Transmission lag

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 02:30 AM
  #1  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
Transmission lag

just wondering, how much transmission lag is considered "normal"? My 07 tl-s seems to have a laggy transmission compared to my past cars. it drives great and no problems, but it would take almost a full second from when i switch from P, R, or D. Also, what about when shifting manually? I have an automatic TL-S, and when I have it on D, it shifts great, no problems or lag at all. However in manual mode, whether shifting with the paddle shifters or the shift knob, it seems to lag maybe 3/4 of a second. Basically if I were to floor it, I would need to shift at around 5k rpm for it not bounce off the rev limiter from the lag. The gear # display on dash responds instantly but the actual shift seems to lag. If this is normal for a TL-S, I don't really mind since its not a big deal to me because the car drives great. But just wondering if everyone else is experiencing the same thing.

It'd be great if someone local to me could show me their car and I would know if its the same for everyone.

Last edited by paperboy42190; Feb 24, 2011 at 02:33 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 02:39 AM
  #2  
winkyyy's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 357
Likes: 16
From: SOCAL 626
After I switched to redline d4 ATF. It helped a lot with the lag IMO. And shifts are a lot smoother too. Just get that Z1 crap out of your car asap if you haven't done so already. I see that you live in Alhambra. So I can let you drive my car after I get it back from the body shop if you like. Hopefully i can it back by tomorrow or Friday.
Reply
Old Feb 24, 2011 | 03:09 AM
  #3  
SpiderX1016's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 96
I use Redline Type F and mine has that delay changing from P-R-D.
I don't need to shift earlier to avoid the rev limiter like you said though.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 03:22 PM
  #4  
Steve 21's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 183
Likes: 19
From: Staten Island, NY; Myrtle Beach, SC
I was just about to ask the same question, but now that its answered hopefully sometime by next week I will make the time to swap out the fluid. Since the price isn't much different should I just go for the type F since its racing fluid even though my car is a daily driver with my occasional having fun on an empty road? or does it not make a difference since im not really going to the track and i have a stock transmission not a racing one?
Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 03:34 PM
  #5  
SpiderX1016's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 96
Originally Posted by Steve 21
I was just about to ask the same question, but now that its answered hopefully sometime by next week I will make the time to swap out the fluid. Since the price isn't much different should I just go for the type F since its racing fluid even though my car is a daily driver with my occasional having fun on an empty road? or does it not make a difference since im not really going to the track and i have a stock transmission not a racing one?
Thanks
You'll be fine with the Redline Racing Type F. No need to worry about it.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 04:42 PM
  #6  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
how do you guys do the transition from z1 to the redline atf? im assuming a 3x3 drain and fill wont be sufficient?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 04:48 PM
  #7  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
so, redline d4 or redline racing type F? what do you guys think? type F has no FM which i hear makes less smooth shifts, how bad will it be?

quotes from nva-av6: Type F fluid is a BIG NO NO, it has detergent in it and will destroy the seals in the soliniod within 3-6 months (seen it happen). Other Honda trans I have seen run with Dextron I,II,III usually have clutch failures quickly.

Last edited by paperboy42190; Mar 2, 2011 at 04:51 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 05:44 PM
  #8  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Serously? This has been gone over a million times. Try a search and enjoy a few days worth of reading.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 05:47 PM
  #9  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
fine...

i already read some threads btw.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #10  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Redline racing or any other type F like Amsoil Super Shift for everyone from a grandma to a pure track car. It's marketed as a racing fluid now but at one time it was an OEM fluid. Just marketing, that's all.

Less FM equals quicker shifts, more holding power, and much less wear. Because the shifts are quicker and the bump shift is eliminated shifts actually feel better yet it's shifting quicker and harder. It's the best of all worlds. No need for D4 or any other non type f fluid and no worries about mixing with Z1 or how quickly you do all 3 of the drains and fills. You car will shift better than stock and you will nearly eliminate trans wear. This fluid along with the switches will nearly eliminate trans failures.


