less 1.0 second

10.60 - 0.45 - 1.0 =
Old 04-27-2011, 02:07 PM
  #273  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,812 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
So you haven't been to the track in 10 years? :o
Nah, I had the same combo starting 10 years ago. Haven't been to the track in this car in around 4-5 years but I've been a few times a year in other peoples' rides. Current combo was done around 4 years ago. Never dyno'd it with the old combo, it's just a guess that it made around 500 to the wheels based on the 1/4 time.

Originally Posted by Inaccurate
Thinking to myself.......

10.60
Less 450 lbs = Less 0.45 seconds
Extra 100 hp = Less 1.0 second

10.60 - 0.45 - 1.0 =
Now if only I had the finances to get it back on the road to prove what it has been capable of for a long time. I think the ZR1 was the quickest stock street car I've ever run and it wasn't a close race but being on slicks it wasn't exactly a fair race. With the pressure on me to start a family soon, it may not happen for a very long time.
Old 04-27-2011, 10:42 PM
  #274  
www.colradodetail.com
 
Hondaforlife954's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aurora CO
Age: 41
Posts: 370
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by AckTL05
Running with FWD, all season tires and wheel hop breaks axels as well..
i think im going to start making crabon/glass fiber hybrid drive shafts. light and stronger than steel.... i think that would be sick!!!!
Old 04-27-2011, 10:44 PM
  #275  
www.colradodetail.com
 
Hondaforlife954's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aurora CO
Age: 41
Posts: 370
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
btw sick car man!!! someday ill buy another tl make it light and fast!! just for fun....when i become rich
Old 04-27-2011, 10:47 PM
  #276  
Drifting
iTrader: (1)
 
greco9885's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: long island, new york
Age: 35
Posts: 2,587
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Hondaforlife954
i think im going to start making crabon/glass fiber hybrid drive shafts. light and stronger than steel.... i think that would be sick!!!!
id love to see a drive shaft on a fwd car

half shafts are what you want, atleast thats what makes sense

Last edited by greco9885; 04-27-2011 at 10:52 PM.
Old 04-27-2011, 11:10 PM
  #277  
www.colradodetail.com
 
Hondaforlife954's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Aurora CO
Age: 41
Posts: 370
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by greco9885
id love to see a drive shaft on a fwd car

half shafts are what you want, atleast thats what makes sense
well ya.....lol
Old 04-28-2011, 10:30 AM
  #278  
All motor
 
Sonnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 3,530
Received 532 Likes on 395 Posts
Originally Posted by I hate cars
That was nearly 10 years ago with 100hp less and an extra 450lbs. Its never been to the track with the current combo. I know what it should run but until it runs the number its not worth mentioning.
Well in that case, I'd say the car is good for 9s. 450lb weight reduction, plus 100hp on an already 10 sec car....I'd guess around 9.6-9.7 @134-136. Damn, that's fast.
Old 04-30-2011, 02:16 AM
  #279  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
Is this 560+ WHP far-fetched for a Base TL?

Does the .3 liter makes that much of a difference?

The more and more I see the TL getting in the 400WHP and up zone, the more I want to save up my money and buy the T/C.
Old 04-30-2011, 02:36 AM
  #280  
Safety Car
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
Does the .3 liter makes that much of a difference?
There is an approx 10% difference.

The difference will be felt by the pistons, head gasket, and cylinder walls.

That is, the 3.2 will need to have approx 10% more cylinder pressure to equal the same output from a 3.5.

In other words, you will need to stress the 3.2 engine by 10% more than the 3.5 engine.

Another way of viewing it is as follows. If we assume both engines have the identical mechanical strength (in the cylinder walls, pistons, and head gasket), then the 3.2 will only be able to make 90% of the power compared to the 3.5 before failure occurred in either engine.

The following was a very simplistic explanation. Results in real life could differ. Science is tricky, meaning that this explanation does not take into considerations other aspects that could come into play.

Last edited by Inaccurate; 04-30-2011 at 02:40 AM.


Quick Reply: Kikazz Acura TL Type S Jandr Turbo Kit Transformation begins in 3 days 550 whp goal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 PM.