TL is so friggin bumpy!!!!!
#41
I drive mostly on country roads in Virginia and absolutely love the feel and handling of the TL. I can tell, though, that it would be tough on lousy roads.
By the way, thank you for your service, Flatfoot!
By the way, thank you for your service, Flatfoot!
#42
Not a Blowhole
The roads are bumpy - the TL suspension is a bit jittery.
I think the G35 is softer, but has excellent balance of ride and handling. RWD has its advantages, including spring travel.
The TL is tight, but not offesnive to me on the roads I drive. If you want cush, there are CTS's and Avalons galore.
I think the G35 is softer, but has excellent balance of ride and handling. RWD has its advantages, including spring travel.
The TL is tight, but not offesnive to me on the roads I drive. If you want cush, there are CTS's and Avalons galore.
#43
10th Gear
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brentwood, NY
Age: 45
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats not exactly true
Originally Posted by BG74
bumpy??? drive the G35 or the 330i...the TL is a limo compared to those, as well as my 2002 A4, 1990 BMW 735iL, and especially '85 Mustang GT![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I own both, a 330Ci and an acura TL. Out of the two the TL is much more bumpier than the beamer.
#44
[
Your options are limited.. you can get different tires. If you want to keep it at the stock profile, then choose a set that's meant for quiet, comfy rides, instead of high performance tires. You can try going with the 50 profile tires, but it'll affect your odometer reading, as well as potentially f'ing up the car's dynamics.
I have looked at getting different tires for this car. I have gone on tire rack, and punched in that comfort is my first option, handling second, and tread wear as least important, and that I drive in a snow zone, and want all season. They give me around three selections, in the brands that I would consider, and wonder if it would make a difference in the ride.
The tires, seem to be the popular ones, The michelin pilot sport a/s and the pirelli pzero nero m and s.
Would these tires, make a difference that I would actually feel?
Also, would they be an improvement for driving in the snow, then the stock michelins?
I dont want to waste possible six to eight hundred dollars on tires, that wont make a difference.
Thanks to all.
Your options are limited.. you can get different tires. If you want to keep it at the stock profile, then choose a set that's meant for quiet, comfy rides, instead of high performance tires. You can try going with the 50 profile tires, but it'll affect your odometer reading, as well as potentially f'ing up the car's dynamics.
I have looked at getting different tires for this car. I have gone on tire rack, and punched in that comfort is my first option, handling second, and tread wear as least important, and that I drive in a snow zone, and want all season. They give me around three selections, in the brands that I would consider, and wonder if it would make a difference in the ride.
The tires, seem to be the popular ones, The michelin pilot sport a/s and the pirelli pzero nero m and s.
Would these tires, make a difference that I would actually feel?
Also, would they be an improvement for driving in the snow, then the stock michelins?
I dont want to waste possible six to eight hundred dollars on tires, that wont make a difference.
Thanks to all.
#45
Moderator Alumnus
Originally Posted by TL_BLUE
Guys, first of all, thanks a ton for the feedback!!! Let me reply to everyone in this one post:
1. Yes, I did test drive the TL before I got it and I did not notice this level of bumpiness. This is my 4th car, and I've test driven all of my cars before buying them and spent quite a bit of time researching them.
And FYI: This bumpiness seems like it has gotten worse over time now. I do not remember my ride being this bumpy a few thousand miles ago.
2. I have a 2004 ABP w/ Quartz interior, w/ 24K miles on it.
3. The ES300 cannot handle like the TL does, but it is just a smoother car, which is to be expected since its a difference car altogether.
4. I do love my TL, I just wish it was less bumpy. And in addition to this bumpy thing annoying me, guess what?
My entire roof lining is come off!!! The dealer's first attempt at fixing this failed as the tape they used didn't work. So I am going in again next friday. Wish me luck.
Thanks again peeps!
1. Yes, I did test drive the TL before I got it and I did not notice this level of bumpiness. This is my 4th car, and I've test driven all of my cars before buying them and spent quite a bit of time researching them.
And FYI: This bumpiness seems like it has gotten worse over time now. I do not remember my ride being this bumpy a few thousand miles ago.
2. I have a 2004 ABP w/ Quartz interior, w/ 24K miles on it.
3. The ES300 cannot handle like the TL does, but it is just a smoother car, which is to be expected since its a difference car altogether.
4. I do love my TL, I just wish it was less bumpy. And in addition to this bumpy thing annoying me, guess what?
My entire roof lining is come off!!! The dealer's first attempt at fixing this failed as the tape they used didn't work. So I am going in again next friday. Wish me luck.
Thanks again peeps!
I test-drove 4 TLs before getting my own. The 1st one was the worst, and the car was almost impossible to gain any control over the west side highway and constructing streets during Oct. 2003. Luckily, the rest of 04TLs I tested were much better than that one. When getting my TL, I started to realize how bad that 1st one was...
I feel my car is "tight" when driving in Mahattan roads, and now get used to knowing this feeling now. However, I'd prefer to drive this beast over the highways, that's where this car shoud be.
