3 inch piping.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2008 | 11:18 PM
  #1  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
3 inch piping.

...On tuesday i'm going to try a custom 3 inch exhaust, single outlet.

I had always wanted to and on friday the opportunity came to the surface when the exhaust components decided to have a little negotiation with a manhole on my way to Wrightsville beach. In the small town of Wadesboro, the pavement was not complete, and there was a manhole sitting there waiting for me. It wasn't even that tall, maybe 2 or 3 inches. The school bus beside me at the time prevented me from merging lanes, so i decided to charge the manhole. The bumper cleared it, as usual, but this time the exhaust system decided otherwise. An intense BANG, and a loud exhaust note was the result. I was too scared!! haha. Thought maybe the oil pan was done for. Checked the gauges and nothing changed, so i pulled into a motel parking lot. Looked underneath and to my surprise the entire system from the j-pipe back was missing!! hehehe. I started laughing. Went around to the rear and the passenger side of the bumper had come out a little bit. Luckily the varis pieces were still intact. So off i go jogging back down the road to see where the exhaust system is sitting. I'm almost to the spot and there it is,...buddy in a buick or some shit is putting it in his trunk!!! hahahaha. I go up to him, said hello, told him what happened, looked at the exhaust, and say, dude..you can have it. It was all mangled to the death. So back down the sidewalk i go to the TL....laughing during the entire walk. For some reason i thought it was comical.

So i pull the rear passenger wheel off so i could put the bumper back in place. I made the decision that it's safe to continue the trip to the beach, despite not having any piping. So i start the engine, not knowing if the lack of back pressure was going to be an issue. To my surprise, it started fine and ran with ease. Gas mileage went up which was awesome. The engine sounds like a mean pontiac. It also sounds like the Spoon Honda Legend that i've heard in a video. So the current setup is: Primary eshift procats, and 50% j-pipe, then nothing. I think the ATLP j-pipe is where it broke. I can't remember exactly which section is still intact.

My brother has a muffler he got off ebay that i'm going to use. It looks titanium and has a turn down, with a 3 inch diameter inlet. I probably won't use a resonator, so it should sound pretty raw.

Suggestions, input, flames, laughs?!?!...
Old 05-25-2008 | 11:38 PM
  #2  
ABP_04TL's Avatar
6-SPEED LOVER
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,173
Likes: 122
From: NJ/NY
crazy shyt bro lol....

Do It!!!
Old 05-25-2008 | 11:55 PM
  #3  
csmeance's Avatar
Senior Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 20,941
Likes: 2,021
From: Space Coast, FL
since it broke off at the J pipe, maybe a true dual exhaust?
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:04 AM
  #4  
stillhere153's Avatar
94 DC4 RS LSV/Turbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 11
From: New York City | Stuck in Traffic
let me know if your jpipe got fucked.. cuz I will sell you my atlp jpipe... $350 shipped
pretty sure it was the jpipe because there isn't much ground clearance
also i have a stock jpipe aswell on the black market...for mad cheap eheheheh

aside from that... 3" tubing should serve you well... have the shop who does it for you raise the exhaust a little....
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:05 AM
  #5  
ballinfizzle89's Avatar
FizzyStatus!
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 7,672
Likes: 20
From: Central Virginia
You should be good with 3" being F/I.

Damn..you let some random guy cop your HKS muffler?! hahah
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:17 AM
  #6  
anx1300c's Avatar
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,020
Likes: 930
From: 633 Stag Trail Rd
You started laughing?

Please PM me what medication you're on. I want a prescription for it.
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:28 AM
  #7  
Snookynibbles's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Hey there. Sounds like a fun project, and I wish you the best of results.

I'm no expert by far here, but reading about the quasi-science of exhaust systems, it seems it's possible to oversize the 'plumbing'. The intent of optimizing a system is to minimize backpressure while maintaining tolerable sound levels, and in the extreme (i.e., a total absence of a system), avoiding burning exhaust valves. To achieve this end, one seeks to maximize exhaust velocity, which in turn assures the hottest gas flow; the hotter the gas, the less dense it is, and hence, the less force (i.e., backpressure) required to expel it.

