3G TL (2004-2008)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

One Question, and one answer about Gas

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-07-2006, 08:03 PM
  #1  
peemp
Thread Starter
 
octl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One Question, and one answer about Gas

I've read the posts in the forum about the Octane debates, and there was a lot of very interesting information there.

Although I do not mean to spark any further debate, I could not find a simple answer I was looking for (just an honest and well informed, YES or NO would be most helpful!):

Will I destroy my engine if I use 87 Octane on my 3G TL?
Old 10-07-2006, 08:13 PM
  #2  
Administrator
 
Ron A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 16,417
Received 1,016 Likes on 577 Posts
Originally Posted by octl
Will I destroy my engine if I use 87 Octane on my 3G TL?
No, but your performance will suffer. I am not sure your mileage will suffer, though, because there are varied reports here on that, and the couple of times I tried regular gas (notably after Katrina when that was all that was available) my mileage remained the same as always.

If you drive reasonably and never get the tach up into the upper limits, you might not even notice it.

But then there is the other school of thought, which says that even though you have knock sensors to detect the knock and therefore retard the spark, think of this. If it is detecting a knock, that means there is a knock to detect, and knocks do not do your engine any good. Something to think about!
Old 10-07-2006, 09:45 PM
  #3  
Advanced
 
crzydrifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Age: 37
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i was wondering regarding the gas question, is it me or does it seem like the first half of a ful tank go down faster then the last half?
Old 10-07-2006, 10:06 PM
  #4  
nnInn
 
jupitersolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 37,670
Received 1,084 Likes on 646 Posts
^^I wouldn't say it goes down faster, it's just the way the needle reads. Even when the MID says ?? to empty many have stated to drive far then told. I think it then same way as my other cars.

I think it has something to with the level indicator in the tank. It does allow the full movement for the indicator to travel to the top of the inside of the tank and will sit in the middle of the tank longer.
Old 10-07-2006, 10:29 PM
  #5  
Intermediate
 
Jetmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why the debate? The difference in cost of a tank of gas between premium and regular is less than 2 bucks. Why would you risk it?

Here's an interesting observation: I have used mainly Shell and Safeway gas in my TL. I have consistently noted an average MPG of 21 with the Shell and 19 with the Safeway (I drive mainly in-city). Anybody else notice such differences between brands? And, since the Safeway fuel seems to burn inefficiently, it seems to me it is probably not as good for the engine as the Shell. For the same logic as above I have decided not to put the poorer quality Safeway fuel into my car any more.
Old 10-07-2006, 10:52 PM
  #6  
RAR
 
leedogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DC Metro
Age: 47
Posts: 10,783
Received 1,286 Likes on 714 Posts
your computer will retard the engine so you can use the lower octane.
Old 10-08-2006, 12:43 AM
  #7  
peemp
Thread Starter
 
octl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
THanks a lot for the responses guys. I feel pretty confident about not having to use the premium gas... The performance is not so important for me, and I probably wouldn't notice... my days of crazy driving ended several years ago

Originally Posted by Jetmaker
Why the debate? The difference in cost of a tank of gas between premium and regular is less than 2 bucks. Why would you risk it?
Well, $2-$3 per fill-up is not a lot, but it's not the "snowflake" its the "avalanche." Time and repetition is always the killer. I've done the math, and between cars that require premium gas, and our driving mileage over the last 10 years... switching from Premium to Regular Unleaded saves me about $700 per year -- that's not $2-$3 anymore - that's the way I seez it
Old 10-08-2006, 03:11 AM
  #8  
RAR
 
leedogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DC Metro
Age: 47
Posts: 10,783
Received 1,286 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by octl
THanks a lot for the responses guys. I feel pretty confident about not having to use the premium gas... The performance is not so important for me, and I probably wouldn't notice... my days of crazy driving ended several years ago



Well, $2-$3 per fill-up is not a lot, but it's not the "snowflake" its the "avalanche." Time and repetition is always the killer. I've done the math, and between cars that require premium gas, and our driving mileage over the last 10 years... switching from Premium to Regular Unleaded saves me about $700 per year -- that's not $2-$3 anymore - that's the way I seez it

Its not about performance. Its about efficiency. Your car will run most efficiently at the octane spec'd for it. Its like trying to use a cruder oil because its cheaper.

Make sure your calculations measure the difference in actual gas usage & mileage, because you will get worse.
Old 10-08-2006, 03:21 AM
  #9  
Engineer
iTrader: (1)
 
lights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 1,604
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by leedogg
Its not about performance. Its about efficiency. Your car will run most efficiently at the octane spec'd for it. Its like trying to use a cruder oil because its cheaper.

