video: 07 Type-S vs. 350z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 11:16 AM
  #1  
Ruby's Avatar
Thread Starter
US Navy Seabees
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 75
From: NH
video: 07 Type-S vs. 350z

Type-S is an automatic VSA off, manual mode no brake torquing. Ending up with an ET of 14.7. The Z was also an automatic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PhlJpQwIRo
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 11:38 AM
  #2  
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,600
From: Raleigh, NC - USA
Looks pretty even. TL had a much better reaction time but it looked the original gap stayed the same down the track. What was the Z's ET?
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 11:57 AM
  #3  
Ruby's Avatar
Thread Starter
US Navy Seabees
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 75
From: NH
15.3, I posted the time slip in the 1/4 mile thread. I was pulling the whole time ever so slightly..
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 12:10 PM
  #4  
juruki's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 5
From: California
nice kill! What were the trap speeds? yours and the Z's
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #5  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
aw man i thought a 5at tl-s is able to do mid 14's bone stock and 6mt tl-s low 14's....
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 03:42 PM
  #6  
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,600
From: Raleigh, NC - USA
Originally Posted by Ruby
15.3, I posted the time slip in the 1/4 mile thread. I was pulling the whole time ever so slightly..
Sounds good - nice win, but its a long way from the other guys claim of 6/7 car lengths & going away after he made 2 big mistakes on the run.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 03:47 PM
  #7  
Rockstar21's Avatar
The Dumb One
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 11,810
Likes: 373
From: Baton Rouge, LA
launch/tires/health of the car play a big roll in things like that.

you're thinking too hard.

my 94 accord wagon with an f22b2 would lay the law down on a friends '95 4-door with the same motor and transmission...

Last edited by Rockstar21; Sep 22, 2011 at 03:50 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 04:16 PM
  #8  
DisgustipatedAP1's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 204
Likes: 18
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
aw man i thought a 5at tl-s is able to do mid 14's bone stock and 6mt tl-s low 14's....
Remember that tires/launch/driver/ambient conditions/track have a huge factor.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2011 | 04:56 PM
  #9  
Ruby's Avatar
Thread Starter
US Navy Seabees
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 75
From: NH
I'm sure with brake torquing it could do it but I like my transmission....lol
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 07:20 AM
  #10  
bouncer07's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 182
From: Minnesota
Good to see a day at the track. What was your 60 ft?
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #11  
dgsedan06's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 169
Likes: 15
From: NY
^ +1 is this a slow track or something? Both cars should be faster than that...
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 09:12 AM
  #12  
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,674
Likes: 2,600
From: Raleigh, NC - USA
Originally Posted by dgsedan06
^ +1 is this a slow track or something? Both cars should be faster than that...
So now there is no excuse not to run yours since you should, based on your claims, be quicker.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 11:33 AM
  #13  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Nice run Ruby. What was your Trap speed and 60ft time? We would be a good run!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 12:15 PM
  #14  
SatinSilverAV6's Avatar
2003 Accord Coupe V6
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 74
From: Oceanside, Ca
Originally Posted by SatinSilverAV6
Nice run Ruby. What was your Trap speed and 60ft time? We would be a good run!
Nevermind! Just saw it in the 1/4 mile times section
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
dgsedan06's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 169
Likes: 15
From: NY
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
So now there is no excuse not to run yours since you should, based on your claims, be quicker.
Definately quicker than that. I ran 14.3 stock using the dynolicious app In all seriousness though, I really want to run an AT and MT TL-S. I ran a base TL auto and got him pretty bad (he had a bad launch).
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:26 PM
  #16  
Bread-A Spec's Avatar
08 WDP TL-S
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 2
From: Richmond,BC
Originally Posted by dgsedan06
Definately quicker than that. I ran 14.3 stock using the dynolicious app In all seriousness though, I really want to run an AT and MT TL-S. I ran a base TL auto and got him pretty bad (he had a bad launch).
yeah.....i wanna run an 6MT Type S as well,i wanna see how much i will lose
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #17  
Bread-A Spec's Avatar
08 WDP TL-S
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 2
From: Richmond,BC
Originally Posted by Ruby
15.3, I posted the time slip in the 1/4 mile thread. I was pulling the whole time ever so slightly..
u running with bone stock 5AT?
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2011 | 06:31 AM
  #18  
Ruby's Avatar
Thread Starter
US Navy Seabees
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 75
From: NH
Originally Posted by Bread-A Spec
u running with bone stock 5AT?
yup bone stock
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #19  
Bread-A Spec's Avatar
08 WDP TL-S
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 2
From: Richmond,BC
Originally Posted by Ruby
yup bone stock
holy sweet.....nice man350z is slow.....i beat one on my prev 2G Type S with only intake & catback exhaust