On the surface it might seem that if going from a stock 2.25" dia. to 2.5" dia. is good, then going to 3.0 " is better still. However, this might not prove to be true. Oversizing the exhaust system means the volume increases...going from a stock 2.25" dia to a 3.0 dia = approx. a 24% increase in total gas volume...every exhaust stroke has to push 24% more gas out the muffler(s). At some point, this increase substantially reduces the velocity which equates to a more rapid cooling / loss of heat content of the gas. This makes it more dense, increasing the backpressure.

Your actual results will of course tell if you've crossed that point; You'd need to do b/4/after dynos to verify.
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:37 AM
  #8  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by Snookynibbles
Hey there. Sounds like a fun project, and I wish you the best of results.

I'm no expert by far here, but reading about the quasi-science of exhaust systems, it seems it's possible to oversize the 'plumbing'. The intent of optimizing a system is to minimize backpressure while maintaining tolerable sound levels, and in the extreme (i.e., a total absence of a system), avoiding burning exhaust valves. To achieve this end, one seeks to maximize exhaust velocity, which in turn assures the hottest gas flow; the hotter the gas, the less dense it is, and hence, the less force (i.e., backpressure) required to expel it.

On the surface it might seem that if going from a stock 2.25" dia. to 2.5" dia. is good, then going to 3.0 " is better still. However, this might not prove to be true. Oversizing the exhaust system means the volume increases...going from a stock 2.25" dia to a 3.0 dia = approx. a 24% increase in total gas volume...every exhaust stroke has to push 24% more gas out the muffler(s). At some point, this increase substantially reduces the velocity which equates to a more rapid cooling / loss of heat content of the gas. This makes it more dense, increasing the backpressure.

Your actual results will of course tell if you've crossed that point; You'd need to do b/4/after dynos to verify.
Some good info here. Thanks for posting!

OMP Prelude has posted the quickest 1/4 mile time being 13.1 at 105mph. He is running 3 inch piping, so this would be the reason why I am deciding to add another .5 inches.

Hopefully it'll work out.
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:39 AM
  #9  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by stillhere153
let me know if your jpipe got fucked.. cuz I will sell you my atlp jpipe... $350 shipped
pretty sure it was the jpipe because there isn't much ground clearance
also i have a stock jpipe aswell on the black market...for mad cheap eheheheh

aside from that... 3" tubing should serve you well... have the shop who does it for you raise the exhaust a little....
It must have been the low clearance that made it snip the manhole. I've driven over them before with ease, but now with the ATLP j-pipe...Fail.
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:41 AM
  #10  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by anx1300c
You started laughing?

Please PM me what medication you're on. I want a prescription for it.
I laughed the entire trip almost!! You think one would be pissed, but for some reason i just couldnt help but laugh out loud. Even typing this post i get a chuckle out of the dilemna.
Old 05-26-2008 | 12:43 AM
  #11  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by ballinfizzle89
You should be good with 3" being F/I.

Damn..you let some random guy cop your HKS muffler?! hahah
Yeah i looked in his trunk and was like..you know what...fuck it. Finders keepers, losers weepers. But now looking back, i kinda wish i would have taken back the HKS muffler...could have put that on the girlfriends lexus. Damnit.
Old 05-26-2008 | 01:15 AM
  #12  
stillhere153's Avatar
94 DC4 RS LSV/Turbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 11
From: New York City | Stuck in Traffic
wait so it broke off from the jpipe back... wth... wow
Old 05-26-2008 | 02:30 AM
  #13  
lookinco's Avatar
B A N N E D
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: vancouver, BC
I had a custom 3" exhaust made for the TL along with a custom 3" J-pipe but i didn't really like the low end. I then switched to the greddy exhaust with stock J-pipe and the daily driving low end was much better. I have a custom 2.5" J-pipe made which is very similar to the atlp J-pipe that i am going to try out. Hopefully that will help the low-mid end a bit.

Let me know how your setup turns out!
Old 05-26-2008 | 02:39 AM
  #14  
ussi's Avatar
I (don't) whine.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 2
From: Irvine CA
YOU just need an excuse to do mod something else on your car, admit it!
Old 05-26-2008 | 06:26 AM
  #15  
SRT-11's Avatar
Quiet, Rika Neenja!
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 620
Likes: 8
From: Tampa
Why has no one asked for a sound clip of the current setup? I wanna know what that thing sounds like with nothing behind the J pipe!