Make sure your calculations measure the difference in actual gas usage & mileage, because you will get worse.
He just answered ur question and my answer there for you.
Old 10-08-2006, 05:13 AM
  #10  
'17 RDX Tech AWD - WDP
 
meburdick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Connecticut
Age: 54
Posts: 274
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Jetmaker
Why the debate? The difference in cost of a tank of gas between premium and regular is less than 2 bucks. Why would you risk it?
In the NorthEast, at least, the average difference in cost between Regular and Premium unleaded fuels seems to be right around $0.32/gallon. Assuming a 15 gallon "complete" fill, the difference in cost is actually much closer to $5 per tankfull.

I have always found that, for my driving style, it costs me less money to use the higher octane fuel. With the lower octane stuff, I tend to have my foot in it more because the car degrades performance with the lower octane (I don't drive like a maniac, I just want my car to move when I tell it to).
Old 10-08-2006, 08:09 AM
  #11  
Racer
 
CobraGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix...Greatest City on Earth
Age: 72
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I guess I just don't understand paying this much for a car then cheaping out on the gas to run it. Makes absolutely no sense to me. If you want to risk detonation on a high compression engine, then by all means by the cheap gas. The ECM can only pull so much timing when it detects detonation, so you are putting a lot of faith in what you hope the factory made dummy proof....
Old 10-08-2006, 08:10 AM
  #12  
Racer
 
JohnDoe2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN 55408
Posts: 378
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by crzydrifter
i was wondering regarding the gas question, is it me or does it seem like the first half of a ful tank go down faster then the last half?
It's just you.


(However an argument could be made that your mileage may get better as the gas is consumed and the car has less weight to carry)
Old 10-08-2006, 10:04 AM
  #13  
Retired and Loving It
 
Ernie Golfs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Age: 75
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you bought the TL you knew up front it used premium fuel. I don't understand why folks buy a car they either can't afford to put the proper fuel in or are just to cheap to do what is required. I wouldn't put anything but premium in my TL or my RL. It isn't worth the 3 to 4 dollars I might save per tank.

I've read several threads on this subject and Im getting tired of them. Why don't you just put in ten gallons at a time and save the weight of a full tank, that will give you better milage. If you want to save on gas you should have bought a Civic. Oh, you could skip changing the oil, just reset the info screen that'll save a few bucks!

OK, I'm about finished venting. If you're leasing the car, put whatever crap you want in it. If you're buying, remember the old saying, PAY ME NOW OR PAY ME LATER.
Old 10-08-2006, 10:10 AM
  #14  
Three Wheelin'
 
coykiam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York,NY
Age: 44
Posts: 1,878
Received 38 Likes on 37 Posts
another gas debate ? wasnt there a thread like this a couple months ago ?
Old 10-08-2006, 10:46 AM
  #15  
Senior Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
ggesq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 12,453
Received 2,183 Likes on 1,211 Posts
Originally Posted by octl
THanks a lot for the responses guys. I feel pretty confident about not having to use the premium gas... The performance is not so important for me, and I probably wouldn't notice... my days of crazy driving ended several years ago



Well, $2-$3 per fill-up is not a lot, but it's not the "snowflake" its the "avalanche." Time and repetition is always the killer. I've done the math, and between cars that require premium gas, and our driving mileage over the last 10 years... switching from Premium to Regular Unleaded saves me about $700 per year -- that's not $2-$3 anymore - that's the way I seez it
If you bought the car and intend on ever selling it, I hope you inform the buyer that you used lower octane fuel.
Old 10-08-2006, 12:04 PM
  #16  
peemp
Thread Starter
 
octl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I suppose the question should be:

Has there ever been any evidence of a 3.2L Acura TL ever destroyed due to use of Regular Unleaded Fuel?
Old 10-08-2006, 12:24 PM
  #17  
Suzuka Master
 
crazymjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 34
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Think of it this way, evertime your engine detects or you hear a ping, the piston is shuddering and wacking into the cylinder walls. You can figure out what that can do, especially to an aluminum block.

You spent 33-36K on the car, give it it's premium. They through an 11:1 compression ration in that engine, not an 8.5:1 compression ration, put premium in it.



Mike
Old 10-08-2006, 12:56 PM
  #18  
peemp
Thread Starter
 
octl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Age: 56
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by crazymjb
Think of it this way, evertime your engine detects or you hear a ping, the piston is shuddering and wacking into the cylinder walls. You can figure out what that can do, especially to an aluminum block.

You spent 33-36K on the car, give it it's premium. They through an 11:1 compression ration in that engine, not an 8.5:1 compression ration, put premium in it.