Most Type F fluids are fully compatible with our trans and it's seals. Type F only designates no FM so it can be a synthetic, dino, thick, thin, it can have lots of detergents or no detergents and seal swell agents. Redline and Amsoil's versions are basically the same fluid as their street stuff but without FM.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #11  
abracing's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 135
Likes: 12
From: Corona
You wont regret type F. After 50,000 miles i did my 07 type s yesterday and i can really feel the difference. Theres also some metal particles on the magnetic bolt so im glad i did the flush. A little tip would be to jack the driver side and you'll get 4 quarts per drain. I ordered a case of 12 so i in my case its 4x3.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 07:16 PM
  #12  
DUHockey9's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 134
Likes: 8
From: Massachusetts
Definitely Type F done with a 3X3, no if's, and's, or but's.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 07:34 PM
  #13  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
okay you guys got me convinced. im gonna change it out to redline racing atf
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 07:38 PM
  #14  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
just ordered this: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00..._ya_os_product
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:15 PM
  #15  
drivinginmy04tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 5
I use to get this as well but it improved allot going to the new dw1 fluid. I always ran z1 before and delays and sloppy shifting were common.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:33 PM
  #16  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
i heard mixed reviews about the new fluid being compatible or not. dont make me regret the 12 quarts of redline type f atf i just ordered :X
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:41 PM
  #17  
pohljm's Avatar
Suzuka Master
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,071
Likes: 596
From: San Diego, CA
well they just replaced my trans in my 06 with 69K miles, i asked about the DW1 but they filled it with Z1 and said only 2010 and up get the DW1?
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 08:51 PM
  #18  
drivinginmy04tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 5
My neighbor is a service manager at a large Honda dealer and was told dw1 is safe in all Honda Acura cars in recent years. He also said it's better but time will tell my car is shifting much better on it but I'm still curious on the mixture as there is so many different comments on the web about it. Also my car has always clunked into 3rd gear at low speeds in traffic and what not and that has since gone away switching to the dw1. Also I had my valves adjusted so don't no if that and the throttle body being cleaned in combination with the fluid had something to do with it.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:41 PM
  #19  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
I'm always amazed at how retarded Acura is. I'll guarantee the new fluid is there for the ever tightening fuel economy standards. GM went with a lightweight with the DEX VI fluid and now Honda along with some others are doing it too. The primary purpose of this fluid is it's lower viscosity gain that important .5mpg if you do a lot of short trips where the fluid hardly ever gets to full temp. The thinner when cold fluid is easier to pump so there's less pumping/friction losses.

To clarify, the new stuff is there to help with CAFE standards. It's not to make your trans last longer. Marketing will spin it every which way but it's there for fuel economy. 0.5mpg is not much to us but when you sell a million cars it adds up for Honda.

The good side is it forces them to use a better base oil to achieve adequate hot protection (maybe a semi-syn??). I saw a patent paper which had a few clues pointing to the use of less FM in this fluid. They didn't come right out and say it but it's a pretty safe guess. They're only 12 years too late....

But the Type F is still a huge step up in wear protection and performance since it uses no FM. And if you go with the Amsoil and especially the Redline the base oils are waaaay better.

I would view the new Honda fluid as the bare minimum, what Honda should have been using many years ago and the Type F as a serious upgrade.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:51 PM
  #20  
drivinginmy04tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by I hate cars
I'm always amazed at how retarded Acura is. I'll guarantee the new fluid is there for the ever tightening fuel economy standards. GM went with a lightweight with the DEX VI fluid and now Honda along with some others are doing it too. The primary purpose of this fluid is it's lower viscosity gain that important .5mpg if you do a lot of short trips where the fluid hardly ever gets to full temp. The thinner when cold fluid is easier to pump so there's less pumping/friction losses.

To clarify, the new stuff is there to help with CAFE standards. It's not to make your trans last longer. Marketing will spin it every which way but it's there for fuel economy. 0.5mpg is not much to us but when you sell a million cars it adds up for Honda.

