3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TL versus Eclipse GT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2006, 06:03 PM
  #1  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
gsmith6915's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 54
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TL versus Eclipse GT

I was on my way home last night with my wife , brother and sister in law in the car when an Eclipse Gt pulled up to me. I knew what time it was so I switched the tranny in manual and away we went. From the line this car took off. From a rolling start this car took off. It seemed as if there was no way to beat this guy. Yes I am ashamed to admit but I GOT CREAMED. We pulled into a gas station because my wife had to use the bathroom, I guess I scared the pi-- out of her. He stop also so we could talk. I asked what he had under the hood and he told me it was all stock. This car was possibly an 04 model stick shift 3.0liter with no one else riding with him but I just can't believe he was faster. Can anyone shed some light on this please. Was it me or is our stock engine just not good enough to compete against a stock eclipse GT?
Old 02-15-2006, 07:51 PM
  #2  
Aaaarrrggghhhh!
 
Scribesoft's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Way up here ^
Age: 50
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Did it look more like this (number 1):



or this (number 2):

Old 02-15-2006, 07:53 PM
  #3  
Cruisin'
Thread Starter
 
gsmith6915's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 54
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
number 2
Old 02-15-2006, 08:05 PM
  #4  
Racer
 
carguyrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Streamwood, IL
Age: 54
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsmith6915
number 2
My friend has "number 2". They aren't that fast. If you stepped on it, you would have handed him his a$$ and got change back.

Number 1 would be a different story against an auto TL.
Old 02-15-2006, 09:26 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
Ron A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,379
Received 1,003 Likes on 573 Posts
.
Old 02-15-2006, 10:03 PM
  #6  
Racer
 
jjh1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 54
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new eclipse is friggin fast. I test drove one before I bought my TL and there was no contest. The other nice thing is the eclipse allows you to tiptronic shift to 1st. I hate that the TL does not. That being said, the TL beats the GT in every other way you can imagine. The GT has no Nav, Buetooth, or about 100 other things that the TL does. Needless to say, I bought the TL and did not look back.
Old 02-15-2006, 10:20 PM
  #7  
Safety Car
 
datmrman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 42
Posts: 4,171
Received 39 Likes on 15 Posts
isn't the TL a heavier car than the eclipse?
Old 02-15-2006, 10:30 PM
  #8  
Senior Moderator
Regions Leader
 