Mike

Thanks Mike.... so, even with knock sensors, there is a high risk of this happening?
Old 10-08-2006, 01:12 PM
  #19  
RAR
 
leedogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DC Metro
Age: 47
Posts: 10,783
Received 1,286 Likes on 714 Posts
Originally Posted by octl
Thanks Mike.... so, even with knock sensors, there is a high risk of this happening?

Thats like asking, if you carefully play with fire a couple hrs every day, is there a high risk of getting burned or setting something on fire?

depends on the quality of gas, the age of the gas, the capabilities of your computer to adjust itself constantly. I've gotta think that this sensor can only determine after the fact, meaning it treats it like 91 until it detects the early detonation.

Maybe if you stick with the more reputable gas stations that keep their gas fresh, you can get away with it. But of course they usually have higher prices anyway. I'm sure all it would take would be one bad batch of gas at the lower grade that has water in it or is older than usual and you'll get knocks.
Old 10-08-2006, 01:44 PM
  #20  
Registered Member
 
SouthernBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Suburb of Manassas, VA
Posts: 8,342
Received 162 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by crazymjb
Think of it this way, evertime your engine detects or you hear a ping, the piston is shuddering and wacking into the cylinder walls. You can figure out what that can do, especially to an aluminum block.

You spent 33-36K on the car, give it it's premium. They through an 11:1 compression ration in that engine, not an 8.5:1 compression ration, put premium in it.



Mike
The cylinders aren't aluminum. There's an iron sleeve pressed into each cylinder.

However, I completely agree with your premise. Buy a car that recommends premium fuel? Use premium fuel. It's that simple.
Old 10-08-2006, 02:21 PM
  #21  
.:KCCO:.
 
ayethetiense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine
Age: 42
Posts: 2,174
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
you guys are funny.... my wife drives a legend and she puts the higher octane in it and she can use the lower octane. she insists on putting the higher octane in it even though we've put the lower stuff for a long time with no problems at all. sow hike you guys argue about being able to go lower, my wife is putting the higher stuff in hers.

if it says to put premium, just put premium. all you gotta do is get one less cup of coffee at starbucks for each fill up you do. and honestly, there are studies out there that show that if you put a lower octane gas then what you are supposed to, the engine uses more gas to compensate and/or you lose performance.
Old 10-08-2006, 02:30 PM
  #22  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by ayethetiense
you guys are funny.... my wife drives a legend and she puts the higher octane in it and she can use the lower octane. she insists on putting the higher octane in it even though we've put the lower stuff for a long time with no problems at all. sow hike you guys argue about being able to go lower, my wife is putting the higher stuff in hers.

if it says to put premium, just put premium. all you gotta do is get one less cup of coffee at starbucks for each fill up you do. and honestly, there are studies out there that show that if you put a lower octane gas then what you are supposed to, the engine uses more gas to compensate and/or you lose performance.
In a Legend's engine, premium is a must. My '97 TL has the same motor, regular fuel will starve its power AND kill fuel economy. Its CHEAPER to run premium, its that big of a difference.
Old 10-08-2006, 03:02 PM
  #23  
.:KCCO:.
 
ayethetiense's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irvine
Age: 42
Posts: 2,174
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken1997TL
In a Legend's engine, premium is a must. My '97 TL has the same motor, regular fuel will starve its power AND kill fuel economy. Its CHEAPER to run premium, its that big of a difference.
she gets the exact same mileage. hers is a 94
Old 10-08-2006, 04:09 PM
  #24  
Senior Moderator
 
Ken1997TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Better Neighborhood, Arizona
Posts: 45,641
Received 2,329 Likes on 1,309 Posts
Originally Posted by ayethetiense
she gets the exact same mileage. hers is a 94
Depends on the driving conditions too. But I do a consistent 275 mile route. 75 mph with the A/C set at 75 degrees. 32 psi front and rear tires.

I'll get 30 mpg with premium. And around 26 with regular. Tried it several times just to be sure and its very consistent.
Old 10-08-2006, 04:27 PM
  #25  
Trolling Canuckistan
 
black label's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 100 Legends Way, Boston, MA 02114
Age: 50
Posts: 10,453
Received 811 Likes on 644 Posts
Originally Posted by octl
I've read the posts in the forum about the Octane debates, and there was a lot of very interesting information there.

Although I do not mean to spark any further debate, I could not find a simple answer I was looking for (just an honest and well informed, YES or NO would be most helpful!):

Will I destroy my engine if I use 87 Octane on my 3G TL?
Short term, no. Long term, yes. The ECU will make adjustments so the vehicle can operate on regular fuel. This is for occasional use, there are parts of the midwest (Montana comes to mind) where regular is 84 octaneand premium is 89. The ECU was designed so if you are driving through an area like this you can fill up and continue your trip.

