What is the reason the TL is not considered an affordable luxury car?
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
![Question](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
#2
Race Director
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte(home) /Raleigh (school), NC
Age: 35
Posts: 11,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow thats actually really embarrassing. I mean they can put Jaguar and Saab on the list but not Acura? Who buys a Jaguar or saab anymore? That makes Acura look pretty bad actually.
#4
Senior Moderator
maybe its more than luxury....
![Wish](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/wish.gif)
#7
One on the right for me
Originally Posted by Trackruner228
Wow thats actually really embarrassing. I mean they can put Jaguar and Saab on the list but not Acura? Who buys a Jaguar or saab anymore? That makes Acura look pretty bad actually.
Jags are still very nice cars, I just wouldn't consider them an affordable luxury car.
Trending Topics
#8
Acura still lacks the prestige of the brands on the list. Most people see Acura as a nice car at a bargin price...that's where the problem is. When people ask me about what kind of car they should buy, the first words out of my mouth are "if you want a nice car for cheap, get an Acura." And it's true, Acura pretty much under cuts everyone in the luxury market. Much like how companies like Hyundai is under cutting everyone in the market and putting out decent cars.
Acura=bargin luxury
luxury and bargin dont quite mix.
Acura=bargin luxury
luxury and bargin dont quite mix.
#14
FizzyStatus!
iTrader: (6)
Wow, that is kinda annoying. I mean I don't get how a Jaguar X-Type, Saab 9-3, or the Volvo C30 made the list, and that over a TL
. I know a TL isn't the perfect car, actually it kinda is
, but I know they're nicer than a C30 and even the X-Type(Friend's dad has one). But whatever, I love the TL
haha
![Why Me](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/whyme.gif)
![Tomato](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/tomato.gif)
![Rock Star](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/rockstar.gif)
#15
Acuras Only in
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank God this is not an authentic auto magzine's listing ... I can deal with the mass' lack of knowledge about my ride, esp. some editors from a money magzine ...
#16
FOR SALE - BM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's odd that it isn't considered a luxury car bc in motortrend the TL is a compeditor for cars like BMW 3series, Audi A4, and Infinity G. What gives!!!
#17
Senior Moderator
It is indeed amazing that the TL is not on that list, particularly because it is not exactly a slow seller.
I think this illustrates a problem Acura has in the public eye. Is it invisible except to Honda owners?
I think this illustrates a problem Acura has in the public eye. Is it invisible except to Honda owners?
#20
The TL should take the G37's or the Volvo C30's spot. Do they factor in quality and value into these articles?
I love how they list the starting prices on these cars. Let's list the price after you add on just a few of the options people who buy these cars want. That's already done w/ the TL. Oh well, at least we know that we got a lot more for our money and others are just buying a brand...
I love how they list the starting prices on these cars. Let's list the price after you add on just a few of the options people who buy these cars want. That's already done w/ the TL. Oh well, at least we know that we got a lot more for our money and others are just buying a brand...
![Dunno](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/dunno.gif)
#21
Burning Brakes
I saw this list a while ago. Yeah I do agree to add Infiniti and Lexus is a kick to the nads. The silver lining is that it's Forbes and not a reputable car mag.
#22
RAR
Originally Posted by thevikas87
beemers do, porsches dont, ACURA definitely does
#23
Originally Posted by nmsujeff88
Screw em. They don't know what they're missing.
#25
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
The TL should be on the cover page for that story! It is one of the MOST affordable entry level luxury cars on the market. The sales figures speak for themselves- second to BMW.
#27
AZ Community Team
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes
on
4,341 Posts
Since it is obvious to the majority of us that the TL provides a good level of Luxury and lots of other "goodies" at a great price, there can only be (IMHO) 2 possible explanations for why the TL missed the list:
1. The Acura brand does not extend far enough UP the luxury/$ scale. Almost every brand listed has cars at $60k+ available.
2. Acura doesn't advertise enough in Forbes.
The cynic in me chooses number 2.
1. The Acura brand does not extend far enough UP the luxury/$ scale. Almost every brand listed has cars at $60k+ available.
2. Acura doesn't advertise enough in Forbes.
The cynic in me chooses number 2.
#29
Drifting
The majority of cars were < 35K with a few exceptions. Based on that cutoff, the TL should have been at least considered.
I did a quick survey of the cars listed and it seemed that the majority of the cars listed were European: Saab, Bmw, Benz, Rover, Audi, and Porshe. A couple were domestic and a couple were Japanese. I imagine if the split was more even across the continents then Acura would have gotten a spot with the TL. We all know that the TL is both affordable and somewhat Luxurious and that's what matters.
Forbes should stick to reporting corporate news anyway.
I did a quick survey of the cars listed and it seemed that the majority of the cars listed were European: Saab, Bmw, Benz, Rover, Audi, and Porshe. A couple were domestic and a couple were Japanese. I imagine if the split was more even across the continents then Acura would have gotten a spot with the TL. We all know that the TL is both affordable and somewhat Luxurious and that's what matters.
Forbes should stick to reporting corporate news anyway.