Post a sound clip good sir, and of course another when you're at all 3"!
Old 05-26-2008 | 08:00 AM
  #16  
VanPelt's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
2.25 " to 3" is a 77% increase in area
Old 05-26-2008 | 08:24 AM
  #17  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Awesome story. I can see you laughing over this, too...any excuse to mod the car, and this situation completely necessitates it. The best part was some bumpking pocketing the exhaust. Looking forward to seeing the new setup.
Old 05-26-2008 | 08:47 AM
  #18  
stillhere153's Avatar
94 DC4 RS LSV/Turbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 11
From: New York City | Stuck in Traffic
Originally Posted by VanPelt
2.25 " to 3" is a 77% increase in area
ur math is so off
Old 05-26-2008 | 11:05 AM
  #19  
Malayalee King's Avatar
ഥഎണഡഏ Fellas Inc.
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,823
Likes: 8
From: $,{MD,CA}
lol @ xhaust :thief
Old 05-26-2008 | 11:24 AM
  #20  
enigmaos's Avatar
Too Fast TOO FURIOUS
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,571
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by ussi
YOU just need an excuse to do mod something else on your car, admit it!
that's the spirit. it's an addiction.
Old 05-26-2008 | 11:31 AM
  #21  
godfather2's Avatar
Time to Climb
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,402
Likes: 49
From: Little Rock, AR
good luck with the new exhaust, i'm sure the tl-r will turn out meaner than ever
Old 05-26-2008 | 02:38 PM
  #22  
VanPelt's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stillhere153
ur math is so off
2.25 tubing area of 3.97

3.0 tubing area of 7.06

7.06/3.97 is 1.77 or a 77% increase.
Granted I havent done any calculating for quite a few years so you might be right
Old 05-26-2008 | 06:19 PM
  #23  
Laxplaya11385's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,435
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
Originally Posted by VanPelt
2.25 tubing area of 3.97

3.0 tubing area of 7.06

7.06/3.97 is 1.77 or a 77% increase.
Granted I havent done any calculating for quite a few years so you might be right
Van Pelt, you're right

*PWNED*
Old 05-26-2008 | 08:17 PM
  #24  
MINIFVR's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
3.0 is pretty big for an engine with a displacement of only 3.2 L. It will be loud as hell.
Old 05-26-2008 | 09:04 PM
  #25  
VanPelt's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
^ Fine for F/I , for n/a it would def drone
Old 05-26-2008 | 11:47 PM
  #26  
stillhere153's Avatar
94 DC4 RS LSV/Turbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 11
From: New York City | Stuck in Traffic
Originally Posted by Laxplaya11385
Van Pelt, you're right

*PWNED*
nope, I didn't know which calculations he had made, i figured he was going merely by percentage which would honestly be a 25% increase... but he's correct via area
Old 05-26-2008 | 11:55 PM
  #27  
Eoanou's Avatar
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 7
From: CT
Quick Go Get A Video And Post On Youtube, I Want To Hear This With No Exhaust!
Old 05-26-2008 | 11:56 PM
  #28  
Eoanou's Avatar
'10 Hyundai Genesis Coupe
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 7
From: CT
Funny story by the way, I've never experienced my exhaust scraping, but I ALWAYS scrape the black panel below the front bumper!
Old 05-27-2008 | 01:20 AM
  #29  
OMP Prelude's Avatar
13.19@105.48MPH
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 126
Likes: 1
From: vancouver
just do it i ran a 3in even before the charger and i still pulled a 13.7 n/a
Old 05-27-2008 | 06:25 AM
  #30  
VanPelt's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by stillhere153
nope, I didn't know which calculations he had made, i figured he was going merely by percentage which would honestly be a 25% increase... but he's correct via area


The 77% is also the same for volume.If its 25% show me
Old 05-27-2008 | 08:19 AM
  #31  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
Originally Posted by stillhere153
nope, I didn't know which calculations he had made, i figured he was going merely by percentage which would honestly be a 25% increase... but he's correct via area
Reading is fundamental...