trancemission's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Dallas TX
Age: 53
Posts: 8,890
Received 205 Likes on 128 Posts
My brother has a number two and I smoked him. I think alot has to do with the driver. Im gonna move this thread to Racing.
Old 02-15-2006, 11:55 PM
  #9  
~~~~~~~~~~~
 
2003TL-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Age: 46
Posts: 816
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Are you in a 3rd gen TL?? Either way it doesn't matter, if it was number 2 he's modded, and was just lying, I've beaten those auto/manual GT's before with no problem. Don't be ashamed it happens.
Old 02-16-2006, 01:10 AM
  #10  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You DID have 3 people in your car, and the TL already has a weight disadvantage. My TL is significantly slower with 2 passengers.

With just me I've toasted MANY of those number 2 Eclipses... and I have a stock TL-P.
Old 02-16-2006, 01:35 AM
  #11  
Advanced
 
TBnDFW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Age: 65
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I traded in a #2 for a new TL just 4 weeks ago. No way on earth is the TL slower. The TL should be at least 0.7 seconds faster 0-60. It was the weight of all those people that killed you.
Old 02-17-2006, 01:40 PM
  #12  
6MT & LSD
 
ndx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TBnDFW
I traded in a #2 for a new TL just 4 weeks ago. No way on earth is the TL slower. The TL should be at least 0.7 seconds faster 0-60. It was the weight of all those people that killed you.
I love how you came up with "0.7" seconds... Got that magazine in front of ya, huh?

I had an 01 Eclipse GT, 4AT Sportronic, and ran against my brother's 03 TL-S on a few occasions. I could keep up in the first gear, but come second... well, it was embarassing.

I can see a 5spd w/ a few mods keeping up with a stock TL-S, though. There are some S/C'd GT's running around, too... which could take on a TL-S without too much problem.
Old 02-17-2006, 02:14 PM
  #13  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NDX, your avatar is hilarious.

I've never raced the older Eclipses from a standstill, only from like 40mph a couple of times, and they didn't have much of a chance. I'm assuming they were stock with no mods.
Old 02-18-2006, 12:38 PM
  #14  
Moderator Alumnus
 
FiftyFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SW Connecticut
Age: 39
Posts: 10,823
Received 52 Likes on 36 Posts
my friend has a 2002 eclipse gt 5mt with intake headers and exhaust, i beat him with my 2001 TL w/ i/h/e/p. he got me off the jump but around the top of econd gear i passed him
Old 02-18-2006, 04:19 PM
  #15  
6MT & LSD
 
ndx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
NDX, your avatar is hilarious.

I've never raced the older Eclipses from a standstill, only from like 40mph a couple of times, and they didn't have much of a chance. I'm assuming they were stock with no mods.
Yeah, I thought it was a good find.

Anyway, the 1st gear (in the 4AT) went up to 40, so it makes sense that it didn't have a chance at 40+ MPH. The only speed the Eclipse GT will do better is when starting at about 10, 20 MPH, where it can be downshifted into 1st whereas the TL (5AT) would be in 2nd.
Old 02-18-2006, 05:28 PM
  #16  
Racer
 
TLdriver022's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Chicago,IL
Age: 35
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gsmith6915
I was on my way home last night with my wife , brother and sister in law in the car when an Eclipse Gt pulled up to me. I knew what time it was so I switched the tranny in manual and away we went. From the line this car took off. From a rolling start this car took off. It seemed as if there was no way to beat this guy. Yes I am ashamed to admit but I GOT CREAMED. We pulled into a gas station because my wife had to use the bathroom, I guess I scared the pi-- out of her. He stop also so we could talk. I asked what he had under the hood and he told me it was all stock. This car was possibly an 04 model stick shift 3.0liter with no one else riding with him but I just can't believe he was faster. Can anyone shed some light on this please. Was it me or is our stock engine just not good enough to compete against a stock eclipse GT?

The reason you lost is you had four people in the car and he had one. It is common sense that he would have beaten you. If you were alone I think there is no question you would have killed him
Old 02-18-2006, 07:01 PM
  #17  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ndx2
Yeah, I thought it was a good find.

Anyway, the 1st gear (in the 4AT) went up to 40, so it makes sense that it didn't have a chance at 40+ MPH. The only speed the Eclipse GT will do better is when starting at about 10, 20 MPH, where it can be downshifted into 1st whereas the TL (5AT) would be in 2nd.
Stomp the throttle in my TL-P at 10-30mph and it will downshift to 1st, or I can hold gateshift. I don't think an Eclipse GT stock has much of a chance against even a TL-P like mine.
Old 02-18-2006, 07:47 PM
  #18  
Instructor
 
vidhartha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ann arbor/new york city
Age: 39
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
Stomp the throttle in my TL-P at 10-30mph and it will downshift to 1st, or I can hold gateshift. I don't think an Eclipse GT stock has much of a chance against even a TL-P like mine.
no way the old gt culd take you, even the new ones with that ton of HP are considerable heavier than the older models, from what ive heard they're not that fast