The good side is it forces them to use a better base oil to achieve adequate hot protection (maybe a semi-syn??). I saw a patent paper which had a few
clues pointing to the use of less FM in this fluid. They didn't come right out and say it but it's a pretty safe guess. They're only 12 years too late....

But the Type F is still a huge step up in wear protection and performance since it uses no FM. And if you go with the Amsoil and especially the Redline the base oils are waaaay better.

I would view the new Honda fluid as the bare minimum, what Honda should have been using many years ago and the Type F as a serious upgrade.
Now I really want to change my fluid to a type f. That's what I get for jumping the gun. Thanks for the info. At least it's better marginally than the z1 it sounds like.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:54 PM
  #21  
drivinginmy04tl's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 5
The worst part is my local advanced auto probably thinks I am a at home mechanic with all the trans fluid I keep bringing in for recycling. That's the worst part I wish they offered a at home reasonable used oil pickup service.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2011 | 09:56 PM
  #22  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
now you guys got my excited for my package of 12 quarts of redline type F this saturday
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 11:55 AM
  #23  
JackSampson's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 493
Likes: 8
From: Here
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
now you guys got my excited for my package of 12 quarts of redline type F this saturday
Don't get too excited man. I have a 07 Type-S also and hated the trans lag. I changed out the 3 pressure switches and change the fluid to Redline Type F. I feel no improvement at all. If anything the trans feels worse. Harsher shifts.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 12:58 PM
  #24  
I hate cars's Avatar
Team Owner
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 20,172
Likes: 1,818
From: Bakersfield
Originally Posted by JackSampson
Don't get too excited man. I have a 07 Type-S also and hated the trans lag. I changed out the 3 pressure switches and change the fluid to Redline Type F. I feel no improvement at all. If anything the trans feels worse. Harsher shifts.
You're the only one I've heard about in nearly 100 cases. Everyone else loves it, quicker shifting along with less harshness. Maybe your car has other issues. Regardless it's a great success ratio.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 01:00 PM
  #25  
SharksBreath's Avatar
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,054
Likes: 2,886
From: baltimore
^agreed. night n day difference for me. i'm doing another 1x3 at my next oil change n switching out the switches.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 01:23 PM
  #26  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
Originally Posted by JackSampson
Don't get too excited man. I have a 07 Type-S also and hated the trans lag. I changed out the 3 pressure switches and change the fluid to Redline Type F. I feel no improvement at all. If anything the trans feels worse. Harsher shifts.
i thought its only 2 pressure switches? 3rd and 4th gear? what else is there?
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 01:34 PM
  #27  
SharksBreath's Avatar
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,054
Likes: 2,886
From: baltimore
there is 2 3rd gear switches and 1 4th gear for the RL trannies, that's you.

read this thread.

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...builder&page=8
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 03:00 PM
  #28  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
oic, i thought i only had 1 of each. thanks! i'll be replacing all 3 pressure sensors when i reach around 100k miles
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 03:48 PM
  #29  
leedogg's Avatar
RAR
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,783
Likes: 1,286
From: DC Metro
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
oic, i thought i only had 1 of each. thanks! i'll be replacing all 3 pressure sensors when i reach around 100k miles
I would do the sensors every 50k miles. I'm also doing an ATF 3x3 every other oil change.


lol at how many times IHC needs to explain the same transmission things over and over again.

/edit. Here's all the info you need:


Last edited by leedogg; Mar 3, 2011 at 03:51 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 03:54 PM
  #30  
SharksBreath's Avatar
BANNED
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,054
Likes: 2,886
From: baltimore
^agreed with leedog.

go ahead n do the switches when you do the 3x3
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:11 AM
  #31  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
my package came 1 day early! i just finished my drain and fill 4x (used all 12 qts). car definitely shifts quicker!
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 06:13 AM
  #32  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
reason that i am putting the pressure switches off until 100k miles is that i think the previous owner had alrdy done them before.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 04:06 PM
  #33  
SpiderX1016's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 96
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
reason that i am putting the pressure switches off until 100k miles is that i think the previous owner had alrdy done them before.
Are you 100% sure the previous owner changed it? Do you have any records?