Well, TL has the very good safety rating. If you worry about your baby, please drive slowly and this may ease your uncomfortable ride.
http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings/...ide/s0410.htm#
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v509/rets94/Acurazine/NHTSA/0405RLTLTSXNHTSAdata-1.jpg)
I'd say the best way to know whether your car is "bumpy" is to test-drive someone else TL on the same roads. If you want, you could try my car...
![Smile](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#46
Intermediate
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SJ, CA
Age: 61
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by flatfoot
I have looked at getting different tires for this car. I have gone on tire rack, and punched in that comfort is my first option, handling second, and tread wear as least important, and that I drive in a snow zone, and want all season. They give me around three selections, in the brands that I would consider, and wonder if it would make a difference in the ride.
The tires, seem to be the popular ones, The michelin pilot sport a/s and the pirelli pzero nero m and s.
Would these tires, make a difference that I would actually feel?
Also, would they be an improvement for driving in the snow, then the stock michelins?
I dont want to waste possible six to eight hundred dollars on tires, that wont make a difference.
Thanks to all.
The tires, seem to be the popular ones, The michelin pilot sport a/s and the pirelli pzero nero m and s.
Would these tires, make a difference that I would actually feel?
Also, would they be an improvement for driving in the snow, then the stock michelins?
I dont want to waste possible six to eight hundred dollars on tires, that wont make a difference.
Thanks to all.
#47
Bumpy?
My perspective is from a far less luxuriant point of view since I got my TL this year as a replacement for a 1987 Camry that would have become unsafe had I continued to drive it. One of my frustrations with most cars I've driven - and I rent zillions of cars in travel every year - was that the Camry, with shocks that should have been replaced, always had a better road feel. I'm leery of cars that smooth too many bumps out because I want to make sure that the road surface is communicated to me and I'm willing to tolerate a slightly more intense jolt from a car that does that immediately and unambiguously. Having said that, occasionally the TL reminds me of the road surface in a way that I can easily imagine to be too intense for a large percentage of drivers. But it was clear during the test drive that this is what I was getting and it was fine with me.
Having said this, I can also imagine what it might do to someone with back problems. One thing that might work a little bit is to find one of those medical-level gel seat cushions. My family had given me one for the Camry and I ended up liking it quite a lot because my seat had become so worn out over 18 years, but it might be worth doing research on these to see if it helps at all. It would be a shame to miss out on the fun of driving the TL if you could fix it by something that simple. Probably won't work well enough but I thought it was worth suggesting.
Having said this, I can also imagine what it might do to someone with back problems. One thing that might work a little bit is to find one of those medical-level gel seat cushions. My family had given me one for the Camry and I ended up liking it quite a lot because my seat had become so worn out over 18 years, but it might be worth doing research on these to see if it helps at all. It would be a shame to miss out on the fun of driving the TL if you could fix it by something that simple. Probably won't work well enough but I thought it was worth suggesting.
#48
A few years ago I was interested in getting an SUV. I really liked the way the Isuzu Axiom looked. At the time it was a really modern looking SUV so I took it for a test drive. The ride quality was not good. It drove and bounced down the road like a truck. I find that the TL also bounces like a truck, not quite as bad, but its a bouncer. Other sports sedans I have owned have had similar or better handling without the truck like ride. 19 and lowered suspensions look cool and everything but I cannot imagine how bad it would be after that was done to it. Really, I do not mind the ride too much because I don't have a long commute and I do not have back problems but I do get comments from people about it when they are riding in my car and I hate to have to make excuses. I imagine that long trips might be bad for your kidneys.
#49
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 47
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rets, thanks for the feedback!! I was actually thinking about that, a friend of mine has a 2004 TL as well, but the doofus lives all the way in south jersey so I have never gotten a chance to drive it.
I would love to take you up on your offer to let me drive your TL man... let me know if you're serious!! I've been thinking about driving another TL for a while now so its funny you mention that.
Let me know brother
I would love to take you up on your offer to let me drive your TL man... let me know if you're serious!! I've been thinking about driving another TL for a while now so its funny you mention that.
Let me know brother
#52
I agree the TLs ride was tighter than I 1st expected. I think I had a more luxury ride expectation from a TL. But I was amazed, even excited that this car performed so well (for my tastes). I remember thinking to myself as I test drove the TL ... "Acura is really turning the TL into a sport sedan...this is no ES wannabe".
Now 7 months later, I really love the TLs taught ride. Maybe it has relaxed a bit, or just my becoming accustomed to it. I have already considered stepping up to 245 / 45 tires when it is time to replace the OEM Michelins to add a bit more cush (even if sacrificing some performance). I believe the low profile tires may amplify the road conditions a bit.
That said, our roads are not as bad as the NY metro area. And I do steer around rough spots and ease over curbs. I believe this is the expected ride Acura decided upon. It may not be the ride you expected. The majority of consumers like an isolated, relaxed ride. Hense the popularity of Camrys. But Honda seems to focus on a balance of performance, efficiency and practicality. I find the Accord a bit more sporting in ride than the Camry, it's direct competitor.