Originally Posted by VanPelt
2.25 " to 3" is a 77% increase in area
Old 05-27-2008 | 08:27 AM
  #32  
stillhere153's Avatar
94 DC4 RS LSV/Turbo
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 11,734
Likes: 11
From: New York City | Stuck in Traffic
well yea that is after the fact...
Old 05-27-2008 | 10:01 AM
  #33  
bzyrice's Avatar
Drifting
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 21
lets see pics!!!
Old 05-27-2008 | 10:27 AM
  #34  
MINIFVR's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by VanPelt
^ Fine for F/I , for n/a it would def drone
Yeah definitely. The first thing that should be done to a S/C or especially at turbo car is the exhaust. Bigger exhausts for a turbo = big gain!
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:11 PM
  #35  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by csmeance
since it broke off at the J pipe, maybe a true dual exhaust?

A true dual exhaust be the route that i take after looking at the damage on the lift.
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:18 PM
  #36  
ACCURATEin's Avatar
Thread Starter
tehLEGOman
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,306
Likes: 1,991
From: Charlotte, NC
Update:

So i'm back from meineke. Mildy pissed at the moment because i'm having to brainstorm about which route to take. Need some help !...

Options:
1) Have a dual exhaust made with smaller piping, maybe 1.75 inch piping
2) Cat deletes from Richie, then oem j-pipe, then 3 inch all the way back
3) I dont know

After looking underneath to see the damage, basically the ATLP j-pipe is missing. The rear eshift cat was pulled back maybe 1/2 inch so putting the oem j-pipe on was a no go. He said he was going to have to heat it up to bend it back and didn't want to catch anything on fire.
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:50 PM
  #37  
chill_dog's Avatar
Oderint dum metuant.
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 534
From: Lake Wylie
#2
Old 05-27-2008 | 02:52 PM
  #38  
o4Komodo's Avatar
Rev High; Drive Happy
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,076
Likes: 398
From: Scarborough, Ontario
#1--for being unique? =o
Old 05-27-2008 | 05:34 PM
  #39  
VanPelt's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
#1 with 2" but at least a x-pipe or that bitch is going to be loud
Old 05-27-2008 | 05:54 PM
  #40  
Snookynibbles's Avatar
Intermediate
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
I goofed up in my original post…the (approx.) 24% increase posted was actually the % increase of cross-sectional area of a TL stock 2.25” dia pipe upsizing to the 2.5” dia found on certain aftermarket, catback systems. The 77% increase is correct for representing the increase from stock to a 3” diameter. And since the length of the system doesn’t change, the % increase in area also reflects the same % increase for volume.

Just non-authoritative chit-chat by me, but a 77% increase in volume seems tremendous. This would greatly reduce the velocity of flow. Again, the longer the gas remains in the system, the more it cools & the denser/heavier it gets. Plus, the greater surface area of the larger pipe also promotes even more cooling. So the pistons have to work to scavenge not just 77% more gas volume, but 77% more of a denser, heavier gas than from a stock setup…this seems counterproductive...more backpressure for our relatively small displacement motor.

One might safely assume that Honda engineers work to arrive at optimization for economy & power; compromises are made, such as adding resonators/muffler constriction for achieving a sedate & tolerable ride. However, I’d imagine the 2.25” dia stock plumbing is near optimization, except where substantial power gains are involved. And considering how the J series engines won’t tolerate radical external power mods (ie, lots of boost) w/o an internal rebuild, it makes sense that the performance exhaust pro’s (folks like Greddy, Comptech, etc.), made a wise decision to a modest upsizing with a 2.5” dia pipe. But 3”? IMO, there’s a good chance one will actually see less gains going to 3” compared against a 2.5” dia. system. Again, a b/4 – after dyno would be needed to verify.

Also, another way to look at this is to consider how ‘relatively’ little performance is gained over stock from performance exhaust systems for our motors. What gains are seen come mostly from eliminating resonators, mid-mufflers, & from restrictive mufflers…plus the cats. The restrictions come from these choke points, not from the main pipes. Of course, if I’m wrong, with wife’s permission, I’ll jump onto a 3” GB (Not!, hehe).


Quick Reply: 3 inch piping.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 PM.