now i always play with those 335i on the street
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2011 | 05:59 PM
  #20  
Bearcat94's Avatar
AZ Community Team
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 32,488
Likes: 7,771
From: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Originally Posted by Ruby
yup bone stock
Did you remove any weight?

Spare tire and tools, floor mats, OM book, 1/4 - 1/2 tank of gas, etc? Each quarter tank of gas is worth 25 pounds, maybe slightly more.

That's worth a tenth or maybe a tad more.

I ran a 14.37 stock with the weight mentioned above removed (and on a fast track with good conditions).


Regardless, good run & a nice kill.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 08:06 AM
  #21  
Ruby's Avatar
Thread Starter
US Navy Seabees
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 75
From: NH
yup, no floor mats, no spare tire, empty trunk, 1/4 tank of premium gas..
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #22  
Dave_B's Avatar
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 950
Likes: 45
From: Shawnee, KS
LOL at a 5AT 350Z running 15.3s. Dear God. You should be able to get a 14.5 in that thing simply mashing the gas.

Nice run the 5AT TLS. Assuming it was in the 70s+ that night you ran, you should be in the 14.3-14.4 range once cooler (50s and below) weather rolls through.

A brake-stall launch won't hurt the tranny assuming you don't sit there for more than 20 seconds with both the brake and gas fully depressed. Most any factory field service manual uses the brake-stall to test torque converter stall speed.

On a launch, the whole brake-stall launch procedure shouldn't take more than 3 to 4 seconds. You don't want to do any longer because it builds too much heat and can slow the launch. The way I do it is gas to the floor, first amber comes on, gas to the floor, release everything the second the third amber lights up. So basically I'm brake-stalling for about 1 to 1.5 seconds. Hardly damaging to the transmission.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2011 | 10:39 AM
  #23  
Sonnick's Avatar
All motor
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,530
Likes: 533
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by Dave_B
LOL at a 5AT 350Z running 15.3s. Dear God. You should be able to get a 14.5 in that thing simply mashing the gas.

Nice run the 5AT TLS. Assuming it was in the 70s+ that night you ran, you should be in the 14.3-14.4 range once cooler (50s and below) weather rolls through.

A brake-stall launch won't hurt the tranny assuming you don't sit there for more than 20 seconds with both the brake and gas fully depressed. Most any factory field service manual uses the brake-stall to test torque converter stall speed.

On a launch, the whole brake-stall launch procedure shouldn't take more than 3 to 4 seconds. You don't want to do any longer because it builds too much heat and can slow the launch. The way I do it is brake to the floor, first amber comes on, gas to the floor, release everything the second the third amber lights up. So basically I'm brake-stalling for about 1 to 1.5 seconds. Hardly damaging to the transmission.
Fixed. I believe that's what you meant to say.

14.7 is pretty good bone stock man, nice job. As Dave said, with better temperatures expect a few tenths less as well as 1-2mph.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rp_guy
Member Cars for Sale
9
Jul 16, 2017 07:33 AM
Yumcha
Automotive News
5
Dec 13, 2015 02:21 PM
DerrickW
3G TL Performance Parts & Modifications
9
Nov 15, 2015 05:52 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.