#30
Race Director
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Illinois
Age: 45
Posts: 10,741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
maybe the original poster could post this thread too in the car talk section in off-topic and there would be even more different opinions about it.
have you guys seen that youtube video about the riese report with al and laura riese? al goes on and talks about why Lexus overtook Acura even if Acura was the first Japanese luxury brand.
have you guys seen that youtube video about the riese report with al and laura riese? al goes on and talks about why Lexus overtook Acura even if Acura was the first Japanese luxury brand.
#31
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern ILLINOIS
Age: 62
Posts: 4,848
Received 133 Likes
on
129 Posts
Originally Posted by nmsujeff88
Screw em. They don't know what they're missing.
![Annoyed](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/annoyed.gif)
![Yes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yes.gif)
BMW are the most affordable
![No](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/no.gif)
vinyl seats. SAAB, HA. Jaguar, JUNK
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
What a JOKE. FORBES SUCKS ANYWAY
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
#32
Advanced
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norftown, Nevada
Age: 39
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have read before where it has been stated if you want to buy a TL, you can get a fully loaded Accord for about five grand less.
I know, comparing the Accord and the TL is apples and oranges, but a fully loaded V-6 Accord w/navi is about 5k less than a TL w/navi.
I know, comparing the Accord and the TL is apples and oranges, but a fully loaded V-6 Accord w/navi is about 5k less than a TL w/navi.
#34
RAR
Originally Posted by msr1011
I have read before where it has been stated if you want to buy a TL, you can get a fully loaded Accord for about five grand less.
I know, comparing the Accord and the TL is apples and oranges, but a fully loaded V-6 Accord w/navi is about 5k less than a TL w/navi.
I know, comparing the Accord and the TL is apples and oranges, but a fully loaded V-6 Accord w/navi is about 5k less than a TL w/navi.
#35
'02 NBP TL-S
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lacey, WA
Age: 44
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think one of the reason's Acura isn't on the list is that a lot of the car lineup's including the TL weren't always named what they are today. I mean wasn't the RL a Legend and the TL a Vigor? The name changing deal is still apparent to this day with the Integra to RSX/TSX. Maybe the brand has been around for awhile but the car lineup hasn't yet officially established it's certain ground in terms of naming conventions. Lexus has always had their ES, GS, LS, etc. Anyways, just a random thought on my take of Acura.
#37
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Northern ILLINOIS
Age: 62
Posts: 4,848
Received 133 Likes
on
129 Posts
I had a NEW Accord 06 EX V6 Nav, nice, BUT only nice. Then an 06 TL Nav. MUCH BETTER!
No comparison PERIOD. NOW my 07 TL-S !!! That RULES.
Accord=67% ground beef
2007 Acura TL-S=Filet Mignon !!!
No comparison PERIOD. NOW my 07 TL-S !!! That RULES.
Accord=67% ground beef
2007 Acura TL-S=Filet Mignon !!!
#38
Pro
Originally Posted by JD TL-S
Thats waht I say
They can all lick the brown spot between my cheeks
BMW are the most affordable
HOGWASH, If you want it stripped with
vinyl seats. SAAB, HA. Jaguar, JUNK
What a JOKE. FORBES SUCKS ANYWAY![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![Annoyed](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/annoyed.gif)
![Yes](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/yes.gif)
BMW are the most affordable
![No](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/no.gif)
vinyl seats. SAAB, HA. Jaguar, JUNK
![ugh](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/ugh.gif)
What a JOKE. FORBES SUCKS ANYWAY
![2 Cents](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/2cents.gif)
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
Who cares what Forbes says? When did Forbes become a valid source for automotive reviews? Whenever I tell freinds I bought a new Acura TL, they all say something like "WOW, NICE CAR!!!!" or "WISH I COULD AFFORD ONE OF THOSE". I think the public at large knows the value of our cars, and their place in the new car market.
#39
Senior Moderator
Originally Posted by leedogg
These guys are idiots. Acuras epitomize this category.
Indeed!
![Werd](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/werd.gif)
And a quick
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
Other upscale features include electronic brake force distribution to prevent skids, wood trim and a 120-watt sound system.
![Shrug](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/shrug.gif)
Originally Posted by msr1011
I have read before where it has been stated if you want to buy a TL, you can get a fully loaded Accord for about five grand less.
I know, comparing the Accord and the TL is apples and oranges, but a fully loaded V-6 Accord w/navi is about 5k less than a TL w/navi.
I know, comparing the Accord and the TL is apples and oranges, but a fully loaded V-6 Accord w/navi is about 5k less than a TL w/navi.
Originally Posted by JD TL-S
I had a NEW Accord 06 EX V6 Nav, nice, BUT only nice. Then an 06 TL Nav. MUCH BETTER!
No comparison PERIOD. NOW my 07 TL-S !!! That RULES.
Accord=67% ground beef
2007 Acura TL-S=Filet Mignon !!!
No comparison PERIOD. NOW my 07 TL-S !!! That RULES.
Accord=67% ground beef
2007 Acura TL-S=Filet Mignon !!!