Old 02-18-2006, 08:14 PM
  #19  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new ones with the MIVEC 263hp V6s should roast a TL-P easily, and maybe even a TL-S without much trouble.
Old 02-24-2006, 05:51 PM
  #20  
Safety Car
 
yohan81718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose
Age: 42
Posts: 4,444
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
3.8 liter though... vs 3.2 liter TL
Old 03-02-2006, 12:08 AM
  #21  
Advanced
 
montyburnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Minnesota
Age: 48
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is a TL-S or 3G TL faster? Both stock.
Old 03-02-2006, 01:20 AM
  #22  
ChairmanMaoSaysRTFM
iTrader: (1)
 
SatinSilverTypS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dutchess County, NY
Age: 44
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by yohan81718
3.8 liter though... vs 3.2 liter TL
yeah. sucks for them on gas i bet. my friend and i were talking about this the other day. everybody thinks honda should make a V8, and as much as it would be nice they don't have to really. they're making more power out of smaller engines compared to their competitors. considering how many advancements honda has made on the 6 cylinder when they finally get to the V8s they'll be monsters.

SSTS
Old 03-02-2006, 07:24 AM
  #23  
Burning Brakes
 
blktl1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ?, NJ
Age: 39
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SatinSilverTypS
yeah. sucks for them on gas i bet. my friend and i were talking about this the other day. everybody thinks honda should make a V8, and as much as it would be nice they don't have to really. they're making more power out of smaller engines compared to their competitors. considering how many advancements honda has made on the 6 cylinder when they finally get to the V8s they'll be monsters.

SSTS
i would agree with you more. Unfortunately honda is more driven towards fuel efficency. A V8 wuold be nice but i feel that they will not consider this due to this.
Old 03-02-2006, 07:47 AM
  #24  
ChairmanMaoSaysRTFM
iTrader: (1)
 
SatinSilverTypS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dutchess County, NY
Age: 44
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
i was spending some time on a rival acura site around 3am this morning (due to be called in to work the graveyard shift last night) and they were claiming that there are information leaks all over that honda is allready well under development of a V8. supposedly this all stemmed from the mugen V8 that was developed for the mugen tuned RL (if you guys haven't seen it google it. a friggin 590hp thing of beauty).

now of course these are just rumors, but it's worth looking into i guess.

SSTS
Old 03-02-2006, 08:39 AM
  #25  
TSC
Intermediate
 
TSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Age: 45
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
actually from what i heard, is that Honda teamed up with GM to produce a V8 for the Ridgeline. Ever since their team up on the RL (OnStar) they have been working hand and hand with several projects.
Old 03-02-2006, 12:05 PM
  #26  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never heard of that.
Old 03-02-2006, 03:23 PM
  #27  
WDP Is Faster
 
reloaded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Age: 37
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by montyburnz
Is a TL-S or 3G TL faster? Both stock.
From what I've heard, the TL-S are a lil slower than the auto 3G TLs. But if you put the TL-S against the 6-speed 3G TL, the TL-S will get raped...which is undestandable.
Old 03-02-2006, 04:15 PM
  #28  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, I've heard that the TL-S is faster than the 3G 5AT TL. This is substantiated by the torque figures:

2002 TL-S: 232@3500
2004 TL: 238@5000

Plus a little more weight on the new ones.
Old 03-02-2006, 10:53 PM
  #29  
Instructor
 
03Sheermax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern NJ
Age: 42
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
Actually, I've heard that the TL-S is faster than the 3G 5AT TL. This is substantiated by the torque figures:

2002 TL-S: 232@3500
2004 TL: 238@5000

Plus a little more weight on the new ones.

Really?? Aren't the 3rd gen At's putting out better number at the strip?
Old 03-02-2006, 11:42 PM
  #30  
05 C230K & 09 135i 6MT
 
03CoupeV6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't seen any numbers specifically. Just sporadic commentary from former TL-S owners that now own 3G TL 5ATs. Most I've read said the new one didn't have as urgent acceleration as the TL-S did. Could be the DBW system combined with the not-as-great low-end torque.
Old 03-03-2006, 07:11 AM
  #31  
TSC
Intermediate
 
TSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Age: 45
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03CoupeV6
I've never heard of that.

well that's not something Honda is bragging about, but think about it.. A Honda with an Onstar...? GM with a Nav. that actually works...?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
D-Rob
1G RDX Performance Parts & Modifications
62
01-05-2016 11:44 AM
IIDXholic
Car Parts for Sale
23
10-08-2015 07:53 AM
95oRANGEcRUSH
Car Talk
35
09-25-2015 12:50 PM
Simpleman
Car Parts for Sale
5
10-24-2002 11:08 AM
lowpost
Car Parts for Sale
6
01-11-2002 05:54 PM



Quick Reply: TL versus Eclipse GT



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 PM.