If you don't then I'd change them.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 09:04 PM
  #34  
DUHockey9's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 134
Likes: 8
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
reason that i am putting the pressure switches off until 100k miles is that i think the previous owner had alrdy done them before.
I would highly doubt they did it unless they were as much of an enthusiast as we are. I doubt they are even aware of the 3rd and 4th gear switch change unless they were a member of this board.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2011 | 02:15 AM
  #35  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
i bought the car from a member here at acurazine and i also found the ad for the car here in the black market section. i found a few of his posts in the 3rd and 4th gear pressure switches thread so thats why i think he alrdy changed them. he took good care of the car and did the 3x3 drain and fill with z1 periodically. he also installed a dvd player hooked up to the stock nav on the car himself.

i tried the paddle shifters earlier and it definitely feels like theres less lag. i can press the shifter around 5500-6000 rpm and still not bounce off the rev limiter.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:31 AM
  #36  
P1zzaman's Avatar
Three Wheelin'
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,653
Likes: 201
From: San Mateo, CA
Originally Posted by SharksBreath
there is 2 3rd gear switches and 1 4th gear for the RL trannies, that's you.

read this thread.

https://acurazine.com/forums/showthr...builder&page=8
Ok so TWO 3rd gear switches and ONE 4th gear right?

Because I read this in another thread..

Originally Posted by Majofo
Yes - (2) 4th gear pressure sensors & (1) 3rd gear pressure sensor

28600-RKE-004 x 2
28610-RKE-004

...
Just making sure it is not ONE 3rd gear switch and TWO 4th gear switch
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:38 AM
  #37  
abracing's Avatar
Instructor
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 135
Likes: 12
From: Corona
Sorry if its a bit off topic here. I also just switched to type F 7 days ago and im having a difficult time reading the dip stick. The best reading i got was 3/8 above the max line. Is this fine or should i siphon it out? Whats the best way of taking the level reading?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:57 AM
  #38  
skyfox23's Avatar
Racer
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by paperboy42190
just wondering, how much transmission lag is considered "normal"? My 07 tl-s seems to have a laggy transmission compared to my past cars. it drives great and no problems, but it would take almost a full second from when i switch from P, R, or D. Also, what about when shifting manually? I have an automatic TL-S, and when I have it on D, it shifts great, no problems or lag at all. However in manual mode, whether shifting with the paddle shifters or the shift knob, it seems to lag maybe 3/4 of a second. Basically if I were to floor it, I would need to shift at around 5k rpm for it not bounce off the rev limiter from the lag. The gear # display on dash responds instantly but the actual shift seems to lag. If this is normal for a TL-S, I don't really mind since its not a big deal to me because the car drives great. But just wondering if everyone else is experiencing the same thing.

It'd be great if someone local to me could show me their car and I would know if its the same for everyone.
So I've experienced the same lag and have bounced off of the rev limiter, not a big deal for me since I rarely use manual mode, but does doing this hurt the tranny at all?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 01:03 AM
  #39  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
Originally Posted by P1zzaman
Ok so TWO 3rd gear switches and ONE 4th gear right?

Because I read this in another thread..



Just making sure it is not ONE 3rd gear switch and TWO 4th gear switch
i checked the acura parts diagram. its for sure two 3rd gear switches, and one 4th gear switch.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 01:04 AM
  #40  
paperboy42190's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 1,164
From: Alhambra, CA
Originally Posted by abracing
Sorry if its a bit off topic here. I also just switched to type F 7 days ago and im having a difficult time reading the dip stick. The best reading i got was 3/8 above the max line. Is this fine or should i siphon it out? Whats the best way of taking the level reading?
you should be fine

Originally Posted by skyfox23
So I've experienced the same lag and have bounced off of the rev limiter, not a big deal for me since I rarely use manual mode, but does doing this hurt the tranny at all?
well it puts stress for revving so high but its a reliable car so it should be fine if u dont do it too much
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44 AM.