Now 7 months later, I really love the TLs taught ride. Maybe it has relaxed a bit, or just my becoming accustomed to it. I have already considered stepping up to 245 / 45 tires when it is time to replace the OEM Michelins to add a bit more cush (even if sacrificing some performance). I believe the low profile tires may amplify the road conditions a bit.
That said, our roads are not as bad as the NY metro area. And I do steer around rough spots and ease over curbs. I believe this is the expected ride Acura decided upon. It may not be the ride you expected. The majority of consumers like an isolated, relaxed ride. Hense the popularity of Camrys. But Honda seems to focus on a balance of performance, efficiency and practicality. I find the Accord a bit more sporting in ride than the Camry, it's direct competitor.
#54
![Talking](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/icons/icon10.gif)
I agree. Having several Toyota / Lexus cars in the family corral, I generally find he Toyotas a bit more refined / isolated and the Hondas more sporting, but less refined / isolated. That is my opinion but each manufacturer has decided attributes they wish to exibit in their cars.
If I could dream, I'd keep the Honda / Acura performance, styling and efficiency and have Toyota assemble it.
If I could dream, I'd keep the Honda / Acura performance, styling and efficiency and have Toyota assemble it.
Originally Posted by ace_pilot
I agree with the accord and camry analogy. But the accord is a little more noisy, as well. Maybe its noise is "sport-tuned".
#55
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by PoochaKannInc
^ I think the stock suspension is both stiff & floaty at the same time. Like it has shorter travel, but soft shocks.
The only recommendation I can make for those who don't like the ride is to do a "minus 1" wheel/tire adjustment. Get 16 inch tires and 50 or 55 series Touring tires to help dampen out the suspension. You may be able to get away with a little bit of underinflation as well. Say about 30 psi or even 28. But be forewarned about decreased tire life and poorer handling. Just be sure the tires can handle the weight load of the TL.
dsc888
#56
Burning Brakes
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
Buy 16" rims and get touring tires... problem solved...
![Thumbs Up](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
dsc888
#58
AcurAdmirer
Originally Posted by TampaMike
I have already considered stepping up to 245 / 45 tires when it is time to replace the OEM Michelins to add a bit more cush (even if sacrificing some performance).
Maybe you're thinking about going to a higher-profile tire, like a 50- or 55- profile. That will give you a bit more sidewall to absorb road shocks. Just be sure to select a tire that gives you an overall diameter as close to stock as possible so you don't have too big a speedometer error.
#59
Originally Posted by Mike_TX
I'm not sure what you're saying here. The TL comes with 235/45's, so switching to 245/45's will only get you a slightly wider tire.
Maybe you're thinking about going to a higher-profile tire, like a 50- or 55- profile. That will give you a bit more sidewall to absorb road shocks. Just be sure to select a tire that gives you an overall diameter as close to stock as possible so you don't have too big a speedometer error.
Maybe you're thinking about going to a higher-profile tire, like a 50- or 55- profile. That will give you a bit more sidewall to absorb road shocks. Just be sure to select a tire that gives you an overall diameter as close to stock as possible so you don't have too big a speedometer error.
#60
AcurAdmirer
Originally Posted by Neumahn
The 45 is the aspect ratio of the tire. It is the ratio of the tire sidewall height to the tire width. By keeping the same ratio and increasing the tire width the sidewall height is also being increased in this case by 4.5 mm.
What I thought the poster might be thinking was that he was changing the numerical section height of the tire (and thus the sidewall height) by changing the first number. In that vein, I would have expected him to say he was considering going to maybe a 225/50 instead of going to a 245/45.
#61
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 47
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
rets, no worries man - whenever you have time. In the meanwhile, I am now pressuring my buddy to meet up with me and let me drive his TL. Which ever comes first, no sweat!
thanks !!
thanks !!
#62
Safety Car
iTrader: (1)
I went from 235/40/18s to 245/45/18's and the ride is much softer on my Aspec .. (not regrettably since it still handles very well in the turns.. now it's just not as harsh on uneven pavement) the aspect ratio is definitely a worthy argument to consider when choosing a tire.. however, for the performance seeker... the heavier tire will bog down your low end slightly, and w/ our poor low-end torque.. you'll definitely notice it.
#63
AcurAdmirer
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
I went from 235/40/18s to 245/45/18's and the ride is much softer on my Aspec .. (not regrettably since it still handles very well in the turns.. now it's just not as harsh on uneven pavement) the aspect ratio is definitely a worthy argument to consider when choosing a tire.. however, for the performance seeker... the heavier tire will bog down your low end slightly, and w/ our poor low-end torque.. you'll definitely notice it.
#64
AcurAdmirer
BTW, I notice Car & Driver refers to the TL's ride as "crunchy" in its latest comparo ...
(and also that they managed to get a 5.1 sec. 0-60 run out of the IS350 !!!!
Motor Trend was able to get only 6.0, so C&D must have a different test vehicle or better drivers!)
(and also that they managed to get a 5.1 sec. 0-60 run out of the IS350 !!!!
![what](https://acurazine.com/forums/images/smilies/what.gif)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gavriil
Automotive News
5
09-28-2003 08:03 AM