The engine was designed to run on 91 octane or better and long term use of lower octane will slowly damage the engine.

The rule of thumb for normally aspirated engines (non turbo) is if you compression ratio is higher than 10:1 you need premium, if it lower than 10:1 you use regular.
Turbo charged engine need very specific air to fuel ratios and are much more finicky, therefore, regardless of there compression ratio you need premium.

The question is are you in the TL for the long term or do you turn your cars over every few years. If you are getting out of the car in 3 years it doesn't matter much to you, it will matter to the next owner. If you are like me and attempt to drive a Honda or Acura product into the ground (that's not an easy thing to do) you are doing yourself a disservice not using premium.

I've been on premium fuel since the 90's, it's gotten to the point where I don't even look at the lower prices, you'll get desensitized the price, treat your baby right.
Old 10-08-2006, 05:49 PM
  #26  
Suzuka Master
 
crazymjb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Age: 34
Posts: 7,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SouthernBoy
The cylinders aren't aluminum. There's an iron sleeve pressed into each cylinder.
Completely slipped my mind, thanks. I took apart a blown(timing chain snapped) intrepid engine once so I have seen that before.

Mike
Old 10-08-2006, 06:10 PM
  #27  
DRINKING HAS A ME PROBLEM
 
Rpappi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
if you dont want prem. and are worried about 87 then go mid grade.
Old 10-08-2006, 06:52 PM
  #28  
6MT & LSD
 
ndx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 40
Posts: 1,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, my brother did a simple test with different grades of Premium (93, 92, and 91 octane) when he was coming to visit me from Michigan.

The only thing is, he has a J32A2 with a few engine mods, so it's a tad different from ours A3's.

https://acurazine.com/forums/car-parts-sale-361/f-s-01-02-chrome-outer-grill-03-cls-look-129452/

Basically, better mileage with the highest octane. He didn't even bother with regulars or mids, because that's just plain stupid.
Old 10-08-2006, 09:58 PM
  #29  
Engineer
iTrader: (1)
 
lights's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 1,604
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by crazymjb
You spent 33-36K on the car, give it it's premium.
exactly.
we canadians spend WAY more than 33-36K for TL here, and canadian dollar conversion is only 1.12 to US dollar. My TL costed $46K CDN. Go figure.

Put premium gas period.
Old 10-09-2006, 01:18 PM
  #30  
Pro
 
Desert_TL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Age: 41
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know it's been said over and over, but I might as well throw my 2 cents in and agree with many of the people on here. I don't understand how someone could spend $30k+ on a luxury car and then complain about a 20-30 cent different in premium vs. regular gas. If you can't afford the extra $5 or less per tank of gas for premium, then you can't afford the TL and you should never have purchased it, period. If you are really that short on cash, you should have purchased an Accord or Civic. Even if you really can afford the TL and the premium gas, why risk ruining your $30k luxury car by putting bad gas in it? Would you put Golden State oil (the worst there is) in your TL? Of course not. I just don't understand. Either treat your EXPENSIVE LUXURY car with the respect and care it deserves and put the premium in there, or buy a Civic.
Old 10-09-2006, 01:54 PM
  #31  
RAR
 
leedogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DC Metro
Age: 47
Posts: 10,783
Received 1,286 Likes on 714 Posts
Dont knock the guy for trying to save money. Rich people get rich by being frugal and budget conscious in EVERYTHING. A couple dollars here and there add up to 100's and 1000's of dollars a year, and if that is saved I dont even need to go into how much the compound interest would be...

With that said, the TL is a very budget conscious deciision for a luxury vehicle. The number of features, the performance, the enjoyment factor, not to mention that despite it's premium fuel requirement, it is one of, if not the most fuel efficient luxury vehicle out there. Usually performance and fuel efficiency do NOT go hand in hand...

Now. Given all this, the car runs the most efficiently on a 91 octane, which means it gets the best mileage at that octane. You'll get the least number of problems if you use that octane which translates to fewer problems down the road. The difference in gas savings vs the worse mileage + cost of problems down the road attributed to using a lower octane do NOT equal out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Machine
3G TL (2004-2008)
32
09-24-2018 08:27 PM
HOWELLiNC
3G TL Problems & Fixes
2
09-20-2015 04:21 PM
datadr
5G TLX (2015-2020)
6
09-12-2015 09:12 PM
MyGuti
3G TL (2004-2008)
7
09-12-2015 06:52 PM
bailey24
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
2
08-31-2015 05:38 PM



Quick Reply: One Question, and one answer about Gas



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM.